Title: Message
Be careful with the word "InterScan". Note that InterScan Messaging
Security Suite is a relatively new product, not the same as InterScan
VirusWall. We've been Trend resellers for ages, and to be honest it's the
only product we really recommend (Antigen is fine too, but we as
Title: Message
You
reckon?
g
-Original Message-From: Neil Hobson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002
2:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: If a
consultant were to say to you...
Be careful with the word "InterScan". Note that InterScan
Title: Message
Gut feeling, no hard facts though!
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 21 June
2002 11:00Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation:
If a consultant were to say to you...Subject: RE: If a consultant
were to
I've been playing with Cloudmark 1.00ß2 and it seems
pretty good... Give it a whack.
Cheers!
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: [mac-nt] Dealing with the tidal wave of spam
Anyone here using Cloudmark? Is it
Yes, we are seeing the warning in the event logs and no it is not a mixed
e2k/5.5 environment, but we also did not yet flip the switch to native mode
either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:53 PM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
whacking away...
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 6:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [mac-nt] Dealing with the tidal wave of spam: Cloudmark
I've been playing with Cloudmark 1.00ß2 and it seems
pretty
Title: SSL problem
The
untrusted certificate notice is usually from a cerificate that does not match
your domain name,your server or the site name. I had the same problem when I set
ours up. It took me 2 days to get it right. I was using company.com we are
company,Inc. Hope this helps
Title: Message
Baseball is secondary right nowI'm just ticked that ESPN isn't
broadcasting the Germany/USA match on the web right now.AGGG
It really sucks having to be a work early when such a big match is going on
:'(
GO
USA!!
-Original Message-From: Paul Green
SSL in OWA confuses me. Do you need to buy a certificate from Verisign or just use the
certificate server in IIS. Our use of OWA is for employees to check email OUTSIDE of
the company. I don't want them to have to carry a user cert with them. If the MS certs
will work, why buy one form
Title: Message
This
will get you close. No video but at least something. Its what I have
going right now.
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/en/t/m/58
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates
Do not follow where the path may
lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
- Muriel
Title: Message
Yup,
that's what I've got going too!
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:56
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA
revisited
This will get you close. No video but at least something.
The MS Cert will work. I've found people that like to use an outside source
like Verisign because either they don't know how to setup a cert server,
they don't want to or they don't think it is as secure as going outside to
Verisign. I'm no expert but I use our own cert from an IIS 5 certificate
I bought one for $99 from DirectNIC.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL problem
The MS Cert will work. I've found people that like to use an outside source
like Verisign
Same process as Verisign or did you have to help it a lot?
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by
These might help:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q234022
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q218445
Later
Brent
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
I have always set it up using the MS Cert server. Easy to set up and works
just fine
Jay Personette
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mavtech.com/
(281) 455-3993
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange
Title: Message
Well, I don't think most of us mind if the
question/topic is Guinness
- Original Message -
From:
Andy
David
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:25
PM
Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template
Yes,
its much better to
I wonder if anyone might have a suggestion or two for the following
dilemma...
Exchange Server 5.5, Outlook 2000
I am trying to give my boss options that will work for him to keep the size
of his pst files manageable along with being able to get at the files
easily... Some of his pst's have
Title: Message
What you need is a TV in the break room. Man that
was a great match!!
I am pumped about the Brazil/Senegal (yes I already
pick them to beat Turkey) match
As well as the Spain/Korea match. Spain is NOT a
lock!! Those Koreans are playing their hearts out!!!
- Original
Well the pst at home would be read only (from the CD), so a start would be to turn off
the read only bit..
Later
Brent
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Personal Folders
Title: Message
I
don't mind if we talk about Guinness! Someone want to send me
some?
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002
9:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: User
Profiles/Template
Well, I don't
If he copied the pst to a CDR not a CD-RW then the file attribute will be Read Only
when he copies it to the drive at home. He needs to reset that attribute before
Outlook can open the file.
I am guessing that he does not have a VPN connection to the office from home. Is that
correct?
Title: Message
Ive
got their free bottle opener!
