And I thought space was black
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 April 2002 02:51
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Checking white space size of database
Could you please post the syntax for that?
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And
Hi all,
I have sent this to both lists as it covers both Exchange and NT.
I have read with interest a lot of threads with regards to whether or not
one should use AV on servers/exchange etc.. and I am of the opinion that the
more the merrier.
Currently we have been using NAV 7.6 corp
There is a trend toward Trend.
I don't agree with the 'more the merrier' theorem, though. Too many layers
often return too many problems.
As far as messaging is concerned, a good gateway product complimented with
an end user product should be more than sufficient.
William
-Original
Title: Message
We're trying to stop
all of the wonderful SPAM and JUNK MAIL that we receive with the Internet Mail
Service MESSAGE FILTERING option under Exchange v5.5 SP4. We're not deleting
directly and sending all messages to the turf directory. This is on a P2-500MHz
machine with 1 gig
The confusion (I guess) exists because some companies put their display
names back to front (like a real grown-up pro-Directory) and some don't
(like the Mickey Mouse index of names) ;-)
If I had a $ for every time someone has started their mail to me with Dear
Snook ..
well actually
Yes, Anderson Samu who works for a well known UK bank (but is based in
Africa). Sorry to disappoint you, but it's true!
Neil
From a company who uses a Mickey Mouse display name system (but then
again, we're of the size where we can get away with it, and it wasn't my
choice anyway...!)
Hi,
Need some advice on
this. Was stung by management asking abt
this. In
Exchange 5.5 or 2k if I want to support S/MIME is there
anything
to set? At the
moment we are in a transition from 5.5 to 2k, have check
thru IMS in 5.5 and
found nothing on this.
Any advice is
appreciated.
Hi all,
I've two problems with our mail system.
We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6a
On the same machine is Mail essentials 5.0 running.
First problem is that all mail is coming out as clear text.
If I set the advanced options on User defined, always RTF or always clear
text. Its ALLWAYS
Title: RE: Checking white space size of database
... and as for the number of times messages to me start Dear Lynn (even when I've made a point of signing the message Karen: I mean I know Lynn can be a first name - but how often is Karen a surname - and would you sign your message with your
Ah yes, but your display name doesn't include a comma to distinguish
first and surnames. Very shoddy. :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 22 April 2002 14:01
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Checking white space size of
Title: RE: Checking white space size of database
Worse
than that, we have a guy at another place I work called Mr Tickle. Worse than
THAT, he once went out with a girl called Tessa,who preferred to be called
Tess. Luckily, they didn't get married!!
Kevin
-Original Message-From:
It's part of the NHS cutbacks ;-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 April 2002 14:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Sounds like a load of bo***cks!
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 22 April 2002 14:49
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Checking white space size of database
Subject: RE: Checking white space size of database
Worse than
I would never use Word as my email editor, I have read to much about how
unstable it is, and how much it crashes your system.
My secrateries also like to use it, and they also wonder why there machines
crash. Another good one is But I have 100MB of free space why do I need
more?.
John
You didn't see the budget? Gordon's allocated £6 billion to bring back the
People's comma
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 April 2002 14:16
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Checking white space size of database
It's part of the
It's true, I tell you!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 April 2002 14:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Checking white space size of database
Sounds like a load of bo***cks!
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
Check the item entitled Avoid WordMail to Lessen Impact of Outlook's
Latest HTML Mail Vulnerability on http://www.slipstick.com
Never use MS Word as an email editor.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
Title: RE: Checking white space size of database
Yes, but the budget funding doesn't cut in until next year - so no unnecessary punctuation until then. In the meantime there's a six-month waiting list for curly brackets ...
Karen
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
Tried what? Purchased and installed a 3rd Party or created your own.
What happens when you try to connect to https://server/exchange ?
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 12:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Here is something I actually posted for someone else recently.
OK, here is my Trend spiel.
