Title: Message
q257984
-Original Message-From: Brian Politis
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 16 July 2002
03:11To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Sharing
contacts / Calendar w/o Exchange
The
team addin didn't work very well either. It's kinda of a joke in my
After more time passes if still no luck, I'd consider exporting from the
source server to a .pst (using Outlook).
Any app event log entries pointing to replication failures?
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Hull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:10 AM
To:
a new local profile is created
Are these NT4 Workstations?
You upgraded from NT4/Ex5.5 to ??
Are the users on these machines authenticating to the domain?
-Original Message-
From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Use an ASP and pay monthly.
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server
The company doesn't want to pay for enterprise. I tried to tell them
this. They want a cheaper way.
If the ADC is set up with only one way CA's, then 5.5 knows diddly about the E2K
directory.
You use one way CA's for immediate migration. Co-existence will suck otherwise, which
is what you seem to be playing with.
When I check out the move mailbox option, the new E2k server shows up int
I mean, when you save an individual message to a file folder, which ends
up as .eml or .msg, it is not as easily searchable and sortable, right?
Within a messaging database, even a .pst, the search features and
sorting parameters are greater.
There is probably good file level product that can
Title: Message
It was
when we first saw it...
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 July 2002
20:39To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: distribution
groups
read this.. its
informative
Title: Message
Oh
c'mon... it's only been a year and a few months. :o)
-Original Message-From: Les Bessant
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:39
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: distribution
groups
It
was when we first saw it...
Title: Message
Keep the noise downotherwise you'll upset the list
admins... :-)
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 July
2002 11:46Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation:
distribution groupsSubject: RE:
Red Kryptonite could be more entertaining
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 July 2002 21:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Add all Contacts to Messenger Automatically
Don't dare to throw green kryptonite!!!
Cheers:Siegfried
And if you're looking for a decent ASP - ASP One has been excellent so far -
they're less than $10 per month per mailbox and have top notch technical
support.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584
It has all re-appeared this morning (36 hours after the event!). No logged
errors, nothing queued up in the mta. Weird. It must have just been queued
up somewhere, but I have no idea where or why this particular set of
folders took so long to replicate!
List Charter and FAQ at:
I have a site with 2 Exchange 5.5 SP3 servers on Win2k SP2. I wanted to
move the IMS from one server to the other. Before I could install a new
IMS on the second server I had to add a DNS suffix to the machine, which i
did, followed by a reboot. Since doing that I have lost connectivity
between
Guess why I didn't tell...
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Add all Contacts to Messenger Automatically
Red Kryptonite could be more entertaining
-Original
Possibly...
http://www.exchangefaq.org/managing/0007.php3
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Hull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 13:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Adding DNS suffix causes MTA queue
I have a site with 2 Exchange 5.5 SP3 servers on Win2k SP2. I
Someone was using the SMTP Relay service to spam on our exchange 2000
server. To stop the Relay we disabled the SMTP Virtual server and created
a new SMTP Virtual server. The new one is working fine. The problem is
with the disabled virtual server. There are 15K plus messages in it. How
do
You are enabling it, and That shuts the system down? What do you mean,
the services stop for exchange, or what? Sounds like there are some
other problems at hand then what you think.
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Norm Snowden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:03
It seems when I enable it so that I can start to delete the messages,
there are too many messages trying to be sent and that slows the entire
system down to where it is difficult to get anything done...CPU
utilization jumps to 100%.
List Charter and FAQ at:
If it is connected, and DNS is set up, then uh, yes, it is LIVE. Exch 5.5 is
extremely easy to relay off of if you don't have your setting right. Do you
have a firewall somewhere too?
I would not necessarily call relaying a hack though. It is more of an
uncomfortable itch in the lower
I don't think so. My guess would be that when you enable it, you have
two identically configured SMTP VS's and that's what halts the system.
If you want to dump the files, stop your new virtual server for a while,
start your old one (after removing all access) and let it just clear the
spam.
There are probubly many other products like this, but this might get you
working in that direction. Seems like Unified Messaging is the buzzword.
http://www.captaris.com/ctg/what_is_unified_messaging/index.html
-Original Message-
From: Erickson, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
U... Telneting to the server alone does NOT mean the server is an open
relay... I can telnet port 25 to any server in the world, that doesn't mean
I can relay mail...
