Title: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule)
What,
like America and the IRA?
-Original Message-From: Micciche Robert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 02 October 2001
21:24To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forwarding
e-mail (Server Rule)
Lets see how long they stay
Title: RE: Forwarding e-mail (Server Rule)
Swiss
Air, Switzerland?
Frank
-Original Message-From: STEVE BROOK
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 03 October 2001
10:53To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forwarding
e-mail (Server Rule)
What, like America and the IRA?
Sorry
about this. I missed something. What news from MS yesterday?
-Original Message-From: Clark, Steve
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001
7:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT
SBSYes - I'm going to put them on 2K w/ E2K. Especially
Did
they put up a press release or something?
John Matteson; Exchange
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to
*ME*!
-Original Message-From: Clark, Steve
[mailto:[EMAIL
I am
trying to look for it at the moment.
Hanief
Chowdhary
PC Network
Administrator.
TransGlobal
Freight Management Ltd.,
International
House, Girling Way,
Great South West
Road,
Feltham,
Middx.
TW14
0PH
Tel - (+44) 020 8
400 3521 (DDI)
Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
If you
are referring to Exchange 5.5 the short answer is YES.
John Matteson; Exchange
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to
*ME*!
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence
Which version? 5.5 (and 2000 AFAIK) is fine, but anything less and you
need the annoying Microsoft Exchange Connector disk.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code
Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 03
Were using Exchange 5.5, SP4, on NT 4.0, SP6. I know if I remove the SMTP
address
from a users mailbox, they will not be able to RECEIVE incoming E-mail from
outside
of the company. I can't remember what setting I change though to block them
from
SENDING E-mail outside the company. A point in
Please
repost. I obviously fell down and hit my head and missed the whole thing.
Thanks.
-Original Message-From: John Matteson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001
9:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT
SBS
If
you, or someone on the
Open the Exmerge.ini file.
This is where the config is for the utility.
All the info is explained there.
Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
Phone : 001-212-339-0443
Fax : 001-212-836-3802
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:
Install IIS on server
Put EX5.5 CD in drive
Run setup
Deselect everything appartfrom OWA
Following instructions on screen and specify the remote exchange server
Install SP of your choice for exchange
Thats basically it. You do have to make some changes for ssl but this will
get it running
Could be, but I'm not running E2K yet so I wouldn't know if it's an issue on
it's OWA.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA authentication
I thought this
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5097753,00.html
-Original Message-From: Hanief Chowdhary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday,
October 03, 2001 9:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: NT SBS
I am
trying to look for it at the moment.
Hello all. I have a problem with Exchange 2k and AD (or, at least I think I
do!).
I have an Exchange 5.5 server in my domain, I built a new Exchange 2k
server, and am using the move mailbox method to move users to the new Exch
server. I first created an AD Connector to replicate the info from
Pat,
1.) Are you using the ADC from the Exchange CD?
2.) Do you have one-way or two-way replication setup?
I believe you need to have two-way. I had two-way replication
setup during my migration and everything worked fine. I did the move
mailbox method.
3.) What machine are you using
I'd like to know of a way to hide names from the global address list via
Exchange 5.5 without losing the capability for those hidden users from
logging into the exchange server via web outlook. When you hide
mailboxes/usernames in exchange's Advanced tab, those selected can no longer
access
Microsoft say...Because OWA uses a MAPI session for name resolution, a
hidden recipient cannot
be resolved to a user name. This is by design.
Though someone may know different. I'd like to know if it is possible too
Steve Brook
-Original Message-
From: Klats Myboots [mailto:[EMAIL
wouldn't address book views be the solution for this? Hmmm...
Drew
If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each
other. (Mother Theresa)
KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Pics of
You need to install the Exchange Admin tools to what ever computer you
are going to manage from. If that is your DC, yes, you need to install
it on it.
The LDAP issue only applies to the situation where the Exchange is on a
DC.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From:
I was afraid of that! Thanks for your reply Steve.
Jim
_o/\ __o
_- \_ / \ ,
__(_)/_(_)/\___(_) /_(_)__
From: STEVE BROOK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Hi Drewski,
Can you expand on this?
Are you saying unhide the recipient then create an address book view
showing only the ones you wish to be seen. Then set permissions on who can
search the list. Do you then have to reset each client machine so the
default address book view points to your
Title: Message
Yup...works for me. Users think you're a
magician!
-Original Message-From: Don Ely
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001
10:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Using
native NTBACKUP utility to backup Exchange 5.5 server
actually, I was hoping to jumpstart my brain, but it appears that my backup
brain doesn't have the battery power.
However, a search of Technet for Address book views reveals... not a whole
heck of a lot. Mutter.
However:
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4844
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
How do
they just disappear? Dont they
fill up a mailbox somewhere? Sorry
for the stupid question. I
currently receive all bounced email, and have set up a rule in my Outlook to
just forward ex-employee email to my Deleted Items folder. I like the idea
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Apparently they just "disappear". Haven't had an Exchange guru yet
contradict that.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001
10:05 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
It's a
well-known Exchange Server black hole.
