RE: NAV for Exchange

2002-04-24 Thread Jim Holmgren
Are you sure the "infected" email didn't have the virus portion of the email replaced with a text file? NAV will deliver the body of the message, but replace the infected attachment with a harmless text file that says "This attachment was deleted and replaced with this message" - or words to tha

NAV for Exchange

2002-04-24 Thread Ben Ong
  Anyone having this problem, the nav for exchange detected the virus email and said was deleted. But it still send the infected emails to the recipient.   Subject of the message:  Let's be friends One or more attachments were deleted.   Attachment Status.bat was Deleted for the follo

Moving E2k database files

2002-04-24 Thread MJohnston
Just set up a new E2k server (first one & I'm new to E2k). All the databases are on the C: partition and I would like to move the databases to the D: partition and the logs to the E: partition. Looked up "move databases" in the help and it looks simple, but it's not working. I'm assuming I'm

RE: Modifying AD with a CSV Import (Or a proper CSV to LDIF script)

2002-04-24 Thread Kevin Miller
William's wife?? WTF? Look for CSVDE that util will allow you to direct import a CSV file and you can ignore LDIFE --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Purviance, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server (recovery server)

2002-04-24 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message the base os Version does not matter as long as exchange is on the same SP when you try to mount to recovered store. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message-From: Don Guyer [m

RE: Allow relaying

2002-04-24 Thread Haeger, John
The post below turned out to be pure gold. Thank You ONG Liang Bu I used regedt32 to look at the registry key named in the MS Article and (just dinking around) Viewed Permissions. Regedit reported that they were incorrectly ordered. Would I like for them to be reordered ? Yes BINGO

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Bill Kuhn - MCSE
I just ran the 4198 SuperDat on my 4.5.0 VirusScan on my 2000 Pro laptop and it updated and restarted scan just like always.. -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: 'NTSYSADMIN List' Subj

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
This is the bugNothing serious, just an erroneous non existent error. ST7449 OSCE 5.0- clients are getting errors on TSC.EXE upon boot up. ST7471 OfficeScan 5.0 please insert disk error ST7494 OSCE 5.0- TSC errors after OSCE 5 upgrade. ST7504 OSCE 5.0- TSC.exe - No Disk -Original Mes

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
Yes. I was having an issue with a certain file that they sent me. However they fixed it in a heartbeat -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem No wa

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread Tony Flannery
William, Will probably upgrade. Tony List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server (recovery server)

2002-04-24 Thread Don Guyer
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server (recovery server) Tim,     I went from an NT4 SP6a Exchange 5.5 SP4 box, to an W2k SP1 Exchange 5.5 SP4 box. I installed Exchange on the new W2k box and configured it in an isolated environment, matching it to our live server. When I was ready to go

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Ray Zorz
No way??? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem Relax dude. I had my own troubles with Trend today. Don't feel like the lone ranger. -Ori

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server (recovery server)

2002-04-24 Thread JENSEN, TIMOTHY C
I don't think so. Reason I say that is if you glanced at the event log after applying NT SP6 you would have noticed log msgs about changes to the edb's. I think it extended them or something. I tried to restore just the priv to an NT 4 box with a lower SP as in production and the IS would not s

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server (recovery server)

2002-04-24 Thread Don Guyer
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server (recovery server) Allen,     We went from an Exch 5.5 NT4 Server to an Exch 5.5 W2k Server, exactly the way you mentioned. Don Guyer Information Systems Citadel Federal Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 800.666.0191 x7072 Fax: 610.380.6083 www.ci

RE: OWA

2002-04-24 Thread William Lefkovics
1) What makes you think it will ever be available? There are third party apps that provide this functionality. I never use spell checker, so I am not familiar with their effectiveness. One could compose the message in Word and copy when done. 2) Yes. Create the rule in a MAPI session first.

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
Relax dude. I had my own troubles with Trend today. Don't feel like the lone ranger. -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem Quote, and it's still

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Clark, Steve
meow Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and p

Re: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread whitton
LMAO! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Clark, Steve
::visual:: dark rimmed glasses, the no-tan shine, standing on top of the sand pile just after kicking the sand humm Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The d

OWA

2002-04-24 Thread GCA
Hello All, I have a couple of questions about OWA. 1) When will spell check be available? 2) Is there a way to create a rule on the server side to block certain people from sending mail to my users. ie. spam and other mail to be blocked. 3) How does one create a signature in owa?

