dy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: POP3 & IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K
>
> As far as I know, its still true for E2k - as it was for 5.5.
>
>
>
> -- Original Message
senders do get an NDR.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: POP3 & IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K
Previous versions bypassed the prohibit send as well IIRC.
On 1/18/0
Oh, I see Mr. David has pointed this out as well. Not sure I understand why
this would be a critical design flaw in a deployment though. Heck, using
AUTH SMTP I can send outbound SMTP mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
that address doesn't even exist, let alone have a mailbox limit associated
with it.
Previous versions bypassed the prohibit send as well IIRC.
On 1/18/03 14:09, "Fay, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this KB Article still on point, 247126? It's dated 4/11/01 and only
refers to E2K with no SP. I am deploying a 3,000 student E2K SP3 server
with POP and IMAP only clients w
I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 5:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3 & IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K
Ye
owever. According to my client, it has for them. Higher
>ED with ~1,000 staff mailboxes.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 6:08 PM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: POP3 & IMAP Prohibit Send o
-
From: Fay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POP3 & IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K
Is this KB Article still on point, 247126? It's dated 4/11/01 and only
refers to E2K with no SP. I am deploying a 3,000 student E2K S
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 6:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3 & IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K
I cant.
Im just not aware of any mechanism in any version of Exchange that would
prevent a pop3 or imap user from sending email if they were over their
sending l
age-
>From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 3:49 PM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Re: POP3 & IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K
>
>As far as I know, its still true for E2k - as it was for 5.5.
>
>
>
>-- Original Messag
ject: Re: POP3 & IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K
As far as I know, its still true for E2k - as it was for 5.5.
-- Original Message --
From: "Fay, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
As far as I know, its still true for E2k - as it was for 5.5.
-- Original Message --
From: "Fay, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:09:50 -0500
>Is this KB Article still on point, 2471
Is this KB Article still on point, 247126? It's dated 4/11/01 and only
refers to E2K with no SP. I am deploying a 3,000 student E2K SP3 server
with POP and IMAP only clients with MB limits. Obviously this will go BUST
on me and I need to change the design for OWA only, MAPI won't be supported.
12 matches
Mail list logo
