Was it doing something different before? This sounds like normal behaviour.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 21:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Free/Busy Shows "No Information" after June 30th
Exchange 2000 sp2. Several version
Paul that usually works in that situation. As long as the site/org match
up you are fine. If you don't know them there will be an error event log
stating what the actual site/org name is and you have to
uninstall/reinstall. Outside of that we have had to do this a number of
times and been successf
Title: Message
You
may want to read up on the Bill Gates book - Business at the Speed of Light, and
then look at some of their study cases. Not sure if they are published or not.
MS internally developed exactly what you are saying via forms in outlook that
auto submit to the dept head and ha
Okay so these servers are in the same org/site then you should have the
mailbox *homed* (they still do this on mixed environments?) on the
correct server? If you look at the 5.5 admin prog and look at it does it
show the proper location of the server. Don't forget LDAP on win2k AD =
389 and so doe
Anything in your event logs?
Thanks
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 21:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Free/Busy Shows "No Information" after June 30th
Exchange 2000 sp2. Several versions of Outlook.
All of the sudden, no
It is the first and only exchange server in this customer's domain and
had been running just fine for the first three weeks since I installed
it.
I ran IISLockdown and URLScan on it according to q309508 when it was
first installed and everything was working fine until now. Since you
mentioned it,
First initial off the cuff replies:
1) Did you run IISLockdown and/or URLScan on IIS?
2) Was this E2K server the first one? Was it migrated from another
since removed?
3) You have multiple issues that are clouding our ability to
troubleshoot I think. Was this working before? What occurred just
I apologize for the length of this post, but here's hoping someone out
there has run across this before. This is a w2k sp2 server running x2k
sp2.
1. Users keep getting the error message
Unable to update public free/busy data. The contents of this public
folder are currently unavailable. And th
Title: Message
Thanks!
-Original Message-From: Angie Sawyer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:54
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: how to remove
an organizational form?
How to delete forms from the
Organization Forms Library
In O
Performance Optimizer...does magic..
-Original Message-
From: Dennis DeVries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange 5.5 information store move
All:
We have a 1.3 GIG IS on the root drive of an NT 4 box. We need to
Run the Performance Optimizer. This will it all for you.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis DeVries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange 5.5 information store move
All:
We have a 1.3 GIG IS on the root drive of an N
Title: Message
How to delete forms from the Organization
Forms Library
In OutlookXP:Tools->Options->Other->Advanced
Options->Custom Forms->Custom Forms->
Manage Forms
-Original Message-From:
Tom Teater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23,
2002 4:38 PMTo: MS-Exchan
All:
We have a 1.3 GIG IS on the root drive of an NT 4 box. We need to move it
to another drive on the same box. Are there any hidden tricks or
undocumented steps we need to be aware of when using performance manager
to affect this move?
TIA
Dennis
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-s
Title: Message
How
can I remove an organizational form?
Exchange 2000, sp2
Outlook 2002
Thanks!
Tom
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
-Exchange 2000 is on the same site as exchange 5.5.
-I don't have a mail connector setup for exchange 2000.
-All external mail going inbound goes to 5.5 IMS.
-I don't see a domains tab in 5.5 IMS. Although "address space" tab shows
smtp having an asterisk * and nothing else.
Also how does it mea
Exchange 2000 sp2. Several versions of Outlook.
All of the sudden, no one can see any free/busy info after June 30th. Does not matter
what version of client you use. Everyones Free/Busy Options are set to 2 months.
Any idea what might be up?
Larry Penrod
Sr. Network Administrator
Barkley Ev
Every order of exchange 2000 comes with exchange 5.5 and outlook 2000 I
think. But not outlook xp, however it is legally licensed with exchange
2000. In my understanding anyway. Just order the media kit only, 29/39
bucks? And you are golden..
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [ma
Chris your best bet maybe to export the data ghost the server and do a
clean install and then reimport the data. Are you currently running
win2k with ex5.5sp4? If so you *should* already have the ADC (when you
make a user acct in ad the mailbox is created in ex55) if not you need
to do this, the o
So you are receiving mail on the exchange 5.5 IS and then its connected
to the e2k server? For the same domain? Do you have the right forwarding
on the IMS Domains tab? Are the sites connected or stand alone i.e.
