Title: Message
Chris,
Take a
look at the AUtoAccept scripts at Microsoft.
Kevin
-Original Message-From: James Chris L
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 June 2002
18:04To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Looking CDO or
VB property
I am looking for a way to create a
Praetor does. He is simply asking, unless I am missing something, to filter
out certain attachments to certain recipients. This can be done via a rule.
Granted, it would be a granular and painstaking rule, but Praetor would do
it.
- Original Message -
From: Precht, David N. [EMAIL
You could do this with Mail Marshal. It has the capability to setup
user by user rules. Again it would be painstaking. If you have the
need for this kind of security, you might also like some of Mail
Marshal's other features as well.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
I like how we are all using each others' words
granular
painstaking...
lol
- Original Message -
From: Brian Politis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:23 AM
Subject: RE: Email Attachment Blocking
You could do this with Mail
Has anyone seen this error before?
Microsoft doesn't give much information about it. I get 17 of them everyday around the
same time 1:18-1:20pm. this is what shows up in my logs.
Error 0xf9bf occurred during a background cleanup on attachment 110707c on
database first storage
Heh ..
Never seen praetor, but this is done in 5 minutes with the gfi product.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Lets say I want to set up an e2k server running OWA. I want to offer remote
email services via OWA to a small number of users. Lets say 50 - 100 users -
would a dual pIII-800 with around 72 gigs of space and a gig of ram be adequate?
I think it will, but wanted the opinions of all you guys.
For 50-100 users?
You could get by with a 3rd of that. That is very nice!
- Original Message -
From: Steve Balen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:03 AM
Subject: E2k Hardware Opinion
Lets say I want to set up an e2k server
I have seen similar errors in 5.5 and have concluded that an attachment has been
deleted but a pointer to it still exists. Of course, I could be wrong too ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
So How would I find delete the pointer. I'm running e2k
-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
I have seen similar errors in 5.5 and have concluded that an
Thanks for the help.
Neil did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed or just like giving people s**t.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
I've seen the
Hehe, that's what I thought.
I may even do some video conferencing with this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE: E2k Hardware Opinion
I guess half of
Pardon me?
Exactly what part of my message is giving you s**t? Realise that some
people on this list are not happy with running serious utilities like
ISINTEG. I responed a lot on this list (ok, a little less lately) but
as far as I'm concerned you could be a developer thrown into managing
And to think that once, someone on this list criticised me for
recommending that someone run eseutil. Hell, I'm damned if I do and
damned if I don't!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:48
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Yeah, what the hell is that all about, anyway? Get back to using those
binoculars in your manager's office or isn't it playtime yet? ;-)
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 June 2002 15:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in
ok my bad. Sorry
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Pardon me?
Exactly what part of my message is giving you s**t? Realise that some
people on this list
From now on, everyone should use both utils on a daily basis
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
And to think that once, someone on this list criticised me
We run them twice a day here for good measure. I'm about to go add InoculateIT to our
servers for added stability as well.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in
Or they shouldn't. There. That should keep both sides happy.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
From now on, everyone should use both utils
Actually, everyone should just migrate to Groupwise.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Or they shouldn't. There. That should keep both sides happy.
I said sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
From now on, everyone should use both utils on a daily basis
-Original Message-
From: Neil
Yes.
But what is the avg. size of mailboxes ?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:03
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E2k Hardware Opinion
Lets say I want to set up an e2k server running OWA. I want to offer
remote email
And you will be...
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
I said sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
For your setup, the correct asnwer is the best darn hardware you can
get! What you list is more than sufficient, unless they let you get
better. g
Go Lance!
-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Yeah! What were you thinking Neil?!?!?! :P
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Damn Neil, quit trying to help people out! :)
-Original Message-
But... But... MS Mail is so much better! :P
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Actually, everyone should just migrate to Groupwise.
How much more useless can your questions be?
What, you think he doesn't have enough disk space for 50-100 users?