I
prefer to actually address the emails in case there is that one important
message
William "not a guru" Lefkovics
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
they
don't bounce, they just dissapear. It's quite spooky,
actually...
DrewIf we have no
peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother
Theresa)KWAR2001
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Thanks William "yes you are, get over it already"
Lefkovics.
I only
use it once someone's been gone 6 months to a year.
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001
10:27 AMTo:
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
I feel so loved (1)
(1) Thanks for the plug Diane (2)
(2) Now I can be as rich and famous as William
(3)
(3) Hi William (4)
(4) Might be coming back out to Vegas in a couple of
weeks...
-Original
Message-From:
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
It was
great meeting you. Those colourful beers at Quarks looked...
well...
Let's
say they reminded me of my days in the lab in biochemistry at
UBC.
-Original Message-From: Bill Higgins
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03,
Great, I didn't realise the Address Book View could affect what is seen in
the GAL. Do you know if this has any effect on OWA, or is it suck it and
see?
Steve Brook
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 October 2001 18:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
We have two Exchange 5.5 SP3 servers in different domains, one on NT4 and
one on 2000 Server (don't ask why, way too complicated political). Users
homed on the 2000 server now need access to calendars on the NT server.
The 2000 server is NOT a domain controller. The two domains have a 100Meg
LAN
Actually the LDAP situation only applies to Exchange 5.5 Running on an
AD DC.
But yes you need to install the exchange Admin tools on any machine you
want to manage mailboxes from.
Keith Nelson
Network Administrator
Orange County High School of the Arts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(714) 560-0900 ex5910
That's what I meant. Obviously, it won't be for Ex2K, since Ex2K uses
AD as its directory, so there won't be that LDAP port conflict issue.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Keith Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:11 AM
To:
Has anyone used this tool?
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q296/0/88.ASP It sounds like there
is no way to recover all the data in the PST file. If that is the case, does anyone
know of any other tools that allow you to recover all the data?
Also, according to the article,
Title: Moving logs
I would like to move my Exchange logs from the default path to a different one but I haven't found a place to do that in Exchange. I'm specifically interested in moving the IMC logs. Is that even doable ?
Thanks.
Eric Peeters
Network Administrator
TexLoc Ltd
List
Title: Moving logs
Use
the performance optimizer for Exchange.
Regards,Sean Martin, MCSENetwork
AdministratorRibelin Lowell CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111
C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax:
(907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried installing Exchange Server 5.5 on a box running Windows 2000
Server, and every time I try I get a won't work with this software type of
message. Yet I hear of people running Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000. What
am I missing? Are folks installing Exchange 5.5 to Windows NT Server 4.0,
Just say Install anyways or whatever the choice is.
As soon as you are done, update to SP4
-Original Message-
From: Lunsford, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: install Exch 5.5 on Windows 2000?
I've tried
It was a fresh Windows 2000 Server installation, no service pack yet
installed, installing from a Select CD containing Exchange EE 5.5. I
don't recall the exact error message, as this was a week or two ago and the
machine is no longer in my hands, so I can't re-create the problem. Sorry
this is
If the error Martin describes comes up just click ignore or whatever and
continue on. It works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Lunsford, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: install Exch 5.5 on Windows
Do you have an old CD?? I have done it many times.. It is an NT server
;o??
Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Title: Message
That's
always the good stuff!
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,
October 03, 2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Well
the spam is deletable.
It's
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
Well,
maybe as (in)famousbut I'm not sure about as rich :-)
Diane
-Original Message-
From: Bill
Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October
03, 2001 10:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
RE: Notification Inbound
Title: RE: Notification Inbound Mail
LOL
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 03,
2001 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Notification Inbound Mail
Well
the spam is deletable.
It's
the email
No one here deletes ANYTHING. Those that do, never empty their deleted items, so they
might as well not have deleted it.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS crop tool
Thank you! I'll give it a whirl.
-Original Message-
From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: AW: MS crop tool for PST files
Try
http://www.metrocast.net/~scott/pst2gb/
Ricki
-Ursprüngliche
There is no problem in mixing Enterprise and Standard edition within a
site. I've done it in the past.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Title: Message
They
are accumulating on Mars.
Greg
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Notification Inbound
Mail
How do
they just "disappear"?
we have the same problem here.
1. Separate into years (1999.pst, 2000.pst, 2001.pst)
2. archive old years to CD
3. put the old years .pst files to the hard drive some place where they
can't find them and open them in mail folders and don't back them up to the
file server..that way you can
Wow dude, so you built another server entirely, not at all connected to
the original? What ware did you use to do the restore, and what was the
config of the orig server compared to the config of the second, ie sp
levels, exchange HF's, names, all that. Also post back your steps, and
order of
We have a mixed here, 5.5 shop with both enterprise
and standard on one site, no problem since the setup
2 yrs ago.
Ong LB
NIE/NTU
Singapore
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
LOTS!
But thank you.
W
-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DS_E_BUSY : After Restoring DS
Uh, that was my next post...
He he..
William, is there anything exchange related
53 matches
Mail list logo