Under Connections do you have a mail connector?
-Original Message-
From: Jim
h
Any other errors?
Can you do an online backup?
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: REG_SERVER - RAID_SERVER in services
Maybe I'm freaking out, but I don't remember these serv
Maybe I'm freaking out, but I don't remember these services running on my
exchange server. They started causing problems with authentication today
and were giving the following in the event log ...
Event ID 151
Source REG_SERVER
Registration Server Alert
Message: Connection Timeout RAID Server
It points to the exchange 5.5 server. Right now we still are using the
exchange 5.5 IMS.
> Okay so it's receiving message from outside the corporate lan which are
> delay. Ie from the internet? Ie .. what does your MX record point to?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jimmy Dejesus [mail
Okay so it's receiving message from outside the corporate lan which are
delay. Ie from the internet? Ie .. what does your MX record point to?
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 15:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: delay when s
Title: Message
Exch 5.5
CALs are not valid for use of Outlook 2002/XP.
See
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2002.htm
under "Availability"
where it talks about Exchange 5.5.
Should be able to
order OL2002 CD from your Microsoft sales rep or distributor,
no?
Carl
-Original Messa
does this change when you want to put 2k back on the
5.5 box.
Thanks
Chris
--- "MHR(Michael Ross)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should install the ADC from exchange 2000 sp2.
> From there create connection agreements to replicate
> your exchange 5.5 data
> to AD
> Then when you run the upgrade
Make sure that anything you send has an OPT-Out feature.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temp
Title: Has anyone seen this one?
Me
too. Klez is all I've seen for weeks. Maybe one or two Magistra, but
just about all Klez. We've had every mailbox but 4 of 78 hit. All
quarantined, but I've never seen so many users receive virus infected
attachments, usually it's those same few who ge
Title: Has anyone seen this one?
Yes,
it seems that Klez is the predominate virus right now, but i'm still getting a
few W32.Magistr coming through. If you really that desperate I can forward
some of these to you... ;)
Nick
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:
Title: Has anyone seen this one?
I'm going to say it's Klez. I saw this come across my Exchange server a few days
ago. Of course, right now, the only thing coming across my Exchange server is Klez. I'm actually hoping for a new virus, just so I can
see something different in the notificati
Um, I don't know if it's intentional or not, but you've sent some
interesting content to the list.
My O2k client is set to not execute active content, and warned me about
your message.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002
Title: Message
i
tried that and it made it worse.
Lets
see what happens after this restore finishes.
-Original Message-From: Salvador Manzo
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002
12:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
Ok,
coming
Just remembered and easy way how. If X400 is avail then your ENT.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Version
That would be standard I believe
-Original Message--
Title: Message
Ok,
coming into this REALLY late, but a quick little bugaboo that's hit me...
Have you made sure the RestoreInProgress flag in the Registry was cleared?
See Q169859, Q168309, and Q175116
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday
Title: Message
Any
Exchange CAL (5.5 or 2000) Provides legal license for any version of Outlook up
to and including Outlook 2002 (XP). But, no word on how you can install it
other than to install it from an Office XP CD.
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NA
Title: Message
Michael,
I totally agree with you. Never
run an isinteg –patch or eseutil command unless told to do so from an event
error message. Other wise you
could cause errors.
George Morse
Nordson Corporation
IT - Sr. Network Analyst
28601 Clemens Road
Westlake, OH 441
Title: Message
Doesn't really need to since he is restoring a full online
backup.
-Original Message-From: David James
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:39
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
Make sure you do the
'isinte
Title: Message
according to this article, i shoudlnt do thathttp://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q231299
This problem is a result of running isinteg -patch or eseutil /r
/is immediately after you restore from an online backup and before you start
the information store
Title: Message
Make sure you do the ‘isinteg –patch’
command….
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:34
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: restore IS
yep, did that
-Original Message-
F
Title: Message
Sounds
like you are good to go then!.
Let us
know if it fails again
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:34
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
yep,
did that
Title: Message
yep,
did that
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002
11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
Ok,
I havent read the entire thread, but I assume same OS and SP Level as well?
