Basically, I have 2 questions of the tracking log :
Question 1:
Recently, one of my user always complains that he received a few messages
after a few hours/days, after the local user sent him. I had checked the
message property of his message, showing that Sent and Received date is
the same. I
I beg to differ, but NAV 2.5 was an Exchange 5.5 release. At least it was
running on ours (maybe that's why it didn't perform well G)
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 314-0197 cell
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a, OL98.
Has anybody had problems using Word as your E-mail editor? I've got a user
that frequently has Word
freeze up when she has one document open, and then tries to open another one
via an attachment
through E-mail. I'm pretty sure I had documentation on this
The question you need to ask is if anybody hasn't had some sort of problem with Word
as the Email Editor. I had a user who frequently had the same problem you did. As
soon as we told them to use the default email editor all was better.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert
DON'T DO IT!
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 April 2002 12:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Word as your E-mail
Any takers on this one?
Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site: www.conference-board.org
-Original Message-
From: Ambrose, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
We've been telling users for a LONG time not to use Word as their E-mail
editor, but this user is a bit higher on
the food chain, so I'm trying to find documentation on it. Anybody seen
any?
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April
I believe if you check Norton's website you will find that the information
given was correct. Nav 2.1x is release supported on Ex5.5
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Maybe it's my memory. It's been a while since we ran that product, add in
old age, Monday morning, a freak April snow storm, lack of a local
Starbucks, and things get a bit fuzzy.
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115
Hi,
I suddenly started getting errors from ARCserve 2000 E8601 Failed to
connect agent. (AGENT=dbaxchg2, EC=402) and while I could find all
manner of patches and fixes for similar problems, none of them seemed to
be appropriate in this case. I have now found the solution and wanted to
share it
Title: Message
I could not access the site this morning,
but the app is called TweakOL, at www.mcdev.com
-Original Message-
From: Gérard Dumazet
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002
11:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE : RE : Outlook
Title: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
Depends on your domain. Is it NT4 or AD? If the domain is using WINS, be sure your WINS servers are identified in TCPIP
-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:48 AM
To:
I'm seeing a rather strange problem here. When users attempt to send mail to 1
particular domain... it's taking hours for the mail to get there. I have seen this
once before. Here's what I see happening:
Users on my side are attempting to email people at another domain. The e-mail
Title: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
Hoo hoo!!
-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
Thanks Carol, and all. I
Well, If it is one particular domain and it works everywhere else, I think you
already absolved yourself of any wrongdoing.
besides [EMAIL PROTECTED] is always easier anyway.
just my 2c.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29,
Check out http://www.woodyswatch.com/office/archtemplate.asp?v6-n20
What he says about Office XP pretty much goes for any version of word and
outlook working together. I am sure if you search the archives you can find
the same thing about Outlook 98.
John Majetic
-Original Message-
Title: RE: Mailbox size limits
I am trying to implement limits here. There
are currently none. I have 8 users at over 700 MB. Although disk space is not
really an issue at the moment, most of said users are remote, and whine about
slow VPN time for their mail. Hmmm...I wonder.
Title: RE: Mailbox size limits
LMAO
Yeah that will happen anytime soon!
-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits
charging resource costs back to departments
Title: Message
Aren't you walking on thin ice by
mandating a mass delete based on age? I would be massacred for that.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:55
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox
Are there any differences in the MX records for mail.domain.com and
domain.com? The DNS zones for these domains are hosted on the same server?
If you try to send some mail manually, via telnet, do you see any suspicious
looking errors?
Cheers,
Marty
-Original Message-
From: Preston
Yeah... unfortunately, my boss wants a little more of an answer. This did happen with
another domain (incidentally both are gov't agencies, both used this non-standard
addressing, and I think both are running Groupwise). So, this time I need some more
ammo.
-Original Message-
From:
This is perfect. Thanks sir.
-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Word as your E-mail editor (OL98)
Check out http://www.woodyswatch.com/office/archtemplate.asp?v6-n20
Well I just tried to circumvent the error by just emailing domain.com and got a 550...
relaying prohibited.
-Original Message-
From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww delivery of e-mail
Did you try telneting mail.domain.com 25 and then do a helo and try to send a message?
This will connect on the smtp port and shouldn't take but a cpl seconds for most
sites.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:50 AM
I am running Exchange 5.5 spk 4 on an NT4.0 spk 6a Server. My users are
using Win98 with Outlook. They are trying to access a certian Public
Folder that everyone has access to. Nothing has changed on the server,
but when they try to access the Public Folder, their CPU spikes to 100%
and locks
Title: Message
whats
the budget
how
many feet are you looking at
inside/outside/Line of sight ?