I am now in my second company where I have done a full Trend rollout using
their Neat Suite product.
http://www.antivirus.com/products/neatsuite/exchange.htm I paid 3K for a 100
User license.
This bundle
Title: Message
Rick,
Great article, but now my boss comes back with, "I need something newer than
1998..."
Maybe we can do this a different way. I set up a simple little web-based
survey to find out Exchange Admin staffing at different organizations. I
would appreciate any input
What about all those poor C++ programmers
--- Lynn Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but the budget funding doesn't cut in until
next year - so no
unnecessary punctuation until then. In the meantime
there's a six-month
waiting list for curly brackets ...
Karen
-Original
I'll take the nurses any day!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Checking white space size of database
Well, there you have it: beds idle for lack of nurses, C++
Hi,
Is it possible to have OWA query public folders for contact e-mail
addresses? I have only found that it finds only items in the GAL.
Thanks,
Darrin
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
You have to install it and the licensing from the W2K CD. Options, but less secure,
are items like VNC from ATT (free, but with a few security flaws), Timbuktu Pro,
PCAnywhere (*shudder*), Carbon Copy, Remote Desktop, Remotely ?(Possible)?.
I would suggest installing the applicaiton and using
I forgot to add this:
http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/downloads/recommended/TSAC/tsac.asp
That is a follow-up to the Advanced PC solutions post. You still have to install the
terminal services product from the CD.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Christian
Sent:
My experience indicates that the majority of calls about the email system
come from field users. Either they call because they cannot sign on to the
VPN, or someone has sent them a large attachment, and they are seeing data
coming down, but do not see any emails.
We have about 200 people
That sounds like client support as well. IMHO VPN's and attachment size
should have nothing to do with Exch admins. Those are help desk issues.
That's one aspect you need to think about. Are you going to be supporting
the clients, or the just the server.
If you have to support the clients, you
That's great if you have a help desk. I dunno, if you have a relatively
stable in-house user base, it shouldn't take much effort to maintain a large
install base. When you start adding high turnover, remote users, etc. it
adds to the admin time.
-Original Message-
From: Martin
Perzaxtly. But the question was How Many Exchange Admins Does It Take and
end user support is going to be a huge skew on those numbers.
So it is a very important piece of info before you can start quoteing
numbers.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: RE: Anti Virus Software
Here's my $0.02 on this subject.
We use Officescan for desktops, Antigen for Exchange and Norton for our servers. This way we are covered round robin.
More and more it is getting to the point that you really *SHOULD* use a different vendor solution for your
Title: Message
question
im trying to
restrict a user from sending to the outside world
we are
company.com
our internal smtp
names are site.company.com
i set the reply
addresses of all users to @company.com
this user i want to
restrict i set the reply address at @site.company.com
it should
Title: Message
Im resending this to
make sure my reply address was correct.. sorry
question
im trying to
restrict a user from sending to the outside world
we are
company.com
our internal smtp
names are site.company.com
i set the reply
addresses of all users to @company.com
this user i
Yup. As is the case with almost every one of these kinds of questions, YMMV.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How Many Exchange Admins Does It Take
Perzaxtly. But the
I have some users that are trying to email files that are over 36MB in size.
That is above the Maximum Message Size that is set at this time. They are
the type that will run to the higher ups in the company and cry to them to
get it changed.
We only have a 256K connection to the Internet.
Can you ping the server by name? Can you ping the server by IP? Can you ping
any other servers by name?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Fjelsted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Problem resolving the name of an
Can you ping it from a moat?
Can you ping it in a boat?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5
server when set ting up a new
Can you ping it in thong?
Can you ping it with a bong?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when set
ting up a new user
Can
I can ping that thong real strong.
Then she might break out in song.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when
set ting up
Title: Message
i triesd to
post to your link but recieved the following error:
FrontPage Run-Time Component Page
You have submitted a form or followed a link to a page that
requires a web server and the FrontPage Server Extensions to function
properly.