A
Title: Message
I have had no issues
with Outlook XP with Office 2K
-Original Message-From: Salvador Manzo
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002
11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook
XP
A CD
containing the Outlook client (2000 SR-1
Title: Message
Ok, I
havent read the entire thread, but I assume same OS and SP Level as well?
Also,
make sure you run the Perf Optimizer on the recovery server as well so that it
is optimized the same as the production.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[
Title: Message
23 GB
for the priv
-Original Message-From: JFadigan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:19
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
How big is your
IS
-Original
Message-From:
MHR(Michael Ross)
Title: RE: Outlook XP
A CD
containing the Outlook client (2000 SR-1 at the time) came with my Exchange 2000
media set. Of course, I got my licenses via our campus Open License, and
order the media set via Worldwide Fulfillment...
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailt
Title: Message
How big is your IS
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:14
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: restore IS
yep, org and site are
setup just like production, same case and everything
OL2K comes with the Exchange package
-Original Message-
From: Robert D. Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook XP
My understanding is that (only since SP1?) Ex2000 comes with OlXP as an
available client, and t
Title: RE: exchange 5.5 to 2k on the same box
You should install the ADC from exchange 2000 sp2.
From there create connection agreements to replicate your exchange 5.5 data to AD
Then when you run the upgrade, it will upgrade your DB and you will have to run the Ad clean up wizard after that.
Title: RE: Outlook XP
Good question!!
-Original Message-
From: Robert D. Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook XP
My understanding is that (only since SP1?) Ex2000 comes with OlXP as an availab
Title: Message
yep,
org and site are setup just like production, same case and
everything
same
sp is on there,, sp4 and the same two post sp4 hotfixes that are on production
are on the test lan
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May
I am getting ready to upgrade from exchange 5.5 to 2k
and i need to do it on the same server does anyone
have an idea how i can do this and keep the data.
Thanks
Chris
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
My understanding is that (only since SP1?) Ex2000 comes with OlXP as an
available client, and that your CALs can be used to run OlXP, even without a
copy of Office XP. My questions are:
Where do you get the copy of OlXP?
Does it require "activation" like the whole Office XP suite does? I've
avoid
Title: RE: restore IS
A full online restore? Yes.
As long as site, org (case-sensitive) SP level etc are the same. Yes.
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: restore IS
Title: Message
go to
www.slipstick.com all about outlook
developement.
-Original Message-From: Tom Teater
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:40
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Sample Outlook
forms??
I know
a bunch of these on the MS site, but I can't
Title: Message
and
when the restore is done, i should just be able to start the store,
right?
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002
10:39 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
Ah,
ok.. So this an o
That would be standard I believe
-Original Message-
From: Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Version
Anyone know how to determine which version of Exchange 5.5 is on a CD prior
to install? (Enterprise or Stan
Title: Message
I know
a bunch of these on the MS site, but I can't seem to locate them. As I recall,
the samples included timesheets, vacation requests, purchase orders, etc. Does
anyone have a link to these (or any others, for that
matter)?
Thanks.
Tom
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://ww
Title: Message
Ah,
ok.. So this an online restore yes? You do not have to set the drives up exactly
as the production server BTW.
You
could have your store on the E: on your production server and restore to the C:
on your backup server for example.
-Original Message-From: MHR
Title: Message
Is
this an online or offline backup?
-Original Message-From: Morse, George
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:20
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
Make
sure that the same Service Packs are applied and th
Anyone know how to determine which version of Exchange 5.5 is on a CD prior
to install? (Enterprise or Standard) It's Disc 4 of 8 from the Backoffice
4.5 set.
Thanks
***
Joseph M. Majzoub
Sr. Systems Engineer
Winstead Sechrest & Minick P.C.
214-745-5706
www.winst
Title: Message
Yes
I
setup the server EXACTLY as our live production server is, I even made sure to
put the same post sp-4 hot fixes on the test lan as i did on
production.
The
restore is proceeding now.
