If you were force to go with one of those 2 company for an antivurus
solution (exchange ), wich one is not too bad ?
I'm used to antigen and Ihave bad very experiences with NAVMSE. For that
contract the customer must go with one of those solution.
I never had to sue the MacAfee Ex AV. So
Hi everyone
How long it could take to do a move mailbox(migration from ex 5.5 to ex2000)
of an Ex 5.5. server to an ex 2000 server on a Switched Network ?
Does the time needed to do it, is about the same as moving 22GB ? or a lot
longer ? Anyway to predict the time ?
Thanks
JF
List
Why switch from Antigen? IMHO, it is better than NAV or McAfee.
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 314-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois
Hopefully you'll never have to sue the McAfee. Or use them.
I would say Symantec's NAV is the lesser of two evils.
William
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Symantec or
Many dependencies. Read/write. How busy the two servers are.
Configuration of servers.
You can export the mailbox to .pst. Create a dummy account. Import it.
And test the move with the dummy account so as to not interrupt the
user. That will give you a fair assessment of time.
William
Time depends more on number of mailboxes and messages. Try to
move empty mailbox, it could take from half to one minute. But you can
start moving more mailboxes in time, which can increase speed. And you
can start moving from source, destination and GC servers in one time too.
We moved 2 servers
Yea, but Im betting you still live with your parents.
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Testing
At least I aint changing my email account to a lame one to be cool like a
15
Big time...unless the man upstairs is your CIO
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 14:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?
if the priv.edb on Exchange 5.5 Standard edition hits 16GB, Exchange
will come to a
Gotta love the PEBCAK error.
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 14:08
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Auto Archive
It turned out to be an ID 10 T problem. (I was being an idiot!!) thanks that
solved my problem
Just don't do it then.
-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 16:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?
Sorry for highjacking the thread, but is there any maintenance other than
backups, event log, and IS
Nah. The Ipaq integrates better with Outlook
-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 16:41
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar pager
that's the reason that I carry a Palm Pilot Otherwise, I'd miss
everything..
Did u scrub it with the Office 2000 cleaner?
-Original Message-
From: Philippe W. De Roover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 14:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: [Outlook Client] Missing fields in appointment
Hello,
One of our users is experiencing a
Title: Message
I
think free would easily beat that...
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:12
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB
Limit?
You
absolutely cannot beat this:
He. is working on a contract that requires either McAfee or Symantec.
McAfee works like a champ if you configure it properlyGet the whole TVD
package (Webshield, Groupshield,Netshield, VirusScan)...Don't rely on
Groupshield alone.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
Yes, my poor sick mother lives with me.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 07:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Testing
Yea, but Im betting you still live with your parents.
-Original Message-
From:
Good call on all counts.
Sue McAfee ;)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 06:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec or McAfee
Hopefully you'll never have to sue the McAfee. Or use them.
I would say
More details needed.
What type of switches ?
Same Switch ?
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 06:47
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Move Mailbox from 5.5 to ex2000 (22GB Priv.edb) Time ???
Hi everyone
How
McAfee is not the god AV ;)
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 06:45
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Symantec or McAfee
If you were force to go with one of those 2 company for an antivurus
solution (exchange
Better than the NT 5 beta
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:51
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Testing
I didnt study.. crap.
I did! Mind you in those days we called it Win NT 3.51...
List Charter and FAQ
Client site is:
NT 4.0 Server SP6a
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 98 clients running Outlook 98
Sporadically Win98 clients are experiencing the following: Client will
launch Outlook 98 and it will open and they can see all the normal
resources, but a logon dialog box will appear (Username, Domain
Good Day All,
I am trying to setup our Help Desk group with Send As
rights on all mailboxes, so they can send as that user when
special notices need to go out. I tried to setup up the
Help Desk group with send as rights at the Recipients
container, but that did not inherit down to the mailboxes
Time to holler at Kevin Browne - Again! - loud long for a unified POP3
Exchange MacOS client.
From MacWindows http://www.macwindows.com/:
Microsoft solicits feedback on Mac products. May 30, 2002 -- Microsoft's
Macintosh Business Unit has set up a web page asking for feedback
Mmmm... That's kind of like asking what I would like better, a hot poker in
my ear or my eye. If I absolutely had to chose I think I'd go with Symantec.
I've had enough with SlackAfee not knowing how to run their own software and
am very tired of trying to get them to understand large enterprise
In McAfee's defense, Groupshield performed best out of their suite.