This form or other FrontPage
Yes I can ping the server both by name and address from the machine in
question.
Kevin
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Hmm, Im a drawing a blank on this one, Exchange 2000 Server
Can you block a single Email address from a user @ store level...
For example reject any incoming mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??
Cheers!
Carlos Garcia-Moran
Senior Network Administrator
Athenahealth, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List
Title: RE: How Many Exchange Admins Does It Take
LOL.. so true..
Please put your question in the form of an answer so we may better be able to help you..
hehehe
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:44 AM
To:
What about the boat?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Fjelsted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5
server when set ting up a new user
Yes I can ping the server
It's a global setting. I'm not sure how to break it down to each store
without an SMTP Transport event sink.
William
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Garcia-Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Block Single Mail
since we are a college things a bit weird for us
Our standard for exchange (which is the admin/faculty system) is 28,29,30
megs (warning, prohibit send, prohibit send/receive respectively) with the
upper most limit (Director of IT or Vice Chancellor approval needed) is
38,39,40. In fact our
520 users. 1 Exchange admin.
Exchange Admin Responsiblities:
1. add/delete/modify user mailboxes, DLs, custom recipients
2. daily backup of IS and DS on Exchange 5.5 server
3. Monthly Disaster Recovery Test - fully documented.
4. Notify users with more than the max. mailbox size.
5. Other
Try doing a NET VIEW \\IP or NET VIEW \\Servername
If IP works (lists shares) and Servername doesn't, you have a NETBIOS name
resolution issue. Either setup WINS or preferably setup DNS with Host (A)
records for your Exchange server, Domain controllers, Domain name (same IP
as controllers),
Wow those are awfully big messages coming and going...are they mpeg movies
or what? I have my user limited to 5MB...and even that is big for
attachments.
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Some excel docs they send out are 30 megs.they also send cadd and access
databases back and forth from student to teacher and admin at 1 college to
admin at another or to the state.
yeah, by my opion the original 15 was fine, but then they cried and it was
upped to 20 then to 30
Title: RE: Message Size
Messages that size could not be business related. I have the size limit on send set to 1MB, if it is legitimately business related and over 1MB, they can submit a HelpDesk all to have it opened up for them to send at a specific time, usually we do it right after 5pm.
Yeah I found a setting to block an entire domain on SMTP connections...
Too bad I only need to block one address :)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Block Single Mail
Title: RE: Message Size
I wish i
could do that..
However the
state want lots of documentation from us on a regular basis and docs on student
enrollement per class for the past 10 years, not matter what format, is
LARGE
Also student
projects tend to get rather large around here...
If you find it, let us know!!!
I would LOVE to be able to do that. We can't block any domains as it would
effect our students
Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Garcia-Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
IMS,
First Tab (Internet Mail)
Clients support S/MIME signatures
from
Help
Enable
if your clients support S/MIME Signatures. Disable to convert messages
with S/MIME signatures to MIME unsigned messages.
-Original Message-From: ONG Liang Bu (CSC)
[mailto:[EMAIL
The net view listed the share names.
I tried the server name and the IP.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Purviance, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when
set
We are using Exchange Server 5.5 on an NT4 machine. We have a Win2K Server
machine that we use for OWA. One of our people was working Friday nite from
her home using OWA to access her email, and today she received an email from
someone she works with outside our organization that they received
Title: RE: INTERESTING PUZZLEMENT
I would make them prove that you sent it to them.
-Original Message-
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: INTERESTING PUZZLEMENT
We are using Exchange Server
I would use the VPN access to the network with Outlook option. Not the
greatest with a dial-up, but assuming he has two lines it should be
manageable for 3-6 months...
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:50 PM
To:
Ha, I made the same assumption...normally I do the he/she thing too...