-Original Message-From: Morse, George
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Title: Message
Make sure that the same Service Packs are applied and that the DB and
Log files are on the same drives as the original server
George Morse
Nordson Corporation
IT - Sr. Network Analyst
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[ma
We witnessed this also, a bizarre approach but mail bound for Exch2K from
the outside IE Internet, would queue on the 5.5 side until a message was
sent from an Exch2K mailbox to an Internet address. Then all Internet
inbound mail would stream into the Exch2K store. Our delay was "until you
sent a
Title: Message
Graham,
Books:
Professional CDO Programming by Siegfried Weber [1]
Developing Applications using Outlook 2000. by Rafaele
Piemonte
Any
Book by Sue Mosher
Any
Book by Thomas Rizzo
Resources:
www.cdolive.com [1]
www.slipstick.com
www.outlookexchange.com
www.microsoft.
NO, it still has delays when receiving messages from outside the corporate
lan. I was assuming its still using IMS instead of the new exchange 2000
smtp server since I have not swapped the ip address of the two servers.
> So the problems' gone away?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jimmy
Matt, you were correct in pointing out that you should analyze what's best
for your organization. For example, if you now store 30 days instead of 3
days, your store could grow substantially. If your users are typically
asking to restore an e-mail that is only a day old, then there's no reason
t
Title: Message
For crying out
loud
That is all I needed
all along. Why didn't someone point that out earlier??? LOL
Thanks Jim, you are
my hero, and I learned a lot from this. Who says we all joke around too much
here and never accomplish anything?
-Original Message-Fro
Title: Message
i
didnt do a no loss restore.
I am
going to reinstall exchange on that recovery server, recreate the default
databases, then restore again from tape.
I will
double check that Im not doing a no loss restore.
when
the restore is complete, the DB should just start. I shouldnt r
Title: Message
Hi
guys
Slightly "different"
request here
I really want to
learn how to use exchange and perhaps SQL Server to automate
different tasks within the company. For example, at present each employee
rights out there expense claim form by hand, give it to their manager for
Title: Message
Michael,
A quick search of MS Support on 1080 states that the Tran Log(s) are
missing. I see two possibilities.
Tran Log location on recovery server isn’t in the same
location as the original server.
You may have done a no loss restore which leaves the DB
Title: Message
no i
didnt copy the logs.
i
didnt do a no loss restore.
i
unchecked that box
-Original Message-From: Morse, George
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:59
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
Michael,
You
Title: Message
Michael,
You said you restored the DB with a no loss restore. Did you copy the salvaged Tran Logs from
the original server to the recovery server?
George Morse
Nordson Corporation
IT - Sr. Network Analyst
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Message-
If you had, for example, a 30 day DIR on your public store and that folder
had been deleted within that time frame, you would now happily have restored
it from your Outlook client in a few clicks and we wouldnt be having this
conversation ! :)
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [m
Title: Message
Yes it
is. Q178630
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23,
2002 9:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Backup Exec Public Folder Restore
OK now it is
making more sense. I am taking over an
Title: Message
q198757
q199792
q185577
q231299
q285116
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 09:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
error codes in the event logs show
Event ID 5000
the
erro
Title: Message
OK now it is making
more sense. I am taking over an already established org here, and am just going
with what they had before. This is a good idea. I am looking to tweak this thing
anyway. I appreciate everyone's input.
STILL, this does not
answer the original question. This
Title: Message
None of them promote
BLBs universally, but every one of them accept the fact that it needs to be
decided on a org by org basis. I had the DIR set to 3 days, must be backed up
setting. I am considering raising it. I need to discuss training too, because I
don't think I have one
Title: Message
OK,
read this.
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm
I
don't do BLB ever and my users can recover any lost critical item THEMSELVES in
less that a minute. When I allow the user to restore their own data I also
cut down on the number of calls to my helpdesk (cost)
Title: Message
I am going to read
more on this issue before I continue with this thread. You have all brought up
great points on both sides. I need to look at my org's needs and make a
decision/proposal based on it.
None of this really
answers the original issue of the Public folder though
Title: Message
So in
your reading, how many articles and whitepapers did you find extolling the
virtues of BLB? Have you read the DR papers?
What
is the DIR for your public and private store?
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thur
Title: Message
Yup,
but not the whole mailbox yes?
