The mailbox limit won't override the IMS. Let us know what happens when
you disable the size limit on the IMS and restart it.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 01 May 2002 17:53
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Attachment
PST=BAD is a bad equation. It should be PST=Usually Bad. Sometimes, you
don't have any choice. For instance, when doing migrations or moving
mailboxes. However, generally you shouldn't use them for permanent storage.
They are actually very similar to the old MSMail format for storing mail
which
Title: RE: PST Bad - why?
Please elaborate more on the issue. I'm also in a dilemma. My users are hard headed when it comes to mailbox size.
One way is to go .PST. My disk space is now only 560k.
TIA.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: RE: PST Bad - why?
Wally,
Kumusta po kayo?
The
.pst will take up disk space. Some companies will have separate budgets for NT
servers and Exchange servers so you end up with lots of disk space on home
drives but no spare capacity in the Exchange server IS. A choice a lot of
Title: Message
Man
(woman) does not live by e-mail alone. On the 7th day, God rested and
looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost
perfect. Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the world
was perfect.
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Title: Message
okay,
i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme' ?
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence
Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002
11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB
Limit?
Man
(woman) does not live by
http://www.krispykreme.com/
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 02 May 2002 12:24
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: 16 GB Limit?
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?
okay, i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme' ?
-Original
wow.. looks nice, shame all we have round here is staniforths - they sell
jam doughnuts but that's it.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?
The
only thing I experienced with watchguard was that there are/had
beenproblems with other mail servers if you use the
standardEHLO-Command (ESMTP-Command).It seems to get an error at
AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN probably causeit's an ESMTP-Keyword with spaces in
between.
After
I checked the
Title: RE: 16 GB Limit?
M, they melt in your mouth, especially when you walk into a store and they have someone handing out samples of freshly made, still warm, donuts...
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:40 AM
Are
there any known issues I should be aware of concerning running a 3rd
party defrag on an NT4 Exchange box? I.e. DiskKeeper, etc.
NT4
SP6 Exch 5.5 SP4
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exclude everything related to Exchange. Only defrag the OS.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed
A viable alternative for those of us stranded up in the Northeast. Coffee's
pretty good too.
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 314-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Title: RE: PST Bad - why?
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htmtells
all you need to know on the subject...
- Original Message -
From:
Lesaca, Wally
R.
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:48
AM
Subject: RE: PST Bad - why?
Title: Message
Well, we'd love to help you sort this out, but
there simply isn't enough information to run with here.
Missy
- Original Message -
From:
Steve Hart
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:59
PM
Subject: Congestion
I
Title: Message
There
you're very right...
But
meanwhile he can search for "exchange congestion" and will receive some Q's in
return...
Ricki
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Missy Koslosky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002
15:14An: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
One would hope that was done before the list was
ever asked about the question.
- Original Message -
From:
Rickenbacher Beat
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:23
AM
Subject: AW: Congestion
There you're very right...
I have changed the IMS connector from 10MB to NO limit and all attachments
are going through fine. The 10MB limit was setup for past 6 months and
doesnot had any problems. One of my user yesterday was trying to send 4MB
attachment and was still getting the same message 'Message exceeds size
Title: Message
Sure...
You are a dreamer
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:27
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Congestion
One would hope that was done before
the list was ever asked about the
Glad it's now working. Everyone who said it is the remote end is
sacked! :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 02 May 2002 14:32
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Attachment sending problem
Subject: RE: Attachment sending
If you recieve an email with this message in the subject line it is a
virus. Do not open the attachment, and immediately scan your system for
infections.
regards,
Maggie
---Original Message---
From: NAV for Microsoft
oh yeah that's nasty one. The subject line will change as will the
payloaddepending on what is in the senders inbox. very sneaky very
bad.