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E2k Hardware Opinion
Wear this thong and all will be forgiven.
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
I said sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
I was actually thinking I'd better include a word about PSS if this
involves isinteg, otherwise Don will be on my case.
;-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:56
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Error 1104 in
I was confused by this If we restart the IMC.
We are talking about Exchange2000, right? So, do you mean the SMTP
Virtual Server?
Now, are the messages queued up to go? Can you turn up logging and see
if anything hits the application event log? Anything between the two
servers, like a VPN or
Isinteg is for wussies! I run it on an hourly basis with the scheduler...
I then follow it up with a variety of Eseutil switches?
I just like to see what they do...
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange
hey I'm running the isinteg util now I can't receive mail. What did I do wrong. I
did just as everyone said.
Just joking!!!
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
You shall be flogged and beaten for the rest of today. (And part of tomorrow too) for
your insolence.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
And you will be...
Welcome to the list Brien... you've officially been hazed.
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
hey I'm running the isinteg util now I can't receive mail.
Spank me baby! :P
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
You shall be flogged and beaten for the rest of today. (And part of tomorrow
too) for your
if he sets 2GB limits on his users, maybe not.. (though i can't imagine why you
would do that...)
Thanks,
Joe Irvine
Director of Information Technology
The Business Office, Inc.
(609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860
www.tbopayroll.com
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
I'm perfectly chilled in my AC controlled office with 90+ temps outside...
What's your excuse?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: E2k Hardware Opinion
Sheesh Don, take a
And it shall continue untill the next person 'oops' all over the place as
well. :)
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
That means so much to me. Thanks all
What does Price Waterhouse Whoever We Merged With Today have to do with
this?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Wow, it must be Monday morninghow else
You didn't include a picture of the thong.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Wear this thong and all will be forgiven.
-Original Message-
From:
If you need pictures that means you contemplated wearing it. (That is all we need to
know). ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
You didn't include a
ew
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:34
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
You didn't include a picture of the thong.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I'm wearing a thong now. Doesn't everyone wear thongs? Or am I sharing to much.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
If you need pictures that means you
Don't ever say the G word
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Actually, everyone should just migrate to Groupwise.
-Original Message-
From: Erik
Not if the avg size was 1.5gig+
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:06
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E2k Hardware Opinion
How much more useless can your questions be?
What, you think he doesn't have enough disk space
Any why not? What did you find the limitations of GroupWise to be?
Care to add some insightful comments about the product? I for one would
love to hear them and I bet some others here would too!
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June
Hehehehe I have had the (dis)pleasure of doing a Groupwise to Exchange 2000 migration.
Once I got it working it was fine... but whew it was a pain in the ass getting it to
work.
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:03 PM
Girl?
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Don't ever say the G word
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Aside from it's dependency on an OS from Utah?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Any why not? What did you find the limitations of GroupWise to be?
Care to
O SO you think someone would deploy a solution
such as this without thinking about the size of the databases or mailbox
quotas? They wouldn't take into consideration that they need twice the
amount of disk space to run DB utilities? Nor would they be thinking about
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/compare/GroupWise.asp
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:56
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Any why not? What did you find the limitations of
And why not? I'd be willing to posit that, based on your previous spamming, your
experience with GroupWise, in any of the 3 major releases, is considerably less that
what would be required to get it functioning in a minor role, let alone in a
full-fledged corporate role.
After all, taking
Yes, aside from that... :P
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Aside from it's dependency on an OS from Utah?
-Original Message-
From: Ely,
Except if you read the question he was asking about OWA not mailboxes.
If the OWA and Exchange mailboxes are to be located on the same server I
would be more concerned with the spindle layout than the size of the
storage.
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL
Unlikely?
Have you read the newsgroups?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E2k Hardware Opinion
O SO you think someone would deploy a
solution such as
Title: Unusual Public Folder issue
Hello list,
Using Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows 2000 Server SP2
We have set up a group calander in a public folder which all users have perrmission to create items, but only to modify there own and not delete anything.