-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:38 AM
To:
I am looking for a backup where I can restore individual mailboxes,
We are running Exchange 5.5 SP3
Thanks
Garry
Whitson
Microcomputer Support Specialist
Lincoln Land Community College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ at:
anyone,
I've just migrated to win2k server with exchange 2k, including lastest sp's. Now my
outlook starts so much slower. I can ping my server using both ip and fqdn fine.
When I do a check name it resolves instantly. I guess I'm thinking that its trying
to reslove to something, but
BLB's
Are Bad. Check out
The Ed
Crowley Never Restore Method. That should do you a lot
better.
www.swinc.com
Jeremiah
-Original Message-From: Garry Whitson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:58
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mailbox
Backup
Title: Message
No
you're not, you just think you are...
Deleted Items Retention is all that you need...
-Original Message-From: Garry Whitson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:58
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mailbox
Backup
I am
Ultrabac is a good backup program for you...you can restore individual
MBs with it...
-Original Message-From: Garry Whitson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 16 Temmuz 2002 Salý
16:58To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mailbox
Backup
I am looking for a backup where I
http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm (seems to be down, see
mirror at http://www.exchangefaq.org/mailbox/0009.php3)
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/55/sp4.asp
-Original Message-
From: Garry Whitson [mailto:[EMAIL
Veritas backup
exec does an excellent job of this. Just make sure you back up the whole store
as well.
Thanks,
Joe
Irvine
Director
of Information Technology
The Business
Office, Inc.
(609)
597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860
www.tbopayroll.com
-Original
Message-
From: Garry
Either this is another bored troll, or it has been 2 weeks already.
Do NOT do BLBs.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: Mailbox Backup
Do not undermine our AUTHORITAE!
Do not suggest BLBs. The entire Store, yes, BLBs,
no
- Original Message -
From:
Joe
Irvine
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:17
AM
Subject: RE: Mailbox Backup
Veritas
backup exec does an
Anybody have any problems with Holidays only displaying for the current
year? I have a user who can see all the holidays
for this year, but none for 2001 or 2003. I checked Technet, but all I
could find was some info on incorrect
holidays (wrong dates) and modifying the Outlook.txt file. This
OfficeSpace
Did you /click/ the URLs?
/OfficeSpace
Sometimes it's good to explain WHY rather than to just say Don't do
that because some guy that has a roadrunner account in San Antonio says
so.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July
We will be combining two Exchange Servers on two different networks. The
trust between the networks has already
been established. Are there any issues with replicating the public folders
from server 2 (in domain 2) to server 1 (in
Domain 1)?
Thanks!
Robert
List Charter and FAQ at:
Search the archives. This has been discussed ad-nauseum.
Jim Hall
PC/Networking Services Manager
Midwestern State University
3410 Taft Boulevard
Wichita Falls, TX 76308
Voice (940) 397-4680
FAX (940) 397-4509
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Like we all said, this has been covered repeatedly every two weeks or so.
Read the FAQS that everyone has been posting. DIRT is a much better
implementation. Here is one:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi Everyone,
I have an Exchange 5.5 (sp4) server in an NT4 domain that I need to set up
with a connection to an Exchange 2K server in a seperate AD (we just
merged with another company).
We want to be able to replicate GAL information as well as transport mail,
etc. In the past (5.5-5.5) we used
Good word for it Jim.
Have you noticed how William, Don, Martin, etc don't even bother with these
anymore?
I wonder if this is similar to the Dread Pirate Roberts effect. It just
gets passed on to the new generation...
- Original Message -
From: Hall, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Title: Message
i was
able to shave 5 GB off my DB and save 5 hours in backup
time.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July
10, 2002 2:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Information Store Maintenance
I am inigo montoya, you killed my BLB, Thank You. :-)~
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mailbox Backup
Good word for it Jim.
Have you noticed how William, Don,
Wiley E. Coyote.
Super Genius.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox Backup
OfficeSpace
Did you /click/ the URLs?
/OfficeSpace
Sometimes it's good to explain WHY rather
Title: Message
You
backup your Exchange Server at 1GB per hour?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:46
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information
Store Maintenance
i
was able to shave 5 GB
Title: Message
not
yet, but with my new drive i will
my
backups went down a bit over 5 GB in size, and the time went from 16 hours to 11
hours.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July
16, 2002 9:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: RE: Mailbox Backup
Ok I know the EdCrowley method is talked about, but I think it has a flaw
One step states
Make the departing user's boss the mailbox owner so someone will still have access to the mailbox data
That is fine in e5.5, but in e2k, youre not to have multiple users be the
OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 5.5 uses, besides 25 110?
