> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:08 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications)
>
>
> I dont think anyone here has ever heard of this problem.
>
>
> ---
Have you changed jobs again? ;)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications)
Yeah, well.. just don't post the Koan lin
That is a safe thing to assume when referring to Andy.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 over
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:41 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications)
>
>
> Have you changed jobs again? ;)
>
>
>
&g
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications)
I am having a serious problem with "new mail notifications" over a WAN.
Basically they don't update until a user clicks on a nether message or waits
in excess of 20 minutes. Needless to say users are frustrated by
ginal Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications)
Well, so far this morning I've been a sales
Yes, & I know it does not work on NATed addresses.
I was just hoping some one had a easy fix.
-John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Morgan, Joshua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 200
Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications)
Yes, & I know it does not work on NATed addresses.
I was just hoping some one had a easy fix.
-John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Morgan, Joshua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exch
That's another guy! But I can get him do pretty much what ever I want! Why?
- Original Message -
From: "Morgan, Joshua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: Excha
: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications)
That's another guy! But I can get him do pretty much what ever I want! Why?
- Original Message -
From: "Morgan, Joshua" <[EMAIL PROTECT
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications)
>
>
> Yes, & I know it does not work on NAT
I thought I read somewhere on this forum that if you run eseutil on certain
raid controllers you will get strange errors.
- Original Message -
From: "Gavin Rewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 3:41 PM
Subject: Exchange 5
Among other things...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault?
I thought I read somewhere on this forum that if you run
Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:59 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault?
> Among other things...
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday,
TECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault?
> During that thread can anyone repeat the the article or Q# that refers to
> approved raid controllers for eseutil. I am running E2K on a HP using
Raid5
> on a Netrai
described here.
Regards
Adam Romain
Technical Consultant
Network Defence
http://www.networkdefence.com
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 November 2001 23:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at faul
;- Original Message -
>From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:05 PM
>Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault?
>
>
>> During that
How big is your Store ?
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Rewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2001 10:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault?
Hi there Daniel,
There is NOTHING in the event log, the DPT Storage
Dollar to a
>doughnut your RAID controller is heading south.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:05 PM
>Subject: Re: Exchange 5.
Disk going bad? What does Insight Manager have to say?
Jim Helfer
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
Around 4:00 pm last night, a
Only about 7% free on your primary partition? Depending on how big your
paging file is, that's not enough free space. Try and move some stuff
off that drive or consider more/bigger disks.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002
Only having 7% free space on your primary petition is not enough.
Consider freeing up some space on that disk or investing in more/bigger
drives?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E
or below 1%.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
Only about 7% free on your primary partition? Depending on how big your
p
OK, just going by your original figures - 27g, 25g free.
-Original Message-
From: Sauer, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
Primary partition for the "s
Apparently a problem with semantics.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
OK, just going by your original figures - 27g, 25g
oking for Ideas ;^)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
OK, just going by your original figures - 27g, 25g free.
ED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
I doubled the raid 5 IS storage space last night and everything looked
good until this morning. It is still pegging the IS disk with reads. I
turned logging up to maximum
If you know some of the properties of the email in question, then
exmerge or isscan can help.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q246916&sd=tech
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];Q224493
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
To ad this extra IE message to my OWA problem
Technical Information (for support personnel)
Error Type:
Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8)
Object required: 'Application(...)'
/exchange/DUT/logon.asp, line 12
Browser Type:
Mozilla/4.0 (compat
http://support.microsoft.com
On 1/16/03 8:55, "Bob Petra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To ad this extra IE message to my OWA problem
Technical Information (for support personnel)
Error Type:
Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8)
Object re
I already searched at many places. Microsoft comes with one article which
seemed to be the solution. That is: deleting an object from the
transaction server. Windows 2000 places these objects in the component
services, aldo the right object to delete wasn't there.
Regards,
Bob
_
Have you read the disaster recovery white paper?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 15:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 back up server, recreate mailboxes etc
Use DoubleTake.
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 5.5 back up server, recreate mailboxes etc
>
>
> Hi all, Anyone have any thoughts on how do this.
