Sam/James,
Thanks for the great information.
The affect on Exchange Performance is my top concern. I just recently added
another mailbox server to split the load of 2300 mailboxes as well
as re-architected the disk subsystems. Each server uses a dedicated RAID 1
for smtp directories, temp, mta qu
I have multiple E2003 servers in my environment. But, one of them
contains the lion share of public folders used across the firm.
On monday we had a UPS failure, and this exchange server crashed hard.
It came back up fine, as far as we can tell, but for this.
Outlook users in one office cannot
BES sizing is something like 3.64 online users to 1 on average (if I am
remembering correctly), not including any regular client access. So I
just round it up to 4 to be safe. The actual usage can be lower or
higher of course, depending on a number of factors (# of user messages,
appointments, et
I've had all three in place before.
Wow, BES was intricate. I think I was Spoiled by Good Messaging.
But, I never had any conflicts with the three. I doubt I have enough
users to accurately gauge load requirements, etc. My Good server with
25 handhelds has purred like a kitten for years.
Exchange 2003 SP2 FE/BE
I'm hearing chatter that we may be asked (forced) to provide support for
multiple mobile device technologies, from Windows Mobile to iPhones to
BlackBerrys. We currently provide Exchange ActiveSync and Good Mobile
Messaging, which handles the WM and iPhones.
*On a side not
Excellent thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Ens
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: Insert company logo in email?
Yep!
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:14 PM, James Kerr wrote:
Is it able to generate signatures by pul
Yep!
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:14 PM, James Kerr wrote:
> Is it able to generate signatures by pulling user data from AD?
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Steve Ens
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Sent:* Friday, December 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Insert company logo i
I haven't gotten my hands on it yet, but E2010 is supposed to be able to do
that.
From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Insert company logo in email?
Is it able to generate signatures by pulling user data
If your environment is more then a hundred or so users, I would
strongly suggest staying as far as possible from Policy Patrol.
Unless they have managed to come up with support engineers that
actually know what they are doing in the last few years.
They managed to get themselves on my 'do not even
Is it able to generate signatures by pulling user data from AD?
- Original Message -
From: Steve Ens
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Insert company logo in email?
Works fine for us, I had a web guy create some HTML to insert
Works fine for us, I had a web guy create some HTML to insert with logos
etc...
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:08 PM, James Kerr wrote:
> Oh smooth, when I try to edit or create a disclaimer in Vipre I get an
> unhandled exception. I guess I will have to open a support ticket in order
> to check out
Oh smooth, when I try to edit or create a disclaimer in Vipre I get an
unhandled exception. I guess I will have to open a support ticket in order to
check out this function of Vipre.
- Original Message -
From: James Kerr
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2
We did an eval of Good a few years ago and as I recall, it was pretty
straightforward to install/configure - certainly no more complex than a BES.
The only negatives we found were that it was an additional BES-like environment
with a huge raft of devices to support and intranet access required a
Vipre can do that? then wtf did I just buy exclaimer for then? let me fire up
vipre console.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Ens
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Insert company logo in email?
I'll be using the Vipre email
Dude, you can use the cloud for testing. Just don't put your data on it
then...
It was just a suggestion, take it or leave it.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Good Messa
Nope. Though shall not allow the possibility of PHI data to enter the
cloud as it may not be in our control. Ever. We are large enough
that we will be hosting it ourselves. No cloud here.
The main reason senior management hasn't just arbitrarily told us to
allow their specific iPhones already
I think a good way to test it is with a hosted provider...
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Good Messaging App for iPhone
We disallow iPhones because we cannot control device
We disallow iPhones because we cannot control device encryption.
Someone found the Good stuff so now we have to build out a test
server.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Barsodi.John wrote:
> Sweet found it. They might be getting a call from me after our risk
> analysis of smartphone meeting in 3
Sweet found it. They might be getting a call from me after our risk analysis
of smartphone meeting in 3 hours. :)
" Over-the-air data transmissions and enterprise data at rest on the iPhone are
secured with industry-standard AES encryption."
Thanks,
JB
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollo
Thank you, this is exactly what I needed without being able to articulate
it.
I'll do this as soon as I get everyone onto our BES.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Barsodi.John wrote:
> ..Which is the BIS service
>
>
>
> You can block inbound connections from the BIS netblocks to your OWA
> dir
Hey Neil
Hope you have a great show tonight!
Bill...
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : Sorry for the Cross Post my sons second gig, trying to
drive up the Yo
..Which is the BIS service
You can block inbound connections from the BIS netblocks to your OWA directory.
http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB11036&sliceId=1&docTypeID=DT_SUPPORTISSUE_1_1&dialogID=231454215&stateId=0%200%20231452369
KB11036
I do this w
So you're saying I would have to disable OWA to truly secure the
environment?
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Richard Stovall <
richard.stov...@researchdata.com> wrote:
> The Blackberries I’ve seen that don’t use BES to get Exchange mail
> actually use OWA. The account at the cellular servic
Check out the link called "Good for Enterprise(tm) Architecture and
Security"
http://www.good.com/resources#tabs-2
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:john.bars...@igt.com]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Good Messaging
The Blackberries I've seen that don't use BES to get Exchange mail
actually use OWA. The account at the cellular service provider is
configured with the OWA address, username and password. These have all
been one off setups for individual users and aren't managed directly by
the company providing
Their approach to the iPhone sounds very similar to Sybase's. Basically a
sandbox of corporate data, which, IMHO, is the way to go when blending personal
devices into Enterprise environments. I checked the data sheet, I don't see
anything talking about the data at rest encryption. Do you hav
Exchange 2003 running on SBS 2003.
I'm currently in the middle of a project to disable mobile access (except
OWA) to email for most users. The only users who will continue to have
access to email on their cell will be managers and partners with
Blackberries. I'm setting up a BES server to servic
I know Good Messaging by Motorola is often left in the dark compared to
EAS and BES, but I have been using their product for about 5 years and I
have nothing bad to say about them.
There has been complaints of the security of the iPhone on this list.
This should help alleviate many, if not all of
Thanks. I see those as well, but I just never expected for inter...@whatever
to be an unusable (reserved) SMTP address in an Exchange organization. No big
deal at the end of the day. I'll just tell the folks that requested the
distribution group that prompted all this to pick another address.
You'll find a few of those in the PF hierarchy. For example, there is also one
named "Microsoft" and one named "schema".
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 'M
Thanks Kurt. Using PFDAVAdmin here's what I found.
The folder with the email address inter...@... Is a named "internal" and is a
subfolder of a System Folder named StoreEvents{GUID}. Enumerating the
DS:proxyAddresses values of this subfolder with the PFDAVAdmin tool shows the
SMTP addresses a
Using a tool such as adfind or dsquery, you should be able to use the simple
LDAP filter "(proxyAddresses=smtp:inter...@*)" and locate the relevant object.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:50 PM
To: MS-
Heh, on the same note, we had a user create a helpdesk ticket complaining that
he wasn't getting enough spam, and was there a problem somewhere. Made us laugh
:)
From: bounce-8754209-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8754209-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Steve
33 matches
Mail list logo