Matt
- Original Message -
From:
whitton
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:53
AM
Subject: Fw: Norton
Where do they collect their P45?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 14:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem
Glad it's now working. Everyone who said it is the remote end is
sacked! :-)
Neil
Title: RE: Attachment sending problem
Well, that initial message he was sending sure looked like it was the remote. Plus, I don't understand why 4 MB attachments were not passing through a 10 MB limit? Unless that email content was dammm long.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson
I know what you mean; some NDRs are very misleading. I agree, the 4Mb
problem does seem weird; even with a hefty 40% encoding on top, that
doesn't make 10Mb.
Mind you, I have seen some strange things recently with a customer who
had a message storm caused by what was originally a 2k message
Eat one doughnut and the taste will stay with you all day. The power of
preservatives.
~
-K.Borndale
IT Manager
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
N!
Your receovery server has to exactly match your production server. Same OS
same OS service packs same OS security patches. Same Version of Exchange
and same exchange patches.
I did this last week if you like I can send you step by step notes on how I
did this.
-Original
Opps nevermind I see you already got it working. Good job.
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Recovery server
N!
Your receovery server has to exactly match your
Yeah thanks...it works like a charm. I as just about to install Win2K, and
then I thought to service pack it up again. Send the notes anyway, it's
always nice to see someone elses method..
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02,
You do have several excellent credentials - but are you certified to beat
someone senseless?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PST Bad - why?
Tell him I will drive
Hell yes, I have Ninja Power.. Becarefull I might freak out all over. If
you look all over you might even find a picture of me on there site now.
http://www.realultimatepower.net
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
Testify!!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PST Bad - why?
Hell yes, I have Ninja Power.. Becarefull I might freak out all over. If you
look all over you might even find a
Hi Rodney,
Thanks for the mail , I know the use of these logs but
my question is should i copy the
res1.log,res2.log,priv.pat pub.pat files also along
with the edbxxx.log .
Harshang shah
(mcse,ccna)
--- Rodney Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After you have restored your information store, the
LOL
how to reduce helpdesk calls to zero
yes, that's a tough one, sir - we'll have to escalate your call to Ninja
status - someone will contact you shortly...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Why bother eating it. I just stick it under my belt. That's where it ends
up anyway.
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 314-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
I am trying to export my gal to a file . How can I include the last logon to
the mailbox in the .csv file? When I go into Servers,Server,Priv,Mailbox
Resources it show that detail. The only way to get this info is to screen
print it. Is there a way to capture this info.
dave
List Charter and
never mind i found it.
dave
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: print detail on gal
I am trying to export my gal to a file . How can I include the last logon to
the mailbox in
I am
running Exchange 2000. After I created a new mailbox account, it tooks long time
(some time several days and I have to rebuilt GAL) to show up on Global Address
List. I have setup Recipient Update Service(RUS) update interval as always run
and domain controller is GC server.
Any
Title: Message
If
your server is dedicated to the messaging application Exchange, and is
configured properly with store and logs in their respective
drives/spindles/partitions, then I am of the opinion there is no true benefit to
running such an application on your exchange server.
If you
You'd think those Microsoft guys could write a decent NDR. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachment sending problem
Glad it's now working. Everyone who said it is the
Title: Message
Is
this a single site? Single Exchange Server? How many DC's? All
on the same LAN?
If I
make lots of changes, I will manually rebuild the RUS. It's just habit
now.
-Original Message-From: Feng, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002
Title: RE: print detail on gal
you dont want to share with us ?
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 13:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: print detail on gal
never mind i found it.
dave
-Original
Title: RE: PST Bad - why?
nice thought ;)
-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PST Bad - why?
LOL
how to reduce helpdesk calls to zero
yes, that's a tough one, sir - we'll
Title: RE: PST Bad - why?
Kevin, you
said it!!
Wally, We
use psts because our users are also hard headed. Oddly enough, I have only lost
2 psts completely (had to restore from backup) and had to repair 5 of them, out
of 900 users on my site over 2 years. Yes, PSTs have a significant
Title: Message
Would
you say your little network is very busy?
I have
learned that patience is mandatory in Exchange2000
administration.
-Original Message-From: Feng, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002
11:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
That
certain large oil company was nutz.
I
don't mind the .pst deployment, because I believe in openness in our
company. An email to me is an email to everyone. Copy the .pst file
off my pc? Sure. Go ahead!
