Exchange 2007 SP1.
Give a user full mailbox access to another mailbox.
User can open the other person's mailbox in Outlook without issue.
User cannot open other user's mailbox in OWA. It says they don't have
permission. Anybody know what is going on here?
Mike Rausch
~ Ninja Email
The only thing I can think of is to just create more subfolders, one per
status that you need.
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 9:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Flags in Public Folders
Hi folks,
My company is a small
Disk IO. Check your disk IO. If it is above 50 ms then you are toast
and you will have end users get the 'waiting on exchange server'
pop-ups. Exchange Best Practices analyzer can help you spot this.
We have this issue currently using a Hitachi SAN. A major in house
project went live recently
News article re outage.
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1114968920080211
Pete Hotchkiss
On Feb 11, 2008 5:19 PM, Ara Avvali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have the same issue
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 11, 2008
We have the same issue
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 11, 2008 5:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BES issues?
Anyone seeing BES issues right now? We are attempting to contact RIM
and our major phone lines but getting all
Yes, we have seen similar in our system also. We worked closely with MS
and found that the hotfix was successful.
SYMPTOMS:
Free/Busy Calendar data was displayed inconsistently or missing in
Microsoft Outlook 2003.
RESOLUTION:
This hotfix was created after the close date for additions to the
Sean,
I'll check the boot.ini switches hadn't thought of that yet.
As for using Diskpart, yes I partitioned those disks following my initial setup
SAs instructions very carefully.
As for the dedicated spindles... we didn't have any way to determine the
damage that was going to be done by the
Gents/Ladies
with Sue Moss out for an extended leave, I turn to
the Exchange group for help/direction
Exchange: 2003/SP2
Windows: 2003/SP1 (SP2 update later in month)
Outlook: Office 2003/SP2
I have at least 1 user whose shared Outlook Calendar displays all of the
appointments and
Running SP1 yet?
From: Brown, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: McCready, Robert
Subject: Exchange Attendant Service
Occasionally we are having to restart the Exchange Attendant Service. The
first clue is usually some
I would guess that 90% of the time that I have seen this problem, in
Exchange 2003, it was related to a name resolution problem (that is, DNS was
messed up, or A/D sites were messed up). If I were to make a SWAG, I would
say that the same is likely to be true on Exchange 2007.
Every 60-90
Occasionally we are having to restart the Exchange Attendant Service. The
first clue is usually some of our Multifunction Devices lose the ability to
scan to email, getting an Unable to Connect to Exchange Server error. Setting
up new Mail profiles also stops working. And today about 10% of
Yuckyou definitely want to dedicate spindles to your Exchange server if
at all possible. Sounds like you may have identified the performance
problem.
We're running our Exchange server off a similiar setup as yours (CX700,
switched fabric, etc.) Did you partition your Exchange LUNs using
A little deeper and the Queue length is all in the disk the store is on...
Hm...
I think I want to run a longer snapshot to look at this.
Say a couple of hours.
Any suggestions about how to correct the Disk Queue time, or is that a hardware
/ vendor specific type question?
Haven't ever dug
Like the other guys said - first thing I'd take a look at is the network.
But the second thing - start perfmon on that Exchange server. Is the disk queue
averaging over 1? Is paging averaging over 20? Is the processor averaging over
70%?
Any of these could be causing the issue as well...
AV = Symantec... I'll check for updates there.
The switch and server are set to auto-negotiate, and they're both capable of
1Gbps. I'll look at specifying the 1Gb Full on both sides of that link and see
what happens.
Thanks for the ideas so far.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam
Trend as your AV perhaps? This happened when we brought a new server online.
I don't recall the exact details but an update from Trend fixed the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Robb Pickinpaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Sounds like network problems, either on the clients or the server.
Check for errors on the switch and make sure both the switch and server are not
set to auto negotiate.
Cheers
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Robb Pickinpaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 February 2008 14:21
To:
Are you running any kind of anti-virus on the Exchange server? Did this
start happening after an update?
-Original Message-
From: Robb Pickinpaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sluggish performance of Mail Store,
Also another tibit.
