did during a recent migration was to simply delete the SRS
and then re-created it on another server. Then we monitored SRS replication
to make sure all was going well.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
> --
> From: Clemens, Rick
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent:
Actually what we did during a recent migration was to simply delete the SRS
and then re-created it on another server. Then we monitored SRS replication
to make sure all was going well.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
> --
> From: Clemens, Rick
> Reply To: Exchange Di
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 2000 SP3
Exchage 5.5 SP4
100% Active Directory
I have an Exchange 5.5 Site with three servers.
Server AExchange 2000 SP3 (With SRS)
Server BExchange 2000 SP3
Server CExchange 5.5 SP4 (Bridgehead)
I want to remove Server A completely from the
hange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
Right. Two moves, but only one intermediate server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROT
25, 2003 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
I think we are saying the same thing aren't we? It's still 2 user
moves.
First - Move users from E55 server to E2K in old site
Second - Move users from E2K server in old site to E2K server
nesday, 26 February 2003 11:51 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
Why not:
5.5 --> E2K in old site --> move mbx to new h/w in new AG
?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
m
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
But still some confusion on 3. If I can't move servers between AG's in
mixed or native mode, I would still need a 2nd intermediate server for
each Site/AG to move to the fi
.
Brain fart praps, PMS, I dunno.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:08 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
1. Yes, taking the old site's display name.
2. Yes, and even then yo
Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
Thanks piles Ed,
So...a key point I've taken is this:
Even when in Native Mode with 5 legacy Sites/AG's, I cannot move Servers
between Administration Groups;
>>> Yes.
But still some confusion on 3. If I can't move
nesday, 26 February 2003 9:08 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
1. Yes, taking the old site's display name.
2. Yes, and even then you can't move servers, just users.
3. You'll have to move to an E2K server in the original site,
to bring up one intermediate server, the new E2K
server in the original administrative group.
4. The SRS gets created automatically on the first Exchange 2000 server
you bring up in a mixed site. Don't worry about it; there is nothing
you need to do with it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelanc
I'm struggling to understand the concepts of SRS and migration to a single
AG and haven't found too much info either in Technet or other resources,
altho' I did find a good article on the Exchange Admin site.
I haven't moved to a test environment yet as I just want to und
Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS
Brain fart I guess. I don't remember configuring it in any way for any
migration.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, February 11,
Brain fart I guess. I don't remember configuring it in any way for any
migration.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SRS
Yes?
On 2/11/03
Yes?
On 2/11/03 17:23, "Charles Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is SRS used and/or necessary with ADCs?
tia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Is SRS used and/or necessary with ADCs?
tia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I can see an entry for the server in the "OU=Domain Controllers"
section. Can you be more specific?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Failed to instal
Use ADSI edit.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duane Purcell
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Failed to install SRS with error "The distinguished name
already exists..."
Yes t
Yes there was a previous SRS on this server. I am also sure
uninstalling exchange and demoting this domain controller (it's a backup
server - no mailboxes), renaming the server and reinstalling exchange
will allow me to create a new SRS - but I'd rather know the cause &a
I have had this error when trying to create an additional SRS on a server
that had had one previously. Is this what is happening in your case? It
was during a call I had logged with Microsoft PSS. They looked up their
version of the article (255703) and the engineers original notes but could
I am trying to install the SRS on a server and keep getting the error,
"The distinguished name already exists. Try the operation again. If
the error reocurs, try stopping the directory service and the
Administrator program and then restarting them.
ID no: C1030B0C
Exchange System Ma
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SRS
Yes, as you'll need to do this before removing the ADC. Check out the
article below for further info.
Q272314
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SRS
Can the Site Replication Service be removed once the last Exchange 5.5
server is decommissioned? Is it used for anything else
ed To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: SRS
Subject: SRS
Can the Site Replication Service be removed once the last Exchange 5.5
server is decommissioned? Is it used for anything else?
Wilson
_
List posting FAQ:
Can the Site Replication Service be removed once the last Exchange 5.5 server is
decommissioned? Is it used for anything else?
Wilson
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I am try to install a new Site Replication Service onto my Ex2k (SP2)
server but I'm getting the error,
Error code 0XC1030B0C (2828): The Distinguished Name already exists.
Try the
operation again. If the error recurs, try stopping the directory
service and
the Administrator program and the
If you want to see what is in the SRS, connect to the E2K server with
the 5.5 admin program.
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:51 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: How can U check what is in SRS
Subject: How
L PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: How can U check what is in SRS
>
>
> We have an SRS.edb file on our Exchange 2000 server but we
> don't think it has any valid data in it as the exchange 5.5
> site we joined doe
We have an SRS.edb file on our Exchange 2000 server but we don't think it
has any valid data in it as the exchange 5.5 site we joined does not see
any config data (even when we force replication of the config_CA).
We have run eseutil to dump out the table stats and there appears to be
data in the
29 matches
Mail list logo