There are 2 owners defined on the
If I wanted Microsoft's opinion on it, I would have gone to their site
myself.
I want your opinion and Experiences with GroupWise. I want to know why
you find it soo bad.
Nice try Davie boy, back to class with you..
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Oh Jaysus. Nothing like quoting the competition.
John Weber
Consultant
Centerlogic
503-262-0490 x203
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 09:11
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Sheesh. Take a chill Don
lol
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: E2k Hardware Opinion
O SO you think someone would deploy a solution
such as
Title: Message
OWA is
on a member server and basic authentication is not selected?
What
if the users logon using:
username: domain/username
password: password
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June
24, 2002 9:22 AMTo:
Title: Message
Monday, no more needs to be
said.
Indeed. What a stupid name for a consultancy
firm.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June
24, 2002 9:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA
login asking for password twice.
All things being
equal (drive configs, memory, etc), for 1500-2000 users per server, would you
choose a 2-way 1.7 GHz PIII or 4x700 MHz PIII Xeons?
Daniel Rosenthal
National Grid USA
Messaging Support
(508)389-2625
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential to
You didn't include a picture of the thong.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Wear this thong and all will be forgiven.
-Original Message-
From:
Go
with 2X700 Mhz PIII Xeon, if necessary then you would have to ability to put two
more processors for future growth.
Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services
CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania
-Original Message-From: Exchange Discussion Group
[mailto:[EMAIL
I'm running Exchange 5.5. SP4 and am getting what appears to be spoofed or
forged email. The reading I've done says I'm susceptible to this if I leave
port 25 open.
I am allowing SMTP traffic through my firewall and the port on the server is
listening for SMTP traffic.
I thought I had to be
This is actually for myself (and what I can afford to start) I am not looking to
make money, just to break even on offering folks full true exchange email via
the web using OWA in e2k.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:18 AM
To:
Yeah, PSS is even better Uh, well, if you uninstall and re-install esxchange,
iss and rebuild the metbase and restore the sotres from scratch, that may fix
your issue
No thanks, I would rather go to a palm reader for advice than PSS. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
The licensure alone will kill you.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E2k Hardware Opinion
This is actually for myself (and what I can afford to start) I am not
looking to
i know if an address of the format [EMAIL PROTECTED]%yourdomain.com will get through
without the yourdomain.com at the end. I recently had the same issue and I removed
special characters other than -_. from my allowed special characters in my firewall
and they stopped cold.
Thanks,
Joe
Friends and astute members of the exchange list. Please forgive such basic
questions but I am new to exchange. (came from lotus notes) Since exchange
is essentially a database, I would assume this database gets fragmented. Is
there a tool that can be used to unfragment?
List Charter and FAQ at:
Well, the PalmOS dies not run a decent messaging server.
PSS is always helpful and thorough, unless you are in some big hurry and
choose to hang up on them or not provide decent information. They are
always worth the money and always help beyond the problem in my
experience.
-Original
Has it been a month already?
Since it is a bright relational database, it runs an online maintenance
process nightly by default that defrags the contents of the databases.
It takes care of itself.
William
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Like I said, to start off, we'll see - I want to be able to break even.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE: E2k Hardware Opinion
The licensure alone
2000, 5.5, all versions?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Compacting
Has it been a month already?
Absolutely.
Now, the overall file size will not change. If a large amount of data
is moved, there will be whitespace within priv.edb ready for reuse and
the data will still be nicely and neatly defragged each night.
Check the application event logs, which you do every morning anyway,
right?
Then I'd recommend a different messaging server application.
Have you read the Exchange2000 hosting whitepaper?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E2k Hardware Opinion
Like I
The extensible storage engine (ese) does daily online defragmentations of the
stores. However, it does not compact the store - it only recovers empty tables
and recovers white space - so essentially, the .edb file will always grow when
you run out of white space. The only way to compact a store
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 12:58pm, Stephen Alston wrote:
I'm running Exchange 5.5. SP4 and am getting what appears to be spoofed or
forged email. The reading I've done says I'm susceptible to this if I leave
port 25 open.