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:46
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User
Profiles/Template
I
don't mind if we talk about Guinness! Someone want to
Title: Message
Mmm..
we are shooting a movie for guiness at the mo'
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:46
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User
Profiles/Template
I
don't mind if we talk about Guinness!
PST's because he's got approx. 4 GB of data between all his folders now, and
is at about 95MB on his Inbox sitting in Exchange. We would be better
served to upgrade to E2K, for a couple other reasons other than simply
mailbox sizes, but that's not in the budget at this point. I know the
Title: Message
Me
Too!!!
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:02
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User
Profiles/Template
Ive
got their free bottle opener!
-Original
Title: Message
Im
drunk as a skunk!
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:12
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: User
Profiles/Template
Me
Too!!!
-Original Message-From: Andy David
Title: Message
I'm
wishin I was. I'm preparing to open a new office in the next week.
Fixin to go install some routers, firewalls, ans switches today... Then
I'm going to go home and drink heavily!
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,
Well, you could move his PST files to a network drive and set up remote
access for him, better yet if he can get broadband at home, set up a VPN
solution allowing him access to his network drive from his home PC. Then he
has both his mailbox and PSTs available from both places without trying to
I don't believe PSTs will respect Offline Files settings automatically :(
-Original Message-
From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 07:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Personal Folders Suggestions to Users
Well, you could move his PST
I would strongly suggest to your boss that he replace the two workstations with a
laptop and docking stations (port replicator) at home and office. That way he could
have his normal keyboard, mouse, and monitor and avoid the disaster that copying files
back and forth between the two
I wouldn't recommend keeping them on CD as such (IOW, primary copy on CD).
What you could do to ease matters is get a single license version of
something like the Servant Salamander file manager(http://www.altap.cz),
which has the option to automatically remove the Read-Only attribute when
Title: Message
poor
USA ;(
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:38
AMPosted To: Exchange 2000 ServerConversation: OWA
revisitedSubject: RE: OWA revisited
Baseball is secondary right nowI'm just ticked
Title: Users Maintaining GAL Info
We would like to allow our users to maintain some of the info in their GAL entry, such as room number and telephone number, etc.
Can this set up in either Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000?
If so, how?
Thanks,
Bruce Briggs
System Administration
State
That is definitely the most profound thing I've heard in a while.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template
And over the hills came thousands, millions
Title: Message
GUINNESS!1
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: User
Profiles/Template
Well, I don't think most of us mind
if the
Title: Message
GALMOD
ships with the Backoffice 4.5 Resource kit. It's an IIS based web site,
that will allow your users to modify their GALinfo in 5.5. I don't
know if their is an update for it on2000.
-Original Message-From: Briggs, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Title: RE: E-mail Content Filtering Recommendations
So does Mail Essentials, this one was quarantined until I approved it
-Original Message-
From: Brian Politis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E-mail
Title: Message
Bummer
dudes ;(
-Original Message-From: Paul Green
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:55
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA
revisited
poor USA ;(
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
Title: Users Maintaining GAL Info
Bruce,
I have
an Outlook form that will work with 5.5 and 2000. Contact me off-list if you
want a copy.
Kevin
-Original Message-From: Briggs, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 June 2002
15:59To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesCc: Becker,
Title: Message
Talk
about Guinness all you want; just keep the fish tacos out of
it.
John Matteson; Exchange
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and
Standards(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one
is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me,
Title: Users Maintaining GAL Info
Look
out everyone..(moths flying out of wallet)
I'm
ready to purchase a book!!!
Ok, So
does anyone have an oppinion on a good Exchange 2000 Server
guide?
TIA
jim
with cash
List Charter and FAQ at:
Title: Message
Tony
Redmond's book "Microsoft Exchange server for Windows 2000"; published by
Digital Press.
Secondary books are "Mission Critical Microsoft Exchange 2000" and
"Scaling Microsoft Exchange 2000" both of which are published by Digital Press
as well.
John Matteson; Exchange
Brien:
Direct Answer: yes...but it depends on your manufacturer, their RAID or SCSI
controller card, where the RAID/SCSI information is stored, etc.
