I am running a VMWare cluster - with 2 mbx servers and 2 CAS servers - all
virtual. I tried using NLB - and it was a complete failure. That is when I
went ahead and got a coyote point, and it has been fine since.
From: Brian McGloin [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Se
HI John,
Thanks for your help in getting this resolved.
Here is what I ended up using.
Get-Mailbox -resultsize Unlimited | Where {$_.ForwardingAddress -ne $null} |
Select Name, ForwardingAddress, DeliverToMailboxAndForward | Export-Csv
c:\forwardusers.csv
-Dan
From: john.c...@pfsf.o
This possibly
Get-Mailbox | Where {$_.ForwardingAddress -ne $null} | Select Name,
ForwardingAddress, DeliverToMailboxAndForward
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Dan Hyatt [mailto:d...@danhyatt.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 03:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Adm
Thanks Michael. Perhaps I'm not being too clear, these aren't in any way
reserved/system smtp addresses, they are 110% names of department specific
public folders with internal project names, and adfind.exe confirms they belong
to specific public folders.
If I mail-enable them it doesn't appea
I don't know which addresses you have, so I can't make really good decisions
about that; but Exchange does use email for PF replication and has quite a
number of reserved SMTP addresses.
That being said, someone made a really good suggestion (last week? Two weeks
ago?) - mail-enable and then sw
OK, but then why on earth do I have them?
I can't find a single command or anything that seems to apply, other than the
ones related to mail-enabled/disabled public folders, which says these aren't
mail-enabled.
From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.
I think it's a serious mistake to delete them.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
So, back to this a little later, but does anyone have any ideas just wtf might
be going on?
I can't see a single problem/error in any logs, yet I seem to have lots of
these things in the MESO folder despite them not being mail-enabled according
to the EMS or ECP.
Best lead I've found so far is
OSS: I'm not terribly familiar with this end of the field, but in the
BSD world there is CARP - pfsense (which is based on FreeBSD), among
other platforms, uses it to load balance. I don't know if it's
suitable for what you're doing, however.
Kurt
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 06:26, Paul Hutchings wro
Anyone used these? http://uk.loadbalancer.org/
From: Paul Hutchings [paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 03 October 2011 3:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Load Balancers?
Sorry yes, “pair” being physical or virtual it’s still (ideally) two Windows
in
Don't quite follow. It's a single server so the rule is on the Hub role, no
edge server. It's the only transport rule and the msg isn't from an
authenticated user. Just allowing the VM server to relay.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent
Different message type.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 11:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exch 2010 Transport Rule
We're finishing up our 03-10 migration
We're finishing up our 03-10 migration (and archive setup) and I didn't like
the way journaling worked in 2010. Instead I created a transport rule to BCC
all email to an archive mailbox. As far as I can tell it's working perfectly
except for one thing. Our VM server emails inbound faxes and V
I am not sure that external load balancers are any simpler, especially if you
are using the SSL offload
Dave Wade
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: 03 October 2011 15:06
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Load Balancers?
Sorry yes, "pair" being physical or
We did windows nlb for a while but moved to Kemp in June.
2 sites, each has:
3 virtual CAS
2hub/MBX servers
3 copy dag, each DB has 2 copies in site, one across site.
~7K mailboxes, 1400 Blackberries, a few hundred EAS devices.
>From my post on this back in June
WNLB at first-
We went WNLB for a c
I'm in the same boat as Paul. We're using NLB, but haven't implemented
our Exchange environment yet. Still working on the details of migrating
from Groupwise.
>>> Brian McGloin 10/3/2011 6:10 AM >>>
Is anyone using the Windows 2008 Server NLB?
Experiences?
Thx in advance
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 a
Further to the email below. I have had a look at the Internet headers of
the email to see if it revealed any extra clues and it doesnt..But, I
did spot that the subject listed in the header of the email does not
match that of the subject displayed in the email.
John
_
Sorry yes, "pair" being physical or virtual it's still (ideally) two Windows
instances I'd sooner not have just to do LB.
From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk]
Sent: 03 October 2011 14:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Load Balancers?
You don't actually need two physical
You don't actually need two physical boxes. You can use HyperV to put the CAS
and the Mailbox server on the same physical box. If you are building a DAG then
you will have Windows Server Enterprise (because you need that for a DAG) so
that allows you to run 4 instances of Windows Server on the o
We are, but we are just at the beginning of our pilot program and haven't done
load testing. Failover works just fine though.
From: Brian McGloin [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 8:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Load Balancers?
Is anyone using the Window
Thanks, I shall look at Coyote Point. I did briefly consider using Windows but
it's another pair of servers etc.
Be interested if there are any low cost or open source options out there than
run as a virtual appliance though (Kemp's VA is more than physical at our sort
of size).
Paul
From: M
Is anyone using the Windows 2008 Server NLB?
Experiences?
Thx in advance
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> Kemp is a good choice, as is Coyote Point.
>
> ** **
>
> If you have lots of money, you can also consider Citrix, Cisco, and F5.***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,**
Kemp is a good choice, as is Coyote Point.
If you have lots of money, you can also consider Citrix, Cisco, and F5.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 8:48 AM
Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
One of our users got a Public folder size warning message
*
Subject: Public folder is over its size limit: Server1
Importance: High
This public folder has exceeded one or more size limits set by your
administrator.
The public folder size is 2295401 KB.
Public F
24 matches
Mail list logo
