> So, the answer is, as usual, "It Depends."
I am surprised Citrix didn't Trademark the phrase "It Depends" since that is
the answer to almost any question related to Citrix!
Webster
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Um, Ouch...
>
> Reg
Regardless of your answer to that question, what makes you think it's
going to be just an address book next time?
You aren't saying that there won't be a next time, are you?
Of course, if you're in a highly competitive industry, a list of
external contacts can say a *lot*, and what it reveals abo
The thought of having an address book stolen would be very upsetting to any
of my clients. In fact this is exactly the sort of thing that keeps me
working maintaining in-house servers.
Roger Scudder
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday
Today an address book. Tomorrow... ? This is just a teaser of things to
come.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 8:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Um, Ouch...
How important is an address book
I'm still not happy about the weird things the EMS does because it has to get
all SOAPy and pretend there's a cloud between my workstation and the Exchange
server in the next room.
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Su
In the context of an address book, those are the two common items between an
address book and a tax return... And yes, more items are stored in the
address book than those...
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Don Andrews wrote:
> I think there can be LOTs more than just email address, name & add
I think there can be LOTs more than just email address, name & address in there.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Um, Ouch...
It could be small, or it could be
I wonder if MS' answer is "gee, you don't need BES or RIM for that matter -
just expose your mail system to the internet - what? - can't get to your other
intranet servers? - just expose them too - it should all be open" or
something...
From: Don Ely [mailto:do
And then having to report to clients that you've had a data breach...
What's the attendant damage going to be from that?
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Campbell, Rob <
rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net> wrote:
> I think the major concern is that there was an unauthorized access of one
> client
I think the major concern is that there was an unauthorized access of one
client's data by another client.
That is was "just an address book" doesn't really do much to repair that loss
of confidence.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wedne
It could be small, or it could be big.
IRS 7216 was updated to match current market trends in efiling, outsourcing,
etc for tax preparers. It covers the disclosure of tax return information.
What is tax return information? Information on the return, such as name and
address. Is it stupid to be
I won't disagree... I'm having a hard time determining who to dislike
more. MS for pretty much rendering MAPI useless or the vendors for not
keeping up with MS... It does piss me off that MS crippled MAPI support for
other software and they have no intention of going away from that plan. Had
th
How important is an address book?
I ask that question - seriously - because in my opinion it's pretty small. I've
had this discussion before, several times, and depending on the audience I've
seen it go both ways.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchang
The challenge (of course - at least from my perspective) is that EWS doesn't
provide as many capabilities as the MAPI service. SO... they have some
challenges. I've migrated several applications from MAPI to EWS (c++ to c#) and
there are just some things you can't do in EWS - you have to use LDA
Given that the EWS version is STILL not available, I would guess you have
some time before this becomes an issue...
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Damien Solodow wrote:
> Would be nice but it leaves pre 2007 Exchange shops SOL. ;)
> --
> Sent using BlackBerry
>
>
> *F
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9202078/Microsoft_BPOS_cloud_service_hit_with_data_breach?source=CTWNLE_nlt_pm_2010-12-22
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsub
Yes.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: to CDO or not CDO? or BESx with EX2010
Wasn't RIM suppo
Would be nice but it leaves pre 2007 Exchange shops SOL. ;)
--
Sent using BlackBerry
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 07:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: to CDO or not CDO? or BESx wit
They are supposed to since MS doesn't really like CDO anymore. And RIM has
numerous support calls going right now with BES and 2010 installs...
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: "Campbell, Rob"
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:26:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issu
Wasn't RIM supposed to be converting everything over to EWS, and quit using CDO?
From: Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: to CDO or not CDO? or BESx with EX2010
situation:
mail=server1: exchange server 2010
b
IF there wasn't, I'd be disappointed.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Campbell, Rob <
rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net> wrote:
> There’s BACON?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:31 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
There's BACON?
From: Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: to CDO or not CDO? or BESx with EX2010
Once again I must bow in humility to the master.
Thanks Michael
I'm going to have to start calling you th
LOL, that is great. Michael "The Refrigerator" Smith
I've always thought Michael was one cool character. Actually, a frig
removes heat and doesn't "make" things cold. So MBS actually takes the heat
off of poor common folk and makes us just look cool to our bosses and peers.
Thanks Frig.
Once again I must bow in humility to the master.
Thanks Michael
I'm going to have to start calling you the refrigerator for all the times
you've saved my bacon.
-Bill
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> The “assumption” of “Outlook 2010 on the mail store machine” goes a
dunno. will give it a go. just found this article hidden in technet.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee633455.aspx
It suggests that the Outlook 2010 requirement was only for Pre SP1. So that
could be my savior.
I'll try uninstalling the Outlook and running the import.
Hpefully my o
The "assumption" of "Outlook 2010 on the mail store machine" goes away with
Exchange 2010 sp1. It's no longer required.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:58
Thats how I did it on my last Exchange 2007 migration.
Gavin.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Sobey, Richard A
wrote:
> Can you install the tools on your desktop 64-bit machine and run an
> elevated Powershell session with Mailbox Import/Export role?
> --
> *From:
Can you install the tools on your desktop 64-bit machine and run an elevated
Powershell session with Mailbox Import/Export role?
From: bounce-9214480-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[bounce-9214480-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] on behalf of Bill Songstad
situation:
mail=server1: exchange server 2010
besx=server2: member server in domain
Requirements:
import and export mailbox data
use BESx to update calendars
Assumptions:
MS requires Outlook 2010 on the mail store machine to import and export pst
files
RIM requires CDO 1.2.1 on exchange server f
It makes life a lot easier to use a SAN cert.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: phil levine [mailto:plevin...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Cert required for 2010
Quick questi
Quick question about Certificates; do i need a SAN cert if i want to combine
OWA, OWA for 2003 with the automatic redirect and Outlook anywhere or will the
regular cert I have work?
Thanks.
Phil
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_fo
31 matches
Mail list logo