However, if your CPU takes a dive, the data that you move over might not be
any good! It depends on why it died.
We
Title: RE: E-mail Content Filtering Recommendations
So, has anyone tried
Mail-Gear 2.0 from Symantec?
Eric
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:07
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail
Content
Title: Message
I am looking for a way to create a VB script
that will logon to all mailboxes and add a check in the auto accept and auto
decline meetings boxes from Outlook. I know this is a setting on the server properties on
the mailbox, and is just changed from the Outlook Client.
resetimc.exe have u tried it?
-Original Message-
From: Sigler, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Stuck messages in IMC...
Exchange Gurus:
We have several messages stuck in the pending state in the IMC Inbound
How do you like it so far? I'm having a blast with Cloudmark; though
it's bogging down: At 6AM EDT it was quick; six hours later it's slow as
mud as their server bogs down. There are still a few rough edges, most
notably with NT4 (and apparently Win2k; unknown about XP) installation.
But, it's
But can you continue to use OWA 5.5 to access mailboxes on a E2K machine after you remove the 5.5 box? Or does it have
to be OWA 2k?
TIA
Garland Mac Neill
Systems Administrator
Solbourne
Office 303-402-2704
Cell 303-641-7574
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ at:
What fields are you referring to? In cert server?
-Original Message-
From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SSL problem
The untrusted certificate notice is usually
Jon,
Are you sure you mean Q319239 ? That is some .Net sample app stuff...
Is your server using SSL or straight forward HTTP ?
Thanks
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Jon Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 June 2002 21:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Logoff button in OWA
Hi Jan,
What were your problems?
Thanks
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 June 2002 00:40
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Connector for Lotus Notes
Good luck! We gave up! Spent hours on the phone with MS - did this did
that - no
Rob, I thought I had a case of the Fridays when I read the email, too.
I said, I must be seeing things.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 13:45
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Logoff button in OWA 2K?
Jon,
Are you
Title: Users Maintaining GAL Info
Web
Mailbox Manager from Automation Specialists...
-Original Message-From: Briggs, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:59
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesCc: Becker,
JimSubject: Users Maintaining GAL Info
We would
Title: RE: Mail Sending order problems
Didn't you jusy post this recently?
-Original Message-
From: Shamim Rahman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 07:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail Sending order problems
Hi,
Can somebody help with a
Title: Message
thanks
John.since i got such a big response...sounds like i"ll go for
it.
-Original Message-From: John Matteson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:56
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference
guide
Tony
Redmond's
Title: Message
I know
it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a
DC?
-Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:21
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Reference
guide
thanks John.since i
Title: Message
Can be..
But I hear horror stories
-Original Message-
From: Herchenbach, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:49
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange on DC?
I know it's not
recommended, but can Exchange 2k be
Having a few problems maybe someone can help me with. Employee leaves
company, I export their mailbox (Exchange 2000 Outlook 2000) to a PST,
write to CD, delete user account mailbox, add their email address to a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] emailbox.
User was a member of a distribution list, that when
So does anyone here have any thoughts on this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:18 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP Issue
Yes, we are seeing the warning in the event
Title: Message
It _can_ be .. But it's not recommended
:-
- Performance will suffer
- Taking "one down" will probably take both down (ie you
apply an Exchange hotfix/service-pack and reboot .. you loose your
DC)
Thanks
Rob
-Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim
adsiedit
I've see that problem, and it took putzing with the M: drive permissions, adsiedit,
and eventually csvde, edit away, csvde -i etc etc.
I do not envy you. And it is always someone who is important too, eh?
John Weber
Consultant
Centerlogic
503-262-0490 x203
-Original
Thanks all.
F Nohejl
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
What
about small test networks ? Like your home dev area?
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002
14:47To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
on DC?
Can
be..