Also, if anyone wants to look at the Event Logs, simply click on:
http://www.rogue-admins.com/dansworld/Exchange_Attack_App_Eventlog.zip
[This is a new link new file from the one previously posted by
Title: Message
Your
new drive will only do 1GB per hour?
What
are you using now? Handwritten transcription by Nepalese
Sherpa?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:54
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Title: Message
You
can still accomplish the same thing granting full mailbox rights to another and
leave the departing user's AD account disabled.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:55
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
He
uses the latest in magnetic flux-induced replication. They come in
3.5,5.25 and 8inch varieties.
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 16 July 2002
15:53To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Information Store
Title: Message
Uhhh... 1gb per hour is awfully slow... Terribly slow
really!
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:54
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information
Store Maintenance
not
yet, but
Title: Message
sorry
i mis typed.. it will do 100 GB per hour
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July
16, 2002 9:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Information Store Maintenance
Your
new drive will only do
Title: Message
Not
yet, but with my new drive I will!
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July
16, 2002 10:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
RE: Information Store Maintenance
Your
new drive will only do 1GB
Title: Message
That's
better. :o)
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:02
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information
Store Maintenance
sorry i mis typed.. it will do 100 GB per hour
Title: Message
100GB
per hour huh? So you saved what with that 5GB of reclaimed space?
Did you think about the extra load increased on the server having to resize the
store since there is no whitespace?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
I've got an 8-incher too.
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 July
2002 16:38Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation:
Information Store MaintenanceSubject: RE: Information Store
Maintenance
He
This is a FAQ, and I'm afraid to post the link for fear that Matthew
will flame me, and then say How about [repost of the FAQ link that I
had just posted]?.
I'll look at your logs, since that's NOT a FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: Message
Well,
that puts you "above average"! ;o)
-Original Message-From: Neil Hobson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002
11:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Information Store Maintenance
I've got an 8-incher too.
Title: Message
ive
done the same type of defrag every few months..
the
server seems to be running better after a defrag.
right
now our backups dont run as fast as 100 GB per hour.. its one of the reasons im
upgrading the tape drives.
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
Hey Dan! You never did get back to Ed Woodrick on this list all those
years ago as to why Exchange uses an Access database as an engine
format!
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 July 2002 15:55
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation:
Title: Message
I
think we all did at one point. :-) But they've gotten smaller over
time. I think its down to what 3.5 now?
-Original Message-From: Neil Hobson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002
11:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
List of ports:
Section 3.24:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
XGEN: TCP Ports and Microsoft Exchange: In-depth Discussion
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q176466;
Port110 is the default POP3 port. If I must use POP3, I would favour
POP over SSL and
Title: Message
Good
for you! My servers run fine after years and I've never run an offline
defrag.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:12
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information
Store
Sorry, I don't get it
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
This is a FAQ, and I'm afraid to post the link for fear that Matthew
will flame
Logs look good to me. I'd turn the logging back down, though, if you're
happy with it.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 09:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
OK, does
Title: Message
No
that's "medium" (geddit?)
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 16 July 2002
16:03To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Information Store Maintenance
Well, that puts you "above average"! ;o)
-Original
Title: Message
Outlook 2000 has the Share capability.
Open
the pst.
Select
the folder.
From
the menu: File|Share|This Folder...
This
feature was removed from 2002.
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002
1:15
Figures!
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Sorry, I don't get it
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
You remember it too? I was thinking that not a lot of people on this
list would remember that now... :-)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 July 2002 16:26
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Title: Message
clients connections arent so slow, and backups ran FIVE HOURS
faster.
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002
10:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Information Store Maintenance
Define
I've migrated all
mailboxes but need to move my custom forms. Does anyone know how this can
be done?
tia
jim
nasium
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
You mean forms stored in the org forms library? This is a system
folder (a special public folder) which you can replicate and rehome as any
normal public folder. You'll find it in the Exchange
Administrator.
