The big deal tends to be with IMAP and POP3 clients that depend on the named
properties existence. For some people, that caused significant disruption.
If you aren't using IMAP or POP3 clients, then you are probably OK.
Obligatory statement: MAPI clients CAN be affected too. But I've not heard o
As I mentioned in an earlier question, we have run into the named property
quota limit in Exchange 2003. I am in the process of increasing the quota (via
registry key) and continued to research the issue. I found an article
(http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/29/3410545.aspx)
Same way as Exchange 2003 - you just have to include more vDirs. Or use a /*.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A
Gah! I was afraid you were going to say that. Guess I have to step up my move
to 2010. I've got it installed, but am still quite confused as to how to
"present it" to the public intarwebs via ISA 2006.
Sean Rector, MCSE
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thurs
Thanks much, Michael!
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How long to unmount/remount info store?
It _shouldn't_ take more than a couple of minutes.
Basically all shuttin
It _shouldn't_ take more than a couple of minutes.
Basically all shutting the store down does is flushing the version store (i.e.,
modified pages) to the database (they've already been flushed to log files),
free memory, and terminate the process.
But if for some odd reason the store crashes on
I have just run into the 9667 issue where I have to increase the named property
quota (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/820379). The last step indicates to
unmounts and remount the database. We are trying to schedule an outage to do
this, and I am trying to figure out if this is a quick or prot
I found where I read it - it was regarding a QFE to Exchange 2007...never mind.
And below, I should've said "meeting organizer" and "organizer" in the places
where I said "owner".
Sorry about that.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Mic
By default, Calendar entries expire 120 days after they have occurred. What
happens to them after that depends on DIR and SingleItemRecoveryEnabled. I
certainly don't know all the various option to the various cmdlets in Exchange
2010, but I'm not aware of a way to change this one.
Regards,
Mi
I would swear I read something about this recently...
But as far as I know, only the meeting owner or a full-control delegate of the
owner will have "Send Update".
Calendar processing is almost black magic on Exchange 2003. It's very
controllable on Exchange 2010.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Co
Is this the MOC courseware?
I turned down a contract to update the MOC. They refused to pay me enough to
fix it properly.
It's really confusing because the guys that wrote it are very good with
Exchange. I can't believe that they came up with some of that stuff.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Cons
They won't get the new OWA - but they WILL get a new forms-based authentication
logon window.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 201
Not my area of expertise - William Lefkovics and Diane Poremsky are always my
"go to" people for Outlook questions I can't answer.
They hang out on the main Outlook group of YahooGroups or you can probably
email them directly.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEss
Nope. They won't get the new OWA until their mailbox is on a 2010 server.
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
-Original Message-
From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Adm
Sorry to highjack your thread.
Then does this mean, that users on the 2003 DB will start using the 2010 OWA
interface once the CAS is installed?
-Original Message-
From: Robb Pickinpaugh [mailto:robb.pickinpa...@anesthesiallc.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Ad
Thanks for all the help!
Turns out my downfall was believing the training class manuals.
They kept saying make the CAS the connection point for all client connections.
I interpreted all, and well... all.
Rather I should have interpreted it as OWA, EAS, and OA. Silly me :)
Once I set up and c
But smtp is listening on second network
From: Hank . [mailto:hgedr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 10:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: what determines the IP address used in the mail header?
I thought it could be but no idea what determines the order.
There are two phy
I thought it could be but no idea what determines the order.
There are two physical networks and two different subnets. The second
network is pretty much isolated. No gateway is defined and there is no
routing between the two subnets either externally or on the server.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:12
This is a Windows thing, not an Exchange thing.
Are the two networks on the same subnet?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Hank . [mailto:hgedr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: wha
I have a site that wasn't set up by me that I manage.
It has Exchange 2007 running on server 2003. The server is connected to two
physical networks. There is the "main" network and then a second network
that is used to connect some internal equipment.
One NIC connects to the "main" network and th
Why are you trolling here? :)
Get back to work, blue-badge!
Nothing to see here, move along...
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sub
I can't tell you details, but I can tell you this:
[1] A fix is being worked on
[2] You can recover everything that "appears" it was deleted by using Recover
Deleted Items
[3] This doesn't happen if you use OWA
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.co
Just a heads up to everyone...
We installed Exchange 2010 SP1 RU4 this past weekend and we are now receiving
reports from our Outlook 2010 users that when they copy/move items from their
personal archive to their mailbox the copied/moved folder is empty. If the
folder they were attempting to m
Relay in Accepted domain
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange and subdomains.
Exchange 2007, will be 2010 in the fall.
So we own the public foo.com. We are about to put up a public subdomain
Not me. I never, except under very few conditions, install updates or service
packs when they are first released. The one basic exception to that rule is
when MS releases a patch outside their normal second Tuesday schedule. In that
case, I figure better a few machines have problems because o
Hi Al,
if you type
get-mailboxdatabase | ft -a name,rpc*
are there any old/wrong entries under RpcClientAccessServer? if so do a
set-mailboxdatabase and put it back
Cheers
Chris
From: Al Rose [arose...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 July 2011 17:04
To: MS-
Actually looking at the code line from my post:
Lid: 8856dwParam: 0x6D9 Msg: EEInfo: prm[1]: Unicode string:
cas.lab.local
i see that loadgen tries to hit an old cas array DNS record (cas.lab.local
was the name of a casarray i had setup but removed), so why?
If i run
[PS] C:\Windows\sys
Anyone of you guys are using Loadgen?
I am trying to run it against my lab (2k10 Sp1 servers) which consists of 2
CAS/HUB servers and 2 Mailboxes servers, DAG is implemented each server has
10 active copies, no casarray, no load balancer...
Firewall is disabled on all servers.
I have tried diffe
Exchange 2010 CAS does not RPC proxy for mailboxes on the EX2003 server, - the
EX2003 server is its own RPC endpoint - i.e. the RPC connection is directly to
the information store service on the 2003 backend server.
What you are describing, is, to my mind, the correct, and expected behaviour...
29 matches
Mail list logo