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Murray Freeman
Quote, and it's still catching the Klez and other viruses just fine. In the nearly 6 years that we've been running McAfee, this is the very first burp. But Martin, I want to sincerely thank you for the encouragement and assistance on this issue. I just knew that at some point one of your responses

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Steve Ens
Stop it Martin...the coke is starting to come up through my nose I am laughing so hard. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem Quote: Geez, my

POP account in Exchange environment

2002-04-24 Thread Scott Burgin
We have an all NT 4 domain with a 5.5 exchange server. We have a few pop accounts set up for a few people. I've tried to add another one, but with no luck. Is there some sort of static mapping that has to be set up from the client to the exchange server before it will work? List Charter and FA

RE: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update Problem

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
Quote: Geez, my Mcafee is catching even the newest Klez and others, I think it's great! Murray -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: 'NTSYSADMIN List' Subject: McAFEE SUPERDAT Update P

RE: Need Feed Back Please

2002-04-24 Thread Allen Crawford
I'm not using Exchange 2000 here, but for some feedback... 1) I am moving people from PSTs to server-based storage and have yet to set mailbox limits. However, I'm thinking 50-100MB for the average users, 250-500MB for Power Users. However, our company is small (about 150 mailboxes) and we shou

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread Precht, David
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server just service pack 4 and 2 them !! Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure

Need Feed Back Please

2002-04-24 Thread Brien Mayer
Hi all We are currently piloting Exchange 2000 for the IT department & are ready to migrate a few corporate users over to Exchange from Sendmail. My questions are!! 1) What size limits do you have setup for a normal users mailbox ? 2) Are you using .pst files if so where do they reside ? 3) Publ

RE: Virus List

2002-04-24 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: RE: Virus List I hear you. We get voted down really quickly with the phrase: "Shut up you nonrevenue producing department!" -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server Sheesh that is a lot of Exchanging! -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server Runs great, we have 8, 2K machine

Re: Virus List

2002-04-24 Thread whitton
www.about.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: The file extension blocking list

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
::preening:: Thanks! -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: The file extension blocking list oooOOOooo Published even... Thanks Martin. -Original Message- From: Marti

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server (recovery server)

2002-04-24 Thread Allen Crawford
I am planning on testing this soon, but since I'm anxious, does anyone know if you are running an NT 4, Exchange 5.5 server, can you use a Windows 2000, Exchange 5.5 server as a recovery server? In other words, if I have Exchange 5.5 running the same service pack and patches and everything, could

RE: The file extension blocking list

2002-04-24 Thread Bob Falkenberg
oooOOOooo Published even... Thanks Martin. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: The file extension blocking list http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm -Ori

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread JENSEN, TIMOTHY C
Yes. I have 15 MSX 5.5 SP4 boxes all running W2K enterprise. Most have been upgrades from NT4 too. Nothing but good things to say about it so far. Especially the terminal service : ) Tim Jensen Cingular Wireless, Chicago -Original Message- From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The file extension blocking list

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: The file extension blocking list Does anyone have a copy of a post with Martin's must block

Modifying AD with a CSV Import (Or a proper CSV to LDIF script)

2002-04-24 Thread Purviance, Chad
First, apology if this has been answered a few times, I spent the last 2 hours going through my archive, found some great info on William's wife and Performance errors but not a method to automate the creation of the LDIF from a CSV for LDIFDE. Basic issue is an NT4 to AD upgrade, the Last name a

RE: Virus List

2002-04-24 Thread Majetic, John RAME
In a perfect world yes, but in my company all someone has to do is claim I am causing them to lose a sale, and all rules, and most common sense goes out the window. Sad but true. John Majetic -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread Cross, Tom
Runs great, we have 8, 2K machines running 5.5 SP4. -Original Message- From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server Does Exchange 5.5 run happily on Windows 2000 se

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server I am running E5.5 SP4 on our Windows 2000 DC's -Original Message- From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server Does Exchange 5.5 run

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread Steve Ens
Works great for me...(even with ArcserveIT)...on a clean install of Win2K. -Original Message- From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server Does Exchange 5.5 run happily on Wind