Whats
the climate (rainy, etc)
-Original Message-From: Graeme Carstairs
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OT: Wireless
Title: Message
you
mean instead of all the DLs in the GAL ?
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message,
including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or
Title: RE: Mailbox size limits
LOL, now class, that is what we call a strict admin.
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 17:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits
60 mb limit. No matter who it
Title: RE: 16 GB Limit?
you are correct. Standard has the 16gig limit. Enterprise does not
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
O.K. wierdness continues. I went over to our SMTP relay (Ex 5.5 sp4) to see what was
going on. In the queue I've got a message I sent to opb about 30 min ago... if you
look at it's details it says network error during host resolution. If I telnet to
port 25 on mail.domain.com from the dmz
Hrm... do you think exchange is freaking out because they don't have an mx record for
mail.opb.state.ga.us? They have one for opb.state.ga.us ... which gives us the
relaying error... but not for mail.opb.state.ga.us.
opb.state.ga.us 86400 IN MX 10 mail.opb.state.ga.us
Title: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
what version of Exchange
-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 06:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
Folks,
I keep
Title: RE: MS Exchange outbound E-mail
what version of Exchange
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
Title: RE: OWA
per
user or per site ?
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message,
including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
I just sent a mail to myself from hotmail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I got an NDR,
I also do not have an MX record for mail.domain.com but i do have one for domain.com
and that mail arrives instantly..
This might be your answer, sir.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares
Title: RE: How much time should I be allowing for Exchange 5.5 SP3 ---SP4
Full backup before SPing
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
Someone outside the company is claiming that they recieved emails from both
postmaster systems administrator that contained viruses. How can I go
back and track this email? I don't have the screen shots that this person is
claiming to have. thanks in advance.
dave
List Charter and FAQ at:
I do not know if this is your issue but my company was experiencing a
denial of service attack on our mail server the other day from several
IP address. I had to block those ports on my firewall. They were
making hundreds of port 25 connections every minute. Maybe this is
happening at the
Title: Message
What
version of Exchange ?
maybe
MIMEsweeper, MailMarshal
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message,
including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use,
Klez spoofs the address so it may not have come from you.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Opps forgot to ask if the same 16GB limit is present in Exchange Server
2000, and not in exchange server 2000 enterprise?
John Majetic
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB
Title: Message
All
users know that this is being done and that they must move items to a pst if
they want to keep it longer than 45 days, and this mandate was approved by upper
level mgmt...
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
What kind of NDR did you get? It could have been that your mail server wasn't set up
to route mail.domain.com as inbound.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slwww
Yup, E2k Standard is still limited to 16GB, and as far as I know,
Enterprise to 16TB.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 29 April 2002 15:27
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: 16 GB Limit?
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?
Opps
Title: Message
Awesome! I do not have the luxury
unfortunately.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:17
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox size limits
All users know that this
is being
Title: Notification:
Notification: Inbound Mail Failure
Out of curiosity on my Exchange 5.5 sp3 running on NT4 server, in IMS I turned on Always send notification when Non delivery reports are generated and boy I am amazed how much rubbish mail is bouncing around. All the mailboxes of
Title: RE: How much time should I be allowing for Exchange 5.5 SP3 ---S P4
All going well it should take less than 15 minutes. It stops all the services applies the service pack and then restarts the services again, if you want it to. And yes make sure you have a full backup.
-Original
Title: Notification:
Depending on the source, some of these junk mail senders never clean out
their lists. So, unless you can unsubscribe the non existent mail box they
will continue to send mail until they decide to update the list or forever,
which ever comes first. Also, the junk mailers
Title: Notification:
I set mine to deliver to my mailbox too. I
see messages hopping for weeks, and Chris is right, some of these guys never
clean their lists up. Since I added a 3rd party filter though, most
of this crap never sees Exchange at all, and thus never cause a load. I am
Title: Notification:
I just got blocked by the list for saying c__p.
Here is my original message. Sorry all, I didn't mean to offend any of
you buggard techs!
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:13
AM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Hahahahahahhahaha
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Pamela Gengler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Personal
Title: RE: Personal Folders
www.lostpassword.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
what a jack*ss ;)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
Posted At: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:32 AM
Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server
Conversation: Personal Folders
Subject: RE: Personal Folders
Hahahahahahhahaha
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Regressive hypnosis? If that fails, you could try scouring the net for a
program called pst19upg. You'll have to move the .pst over to a PC first,
since it doesn't run on a Mac.