The server is sitting at 2.45GB of RAM in use, and the processors never exceed
10% usage.
Hence the confusion, I would understand the behavior if the server was
overloaded, but it's practically doing nothing.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam
I have a really odd behavior pattern happening here and I'm sort of at a loss
as to how to fix it.
All of the sudden starting toward the end of last week (Thursday or Friday) the
mail store seems to be acting funny.
Outlook connections all over the building are popping the Trying to retrieve
Performance on our Exchange 2003 box has deteriorated and users are complaining
of poor response in opening emails. The box is an IBM 2.4 Ghz, 4gig ram
supporting 500 users. The software is windows 2003 enterprise. Running
performance monitor gave disk queue length of around 10 on the stores
Yes there is currently a RIM issue:
A component of the network infrastructure is experiencing a service
interruption
Service Affected: BlackBerry All service for some *The Americas Network
(MULT) subscribers in the following locations: The Americas,
Summary: BlackBerry Network
Ya, saw the news article. Our actual clue was the inability to
actually contact RIM (All circuits are busy, please try again later).
If only they would have and maintain a status page, they could keep
the call volume down significantly.
Steven Peck
On Feb 11, 2008 2:48 PM, Stefan Jafs [EMAIL
On Feb 11, 2008 5:14 PM, Steven Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone seeing BES issues right now?
Apparently, RIM is having a widespread outage. Our BES server isn't
showing any obvious signs of distress (SRP is up, no log warnings) but
users don't get mail on the handhelds.
And this came
Thanks for the reply, Ontrack's power controls actually had it by domain so
I ended up using that.
_
From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Extract mail from @domain.com
Try your anti-virus
Apparently major North America outage.
__
Stefan Jafs | Director of Engineering
Amico Corporation
: 905.747.5010 | Toll Free: 1.877.462.6426 /5010
: 905.764.0862 | Cellular: 416.543.0210
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From NTSysAdmin List:
Here's official word
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1114968920080211
Nikki Peterson
-Original Message-
From: Ara Avvali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BES issues?
Anyone seeing BES issues right now? We are attempting to contact RIM
and our major phone lines but getting all circuits are busy and/or
long hold times. Not the best of things to see.
We're in California if that narrows it down.
Steven Peck
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine
On 2/11/08, MarvinC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our payroll department uses a process that syncs AD with their Ceridan
application. New users are manually created in AD by the helpdesk and once an
email address is generated it's passed back over to HR for further updating.
When HR gets it they
Yes, it is possible
On Feb 11, 2008 9:49 PM, MarvinC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our payroll department uses a process that syncs AD with their Ceridan
application. New users are manually created in AD by the helpdesk and once
an
email address is generated it's passed back over to HR for
Stores are not large - 100 gig in total (raid array has 144 gig
available for stores). Disk layout is operating system raid 1, stores
raid 5 and logs single disk.
On-line maintenance takes about 24 hours. Server is a IBM with a RAID
5I controller
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Michael
Agree - or at minimum email notification - it's on my management's list - as of
10 minutes ago.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BES issues?
Ya, saw the news article. Our
Are you running in cached mode, and do you get the same results if you
look at the free/busy information via OWA?
Original Message-
From: wgardner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Incomplete FreeBusy in Outlook
They have one, I was subscribed, but didn't receive an email on this yet or
haven't.
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BES issues?
Agree - or at minimum email notification -
LOL.
Sorry
Went into the Exchange 2007 GUI, went to Full Mailbox Access management and
added the person.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What am I doing wrong?
No...we aren't allowed to install it until we test in our lab...and the lab
servers are, uh...still on order...
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: McCready, Robert
Subject: RE: Exchange Attendant Service
Running
Robb,
I hope your San isn't the bottleneck, but then again it is a EMC Clariion, so
you never know.
The disk counters in performance would be able to give you a better picture.
Cheers
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Robb Pickinpaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 February 2008
We got an email notification. At around 1544 EST.
(But I can't post to this list from work except via BIS on my BB).
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:03:47
To:MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Yeah, we've been getting caught up for the last 1/2 hr or so.