I never knew proper configuration was necessary to keep netshield from
crashing burning however. Virusscan on the desktop didn't crash, but
would often cause terrible slowdowns.
-Original Message-
From: Kent, Larry
Title: RE: Testing
Nice. You crack on someone here, yet refuse to list your real name. H...Very brave of you
-Original Message-
From: What OS and SP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 6:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Testing
Yes, your
Title: Message
Please
do not take it personally. It has nothing to do with what I think is the
right thing to do. I just have to do what my lead (who thinks because he
has passed the Exch 5.5 cert. test, that he is a certified Exchange Admin) tell
me to do. I've argued till I'm tired of
Title: Message
You go girl!!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?
Please do not take it
personally. It has nothing to do with what I
Title: Message
Hey William, I stopped doing it though.
Does that make you feel better??
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:29
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?
Please do not take
Title: Message
Since
he didn't make any effort to hide the header information in the mail he sent, I
would say it was more a comment about someone incessantly asking OS and SP than
trying to hide behind a false name.
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL
I have to reconfig my 5.5 sp4 server . I currently have one raid 5 strip
(about 29 gig). I want to add 4 drives to seperate the OS and the logs. Does
it matter if I put 4 drives on one scsi controller and mirror the os and the
logs or should I do the OS on ide and the logs on scsi or reversed?
Title: Message
How
would you get it for free?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: Kent, Larry
SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
04, 2002 5:02 AMTo:
Title: Message
He works for the
government...duhhh
They get everything
free and we pay for it remember?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:04
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?
How
Title: Message
You
could always "make" the offline defrag fail... ;o)
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:29
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB
Limit?
Please do not take it personally. It
Do you post just to post? How about providing answers to the questions
instead of qustions to the question?
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox from 5.5 to ex2000
Title: Message
I
would not think they get it all for free, as they are in the top 10 Microsoft
customer list a few times.They still pay for it.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original
We use McAfee here and have for quite awhile with little to no problems. We
have the AVD suite which includes Groupshield, Netshield, Virusscan,
Webshield, etc. Aside from having trouble with the GS 4.03 to 4.04
conversions it has worked flawlessly for us.
That having been said, as Steve said
Title: Grrr..Port26
On exchange 2000 I have been able to set smtp to port 26 in the past but on this new .net beta server Im not able to do it, it keeps bonding to 25 even when I set it up in the properties of the smtp connector..
Anyone else seen this problem is it a .net problem with
Title: Message
E2k
and .net dont work well together at all..
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002
7:35
I did a stupid thing by deleting exchange 5.5 too early from the site.
Although I have full backup of the server, I'm not sure how to add it back
to the site. Thank god I didn't put it on native mode! The reason why
I'm putting it back is because some public folders have age limits and
some of
Title: Message
Ouch,
that would be more pain than I care to endure :'(
-Original Message-From: Ely,
Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002
9:05 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB
Limit?
You
could always "make" the offline defrag fail... ;o)
Title: Message
Naw,
it's called DR practice on your production machine. ;o) Granted, I
have many other tricks up my sleeve when I choose the fate of the
server
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:57
Title: Message
well,
you never asked = ]
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002
8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange
Title: Message
I
wouldn't. It was merely a rhetorical remark to the statement "You absolutely cannot beat
this".
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:04
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB
Limit?
How
Hey Guys
I currently have a exchange 5.5 box running on 2k with
authentication on the same box. I need to upgrade it
now and they say my domain controller needs to be in
native mode is this going to cause a problem and is
how do I set up a pdc emulator I know this guestion is
off topic,but if
Title: Message
o
ya
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002
11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Grrr..Port26
well, you never asked = ]
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And
Title: Message
You
can beat that with a wooden stick though.
Check
this out.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2028951960
-Original Message-From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002
11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
Exchange2000 has too many issues on .Net that it isn't
worth troubleshooting.
Last I
heard, it will require sp3 for Exchange2000 to be able to participate in a .Net
domain and more than sp3 for it to reside on a .Net domain controller.
A few
people have got it to install
Hello Everyone,
Im in the middle of my migration to E2K, and I keep
coming up with a massive irratation. My global address book
keeps disappearing in Outlook. Its a 50-50 chance it will be there when I
look. Ive checked my replication and everything seems fine. What am I missing?
TIA
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange/Outlook problem
Client site is:
NT 4.0 Server SP6a
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 98 clients running Outlook 98
Sporadically Win98 clients
You're correct. Also happens when users cancel the logon at the start of 98.