But I hear horror
Actually I just tell them to live with it, however I'd like to get it
fixed. Is this a common problem for people other than me. Shouldn't AD
remove references to accounts when their deleted?
adsiedit
I've see that problem, and it took putzing with the M: drive =
permissions, adsiedit, and
This depends on the size of your org and the amount of traffic generated. Say a
50 user org - with a nice juicy box (at least a dual p-4 with 4 gigs of ram)
sure you could run e2k on a dc, and even get away with running owa on it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Title: Exchange 5.5 on W2K
No
problems out of the ordinary
-Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002
12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange 5.5 on W2K
Quite a happy combo. I have 2 servers running this
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, at 1:49pm, Herchenbach, Jim wrote:
I know it's not recommended, but can Exchange 2k be installed on a DC?
It will install. It will even work, sort of. But, from practical
experience, I can tell you that it does not work well. We did this with one
of our small customers
Title: RE: Mail Sending order problems
Anyone know how can I make my Exchange 5.5 server
accept the "@domain-name.com" after my account name?
I only have 1 domain, but I still would like users
to enter their full email address.
Thanks,Brent McCrary
kcconnect.net
List Charter and FAQ at:
Title: RE: Mail Sending order problems
Where are you referring?
On OWA? Check Name on a profile set
up?
- Original Message -
From:
Brent
McCrary
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:33 PM
Subject: Domain name in logon?
Anyone know how
Should, apparently doesn't.
It may be an issue associated with the E2K being on a DC. I haven't seen it on a
non-DC box. But I haven''t yet claimed to have seen everything :)
John Weber
Consultant
Centerlogic
503-262-0490 x203
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
in OWA
or Outlook ?
-Original Message-From: Brent McCrary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002
15:33To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Domain name in
logon?
Anyone know how can I make my Exchange 5.5 server
accept the
Title: RE: Mail Sending order problems
When they logon via Outlook or Outlook Express I'd
like them to have to put their full address in the "account name"
field.
- Original Message -
From:
Matthew
Carpenter
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Friday, June 21,
You can stop the IMC service, then zip them. Afterwards restart the IMC.
I have an event in NT that does this nightly on my IMC machines.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated
Yes it is on a DC, however I work for a small company (70 employees) and
we have only 4 servers (Exchange, SQL, File/Print, Terminal Server).
That leaves me with few options as far as where I can put AD. Obviously
the Terminal Server is out of the question, between SQL Exchange you
can flip
Title: Odd Contact Lists
Hey guys, I have an exchange 2000 site that the contacts on several mailboxes arent listed correctly. Like I say File John Smith as Smith, John and it files it as J. If I put file as John Smith, its J, if I put file as Company its filed under J. This is all under
I've been wracking my brain over this one for two days and would really
appreciate any help or pointers that anyone could offer... Pardon the
length, but I've seen from experience that if you aren't complete, you get
bombarded with a million questions about the environment...
Our client is
Title: Message
Display as
File
as
?
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002
15:50To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Odd Contact
Lists
Hey guys, I have an exchange 2000 site that the
contacts on several
I checked and he is in fact using Exchange and not MS-Mail.
I installed some windows update on his machine since all my research was not
leading anywhere and guess what?
Long files names are being displayed now.
Do not know why but problem solved.
Thanks again
-Original Message-
From:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
3.29 Q: Can I delete the files in \imcdata\logs?
A: Yes. And turn off/down SMTP Protocol Logging on the IMS too. You must
restart the IMS for the logging change to take affect. You can only delete
the files while the IMS is stopped.
You can
Hi Guys,
Could you take 1 minute and fill out this survey?
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/surveys/spamsurvey.htm
Thanks a million.
Warm regards,
Stu
***
Stu Sjouwerman - Founder, Chief Operating Off.
Sunbelt Software, # 409 in the Inc. 500 List ~
I acquired a title a few years back. I was known as the Evil Network Guy.
I give the users all the tools they need to do their jobs, but I do not
allow things like word as an email editor that fscks up machines and can
propogate viruses. :o)
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett
I wouldn't recommend keeping them on CD as such (IOW, primary copy on CD).
What you could do to ease matters is get a single license version of
something like the Servant Salamander file manager(http://www.altap.cz),
which has the option to automatically remove the Read-Only attribute when
83 matches
Mail list logo