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Creative Solutions
Wow, what an assumption - it's a
Title: Mensaje
Hi guys I have
problem with Remote site connected by X 400 Connector. When I try replicate from
Directory Replicator in EV I have this Warning
event ID
1091
Source
MSExchangeDS
The Id error is same
what Q 271744 but I follow Workround thos Q and exist 6 messages I dont
Title: Message
Sorry
about the error - doggone Frontpage!!! I have fixed it - please try
again...
Brian
-Original Message-From: Thompson, Elizabeth
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:26
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: How Many
Exchange Admins Does
Title: Message
I have a user that keeps her
mail in seevral large pst's in her home directory then open's them as personal
folders in Outllook. I looked at her files and she has almost 350 Mb of PST's.
In the past users have been allowed to have a 100mb limit on thier exchange
Title: Message
This
does not use up network resources assuming the pst is on her local hard
drive. As long as the user understands that local drives are not
backed up, and that if the file is lost its gone forever, it should not be a
problem.
-Original Message-From: Bill Dodd
Title: Message
She is
opening them across the network? I think opening them locally is much
better. Helps minimize corruption potential and of course uses less
network resources.
I
prefer to keep them local and back them up to the network as needed. They
are archives and dashboard
Title: Message
That
depends on the location of the users home directory. If it is on a network drive
then yes it will use network resources. Users also need to understand that
very large pst files can easily become corrupt resulting in the loss of all
data.
-Original
Title: Message
No the
user keeps her PST's in her "home directory" which is on a server and backed up.
I just checked her Boss and he has a 854 Mb pst he has been hoarding, in his
"home Directory", and keeping open as a personal folder
-Original Message-From: Alan Osborne
Title: Message
He
says pst's are in her home directory. So it should be on the network. It
is a valid concern.
It
would have been better if it was on local machie.
Mal Sasalu Information Systems Facilities
Phone: (403)
295-4501
NovAtel Inc. Fax: (403)
295-4914
1120 68th Avenue NE
Title: Message
I
agree.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22,
2002 3:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Keeping large PST's open
She
is opening them across the network? I think opening them locally
Title: Message
We have all
users store their PSTs on the network to make backups easier.
Since some of our users must keep e-mails for a
year (college thing) , some get very big. However, we have found it to be worth
while. since PSTs are corruptible being able to restore them is important
Title: Message
Thanks. I am sorry when, I said Home directory I assumed everyone
would know I meant a network directory.I guess I have had too much "Microsoft
Brainwashing". I have a hard time with these bone heads. I just had a call from
the President of the company and his secretarywhowere
Title: Message
This
solutionI would not really have a problem with. These people are keeping
email forever and keep their PSt's open all day every day. Her routine is that
as soon as an Email comes in she drags it to her open personnel
folder.
-Original Message-From: Thompson,
Title: Message
well, she
will stop that when she hits system limit!! i thinks thats 2
gig?
-Original Message-From: Bill Dodd
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:56
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Keeping large
PST's open
This
Why not put those large PST's on a CD for her ? Seems like the best solution
to me. - Mark S.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 22, 2002 3:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Keeping large PST's open
She is opening them across
I agree. I am formulating the basis for my argument. So you guys agree what
she is doing and trying to spread to others in the company is not a good
practice?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
I agree. PST should be used to keep messages you need. maybe even CYA
messages. it is not needed to store evry bit of junk mail.
BTW, putting it on a cd will let her read it but not write to it (read-only
attribute) which means she will just create another one on the network to
store more stuff.
Quote from Symantec on this issue:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email:
This worm searches the Windows address book, the ICQ database, and local
files for email addresses. The worm sends an email message to these
addresses with itself as an attachment. The worm contains its own SMTP
engine and
Title: Message
PST
file size limit is indeed 2GB and or 64k items. OST file has the same
limit and will really hoze up when you hit that limit. If you don't know
to look in the deleted items folder for the sync log you may never realize whats
wrong. (Yes the CEO really does have that much
Title: Message
Is
there a way to compress a PST file?