Delete the cache, and remind them to login correctly and the problem goes
away.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
We discussed earlier the list of banned extensions for
attachments. Here is my quickies list for those who were questioning. Any additions???
386
cpl
jse
pl
ade
cpp
jtd
plx
adp
crt
lib
Title: Message
That's
OK, but you're no ass baron.
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04,
2002 1:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Banned
list
We discussed earlier the list of
banned extensions for
Title: Message
I was under the impression that the .NET
stuff was just an upgrade for the 2000 product line. So does that mean its
going to be another adventure in upgrading from 2000 to .NET as it was from NT
to 2000?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL
Is there any place in Exchange 2000 to specify a list of domains known for spamming,
and block any emails from them? I think I remember hearing this before, but wasn't
sure if it was possible in exchange 2000. If so, how, and where can I get these
lists? Are the updated? How often?
Thanks,
Title: Message
It's
more of an issue of tweaking existing software to work with the newer
products. From a migration point of view, there are little differences
between W2K and .NET. However, if you wanted to run existing software on
.NET, then you would have to meet the minimum
Title: Message
Think
of it as NT version 5.5. Things get much better, but not as large of an upgrade
as you got from 4.0 to 5.0. The biggest improvements being in AD and .NET
integration http://www.microsoft.com/net/defined/default.asp
Upgrades will not be that hard, dont worry there.
How
would you go about implementing a banned list?? That last entry is for
double extensions right? Thanks for any help!
Info:
W2K
SP2
Exch
5.5 SP4
NAV
for Exchange 2.17
Nick
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002
Title: Message
Not so much worried about the difficulty
as the amount of time it takes to do it. Although, I dont want to have
rethink my 2000 setup ?(domain structure and etc) so
soon.
Thanks for the clarification.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL
Here's something that may help. When we did our migration of 85 gigs over one
weekend, we had 12 machines set up to do mailmig at the same time. It clearly helped
speed up the length of time it took to do our migration. It took us about 14 hours to
move the bulk of the data.
--
Matt
Ok, so I have 5000 emails in my exchange mailbox on the server. I want to cut this
down. In fact I want to take 90% of it, and archive it. But the thing is, I
reference back to these emails every now and then, and to unarchive it and import it
everytime would be a pain to access an email.
Running Exchange 5.5 in a single site, single domainfairly simple. I'm
contemplating a backup exchange server that could function in case of a
hardware failure on the first box. What would be the best approach, if I
could solicit some opinions?
List Charter and FAQ at:
personal folders will do this.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: PST Archives
Ok, so I have 5000 emails in my exchange mailbox on the server. I want to
cut this down. In fact I
When you archive your mailbox, it creates a .pst file. Typically the .pst
file sits in the apps directory under the common files directory. Anyway,
all you have to do is go to File in Outlook and select open, .pst file and
point to it. It will then open the .pst file and display it folder view as
Archive your email to a .pst file on to your local hard disk. Then File
-open-personal folders file and you will see the archived mails on your
outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
In my case, I use Praetor. You need a 3rd
party app to do that. Yes, the last one is for doubles, and it should be =
*.???.???, not ???.???.???.
-Original Message-
From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:25
PM
To: MS-Exchange
Title: Message
Why didn't
someone come up with a list like this before?
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:00
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned
list
In my case, I use
Praetor. You
Title: Message
Well if you hadnt been slacking
Martin, you could have done this a long time ago.. J
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:07
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Banned list
Why didn't
Any
suggestions for a app, price is a BIG issue.
Nick
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:00
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned
list
In my case, I use
Praetor. You need a 3rd party app to
Hi. We're running Exch 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. I don't
understand why the following scenario works, so please enlighten me:
When an alias name is changed on a mailbox, an Outlook profile that
pre-existed can resolve the new alias name and open the right mailbox.
How does
Title: Message
There
is sufficient change in Active Directory that updates to Exchange2000 is
required.
I
think the upgrade from W2K to .Net will be smooth. My beta's have been
more stable than the W2K ones I broke.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL
I
would add wiz, maybe aspx.
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:06
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Banned
list
We discussed earlier the list of
banned extensions for attachments. Here is my
Title: Message
NAV for Exchange
can do attachment blocking. Don't ask me how, never used it, but it can do
it.
-Original Message-From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:10
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned
Title: Message
I keep
asking that. If only it was including in a FAQ or
something.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,
June 04, 2002 11:07 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list
Why didn't
someone come
The profile speaks to Directory Services on the Exchange server over
MAPI.
William
-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook profile resolves changed alias
Hi. We're running
Magic?