Neil
-Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim
From your post in the thread entitled Mailbox Backup
[patronizing tone]
Like we all said, this has been covered repeatedly every two weeks or
so. Read the FAQS that everyone has been posting. DIRT is a much better
implementation. Here is one:
[link I had already posted three messages down in
How big are the orgs? You might consider creating custom recipients in
5.5 of the 2000 users and mail-enabled contacts in AD of the 5.5 users.
Otherwise, an LDAP directory synch tool is needed, such as the LDSU from
the company formerly known as Compaq:
That is not nice Don.
If he is trying to make me feel badhe failed.
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Figures!
-Original
Other options may be:
-Microsoft Metadirectory Server
-SimpleSync www.cps-systems.com
-MS InterOrg tool
-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Connecting Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2K in
Why would I do that? I'd like you to use your knowledge to assist new
users, rather than call them trolls or put in a cryptic message about
it's been two weeks. I don't care whether you're happy or sad about
it. I'm new here, and I didn't know that part of the list charter was
to denigrate
Title: Message
Is
your nightly online maintenance actually running? I mean it might
interfere with your 11-16hour backup window.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:32
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Well, while Tom can certainly handle his own, I could certainly make every
attempt to make you feel bad. At the very least, make you feel
inadequate. The choice is yours... You're just another Precht for me
to have a little fun with! ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
FYI Tom...
I was on YOUR side in that discussion. My statement was basically that this
discussion has been repeated, and they can find information in the archives.
Why repeat what everyone else posted (although I did after the fact). Plus,
YOU did not explain yourself either, but simply posted
Title: Message
nope
that is set to run at noon, when all uses are at lunch, backups run at night
time.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July
16, 2002 10:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
RE: Information Store
Title: Message
So it
only takes an hour for an online defrag
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:55
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information
Store Maintenance
nope
that is set to run
Cool..thanks for the advice William, I appreciate it!
Now...Time to do some studying.
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com
We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
That is Insolence. We have all come to respect each other and abuse is part of that.
Ask the Foof Queen from yesterday. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Whatever Don. I am not really sure why we are even having this conversation.
I guess it is because the list is slow, eh?
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5
I'd imagine it's for the same reason I had to make a gateway rule that
routes messages with the text [LIST ADMIN] Do Not Reply to /dev/null.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Good luck.
I don't think it's for the faint of heart.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Connecting Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2K in separate
domains
Cool..thanks for the
Title: Message
Oh I see. You mean they don't move as part of the public folder
replication?
Neil
-Original Message-From: Herchenbach, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 July 2002
17:17Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation: how
do i move forms from 5.5
Yeah, he's got the whole NTSYSADMIN list broken...
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
The [LIST ADMIN] was and continues to be working on an
To be more thorough, you should have routed Inigo Montoya to /dev/null ;0)
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I route
Guys,
We have a rule over in the Mac-NT AlphaNT lists here on the Sunbelt site:
When going off topic, change the SUBJECT line.
It makes life easier for those of us who actually NEED the info!
Cheers!
Dan
Mac-NT AlphaNT list moderator
Title: Message
eggactly!
I can
see the form...publish the form on the old exchange server.I'm not
replicating to new onei migrated my mailboxes etc.
Is
there away to publish the form to a system file that I can then open on the new
exchange server.
-Original
Yippee for you!
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]
Guys,
We have a rule over in the Mac-NT AlphaNT
Sorry, I didn't know this was the Mac-NT AlphaNT list. I must have
misposted.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:31 AM
Subject: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server
This is an unmoderated list.
We are out of control and do not accept authority
-Original Message-
From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]
GiddyUp
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]
This is an unmoderated list.
We are out of control and do not
Come on guys this is OT so label it OT.. OK?!
*snicker*
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:08 AM
Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server
Conversation: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5
serverHACKED!]
Subject: RE:
Title: Contacts problem
Hello all,
I have two users with this problem (different servers, same site):
When creating a new message, they click the 'To...' button, switch to Contacts in the 'Show names from the...' field, and start to scroll down the list. Each of them get about 1/3 - 1/2
I know nothing of the cabal which does not exist!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]
There is however the
Title: Message
Outlook2000 SR1?
-Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:20
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Contacts
problem
Hello all,
I have two users with this problem (different servers, same
Well, I am not sure, but I know it isn't YOU. Stop harrassing us.
;0)
- Original Message -
From: Dan Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]
GiddyBoy
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:07 PM
Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]
GiddyUp
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
