Anyone using this EMC appliance and software with Exchange?
We're looking at using it and I was looking for some real world experiences.
Thx in advance
--
smsadm
Jason,
Just wanted to let you know that I was also able to observe a similar issue
where the headers displayed in Outlook or OWA do not match the headers in a
forwarded message (as an attachment)... In my testing, I forwarded the full
messages as attachments to my gmail account.
While I
Thanks Joe, nice to see I'm not the only one.
I also posted in the Outlook general forum with not too much response:
http://ow.ly/1Qd9D
Some discussion occurring on the office development forum too:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vsto/thread/61a98015-24a4-47
You don't have to pay to make bug reports. You ask for a non-dec and they give
it to you. However, you do have to offer a CC up front.
Outlook retains 100% fidelity on RFC headers and on pre-existing NAMED
PROPERTIES. MAPI maintains 100% fidelity on transport headers at incoming
bridgehead
Our domain name is alanet.org, and lately we are getting hammered by
sp**m sent to alanet.org.support. It's obvious that the actual sender
name in the email is a staff name, and the alanet.org.support is the
display name. Does any one know of a filter or rule that can utilize the
display name to
Yikes, thanks for the possible work-around!
I can say with certainty this was not an issue with 2007 sp2.
~JasonG
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 14:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Not all headers
Why not setup your firewall to block all incoming email from alanet.org since
your mail server should be authoritative email should not be generated from
outside. If its hosted created exemptions for those IP's. If you have a
website generating email with your domain create an exemption or an
I'll second the chime-in on Vipre for Exchange. The Anti-Spoofing alone
saves us from looking at quite a bit of spam. Plus - you get A/V,
Disclaimers, RBL and SPF checking.
Sean Rector, MCSE
From: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net
[mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net]
Sent: Wednesday,
We use Message Labs for our first line of defense, then a Multitech
firewall for second line, then a custom anti-spam software on the
workstations.
Works a treat.
Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
i...@sonomatilemakers.com
Just thought I would let you know the results of the move. We were a bit
concerned about the loss of SIS, but we had 4 Databases of varying sizes across
the org and total DB size including STM files was 171 GB on Exchange 2003 SP2,
after moving all mailboxes the mailbox store with log files on
Thanks for the real-world info. Do you know your Perfmon-reported Single
Instance Ratio for each DB before the move? That would be a fun set of
statistics.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:07 AM, greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net wrote:
Just thought I would let you know the results of the move. We
How many users Greg?
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:07 PM, greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net wrote:
Just thought I would let you know the results of the move. We were a bit
concerned about the loss of SIS, but we had 4 Databases of varying sizes
across the org and total DB size including STM files
235 users
Total SIS Ratio: 44
Sis Rations |
916 | Storage 1, 2nd largest group. Most emails were strictly within that
group.
32| Storage 2 IT group. Our limits are a bit larger..for testing
purposes. :)
240 | Storage 3 Largest group. Bulk of users in this group. Lots
Oh yeah and it was simply that the Database didn't have an OAB selected. The
docs refer to an valid location in 2007, in 2010 its under organization not
server. Soon as I clicked and updated OAB about 30 mins later everything just
lit up.
I know how it happened so I wont be making that
14 matches
Mail list logo
