I tried to setup a rule for one of our mailboxes that auto-replied to every
email sent to it, something like
Thank you for contacting the complaint department, we really care, blah blah
blah.
However, it appears to only work internally.
I think there's a setting somewhere on Exchange 2007
We are about to merge our 2000 user sister company into our Active Directory.
We have always had a single domain architecture and now are wanting to move to
a multidomain architecture so the sister company's admins can still manage
their resources. So I am looking for design ideas.
I think
HI there,
Thanks for the info.
I have informed the client, and we are awaiting word from their solictors to
see what the next step is.
Graeme
2009/10/23 James Wells jam...@gmail.com
I'd recommend calling a forensic service (I almost always use Iron
Mountain). Given enough of your config
My laptop is currently in a workgroup setting. When I try and setup my Outlook
2007 client the auto discovery service seems to fail and I can only setup the
profile manually.
Anyone have any idea as to what might be preventing the AD service from working
properly?
Thank you,
John Bowles
Does your domain restrict anonymous access?
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Auto-Discovery Service Not Working
My laptop is currently in a workgroup setting. When I try and setup my Outlook
2007
What kind of management is required on the Exchange servers is required by
the admins in the sister company?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Mayo, Shay shay.m...@absg.com wrote:
We are about to merge our 2000 user sister company into our Active
Directory. We have always had a single domain
I know SP2 has been out for a while, is there any reason not to upgrade?
Looks like I need to expand the schema first!
___
Stefan Jafs
I'm trying to properly create a Certificate on my BES 5 server for the Web
Desktop Admin Service websites to use. It is running on Windows Server 2003
R2 Standard. I am running Server 2008 R2 certificate services. I have
verified permissions on the templates to allow Authenticated users
I have Exchange 2003.
We use it for internal email only. We connect to it using Outlook 2003.
I have a mail provider, mailanyone.net.
We use it for external email only. We connect to it using Outlook Express,
pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com.
I have an ironport that sits on the edge of my
For the most part, we want them to be able to fully admin their exchange
servers. I think we want them to be able to manage their servers but make sure
they can't screw up the entire org.
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
If you are in a workgroup, then you are not authenticated .
CFee
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Auto-Discovery Service Not Working
My laptop is currently in a workgroup setting. When I try and
But what does fully admin mean to you? Is it create and manage users? Do
you want them creating transport rules? Do you just want them to be able
start and stop services? What is it you want them to have the ability to
do? I work with around 20 IT staff that have the ability to manage?admin
Usually, anti-spam devices that sit on the network edge talk SMTP, not POP, for
inbound mail delivery.
Check your Ironport spec sheet to be sure, or look in the configuration menus
for setting up POP mail retrieval, and if you don't find that capability, you
can't get there from here.
Carl
I can't remember off the top of my head. But is anonymouse auth a default
setting in GPO? Cause that would make a world of sense if it is. I guess I
need to configure Outlook Anywhere if I want these features and not access it
via TCP/IP.
John Bowles
Would I set my internal dns to have pop.imcu.com and smtp.imcu.com point to
the smtp relay of the ironport?
That way when the outlook express accounts resolved their addresses they
would be forced to come through the ironport?
I can set up the ASA to funnel all port 25 and port 110 traffic to go
the schema expansion has been the #1 blocker for sp2 deployments.
there are no new issues that i am aware of introduced by sp2. the world-wide
interwebs have been very quiet on that front...
From: Stefan Jafs [sj...@amico.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009
If you already have an email server (Exchange) and all the other necessary
items why not simplify and just (get rid of Outlook Express):
Public IP Private IP
Internet--ASA--Ironport--Exchange--Outlook
you have to allow auto replies on the send connector.
Kevinm | WLKMMAS | This message is Certified Swine Flu Free |
http://www.hedonists.ca
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Rob [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Thanks Jason.
I would love to get rid of OL Express but it is a Legacy thing. I have
promoted this beast because of my fears of viruses in the past. Now I have
been so convincing that nobody will allow me to change their stance on
internal mail and external mail.
:)
Do viruses spread slower because they are attached to an email in a POP
mailbox vs passing through an Exchange server?
I agree with Jason, you paid for the IronPort to scan your incoming mail,
get rid of the OE client and simplify. When no new mail shows up in their OE
mailbox, but appears in
Ditto!
From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Weird problem
:)
Do viruses spread slower because they are attached to an email in a POP mailbox
vs passing through an
That is an org level setting on the properties of the entries on the Remote
Domains tab. It can be allowed for specific external domains or all domains
but I am not aware of a way to allow it only for an individual sender to many
domains.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Rob
But right now they are breaking the law and have the email segregated. Internal
only in Outlook and external only in OE.
They are happy that way.
From: Eric Woodford
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Weird problem
:)
Do viruses spread slower
AD service? That would only be applicable if your system belonged to a
domain - for which you don't appear to be. You should be able to set up a
mail profile manually, and supply credentials that you can also save.
--
ME2
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:51 AM, John Bowles
I want to so bad.
From: Tom Cass
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Weird problem
Ditto!
From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
Yeah, if you want it for only one user/many domains, you are going to need to
create a transport rule, not a mailbox rule (and without checking, I can't
remember in exchange 2007 whether that might need to be an Edge rule instead of
a Hub rule - in exchange 2010, the Hub can do them all).
That doesn't require a subdomain.
It simply requires that you put a particular user as a local administrator on
the Exchange server and delegate them permissions for a particular OU full of
users.
Really, truly, there are rarely reasons for subdomains anymore.
Exactly
On 10/27/09, Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote:
That doesn't require a subdomain.
It simply requires that you put a particular user as a local administrator
on the Exchange server and delegate them permissions for a particular OU
full of users.
Really, truly, there
We've recently migrated a bunch of users from an SBS system on to our Exchange
2007 system. The users had previously existed as contacts in Exchange.
We deleted the contacts and created new users. Everything works great except
for the expected errors from cached internal Outlook addresses.
First, this can take up to 2 hours to take effect.
Second, the last cn should be cn=GeneSnitker, not
cn=genesnit...@wrightbg.commailto:cn=genesnit...@wrightbg.com.
From: Steve Hart [sh...@wrightbg.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange
We did, no problems here.
-Andy
From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 1:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 SP2
I know SP2 has been out for a while, is there any reason not to upgrade?
Looks like I need to expand the schema first!
31 matches
Mail list logo