RegardsRuan Kotze
MCSE, Master ASE
For: Comparex Namibia
-Original Message-
From: Pamela Gengler
yea i saw that on K-PAX... very possible. haha
-Original Message-
From: Ruan Kotze - CPX NAM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:40 AM
Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server
Conversation: Personal Folders
Subject: RE: Personal Folders
Regressive hypnosis? If that
I had to laugh. Then someone gave the answer I was going to give. So I
just left the list with the laugher I got from the question.. I really
do feel for that Admin.
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original
Just indulging in a little wishful thinking.
We have a general IT rule of thumb - if it (1) makes sense and (2) would
solve ongoing issues, then it will most likely never happen.
What was it Mike Meyers (Wayne's World) used to say?.. something like
yeah, that'll happen, when monkeys will fly
Title: RE: track an email
What OS
What version of Exchange
Any SPAM or filtering s/w
What AV
What kind of firewall and/or proxy
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
Each server requires it's own DB and logs. IMS can be shared out of a
single server.
IIRC, the preferred configuration (if you have the disks) is Mirrored Logs
and OS partition and Raid 5 Database partition. However, a straight RAID 5
wil work (might not be optimal, but it will work)
Title: RE: track an email
Dave Eldridge, this may be the Virus spoofing the address's and your not
infected. for example
w32/Klez virusesAll virus company's have data on this virus such as
trend etc.
Get him to send you the name of the virus he found then
you can check it out.
regards
What is the recommended calendar for using this defrag tool?
Once a month?
Twice a year?
Once a decade?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Ok that's great,
I've got a server built to that spec with NT4/exchange installed patched and
Joined to the existing site now.
If I now use the Mailbox move function within exchange admin I can move a
mailbox (mine) to the new server, connect using outlook and all looks well.
I can send an
Title: Message
Only
when necessary?
Only
during DR procedures?
Only
under direction of PSS?
Only
if you're encountering the 16GB DB limit in the Standard
version?
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29,
2002 12:41
Opps wanted to add that I've not installed IMS on the second server as I
wish to use the 1st servers IMS.
cheers
-Original Message-
From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 April 2002 17:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sizing second server in a site
Ok that's
Title: Message
I like
to run it every Monday morning just to piss off my users for the
day.
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Deja Vu :)
Regards
Ruan Kotze
MCSE, Master ASE
For: Comparex Namibia
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 4:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Regular offline defrags: definitive answer
I guess Ed is not busy enough
You'll have to allow relaying from the second server on the first server's
IMC. Also, depending on your network topology, you may want to try adding
an LMHOST entry for the other server on each Exchange machine. It
_shouldn't_ be necessary, esp. if using WINS, but it could be worth a look.
Title: Message
Seriously?
This server has been up for 4 years, and I
am pretty sure it has never been run. Does it fragment like a normal hard drive
on a workstation or server would, which needs regular maintenance?
Exch 5.5 SP4
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
Title: Message
it
gets regular maintance.. it is a database.
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29,
2002 9:52
Title: RE: ESEUTIL
I had a feeling this had come up before. I appreciate the note.
I was misinformed, then, that the ONLINE defrag was not enough. That the online defrag was OK, but an offline ESEUTIL was necessary routinely.
-Original Message-
From: Ruan Kotze - CPX NAM
Title: Message
Yes,
seriously!
Leave
it up for another 4 years without running it too. It runs its own online
defrag every night. That is more than plenty. Look for Event ID 1221
to find out how much white space is created each night.
Oh, I
forgot...
Only
if you've migrated mass
Title: Message
DB
Maintenance and a defrag run automatically every night (check your logs for
Event 1221). Any whitespace recovered from either the auto defrag or
running ESEUTIL will be used again very shortly through normal server use.
The
space recovered (which again will get used
New around here, huh?
Never.
- Original Message -
From:
Matthew
Carpenter
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:41
PM
Subject: ESEUTIL
What is the recommended calendar
for using this defrag tool?
Once a month?
Twice a
Title: Message
Thanks all. I am glad I didn't run
it then
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:52
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Yes, seriously!
Leave it up for another 4
years
Cool. Priv has 1.2 GB of free space. Pub
has 56 MB. I never looked closely at those defrag Ids. Thanks again
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:03
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ESEUTIL
New
I
have asked others on the NT list about this, but maybe you guys know the
answer. Are there tools to monitor Event Viewers for Servers remotely? I am
looking to ease my life by making this a bit easier. I would like to look at
multiple logs at once
-Original Message-
From:
Title: RE: Event Viewer
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I have asked others on the NT list about this, but maybe you guys know the answer. Are there tools to monitor Event Viewers
for Servers remotely? I am looking to ease my life by making this a bit easier. I would
Title: RE: Event Viewer
You
can view the event log of any machine on your network from your local event
viewer. And you can open multiple copies of Event Viewer if you really
need to do that.
