is in order.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
In house exchange server is not being used for internet...only
29, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---s lightly off topic
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09
against an exchange 2000 server appears to
only perform address resolution when the message is sent. There is no
underlining of the address or names by default. If you go to
toolscheck names then the client will underline address's that are
valid. Does anybody know how to configure the Outlook 2002
Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---slightly off topic
Slightly off topic...
The outlook client configured
tools . options . preferences . email options . advanced email options
same as 98 and 2000.
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
Tools/Options/E-Mail Options/Advanced E-Mail Options.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---slightly off topic
Is Automatic Name Checking Checked in Tools/Options/Email Options/Advanced
Email Options ?
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
In 2002 it is.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Is Automatic Name Checking Checked
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Is Automatic
: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook
Isnt that option avail in 2000 as well?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
In 2002
]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---s lightly off topic
Is Automatic Name Checking Checked in Tools/Options/Email
Options/Advanced Email Options ?
-Original Message-
From: Kelley
, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e
Not that option - the 'automatic name checking' option...
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---slightly off topic
, August 29, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---slightly off topic
As much as I have appreciated everybody's responses all the solutions
offered do not solve the problem I am faced with.
Suggestion: CNTRL-K - this does
:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail
addressresolution---sl ightly off topic
However a message must have already been sent to the user previously,
if
that is the case
then when I'm typing I the name outlook will autofill and complete
the
address.
Yes
I have a user who is using Office XP. In Outlook 2002, he is trying to
create a rule to forward messages from one particular person to his 2-way
pager. The rule appears to be a server rule. But, upon execution nothing
happens and no errors are generated. Any ideas??
Thanks
Johnny 5
Need more input!
/Johnny 5
What are the components of the rule?
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002
I have a user who is using Office XP
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002
I have a user who is using Office XP. In Outlook 2002, he is
trying to create a rule to forward messages from
Subject: Outlook 2002
I have a user who is using Office XP. In Outlook 2002, he is
trying to
create a rule to forward messages from one particular person
to his 2-way
pager. The rule appears to be a server rule. But, upon
execution nothing
happens and no errors are generated
What does the rule look like?
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002
Components like what? What do you need to know exactly?
Johnny 5
Need more
]]On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002
What does the rule look like?
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello All,
Got one for you.
I have two users that are homed in different Ex5.5SP4 sites in the same =
Org (user1 and user2). They both are using Outlook 2002 and have =
permissions to each others calendar. However, when user1 sends a meeting
request out = with user2 and other users
Delegates.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 7/15/2002 3:55 PM
Subject: Calendar issue in Outlook 2002
Hello All,
Got one for you.
I have two users that are homed in different Ex5.5SP4 sites in the same
=
Org (user1 and user2). They both are using
-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2002 12:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar issue in Outlook 2002
Hello All,
Got one for you.
I have two users that are homed in different Ex5.5SP4 sites in the same =
Org (user1 and user2). They both are using
it], but it would appear that something
to do with Outlook 2002 exit runs at sub-zero priority [only on some machines], and if
anything else is running at a higher priority the Outlook process effectively hangs
due to ?lack of CPU cycles. If you close the other app, Outlook exits almost
immediately
!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Grafton
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Long shot, but...
Have had users with this or similar problems when
Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was installed
with Office XP Pro.
1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed just the
application GUI. I have to bring up task manager and kill the outlook
process before I can re-launch outlook. Any help would
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony L.
Sollars
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was
installed with Office XP Pro.
1. Whenever I
and leave those off.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Haven't seen that and I'm running the same version. Maybe it's the
Dell--I'm running
Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was
installed with Office XP Pro.
1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed just the
application GUI. I have to bring up task manager and kill the outlook
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was installed
with Office XP Pro.
1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed just the
application GUI. I have to bring up task manager
No but I plan to install it
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Have you got some other application such as 'ActiveSync' running, which
Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
I see this occasionally, no particular reason why it starts or stops. Most
of the time, if I leave it for long enough it will go away. I blame it on
the phase of the moon.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto
I saw this a lot when I was working on a com addin.
Failing to set objects to nothing at exit will cause the
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was installed
with Office XP Pro.
1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed
Ok Thanks, I did update to the latest COM+ engine version. Wonder if there
are some incompatibilities.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging
Nope, it's not the Dell. I have one and don't have those issues either...