Port 25 is SMTP. SMTP is susceptible to spoofing, because you don't
Subsequently, you will see entries in the event logs when ese runs - just open
up those events and you will see how much space in the store was recovered.
-Original Message-
From: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:36 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET'
You were doing fine up until the 'isinteg', which needs to be replaced
by eseutil.exe.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Compacting
The extensible storage engine (ese) does
DON'T DEFRAG!!!
- Original Message -
From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: Compacting
2000, 5.5, all versions?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: User can't see encrypted emails after moving to E2k
I have one user who can't see messages that were sent to him encrypted while he was on the exchange 5.5 system. He was able to open them while on 5.5, but when we moved him over to the E2k server, he selects the message but it doesn't
Title: Message
Dude, that's just plain wrong... LOL!!!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 03:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hiding Start Bar in
Windows NT 4.0
lol
this isn't good.
Never?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Compacting
DON'T DEFRAG!!!
- Original Message -
From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Is this Exchamge 2000 SP 2? If so on the far side, check the
directory access tab in ESM for the server in question (find the server,
right click the servername, choose properties, then the Directory Access
tab). Which servers does that point to? Is it pointing to the servers
in that domain?
am I correct in assuming that message routing *should* take place
automatically within the same Routing Group? Do I need to add any
connectors or anything?
Yes you are correct. No you don't need to add any connectors.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: RE: Error 1104 in app log
Eloquently said William. I just had a very lengthy (almost two weeks) and successful ticket with them on a File/Print clustered server. Ended up being a combination of registry changes provided by PSS two drives on the array that were going bad (of course the
Only if you need to recover the disk space. In the application log, a 1221
event is generated after the automatic online defrag completes that
indicates the amount of disk space that can be recovered.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24,
Im not convinced.
-Original Message-
From: Lambert, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Compacting
Only if you need to recover the disk space. In the application log, a 1221
event is generated after the
Title: RE: Compacting
The only time you should really run an off-line defrag (aka eseutil.exe) is when you expect to regain a large amount of space after having moved and/or deleted a substantial number of mailboxes. Right William?
Exchange priv.edb IS a database, do your Oracle DBA's defrag
Title: RE: Compacting
Be careful Andy. be prepared to be harassed..
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Compacting
Im not convinced.
-Original Message-
No, send me the link to that please?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE: E2k Hardware Opinion
Then I'd recommend a different messaging server
Q186291
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Compacting
The only time you should really run an off-line defrag (aka eseutil.exe) is
when you expect to regain a large amount
Of course :-) I always get the names mixed up in explaining the two but in
practice, I know better.
Thanks for pointing that out.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Ready and waiting...
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Compacting
Be careful Andy. be prepared to be harassed..
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 6a
I'd like to only give our users here a list of address books that include the GAL,
one address book view created at the org, and their contacts. The default view is
very busy and they really do not need to see all the other views/recipient containers.
Anyone have
Title: RE: Compacting
Here it comes
- Original Message -
From:
Abercrombie,
Sherry
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: Compacting
Be careful Andy. be prepared to be
harassed..
-Original
Again, defragmentation happens daily when ese runs. I am assuming this person
means don't compact the store. Running eseutil can be a dangerous thing. Running
either of the utilities that will change the structure of the store, can be a
dangerous thing and should only be done in extreme measures
Yes, both servers are running Win2k SP2 and Exch 2k SP2.
On the directory access tab, automatically discover servers is set on, and the server
itself (mail.intl.com) is listed as Config, DC, and GC.
Everything looks like it should be working, but messages from intl.com to local.com
(or more
thats why I do BLB.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Compacting
Again, defragmentation happens daily when ese runs. I am assuming this
person
means don't compact the store.
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