-Original Message-From: Lynn Karen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:41
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec
Public Folder Restore
But
doesn't moving the recovered item bac
Title: Message
But
doesn't moving the recovered item back from the pst to the mailbox break
SIS just as much (if the message had been (b)cc'ed to others on the server there
would now be two copies in the IS?)?
Confused of Bristol
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMA
Title: Message
error
codes in the event logs show
Event
ID 5000
the
error given is 0xc8000713
and
Event
ID 1080
the
error given is 0xc8000713
-Original Message-From: Morse, George
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:01
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Is
Title: Message
Gee thanks. That is
helpful
You have not made a
good case for your statement.
We do full BLB each
day. On a 6 week cycle I can restore any lost critical item within less
than an hour.
I have the disk
space and available tapes to do this with ease.
-Original
Bill,
Explain more of what you want to achieve. Do you actually require a live
server that will "swap" should the primary server go down?
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 14:02
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backup server
Title: Message
the
original server was NT 4, but was upgraded to win2k prior to
this.
ill
try a defrag.
-Original Message-From: Morse, George
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:01
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: restore
IS
What
Far from being an exchange guru, I thought I'd query the list.
I have an existing exchange 5.5 server, pretty basic. It resides in a single
domain. Since our email being up is critical, I'm thinking about installing
a second backup server. However, I really don't know the best way to do
this. Can
Title: Message
I
understand your particular issue, for the most part the reasons you give are
very particular to your organization. For the majority of administrators, they
are not constrained as you are. You also were praising your ability to do
restores via BLB and that is just wrong (exce
Title: Message
What
errors are in the event log? Was
the original server WinNT 4.0? If
so there should be an error in the event log stating that you need to defrag
the DB. Do that and it should be
running again.
George Morse
Nordson Corporation
IT - Sr. Network Analyst
email: [E
Title: Message
Error
messages?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:50
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: restore
IS
I restored my
production IS from backup to a recovery server with the same server
Title: Message
And
when you restore a mailbox from a BLB, you break SIS, thus increasing the size
of your store.
On the
other hand, I can restore a mailbox to my recovery server, spit the mailbox to a
pst and grab the required email that I need.
-Original Message-From: Aberc
Title: Message
Exactly?
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 23 May 2002 13:20To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Exec Public Folder
Restore
Jim,
I know exactly what Deleted
Item Retention is, how to set it, and how it
Title: Message
Jim,
I know exactly what Deleted Item
Retention is, how to set it, and how it works, however, if you would read my
previous post you would see that I CANNOT use it currently due to space,
hardware & version constraints, in my current environment, Deleted Item
Retention is not
Yes, I have. And I found the solution too now. :) Thanks
I needed to select restore private and public folders first before I could
clear the checkbox.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 23 mei 2002 14:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Never mind, found it. I needed to select private and public folder restore
first before I could clear the checkbox.
-Original Message-
From: Rene de Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 23 mei 2002 14:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backup Exec 8.5 No Loss Restore grey
Title: Message
I restored my
production IS from backup to a recovery server with the same server
name
org
name
site
name
same service pack
level
same BE
level
Win2k Advanced
Server
Exchange 5.5
sp4
i cant start
the IS.
i ran ISINTEG -patch
and it tells me to start the IS, stop the I
Have you enabled Exchange Support in Tools/Options/Exchange tab ?
-Original Message-
From: Rene de Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange GAL
I want to redirect the restore of the IS of an Exchange 5.5 SP
Sorry, forgot to change the subject
-Original Message-
From: Rene de Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 23 mei 2002 14:12
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange GAL
I want to redirect the restore of the IS of an Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP2
installation to anothe
I want to redirect the restore of the IS of an Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP2
installation to another server NT4 SP6A, Exchange SP4.
Backup Exec 8.5 tells me I need to clear the No Loss Restore checkbox, which
is what I wanted to do in the first place, but the option is greyed out.
Without that it d
Eeek!Trust
:)
-Original Message-
From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange GAL
no-eTrust ? Non-eTrust? eTrustNot?
just had an install for their new 2k compliant nonbackup 'system' blow up in
Sorry?
Exchange 2000.
Thanks,
Rui
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quinta-feira, 23 de Maio de 2002 11:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Automatic Signatures
Exchange Version?
-Original Message-
From: Rui Edgar Machado
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