:P
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Haven't seen that and I'm
, but
I'm also not a fan of the average users ability to exercise discretion when
it comes to suspicious attachments.
-Original Message-
From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 attachment security
Warren - Is this any help for you?
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm. Let me know.
Amy
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 attachment security
Once
Hi Everybody,
I have gotten around OL XP's annoying attachment security through the reg
hack at slipstick.com. However, I still get a save to disk.. dialog box
when I receive an attachment. This is a pain in the ass when we're sending
around .LNK attachments, adding at extra step. Is there
Why would anyone need to send around a .lnk file and do you understand why
the Outlook object model was modified in the first place?
-Original Message-
From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002
]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 attachment security
Hi Everybody,
I have gotten around OL XP's annoying attachment security
through the reg hack at slipstick.com. However, I still get
a save to disk.. dialog box when I receive
: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 attachment security
We have a custom application that generates .lnk files. And, no.
-W
Why would anyone need to send around a .lnk file and do
List
Conversation: Outlook 2002 attachment security
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 attachment security
We have a custom application that generates .lnk files. And, no.
-W
Why would anyone need to send around a .lnk file and do you
understand why the Outlook object model was modified
WHAT!?!??!?! Do it right and sensible!?!?! Noo We'd could never
do that... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 attachment security
Why not change your
Well, we didn't write the application, I should have said 3rd party app.
Anyway, that's not really the point.. I was just wondering if the Outlook
2002 attachment security could be hacked all the way back to Outlook 98
style, but it doesn't look like it.. What a shame.
-Warren
Why not change
Hi,
Has anybody seen any slowness on an XP box that was running Outlook 2002
with the most recent IE security patch? A couple of our users are having
horrible slowness with their browser and with Outlook 2002.
Our web browsers take more than a minute to pull up an internal page
: 09 May 2002 16:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 and Profgen
LOL...oh my gosh. How weird is that? ;0)
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Ted Mosher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002
As long as you set the Exchange alias the same as the user's NT logon,
Outlook 2002 will auto create the profile for you. Use the Custom Install
Wizard to define your install. Page 16 and 17 of the wizard allow you to set
what you want Outlook to do with the profile.
-Original Message
I have a user in florida that has outlook 2002 installed using a vpn line to
connect to our office in NY. He callled me and asked where the from button
was in outlook. I told him to create a new message then go to view and
click the from button. The problem is that its not there does anyone
The drop-down menu probably needs to be expanded.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outlook 2002
I have a user in florida that has outlook 2002 installed using a vpn line
had a
fresh install and he didn't.
Go figure.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002 15:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outlook 2002
I have a user in florida
And what's more, it's not a button is it? More of menu option. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 30 April 2002 15:46
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: outlook 2002
Subject: RE: outlook 2002
The drop-down menu probably needs
Scrub that, I'm on drugs today...
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson
Sent: 30 April 2002 15:50
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: outlook 2002
And what's more, it's not a button is it? More of menu option. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook 2002
Ive seen this before but cant remember the solution if any. I remember it
worked on my outlook XP but not on my colleagues. I just ridiculed him about
it.
Might make a difference if you upgrade outlook 2000 to outlook XP, rather
than
your right its a menu item but then you hit the menu and you get the button
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook 2002
Scrub that, I'm on drugs today...
-Original Message
I realised that once I'd hit send. I'm having a blonde day today.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 30 April 2002 15:55
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: outlook 2002
Subject: RE: outlook 2002
your right its a menu item
Open new message. Click on View, From Field
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 7:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outlook 2002
I have a user in florida that has outlook 2002 installed using a vpn line to
connect
Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: VBA In Outlook 2002 to replace Rules Wizard
Folks, I just want to replace my rules wizard with my own VBA
code
Folks, I just want to replace my rules wizard with my own VBA code.
Simply want to trigger an event when a message arrives and do filtering
based mostly on the To: line. I want to move certain messages to
certain folders, etc. Nothing too complicated but I can't seem to find
any clear info that
Subject: VBA In Outlook 2002 to replace Rules Wizard
Folks, I just want to replace my rules wizard with my own VBA code.