If you
are using .pst's as your primary email storage, well, then
Title: Message
We
have single site, two DCs and all on the same LAN. It looks like every time when
I create new account (user or group) I have to rebuilt RUS. Otherwise it takes
long time to show up. If I just update some attribute on exist account, that
have no problem.
-Original
Title: RE: print detail on gal
No.
Just the last time they physically logged into the Exchange server.
If you want to look at the last access
time, go to Logons and check the column Last Access Time.
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
ADMIN TEST: Do not reply
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Hello All, I having an error pop up in exchange adminstrator when I try to
pull up someone's mailbox. The error message is: Extension'FUSEREXT' could
not be loaded. The specified module could not be found Microsoft Windows NT
ID no: 0xc002007e. We had just changed the service account password
Do you use any 3rd party apps that integrate with Exchange? Fax server
maybe? Could be a password problem with that Extension.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange
yes we have software called faxination that integrates with exchange. that
gives me a clue to check that.
-Original Message-
From: Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange error message
Do you
Did you change the password on all the services, too?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q157780
William
-Original Message-
From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange
Title: Message
I have
a theory on Watchguard firewalls. They SUCK! SUCK!
SUCK!! SUCK I say! SUCK!
I have
gone to using the Filtered SMTP service for now instead of the Proxied SMTP
service. You will notice other email problems down the road as well when
using the SMTP proxy. Such as other
yeah actually i had that same article and followed the steps. we do have a
third part utility that integrates with exchange. i am checking that
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Title: Message
Don't
you just hate it when someone is wishy-washy and refuses to give an
opinion?
Bruce
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:19
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing
Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message
Title: Message
Don,
would you tell us how you really feel please?
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:19
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing
Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
I
have a
Does anyone have experience working with Team Calendars in Outlook 2000? I
have been instructed to implement Team Calendars, but the support at
Microsoft doesn't give me much to go on for troubleshooting. I've gotten
them to work on all W2K/Office 2K systems, but am having problems with about
Title: RE: Outlook Team Calendars
I know that you have to have CDO installed, but I have not worked with Team Calendar on 98. Only on 2K
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
That's alright Kevin, I think there were a few more people out there
laughing.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Personal Folders
I had to laugh. Then
Title: RE: print detail on gal
Why
does it show people twice. Not everyone but most.
dave
-Original Message-From: Sweetman, John
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:04
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: print detail
on gal
No. Just the last
Title: RE: print detail on gal
They show as having logged on when they check
public folders and other resources.
- Original Message -
From:
Eldridge,
Dave
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:48
PM
Subject: RE: print detail on gal
Why
I've heard they suck - you might try outlook 4 teams (www.outlook4team.com)
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document
I guarantee you you've got another service out there using the same service account
with the old password. It will keep locking out your account until you get it
changed. My suggestion... change the password back to the old password and adjust the
services you know about to get it back
I have a user that claims that he could take an attachment out of outlook
right click, select, Save As, in the save in addres bar, click the arrow
select an ftp location. He calim he could do it before we upgraded to
Windows 2000. When he tries it now he gets the following message. You
cannot
permissions on the unix-box?
/reto
- Original Message -
From: Miguel Bosseloo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:27 PM
Subject: You cannot enter an Internet address here.
I have a user that claims that he could take an
I figured that it would probably be too good to be true, something that
would work that we wouldn't have to pay for. I had a design engineer
introduce Team Calendars to VPEngineering, and he loved it, but, can't get
them to work on his machine. VP, Well, it's working on Joe's machine, I
need it
No I tried it as root and get the same error. thanks anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Reto Inversini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: You cannot enter an Internet address here.
permissions on the unix-box?
See www.slipstick.com for more info.
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Team Calendars
I figured that it would probably be too good to be true, something that
would
This only happens when you first open it correct??
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange
I like the line - well it worked at my last company we'll, yes we did
have notes, no we did not have exchange, yes we used PST's and POP mail
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
Title: Message
That
would be way worse I'm afraid... ;o)
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:39
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing
Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Don,
Title: RE: Outlook XP, Rules
'undocumented feature'
a/k/a a bug
I see every once and while. U have run the rules manually.
