So 2003 users should wait .2007 was a flop !
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 6.35
A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Oggetto: Finally 2010
We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010
2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude cooler
than 2007.
Thanks,
Jeremy Phillips
Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 |
BB PIN: 318A6889
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:23 PM
To:
May be was a theoretical improvement, but so complicated and buggy
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com]
Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 8.24
A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Finally 2010
2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010
Very cool. I'm still on 2003. Since we're talking about it, what's the
anticipated release date?
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:34:53 AM GMT -05:00
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect (explains MS' lifecycle policy).
-Scott
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Finally 2010
Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry
Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post
2010 release?
2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org
We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7
~Kevinm
Cool, thanks :-)
2009/4/15 Bolser, Scott scott.bol...@childrens.harvard.edu
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect (explains MS’ lifecycle
policy).
-Scott
*From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:43 AM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin
I heard way back that 2007 was the last Exchange version to support Public
Folders. Is that still accurate? Are the PFs in 2010?
Craig
Craig M. Sauvigne
System Administrator
Winthrop University
Rock Hill, SC 29733
sauvig...@winthrop.edu
SC143
From:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote:
We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010
Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :)
(I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or
several, and write a few words or
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7
that is a Beta 2010 download that is now available.
Some info on new stuff is available at
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124558(EXCHG.140).aspx
and
Been browsing the docs. That header firewall looks like it will make life
easier.
It doesn't look like they've got the transport rules to use the .net regex
library yet.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:20 AM
To:
The one new feature that sounds promising is DAG (Database Availability Group).
I'm running Win2K8 and Exchange 2007 with CCR across two data centers (separate
subnets).
DAG simplifies that setup by removing the complexity of clustering as E2010
requires Win2k8 enterprise, but does not
Public Folders are still alive and kicking on the Mailbox role of an Exchange
2010 server.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd351040(EXCHG.140).aspx
From: Sauvigne, Craig M [mailto:sauvig...@winthrop.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Anybody know what the heck cmdlet extension agents are?
From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Finally 2010
We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010
I'm no expert on Exchange by any stretch of the imagination, but 2007 is
working just peachy in our environment (~ 500 mailboxes). Complicated, yes-but
not really more than 2003 was. Buggy? If it is, we're not seeing it. It has
been humming along nicely here for a while.
John Hornbuckle
I am seeing this issue only on Outlook 2007 using Cached access. Outlook is
updated with all the latest fixes and Exchange 2007 is also fully updated.
Whenever we make any changes to an Exchange object, the changes are not
reflected in Outlook until we delete the OAB files and let Outlook
Well, aren't you going to talk about it?
_
John Bowles
301.473.2260
From: KevinM [kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Finally 2010
We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010
It's Working As Intended I'm afraid to say. The OAB is only updated server side
every 24 hours or so and then the client has to fetch the changes and update
its cached copy, which could be another 12-24 hours. That explanation is
extremely simple, but the upshot is that you could be waiting up
I'm particularly intrigued by the size of the installer: 300MB!
From: bounce-8490525-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8490525-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of John
Bowles
Sent: 15 April 2009 14:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Finally 2010
Well,
Thought this would be interesting to those that watched the Forefront
thread last week...
http://redmondmag.com/news/article.asp?EditorialsID=10754
Bill Lambert
Windows System Administrator
Concuity
A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc.
Phone 847-941-9206
Fax 847-465-9147
The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move
stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE
CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design.
~Kevinm WLKMMAS
My life http://www.hedonists.ca
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Campbell, Rob
rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net wrote:
Anybody know what the heck “cmdlet extension agents” are?
I would guess they're additional commands, or command options, for PowerShell.
-- Ben
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets
2003 just entered extended support yesterday...