Simply want to trigger an event when a message arrives and do filtering
based mostly on the To: line. I want to move certain messages to
certain folders, etc. Nothing too
: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: VBA In Outlook 2002 to replace Rules Wizard
Folks, I just want to replace my rules wizard with my own VBA code.
Simply want to trigger an event when a message arrives and do filtering
based mostly on the To: line. I want
go to www.slipstick.com for all things Outlook. Sue has a developers group.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dean Michael
Dorman
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: VBA In Outlook 2002 to replace
I am having a failure on a client's system in which Outlook 2002 refuses
to activate new rules. The error reports that there are options used
which prevent the rule from being activated or there is not enough room
to store all the rules. There are only 26 simple rules and it is
refusing
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
I am having a failure on a client's system in which Outlook 2002 refuses
to activate new rules. The error reports that there are options used
which prevent
sub stantial answer. Well Done.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
The limit is the limit. Can you consolidate any of the first 26 rules
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
I am having a failure on a client's system in which Outlook 2002 refuses
, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
The limit is the limit. Can you consolidate any of the first 26 rules?
That seems high to me as I am not a proponent of rules. You should sub
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
sub stantial answer. Well Done.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange
and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dean Michael
Dorman
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
I am having a failure on a client's system in which
Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Winzenz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
Are there any rules set to permanently delete any items? I have
, January 30, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
I am having a failure on a client's system in which Outlook
2002 refuses to activate new rules. The error reports that
there are options used which prevent the rule from being
activated
Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
Well, thanks for the answer but it really didn't contain any info I was
hoping for. For instance...what is the rules limit? After I sent the
email to the this list, I went and exported all the emails (27), deleted
them, and imported
: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
We have customer who insisted on having more rules that the 32K we allow
on our exchange servers. We had him create a VBA add in to do his own
rule processing. Tell the person to get a book on programing exchange /
outlook using VBA.
Jerry
-Original
]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:18 AM
Subject: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
I am having a failure on a client's system in which Outlook 2002 refuses
to activate new rules. The error reports that there are options used
which prevent the rule from
-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 and public folder on exchange 5.5 SP4
The public folder permissions are as follows:
Default: Custom -- ie. Users can read
In previous discussions I have read about people asking where Outlook 2002
is located. I just received Exchange 2000 and can not find outlook 2002
on it where I thought is where this group had said it was.
TIA,
Brett
_
List
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2002.htm
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002
In previous discussions I have read about people asking where Outlook 2002
is located
Outlook Security in 2k2 disables most attachments , it was part of Outlook
2000 sr-1 , i believe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 14:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 unable
measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2002 unable to send web pages or links to web pages
I have a smattering of W98 clients that are unable to send
Explain please.
Thanx.
Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse
Endoxy Healthcare
847-465-2351 x2232
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 unable to send web pages
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 unable to send web pages or links to web pages
Explain please.
Thanx.
Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse
Endoxy Healthcare
847-465-2351 x2232
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Explain which part? Copying and pasting a URL?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 unable to send web pages or links to web pages
Explain please.
Thanx.
Bill
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 unable to send web pages or links to web pages
He means select the url, copy it, and paste it into an email message.
Oh, I bet you mean the virus bit. :p
Drew
If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each
other
2002 unable to send web pages or links to web pages
Explain which part? Copying and pasting a URL?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 unable to send web pages or links
Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 unable to send web pages or links to web pages
LOL!! God, I love this list...
Yea, watta ya mean I got ancient com puters?
Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse
Endoxy Healthcare
847-465-2351 x2232
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL
Nobody can kick a** like James T. Kirk! I'll put him up against Rocky any
day.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 unable to send web pages or links to web pages
We love
Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 unable to send web pages or links to web pages
We love you too Bill, and we mean that. Seriously.
Actually, I'm interested in what Chris meant about the just waiting to be
exploited bit, so long as he isn't talking about 12 year old girls. Or
boys, for that matter
I don't have Outlook 2002 here, but I would assume that there is a default
.prf file that gets installed with it. Check this out, and see if it can be
modified to fit your needs. Also, check the installation CD and see if there
are sample .prf files there.
As for you sniffer-- probably
Good day - I have just put a script in place to use the profgen.exe to
config all my outlook clients automatically. All are outlook 2000 save about
3 users. The batch file doesn't work with Outlook2002 or rather I'm sure the
PRF file is probably in the wrong format. Does anyone know of the proper
101 - 191 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