-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Outlook profile resolves changed alias
Hi. We're running Exch 5.5 SP4 and
Title: Message
like
here?
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
MAPI!
-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook profile resolves changed alias
Hi. We're running Exch 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. I don't
understand why the following
Title: Message
If you
have NAV for Gateways you just specify which extensions to
block.
I use
Martin's list.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,
June 04, 2002 2:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list
Title: Message
Add the following to
that list: cgi, aspx and php.
I think they exist,
but no one has posted them here
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Banned
Personally, I love Praetor. I tried Mail
Essentials too, but liked this better. Not sure about price. It goes by user
total.
Lotta users. Lotta moola
www.cmsconnect.com
There is also Mail Marshal, Mail
Essentials, blah blah
-Original Message-
From: Nickolaos
Ok ... thanks William and Martin ... but sorry for my ignorance: what does
MAPI use to resolve it? When you create a profile, doesn't it use the
alias name to find the correct mailbox ... but I guess it then must use the
distinguished name or the directory name after that??
Rob
Yes, but if the profile at the client can't resolve, it asks Directory
Services on the Exchange Server which updates the MAPI client profile
with certain changes.
A good use for this occurs if you move a mailbox between servers as long
as both servers remain available, MAPI can't resolve the
NT authentication
-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 14:24
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook profile resolves changed alias
Ok ... thanks William and Martin ... but sorry for my ignorance: what does
MAPI use
Excellent. ..and I appreciate your simplified version because I'm tired
... many thanks!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook profile resolves changed alias
Yes,
Title: Message
You
might price out NEMX
http://www.nemx.com/products/powerpac/index.html
I
haven't used in a few years, but it was fairly inexpensive 3 years ago when we
implemented it at a former site. We used the atachment blocking
features.
-sp
-Original Message-From:
Uh... Check your facts there sir. NT Auth has nothing to do with name
resolution.
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook profile resolves changed alias
NT authentication
Title: Replies via HTML
New issue for me, maybe someone else has seen this before
Exchange 2000 SP2
Outlook 2002 - field user configured to deliver to pst. (Yeah, I know not the greatest idea, but until synch times improve over dialup our users will continue to demand the quicker delivery
Ding ding ding. Distinguished name!
- Original Message -
From: Sargent, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook profile resolves changed alias
Ok ... thanks William and Martin ... but sorry for my
Is that like NT Authentication? ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook profile resolves changed alias
Ding ding ding. Distinguished name!
- Original Message
Title: Message
I
worked up some reg clips for NAVMSE based on somebody's definitive list that I
found here a long time past.
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002
11:16To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned
Title: Replies via HTML
All
addresses or certain address ?
-Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 14:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Replies via
HTML
New issue for me, maybe someone else has seen this
NAV for Exchange blocks attachments. You enter
theextensions to block via registry entries. Not hard to do but I wish
they would have done it via the web interface.If you search the Symantec
website the details are there. In their knowledge base use the keywords:
attachment blocking. If I
Using a VPN, my users complain all the time that getting
their mail in Outlook takes too long. Can someone point me to a doc on setting
up syncing? I know that psts suck, but what do you do? What is the best option
for these remote people? A pointer to a doc would be great. I searched a
Title: Message
There
is no particualr document I know of. Knowing what I know about Offline
folders and dial up, I educate my users on how I avoid the long delays. I
don't think when I logon to Outlook nor when I exit. I choose to synch
when I want to synch. Leave that part to the users.
Title: Message
FSCK
" I
don't think when I logon to Outlook " should have been I don't
synch
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:14 PMTo: MS-Exchange
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Remote Mail users
There is no particualr document I know
We are running Win NT 4.0 SP4, Exchange Server 5.5 SP3, Outlook 2000. All
staff have access to their email via OWA. All are working except the
President. (why is it always the one that you can least afford to upset...)
He gets the error 'failed to get inbox'. His outlook is set up identically
Title: Message
Offline folders works great over VPN. .psts are
not going to be much better.
I used
offline folders over 19,2 and I get more than a few emails a day. How bad
can it be?
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June
Title: Message
Although your previous spelling would mitigate the long delay.
;)
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:15
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Remote Mail
users
FSCK
" I
don't think when
Title: Message
If
they want to be online, make sure the preview pane is off so they dont get
delays from downloading a message just for single-clicking an email.
--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics
Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
I had that happen and I'm trying to remember what we did. Are you logging in
with domain/username?
-Original Message-
From: Benedict, Hope [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
