We have recently deployed Exchange 2007 and setup the autodiscover service.
Works great for all of our users. Unfortunately while we are the central IT
department for the University, we are not the only area running Exchange.
There are several smaller departments that run their own AD Forests
time? It sounds
to me (and I can be totally off here) that this is a user education problem.
_
John Bowles
From: "Boggis, Josh"
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 9:34:03 AM
Subject: Autodiscover service and multipl
address this.
--James
On 3/12/09, Boggis, Josh wrote:
> We have recently deployed Exchange 2007 and setup the autodiscover service.
> Works great for all of our users. Unfortunately while we are the central IT
> department for the University, we are not the only area running Exchange
In the middle of a migration from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007. One of the
features we heavily used in 2003 was a shared/group calendar. Just a mailbox
where users only have permission to the calendar that they used for various
things (an out of office/vacation listing for an entire departme
you mean by required. IE is required for full feature access. But
that is not new to 2007 and not limited to the calendar. It is true of many of
the OWA features.
From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:josh.bog...@uconn.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: G
ers. He said it better than I
just did..it made sense to me at the time.
From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:josh.bog...@uconn.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Calendering and OWA
Let me give an example:
https://yourservername/owa/usersalias/
n was
they would rather spend the time adding functionality to IE than spending their
time adding limited functionality to other browsers. He said it better than I
just did..it made sense to me at the time.
From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:josh.bog...@uconn.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:27
This stuff works! I poured it all over OWA, and now I have OWA light!
From: Francisca Fitzgerald
[mailto:supplicatingnf...@approvedfinancialservices.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Losing wieht does not have to be tough , Introducing Acai Berry
In recent Upgrading skills to 2007 class I had the instructor commented
that you can only do this on a 32-bit version of windows. From my
understanding that's only a requirement if you're looking to do it FROM
a pst, not TO a pst. Otherwise why not just use exmerge on the 32 bit
machine? Which i
ge uses for the mail store on a 64 bit system.
____
From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 7:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange 2007 newbie question - Exmerge
In recent Upgrading skills to
Setting up an Exchange 2007 system in a test environment that already
has Exchange 2003. Created a mailbox on 2007, able to go into OWA and
look at other peoples free/busy without a problem. Use outlook 2007 on
a newly created profile (done manually), and free/busy isn't available.
Recreate t
p, you may want to consider pushing the
reg-hack to pull from e2k3 f/b system folders.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Boggis, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Setting up an Exchange 2007 system in a test environment that already
has Exchange 2003. Created a mailbox on 2007, able to go
We are currently looking at various UM products out there (AVST, Cisco Unity)
and am wondering if anyone has any experience with these products? Also, as an
Exchange admin, why wouldn't I just want to go with Microsoft's UM? It's
another checkbox on the install!
I am hoping 3rd party produ
How about accessing someone else's calendar for editing, if the proper
delegation has been granted. I'm currently trying to figure that one
out, I know it wasn't possible in 2003 without granting full access to
the mailbox, how about 2007?
From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org]
Se
Anyone have Symantec installed out on users PC's with the outlook
plugin? I am concerned about the load put on the server if a user does
a manual scan of all their email. In my mind this is going to pull down
all their attachments and go through them one by one. If some default
policy is set to
Do you care if they log in to Exchange only or in AD at all?
AD has two fields, lastlogon and lastlogontimestamp.
These fields are set when the user authenticates to AD. Lastlogon is
set per domain controller, and lastlogontimestamp (new in AD 2003) is
replicated throughout the entire doma
We had this problem on our mail servers a while back. Had to do with
Mac users and message size limits, where the mac client (don't remember
which one) wouldn't quite understand that a message the user is trying
to send out is over the message size limit, so it would keep
resubmitting it, maxing
Wow I said the same thing as an Exchange MVP!! Wonder if that makes me
certified...or just certifiable.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to pinpoint source of high traffic volume
Look
Currently where I work we are using Exchange 2003. I have written some
VB code that uses CDO and CDOEXM to create mailboxes for new users.
Another process creates new accounts in active directory, and my code
goes through all the accounts, sees what department they are in, goes to
a lookup table t
really the EMS you aren't happy with, or the CDO support in E2k7?
What you are describing doesn't seem like it should be that hard to do
via the EMS.
____
From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:08 AM
To: MS-Exch
Anyone have any suggestions on anything for stopping what I call internal spam.
Users who reply to phishing emails, who's account is then used to send out
massive amounts of spam to the world. Because of this massive blast of spam,
our mail server gets placed on many block lists, and then I h
ight twice a day."
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Boggis, Josh
mailto:josh.bog...@uconn.edu>> wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions on anything for stopping what I call internal spam.
Users who reply to phishing emails, who's account is then used to send out
massive amounts of spam
Lets try and bring this all back to the point of this list.
Just get your dogs windows network load balanced, and then you have redundancy
to handle the coyote situation. That assuming of course that the coyotes
aren't clustered, especially in active active.
From: Eric Wittersheim [mai
I wish Outlook just didn't have this option. Trying to explain the situations
where it will or won't work are a pain. Maybe Outlook should have a "are you
SURE you want to send this message?" popup requiring senders to count to 10
before being able to send an email.
-Original Message--
24 matches
Mail list logo