The file extension blocking list

2002-04-24 Thread Bob Falkenberg
Does anyone have a copy of a post with Martin's must block file extension list they can post? I need to run it past the boss to get approval. Bob F. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread NeoNexus Support
Works fine here. I had Exch 5.5 on NT4. Built Win2K from scratch, and loaded Exch 5.5 on it. Then MOVEd mailboxes over. Even installed OWA and it was able to keep up with me. About 25 users. The only caveat, make sure both Exch 5.5 had similar installations, same SP loaded, and were able to se

RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread William Lefkovics
More than happily. Fresh install or upgrade from NT underneath? William -Original Message- From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server Does Exchange 5.5 run happily on Window

RE: Virus List

2002-04-24 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: RE: Virus List Why are your users sending each other exe and com files? I never allow such files in through email. I return them to sender. Users who exchange such files really should zip or rar them -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server

2002-04-24 Thread Tony Flannery
Does Exchange 5.5 run happily on Windows 2000 server ? Has anyone experienced problems with this configuration ? Thanks, Tony. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Virus List

2002-04-24 Thread Majetic, John RAME
Well maybe I wasn't specific enough. All the big AV sorces seem to have these, and they all seem to work with varing levels of success. For instance if you search on the phrase "I love You" at NAI or Trend they find nothing. If you search on "Naked Wife" they find said virus. At CompAss, at Willi

Auto-Accept for Resources

2002-04-24 Thread Rick Ward - HQ
Title: Message Anyone know of a good(read:100% reliable) 3rd party product for resource bookings?   Environment - Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on WIN2K SP2 I tried the auto-accept script and it's not as robust as we need (short of programming it in). We're currently using SLIPSTICK .. but i

RE: thank god for test lans

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message right i saw that.. but what do you do about it? -Original Message-From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: thank god for test lans     http://support.microsoft.com/

RE: thank god for test lans

2002-04-24 Thread Salvador Manzo
Title: Message     http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q266367    #define JET_errPageSizeMismatch -1213 /* The database page size does not match the engine */ -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message its set to the local server as default -Original Message-From: Matt Bullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Admin hanging Is the admin program connecting to the server as a defa

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread Matt Bullock
Title: RE: Admin hanging Is the admin program connecting to the server as a default?  I have seen the admin program hang on creating a new mailbox if the default server wasnt set in User Manager for Domains. -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sen

AW: SMTP Header

2002-04-24 Thread Rickenbacher Beat
Title: SMTP Header Q281224 (with the help of the METAEdit Tool, Download URL in the Q)   Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Angela Holden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. April 2002 16:43An: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesBetreff: SMTP Header Hi I have a prob

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread Ray Zorz
Title: RE: Additional Email Addresses Our standard was First inital last name.  I had about 50 users, some with rather long or unusual names.  Many spoke with people all over the world, and finally I added First initial Last initial as an additional address.  This way, instead of trying to s

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: RE: Admin hanging Any admin client that connects to the server I did an integrity check and the DB isnt consistent. Im gonna exmerge the data out just in case I do a recover on the DB and it wont come back online. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread Patrick Rouse
I'm not concerned about internal emails because they just use the GAL or type first name, part of last name & let Outlook Resolve the rest. I was wondering if there was any Exchange 2000 native thing I could do redirect non-exact incoming emails (mis-typing or mispellings) to their intended recip

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread Kelly_Borndale
What happens to the server when you are deleting the mailbox? Is this just the one exchange admin client, or if you installed the client on another machine is the same behaviour occuring? ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct d

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread William Lefkovics
Title: RE: Additional Email Addresses It may be in RFC2821. http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html   Handling variants might be a little different than "any email addressed to mcarp*@*.sarma.com goes to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "   William         --

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message Wildcards are not allowed.  That is the violation...     Don ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message Oh, and you should read it, there is very valuable information in there.  Not to mention RFC 2821 and many others that I'll not mention     Don ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobi

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: RE: Additional Email Addresses What exactly is in violation of RFC2822? I am not reading that beast. Anything specific? I understand your problem Patrick. I have that happen, but can not imagine dealing with such names. I use a 3rd party app to do filtering, and I set up a rule to ret

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread William Lefkovics
Certainly an option. My brother does that. I will not. (though my name is not all that long or anything). -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Additional Email Addresse

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread Lathrum Matt-P55173
Perhaps I'm overlooking something, but why not just add an email alias with a shortened nickname? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message- From: William Lefko