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 4:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BES issues?
Jusr kicked back in here in Fl
Painstakingly sent to you from my
Mine's a 2850 and has Intel NICs... figures it wouldn't be THAT easy LOL.
I've been working with newer servers lately that's why my jump to Broadcoms was
so quick...
Thanks for the info, and I'll watch for that when I apply SP2 to the server for
sure.
I'm still going to look for updated
Robb,
Either look at the following document
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=8679F6BD-7FF0-41F5-BDD0-C09019409FC0displaylang=en
Which goes over exchange performance troubleshooting, and what to look for.
Or
Download the Microsoft exchange performance and
Thanks Mario, nicely done on the ballooning trip.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Mario Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My Dear Family:
Below is a link (with a password) to access 3 albums of our trip to New
Mexico last October. Hope you enjoy them.
I had the same thing happen a few months ago. Turned out to be the IP Chimney
/ RSS issue.
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/01/03/more-issues-with-the-windows-server-2003-scalable-networking-pack.aspx
(Watch for wrappage in the link)
Bob Fronk
-Original
I'm seeing our backlog working off now. I expect we'll have a
conversation with our rep soon.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003
I just try
Michael,
Quick look at the permon (running real time) and I think you've picked up on
something.
Avg Disk Queue is about 1.1
Pages/Sec avg has run as high as 35 and as low as 11.
Looks like I may need to do some performance tweaks perhaps?
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets
I just try contacting Rim it goes to their auto reply and then drops the
call. This is a dark day for all blackberry users I can't believe they
don't have redundecy or contingency planning in place.
Dr
Dennis Rogov
Senior Network Analyst
THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications
Sounds like network.
Any changes to the adapter or switch port settings?
-Original Message-
From: Robb Pickinpaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: re: Sluggish performance of Mail Store, Server sitting mostly
idle
An average disk queue length of 10 is abysmal.
Running a defrag will not help and may very well hurt.
How large are your stores? What is the hardware of the disks? How often is
online maintenance completing?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
LOL - yeah, I'm sure he appreciated that response.
Heh.
On 2/11/08, Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it is possible
On Feb 11, 2008 9:49 PM, MarvinC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our payroll department uses a process that syncs AD with their Ceridan
application. New users are manually
Monday morning, lol, figured this one out, and yes it is possible. Who
would have thought the answer would be in the Exchange Help Files.
Go figure! ;-)
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 February 2008 09:47
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Journaling to multiple
Our payroll department uses a process that syncs AD with their Ceridan
application. New users are manually created in AD by the helpdesk and once an
email address is generated it's passed back over to HR for further updating.
When HR gets it they add basic account info. This is the way it's been
So...how did you do it?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Rausch, Michael D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: What am I doing wrong?
Exchange 2007
no, definitely not running in cached mode - even created a new profile
on another computer with no change ...
OWA yields same results arg!!
Wendell
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 2:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
A disk queue depth of 1.1 doesn't seem to be nearly enough to cause the
kind of symptoms you're seeing, IMHO.
-Original Message-
From: Robb Pickinpaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish performance of
They are supposed to publish Root Cause tomorrow morning.
Tom McCarty
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We got an email notification. At around 1544 EST.
(But I can't post to this list from work except via BIS on my BB).
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews
interesting - unfortunately I've been approaching this as being an
Exchange server/data
issue, since it has been easy to replicate from several different
workstations (all running
Outlook 2003, SP2) and didn't delve to deep into the client side .
According to the link
Jusr kicked back in here in Fl
Painstakingly sent to you from my Blackberry.
- Original Message -
From: Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Mon Feb 11 18:08:53 2008
Subject: RE: BES issues?
Any details welcome - even if
Try your anti-virus product using content filtering rules, perhaps.
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Extract mail from @domain.com
I thought exmerge would give me an easy way to do this, but
Only if it's sustained above 50ms is it an issue.
Spikes are ok.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 5:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sluggish performance of Mail Store, Server sitting mostly idle
Disk IO.
59 matches
Mail list logo