-Original Message-From: Bob Falkenberg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:26
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Keeping large
PST's open
PST
file size limit is indeed 2GB and or 64k
By putting it on CD's she will loose the ability to read the mails.
She will have to save it to the disk before reading it.
Mal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Keeping
Title: Message
Keep
it in the IS where it belongs.. WinZip?
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:27
Title: Message
del
*.pst compresses them nicely.
NTFS
compression works, but again, you increase the corruptability
factor.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:27
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Title: Message
Yeah Kevin that sounds absurd. The CD
option will work fine, but as someone pointed out, they will have to copy them
to the HD to view them, and then they have to have the brains to change
attributes.
The best option is to have them save the
PST locally, especially
I am not sure if this message made it out.
The Net View works fine for both the IP address and the name. All shares
show up.
Are there any other thoughts on the matter.
Regards,
Kevin Fjelsted Try doing a NET VIEW \\IP or NET VIEW \\Servername
If IP works (lists shares) and Servername
Title: Message
Why is
that absurd? .pst's use up more disk space than the equivalent email in
the Information store.
If
someone is constantly referring to a .pst on a CD for information access, you
aren't doing the Exchange Server product justice.
Nothing absurd about Kevin's comments. A
I'm getting ready to migrate my Exch 5.5 to 2K. The domain is already in
2K native mode. In a recent w2knews issue, part of the suggested process
was to install the ADC, then run forestprep and domainprep. However, in
MS' Guide to Upgrading from MS Exch 5.5 to Exch 2K Server, they say to run
Hello everyone,
How would you type a subject filter within Antigen for the following
subject,
Reduction in Student Loan Interest
Thanks,
Nelson Aguillon
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
The latter is correct. Also use the ADC from the Exchange2000 sp2 CD.
The w2knews is often plagued with inaccuracies.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exch 5.5 - 2K Migration Process
Title: Message
With PSTs in the 850+ MB range, it does
not do an Exchange environment any good to put that burden back on the IS. What
really needs to be done is 'spring cleaning.' Get the users to
delete mail that is never needed, which probably includes personal mail, SPAM,
etc, and
I would agree. If I recall, we ran forestprep first. I think the idea was to give AD
the time to replicate the new schema changes to all DCs before installing the ADC,
which will rely on some of those changes being in place.
-Bonnie
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
Title: Message
Wouldn't want to burden the Exchange server,
right?
I
agree with what you said though. But, if the person is constantly using
this .pst it belongs in the store. That's what it's for.
Is
therea policy reason for limiting a mailbox to 100MB? Perhaps
restore time or your
Title: Message
PST=BAD! see the faq...
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22,
2002 1:38 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
I have
a 5 gig Email folder on my server.. it does just fine??? please prove your
statement to me.
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter
There is an event ID to tell you when it is all done. William knows it.
Forest prep has to be run first..
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
Is there anetworkproblem? Otherwise,
just let them continue what they are doing, but warn them about the
limits. Moving it local doesn't get them backed up.
-Original
Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 22,
Title: Message
True,
but make it the users' problem. You got enough to do enforcing limits on
Exchange.
The
users can back them up. Or keep a copy on the network and use a copy
locally.
William
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April
Title: Message
*some*
of us don't have Exchange Enterprise, but do have some room on our file
server.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:03
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Keeping large
PST's open
I
Title: Message
I still say that you need to have them do
cleaning. All of this discussion depends on resources. Bandwidth, storage space,
WAN (if they are remote users), memory, blah blah blah.
Hey, if that domain has them, then screw
all the suggestions. More power to you. Let them
Title: RE: Message Size
Couldn't you schedule messages above a certain size to
go out in the evening hours?
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:19
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Message
Size
Title: Message
Because if we did not set some limit every user would have 3gb of
mailboxes. These people seem to think it is a wonderful filing
system
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22,
2002 5:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