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread William Lefkovics
I have a friend from Sri Lanka, Sivarajah Sivaguranathar. We call him Siva-Siva. You could create some event sink that would do this for you, but it is not inherent in basic SMTP itself to allow wildcards. William -Original Message- From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message This is nutty server has been re serviced packed. It has been booted I can delete DL's but not mailboxes -Original Message-From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:

RE: settle this

2002-04-24 Thread Ben Winzenz
Yep - you are definitely right. I also referenced my wonderful book by Tony Redmond and it states quite clearly that you are limited to 5 databases per storage group, and 4 storage groups per server. He goes on to say that the actual limit is 6 databases per storage group, but one is reserved fo

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread Patrick Rouse
D^mn. Oh well, we only have 75 lusers so it's pretty easy to reroute or DELETE misaddressed emails. Just checking for alternatives. Thanks William. > That would be in violation of RFC2822. > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent:

RE: Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread William Lefkovics
That would be in violation of RFC2822. William -Original Message- From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Additional Email Addresses Using Exchange 2000SP2, everone's email addresses are %firstinitia

Additional Email Addresses

2002-04-24 Thread Patrick Rouse
Using Exchange 2000SP2, everone's email addresses are %firstinitial%Lastname. For users with long or commonly mispelled names I add the alterations of the correct spellings as additional SMTP Addresses on their account. i.e. dfleming - dflemming rmlodzik - rmoldzik gsmith - gsmit you get the id

RE: unable to disable relaying in Exchange 2000

2002-04-24 Thread William Lefkovics
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q310380 William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, WLKMMAS -Original Message- From: Jon Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: unable to disable relaying in Exchange 2000

RE: unable to disable relaying in Exchange 2000

2002-04-24 Thread Jon Farr
You can use the article John listed as a reference, or I use an article from the Exch 5.5 documentation (Configuring the Internet Mail Service). Haven't seen a specific E2K one yet. On ours, I've configured the relay settings to allow relay only to addresses on the list, and have our subnets

RE: Virus List

2002-04-24 Thread William Lefkovics
Don't most Antivirus vendors have searchable virus libraries? I think you can search: Trend - www.antivirus.com and CompAss - www.cai.com Using text from the body or subject of a suspected infected email. William -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Se

RE: Virus List

2002-04-24 Thread Clark, Steve
Nai Sarc Just about all of them have it Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support

Virus List

2002-04-24 Thread Majetic, John RAME
Hey does anyone out there know of a virus List or Library that would let you search for a mail virus bye the subject line, uuch as "I LoveYou", "Pictures or your Naked Wife", etc? Thanks John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Problem mailbox in 5.5

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
Call PSS -Original Message- From: Jon Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Problem mailbox in 5.5 I've got a mailbox I can't get access to /can't get rid of and some issues with the store/priv.edb. The server's r

RE: unable to disable relaying in Exchange 2000

2002-04-24 Thread Majetic, John RAME
Have you restarted the IMC service? I know in 5.5 if you make changes to the routing you have to restart the IMC. I would maybe also restart the MTA just in case. http://www.ntsecurity.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 covers turning of relaying in 5.5 really well. Got it from someone on the

Problem mailbox in 5.5

2002-04-24 Thread Jon Farr
I've got a mailbox I can't get access to /can't get rid of and some issues with the store/priv.edb. The server's running 5.5 SP4 in an 2K native mode domain. I noticed that the store.exe process was gobbling up CPU time (~50% on dual P3 800's). When I try to stop the process, it hangs. I can m

RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4

2002-04-24 Thread Majetic, John RAME
I have spent at least 40 hours trying to figure out various problems with McAfee, both online and on the phone, and I am no closer to solving them at all. First time I installed Trend Neat Suite it took me 3 hours, 1 hour to read the manuals and two to set everything up, and make sure it tested

unable to disable relaying in Exchange 2000

2002-04-24 Thread Matt Vance
I am having a problem shutting off relaying on a Exchange 2000 server. I had it turned off (confirmed by being removed from the ORBS list). In trying to fix some problems that one user was having sending mail from his Mac, I turned it back on (and tried turning off "Anonymous access", which stopp

RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4

2002-04-24 Thread Kent, Larry SYNETICS
Title: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4 If you now how to configure it, it works fine.  Stop blaming the software. We run Webshield, Netshield, Groupshield and VirusScan here and NEVER get infected. Outbreak Manager works well also.  We have premier support and it works well for