>
> One Exchange server
Yes, but I would recommend adding a second drive to your current box if
possible instead. Routing to a different drive across the network will at
minimum double the time it takes to run this.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Guy Fortin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 0
yes
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Fortin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:13 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IS has reached the 16GB limit
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=185457
I want to do an eseutil to defragment th
You can also move the database files to another machine and run ESEUTIL
there.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Fortin
Sent:
You didn't SP the OWA box did you? Install SP4 for Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PEter
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server
I getting this messa
You can, but you might find your rules acting funny if you use any of the
O2k3 rules...
I use OL2k3 most always, but I was recently relegated to dial-up on a
business trip and had to use Citrix instead where we have OL2k2 installed...
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EM
Yes they can.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raji Arulambalam
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 to access their mailbox on
Exchange
I have seen it screw up rules, and at times blow them completely out.
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both O
I had a blow out last night
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
I have seen it screw up rules, and at
Madre Del Dios!!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
I had a blow out last night
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Aye carumba!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Madre Del Dios!!
-Original Message-
From
Dumb question: it's not a hidden user is it?
You can't delete mailboxes from the mailbox resources list.
Curious question: after a user is deleted from the server, do the resources
show up as still being allocated until the deleted item recovery time is
passed?
S.
-Original Message-
When you say free space of 3+ gb. Does this mean you have the OS and App on
one drive only?
- Original Message -
From: "AJ Bruno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4 SP6A IS Stops
> I
Free space on what drive? I will assume you have more than one drive
letter. Check the drive where the log files reside. If your server is
configured correctly, they wont be on the same spindles as your IS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Inoculan. I had the same problem, and by a process of elimination found that
the only thing that would stop it re-occurring was to not use inoculan. It
also just started happening out of the blue for me, and caused lots of
problems because the store would not always restart after this error, and I
The OS is on C:. Exchange is on D:.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Lis
The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain.
-Original Message-
From: AJ Bruno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4 SP6A IS Stops
The OS is on C:. Exchange is on D
what's_p ! with Spai
que passsa ! ;)
-Mensaje original-
De: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: martes, 20 de noviembre de 2001 14:22
Para: Exchange Discussions
Asunto: RE: Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4 SP6A IS Stops
The rain in Spain stays mainly in the
ose of a middle name is so he can tell
when he's really in trouble.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of AJ Bruno
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4 SP6A IS Stops
The OS i
This was in the orginal post from yesterday:
I have had this happen twice now and am trying to figure out what is
causing
the problem. The IS stops suddenly and I get the following message in the
event log. "Event Id 125 MSExchange IS 397 unable to create log file the
Drive may be read only, out
Q213202
-Original Message-
From: AJ Bruno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4 SP6A IS Stops
This was in the orginal post from yesterday:
I have had this happen twice now and am trying to
Need to know a little bit more about your intended Exchange configuration.
If this is not yet defined, here is how I would suggest doing this. First,
install your Windows 2000 server into a new domain and install AD. Next,
establish a trust relationship to your old domain. Then, install Exchange
<>
I am no expert but me think you need to do a lot of planning,testing and
detailed documenting on a test environment befor you attempt this.It is
possible that you may be able to do it in a weekend ideally if you
follow Microsoft's instructions but you never know what could go wrong
because ev
Are they also two different email domains/orgs. How many users?
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000 on different domains (helpl!)
Hey if you change your 5.5 server domain membership, all the mailbox permissions will
be lost because each user's NT account has User permissions to his/her own mailbox. I
think it is a bad idea unless you are a masochist.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi there
One of our other divisions actually did this - they told me they used a tool
from a company called NetIQ. Don't know the exact tool they used. If you
need the exact name of the tool, email me offlist and I'll contact them to
get all the details...
HTH
Russell
-Original Message--
Need a consultant? My prices aren't tooo outrageous... ;o) Of course,
that depends on the number of hours I would wind up working...
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchan
Tell me some more about how big everything is, and why you have to do
this migration, is all the email on the server? Have you read what Greg
told you?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Micha
://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxk.htm
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000 on different domains (helpl!)
Hey if you change your 5.5 server domain
Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this
- Original Message -
From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMA
]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnic al)
Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to
mamangement.
Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitati
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical)
Sorry, but
D]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
es it more feasible
then I would say maybe there's the load on the disk array...maybe...
and so on
bill
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations
Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exch
les, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Pet
Does your CPU peg at 100% when this happens?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question
Sorry if this comes in a secon
Windows 2000 SP3
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question
What Windows SP?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn
What Windows SP?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question
Sorry if this comes in a second time. Tried posting and i
I don't think it did, but I'll make sure to look the next time it occurs.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS ques
What makes you think its not?
So, when you do netstat -a , doesnt it show your machine listening on 110?
-Original Message-
From: Fred Macondray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Port 110 binding only to local
What does a netstat -an -p TCP return for Port 110 ? No entry for 0.0.0.0:110 ?
-Original Message-
From: Fred Macondray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 May 2002 00:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Port 110 binding only to local host
Hi All,
I've got an exchange 5.5
Kinda sounds like a service is not shutting down properly. Try manually
shutting down all services for Exchange then try.
From: Jose Manzano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to
I tried manually stopping the IIS services but, it didn't help. Outlook Web
Access is the only exchange app installed on this box :(
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchang
Not sure maybe shutdown any antivirus programs running
From: Jose Manzano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :(
What happens when you do a rebuild/restore on a test box?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 in SBS 4.5 w/SP6 - Shared Calendar Prob
MS Exchange 5.5 Standard edition limit is 16GB.
MS Exchange 5.5 Enterprise edition limit is only limited by the amount of
hard drive space you have.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E
ginal Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Technic al)
Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB.
http://support.micros
certain my employer would be happy to send out a consultant to write this up
for you.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:11 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange
How old was the restored backup?
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Brandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 server sending and receiving previously processed me
ssages
>
> Hi All,
> A few day
Disable your AV and contact the AV company.
- Original Message -
From: "RSangha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:34 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4, Event ID:3038 -IMC Warning in Event Log
> Here's the entire error me
I want to tell you, "Yes it will work." But I can't say that because all
the detail you've provided about your strategy is the word "migrate".
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
-Original Message
My advice to you would be to find some additional equipment and use the
"leapfrog" method of upgrading. The Exchange part is explained in the FAQ
Appendix A.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
-Origi
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving me
nu ts!
Hi All,
I have an outlook 2000 workstation that is blocking al
Uninstall the patch or zip everything there is no way of Turing it off.
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving me
nu
This is by product design. If you don't want to use a 3rd party event sink,
you can write your own or rehome the public folders in question to a 5.5
server.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne
Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:http://
I would suspect the system is replaying the queue.dat file found in the imcdata
folder. I would hazard a guess that all the messages being "replayed" if you
will are all SMTP. Stop the Internet mail service then rename/move/delete the
queue.dat file and then restart the service. This should corr
t: Re: Exchange 5.5 server sending and receiving previously processed
me ssages
How old was the restored backup?
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Brandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:18 PM
Sorry, to clarify my first post: We "rebuilt" the disk array not the server.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Brandt
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server sending and receiving previously processe d
me ssages
It wa
Dvaid, what happend to this chat?
The site says the technet chat room is currently unavailable.
When you visit
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itcommunity/chats/chatroomtn.asp
it states
"The TechNet Chat Room is currently unavailable.
We are in the middle of improving our chat client. Thank
Leo,
I have no idea what happened. My participation would have been limited to
looking for local candidates with experience in this area.
David
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange
Chat
Coming April 30
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Migration Microsoft Chat
Coming April 30
Dvaid, what happend to this chat?
The site says the technet chat room is currently unavailable. When you
visit http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itcommunity/chats/chatroomtn.asp
it states
14:43 pm
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Migration Microsoft Chat
Coming April 30
Leo,
I have no idea what happened. My participation would have been limited
to looking for local candidates with experience in this area.
David
-Original Message-
From
You only need to change the LDAP port of Exchange servers running on a DC.
The servers don't talk to each other via LDAP, so they don't care what port
any other server is listening on.. Or if it is listening at all.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, yo
Why do you need it off, and why are you not blocking these file types on
your Exchange server?
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment fil
That is not a problem, but a security feature.
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving me
nu ts!
Hi All,
I have a
ebruary 05, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving
m e nu ts!
That is not a problem, but a security feature.
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 20
501 - 600 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