-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April
Title: RE: Event Viewer
Never mind all. Ignore me today. I am
having serious mental deficiencies this Monday morn...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:24
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Event
I'm having a memory issue on my Exchange server, I'm not entirely sure if
it is related to exchange, but since that's the only application running
(other than IIS for OWA), I thought I'd ask here.
Our server has 256mb ram (low, but we're small). Running Exchange 5.5 Sp4
on NT4 Sp6. The
Title: Message
Well,
it was one of those situations where we cannot add more drives to the Exchange
box unless we get a new box, mgmt doesn't want to spend the money on that, mgmt.
doesn't want to spend the money to upgrade to Enterprise, (if
ExchangeEnterprise 5.5 were available) mgmt.
Title: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
5.5
SP4. Now resolved. Problem was Exchange wasn't registered in
DNS.
Thanks
Frank
-Original Message-From: Precht, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 29 April 2002
15:23To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MS
Title: RE: High CPU on Public Folder
How large is the public folder?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:14
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: High CPU on Public Folder
I am running Exchange 5.5 spk 4 on an NT4.0
Title: Message
LOL having a bit of weight to throw around
IS fun! Too bad it takes so much to get things done. I am afraid mine would
come to that before I could get anything done too.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April
When a person leaves I delete his NT account. I remove his mailbox on the
server from any DSs it's in, and then hide the mailbox from the GAL. I will
check the box every week, and unsubscribe him/her from any emails group/
lists that I can. After a month I will delete the box, and assign the
Title: Message
I have
a "Terminated Employees" mailbox that is hidden from the GAL, that I add the
SMPT address of former employees to it. I made myself the owner of this
mailbox, went into it and setup a rule to move all incoming messages to the
deleted items folder. There is apparently no
Title: Message
NDRs By William LefkovicsThe
blackhole is to create a DL that has multiple SMTP addresses of ex-employees,
but make sure there's no members in the DL. Messages sent to the relevant SMTP
addresses simply vanish. Shame you can't put a few selected people into the DL
as well.
Running Exchange 5.5 SP2 on NT 4.0 SP6 with Outlook 2000 SR1 as a client. A
user shares his Contacts with his assistant. The user has 32 contacts in his
Contacts folder but the assistant only sees 4 when she opens his shared
folder, although the status bar on the lower left side of Outlook
Title: RE: Notification:
Ahh, good idea. I wish I had thought of that...
-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Notification:
When a person leaves I delete his NT
Never mind. I get the duh award today. I'll just add it to my shelf with
the rest of the duh awards. Owner of the mailbox had most of his Contacts
marked private.
duh...
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:16 PM
To:
Not to mention the latest security vulernability that MS finally
acknowledged.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-021.asp
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
On one of our test OWA servers, if receive a meeting request I cannot click the
accept, decline, or tentative buttons. Doing so results in an IE popup that states
unable to perform the operation. I originally experienced this problem on another
test OWA server that has IISLockDown installed,
Sorry, forgot to mention this is an Exchange 2000 SP2 front-end server.
Jon Bonner
-Original Message-
From: Bonner, Jon
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA problem
On one of our test OWA servers, if receive a meeting request I cannot click
Title: Message
I'm
been using the old 2Mbps Enterasys (Digital) RoamAbout building-to-building
wireless bridges for a few years for 3 wireless links, with few
problems.
They
now have 802.11b 11Mbps models.
I've
not gotten around to upgrading my links yet, so I can't speak to their new
Hi All,
Can anybody help me out to subscribe to a free mail
service like yahoo , which offers atleast 6 to 7 mb
mailbox size with pop3 smtp support anything .
Previously I used to have all the mails of this list
coming to my yahoo account which I download at home pc
and then go through them
www.myrealbox.com
They also offer IMAP support.
-Original Message-
From: harshang shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Help Needed !
Hi All,
Can anybody help me out to subscribe to a free mail
service like yahoo ,
Has anyone else here had an issue with sales people wanting
to use BULK MAILERS??
I am fighting this fight here. User states that they are an
OPT IN mailer group (meaning legal), but this is a SERIOUS issue with my
servers, even if they are (which I am not sold that it is). Has anyone
I would think you could create forms for each identity.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Question on Exchange 2000 Outlook 2002
I should have been more specifc. I'd like
Title: RE: Help Needed !
Nice. I have been looking for this for awhile too since hotmail became a pain in the a*s and yahoo did it's recent pay change.
$10 per email? Man I had think twice before checking that box. Lol
If you don't get that one, check out the site
-Original
Are
they reallygonna spam, or are only trying to figure out a better way to
send out personalized e-mail to their existing customers?
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:50
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