RE: Restricting OWA

2002-04-24 Thread Martin Blackstone
Enron? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting OWA Huh? Mgmt trustworthy? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (33

RE: Restricting OWA

2002-04-24 Thread DanM . HQ
I actually typed that firstthen I wasn't sureand I changed it Dan Munley -Original Message- From: Whitby.Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting OWA Actually, it was the "Cone" of Si

RE: Restricting OWA

2002-04-24 Thread DanM . HQ
absolutely .at this moment there are no plans to outsource your position... Dan Munley MIS Department (201)930-0100 ext. 308 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restr

RE: Restricting OWA

2002-04-24 Thread DanM . HQ
more access, more opportunity Dan Munley MIS Department -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting OWA But what about management who is always much more trust

RE: Restricting OWE

2002-04-24 Thread DanM . HQ
And THAT is the answer I need to give them. Thank you. I have always been impressed with knowledge you and others have presented on the list. I have personally and professionally benefited from that knowledge as I have been lurking for some time and occasionally post.I have thoroughly enjoy

RE: Restricting OWA

2002-04-24 Thread Whitby.Charles
Actually, it was the "Cone" of Silence.. ...vague Get Smart fan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Restricting OWA then I would have to get 100 of them. No, that wo

thank god for test lans

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message ive got a test lan which has an exact copy of our live lan's AD I was going to do a defrag of the database on the test land I ran ESENTUTL /d ntds.dit I got a -1213 error..   we are sp2. any ideas?   Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message i can delete DL's but not mailboxes or CR's -Original Message-From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Admin hanging We had that problem occur when one of our s

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message i re serviced packed it today, same issue -Original Message-From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Admin hanging We had that problem occur when one of our sit

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread Thompson, Elizabeth
Title: RE: Admin hanging We had that problem occur when one of our sites was a revision behind (SP3 instead of sp4 like the rest of us.)   it occurred when we attempted to delete or move a user from that server, but went away when we service packed it...   Liz -Original Message-Fr

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: Message its the admin program hanging -Original Message-From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Admin hanging Is it Exchange Admin on your workstation or on the serv

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread Dimitri Limanovski
Title: RE: Admin hanging Is it Exchange Admin on your workstation or on the server? I had this problem when Admin was installed on my local machine and was hanging every time I'd try to delete mailbox or CR - ended up reinstalling it from the CD.   Dimitri P.S. You gotta love Notes formatt

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: RE: Admin hanging Exchange 5.5 sp4 I can delete a DL quickly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Admin hanging I got the wrong idea when I saw the subject..

SMTP Header

2002-04-24 Thread Angela Holden
Title: SMTP Header Hi I have a problem with SMTP header information. Ours is currently displaying the version of Exchange, and the exchange server's internal IP address. Is there anything I can do to turn this off, or at least mask it? Thanks Ang List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: RE: Admin hanging E 5.5 sp4 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Admin hanging I got the wrong idea when I saw the subject... Is this 5.5 or 2000?  How qui

SMTP Virtual Server Queues

2002-04-24 Thread bob roberts
Hello all. I have a question I'm hoping someone can assist me with regarding STMP queues. I currently have one Exchange 2000 mailbox server and an Exchange 5.5 IMC server. I just added another Exchange 2000 server which will eventually replace my existing 5.5 server. I changed my mx record to

RE: Restricting OWA

2002-04-24 Thread Ely, Don
Huh? Mgmt trustworthy? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread Kelly_Borndale
I got the wrong idea when I saw the subject... Is this 5.5 or 2000? How quick does it move if you were to delete a DL or CR? ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com "One man's ceiling

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread Ely, Don
Title: Message BAS Syndrome (tm)     Don ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:

RE: settle this

2002-04-24 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: Message Complex seems to be arousing for many techs. Hmmm...that sounded bad didn't it? lol   -Original Message- From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: settle this   Well, just so

Exchange 5.5 and fax problems

2002-04-24 Thread Ambrose, Joseph
We have been seeing a problem with sending faxes through Exchange. When a user sends a fax to 1(262)xxx- Exchange converts the (262) to a C destroying the fax number. MSKB article Q272714 addresses this, for Ex 5.5 sp3. We are at sp4. Has anyone seen this ? We are using Omtool's Fax Sr. f

  1   2   >