-Original Message-
From: Adil Hindistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 17:40
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook XP,
Greetings
folks!
Has anyone heard of or worked with this
product?Any feedback is greatly appreciated!
http://www.goexchange.com/
John Kirkland
MCSE
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
I found that in our environment: OL2K SR-1 and SP2, IE5, XCNG 5.5
These worked very well. The only problems were with folks that had:
IE5.5 with NO SP's.
CDO was not installed
(never tested with 98)
We were all supposed to be up to IE5.5 SP2. The one's who couldn't use it
had a problem with
Title: Outlook 2000 hangs
Whats
her largest email ?
-Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 15:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Outlook 2000
hangs
How much mail is in her mailbox?
What happens if you
Title: Outlook 2000 hangs
check
the sync log
-Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 13:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook 2000
hangs
Hello all,
Environment: Exchange 5.5 (sp3) Enterprise, server OS:
Title: Message
Yep.
No fix in SP1 either.
-Original Message-From: Precht, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002
3:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook
XP, Rules
'undocumented feature' a/k/a a
bug
I see every once and
Well, usually yes I am not sure if it's the only time, did not notice
really.
Adil Hindistan, CE-93, MCSA, MCSE
ICQ : 26477783
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook
Happens to me all the time. Only after the Current folder highlight gets
stuck and I have to close outlook. This was a feature in 98 and is back
in 2002. Look for it to go away in the next version if we are lucky.
It will only happen when you first open.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
Title: Outlook 2000 hangs
Is the
preview pane on?
-Original Message-From: Precht, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:23
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 2000
hangs
Whats her largest email ?
-Original
Title: Exchange newbie
I am trying to upgrade an NT4.0 Exchange 5.5 sp6 server that is in use full time to a Windows 2000 Exchange 2000 machine.
The exchange 5.5 server has been used for some 5 years with no problems. The old server was misconfigured to with a different netbios name from mx
Title: MS Exchange MDB Private and Public out of space
Please help me on what's the best thing to do.
Running WINNT 4 sp5 MS Exchange 5.5 sp4.
I only got 9 gb and it's now full.
What's the best thing for me to do ?
Please do help.
List Charter and FAQ at:
Title: MS Exchange MDB Private and Public out of space
Clean
out all files that you can.
Figure
out how much white space you have, if any (EventID 1221,
IIRC)
Report
back to the list.
-Original Message-From: Lesaca, Wally R.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 02,
Title: Message
OK,
How big is the Priv and Pub?
What
about log files? Are you using an Exchange aware backup program that will flush
the logs?
-Original Message-From: Lesaca, Wally R.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:15
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
so I
take you were not happy with your Watchguard box ;) Maybe you should look
at setting up a Linux firewall. Then you can modify it to your heart's
content.
I
understand that PIX has it's own set of idiosyncrasies when related to
email.
-Original Message-From:
Title: Message
Linux? Wouldn't you want to deploy one on a
remotely secure operating system?
OpenBSD, baby!
-Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:08
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing
Unknown
Title: Message
Linux should be secure, there are thousands of people
coding and checking it ;)
-Original
Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002
10:37To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing
Unknown SMTP/ESMTP
I have seen this occur when a remote IMAP user access
the exchange server through a PIX firewall. The PIX (by default) is configured
to use "MailGuard", and this will prevent the remote user from sending email.
(The error refers to "relaying denied" issue, as I recall.) Microsoft has posted
Title: Message
Mmm
hmmm
-Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:08
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing
Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords
Linux should be secure, there are thousands
Hi,
We have a dedicated IMC/MTA, top notch hardware etc..
NT 4 SP 6a Exchange 5.5 Sp4
CPU/MEM usage etc minimal however
We seem to have a problem with inbound IMC traffic being
converted to MSExchange format.
Sometimes conversion can take over 40 mins!
Once conversion has
91 matches
Mail list logo