Thanks,
Jeremy Phillips
Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 |
BB PIN: 318A6889
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 4:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Maybe. From what little documentation there is, it appears they may be agents
that run powershell scripts.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Finally 2010
On Wed, Apr 15,
You kind of lost me. I'm deployed over 300k seats on 2007 at over a hundred
different organizations. While I've seen a few bugs (literally 3-4) 2007 is
very stable and while it's slightly more complex than 2003 it's nothing
particularly difficult to master.
Thanks,
Jeremy Phillips
Managing
I like DAGs, it will be nice to deploy commodity servers with cheap disks and
no RAID. :)
Thanks,
Jeremy Phillips
Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 |
BB PIN: 318A6889
-Original Message-
From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent:
And the prospect of built in archiving is huge!
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
- Original Message -
From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent:
Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I
remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different
storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nice to have it
in the product though, that's for sure.
Thanks,
Jeremy Phillips
Oh, I'm sure it will be fixed. No worries there. I don't remember the exact
concern as archiving is one thing I haven't played with, but I do remember
being concerned when I saw the design. :)
Thanks,
Jeremy Phillips
Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337
It's worth looking here for Microsoft's cureent take on public folders:
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/03/31/448537.aspx
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal | Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T.
Services Division
Thorn Office Centre,
Kewl. I will be checking it out whenever I finish my deployment of E2K7.
Just getting my test network up and running for the E2K3 - E2K7 migration
so that I have no surprises with the production migration. Then, I think I
will try out the E2K10 beta...
And we still have public folders eh?
Any word on migration strategies from Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007? I'm
assuming a swing migration from 2003 to 2010 is the only way to go, but are
there any additional requirements, caveats, etc. going straight from 2003 to
2010? Is there an upgrade path from 2007 to 2010?
- Sean
On Wed, Apr
Swing method for 2007--2010. There is no option for an in-place upgrade.
-Scott
From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Finally 2010
Any word on migration strategies from Exchange 2003 and Exchange
I would think a swing migration would not be needed between 03 and 10, but
perhaps just install alongside (since it will be 64 bit only) and move
mailboxes and public folders.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.comwrote:
Any word on migration strategies from
Hello all -
I have a quick question about Outlook CAS servers - how does Outlook
choose a Client Access server? - if the CAS role is installed where your
mailbox is, will Outlook always use that CAS server? Is there any
round-robin or load balancing involved? If your mailbox is NOT on a machine
We are using Exchange 2007 CCR, with two separate Hub Transports and two
separate Edge Transports on our DMZ. We use Forefront on all servers for
Anti-virus (currently running 4 engines) and we use Forefront on the Edge
Transports to filter for SPAM using Microsoft's engine and various
Yeah...same thing goes for the GAL. If we add a new user or change an existing
user, with Cached mode enabled the change doesn't show up until the next
morning. Can be a royal pain...
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday,
The SCP record for the server in the same site as the outlook 2007
client will be used or closest site if there is no CAS server or you
have site affinity set
In addition, outlook 2k7 will ALWAYS pick the oldest SCP record
So if you have multiple CAS servers in a site, outlook will always use
the
Forefront Security for Exchange doesn't do spam filtering -- only some
content filtering and anti-malware. The Exchange Edge machine can do the
spam filtering for you.
However, the next version of Forefront for Exchange (F14) will have some
nice anti-spam features. You can beta test F14 if you
true...
~Kevinm WLKMMAS
From: Steve Ens [stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 10:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Finally 2010
I would think a swing migration would not be needed between 03 and 10, but
perhaps just install
Here are some shots of 2010 OWA:
http://www.networkworld.com/slideshows/2009/041509-exchange-2010-test.html?n
etht=rn_041509nladname=041509dailynewspmal
TinyURL: http://tinyurl.com/c5rpjt
\\Steve//
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
One of the more cool parts of OWA or Outlook Live in Exchange server 2010 is
the ECP (Exchange Control Panel) that grants users the power to modify groups,
users, and a limited subset of Exchange settings.
In ECP the enabled user can manage passwords, create, and delete exchange
accounts
42 matches
Mail list logo
