Happy New Year to All.
Does anyone know how, of if it's even possible, to suppress the sender
info of messages delivered to a public folder? I have a request for a
suggestions type of PF for which it is not revealed which employee sent
the suggestion. I've been looking at my Ex3k books and
the
user,
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Phil Hershey phers...@agia.com wrote:
Happy New Year to All.
Does anyone know how, of if it's even possible, to suppress the sender
info of messages delivered to a public folder? I have a request for a
suggestions type of PF for which
In trying to move a number of mailboxes between a pair of our Exchange
2003 servers, the task will fail. The success:failure ratio is about
4:1. The moves are set to skip corrupted items, generally 100, and
generate a report. On the moves that fail, the HTML report that's
generated has the 3rd
Does anyone know where I could find a script for Exchange 2003 (yes,
we're still working toward migrating to 2010 around the end of the year)
to setup replication of our public folders from one backend server to a
new one? I need to move everyone off of an old system onto a new,
temporary Ex2003
to the folder and propagate
it.
No need for a script :)
-Original Message-
From: bounce-9557555-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9557555-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Phil Hershey
Sent: 25 October 2012 13:55
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ex2003 Public Folder
.
-Original Message-
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ex2003 Public Folder Replication
Thanks, Richard. That Manage choice must be in the 2010 manager, as in
the 2003 ESM right clicking doesn't get
it there.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Phil Hershey phers...@agia.com wrote:
Been a member for years, and this list has been a big help. Where can I
send someone to sign up for exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com?
I've been trying to track it down at sunbeltsoftware.com and at gfi.com
to no avail
to substantial cost savings to me and it is not
bad either. Much more functionality than previous versions and also
easier to deploy server based backups, rather than job based.
Steve
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Phil Hershey phers...@agia.com wrote:
Our current backup/imaging solution
.
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 7:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 Public Folder Recovery
In my years administering an E2k3 system, I've never had to use an RSG.
This morning a user deleted a public folder and thus all its
Folder Recovery
PFDAVAdmin
Works great! Less filling!
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Phil Hershey phers...@agia.com wrote:
In my years administering an E2k3 system, I've never had to use an RSG.
This morning a user deleted a public folder and thus all its subfolders
and contents. Deleted
I highly recommend Acronis' Disk Director Server, and their backup/imaging
products as well. Several years of good experiences with them.
Phil Hershey
Carpinteria, CA
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 8:25 AM
, October 11, 2011 8:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SNMP Service Fails to Start
Post the full errors please.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11
://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 12:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SNMP Service Fails to Start
Michael,
All that's in the Application or System logs is a failure to start in a
timely manner, events 7009
My bad. I did try the command that Joseph sent, and I verified that
nothing else was running TCP or UDP on port 161. Checked the
etc\services file to verify nobody had didled with the port. I've
apologized separately to Joseph for not letting him know how it came
out.
Phil Hershey
Sometimes starting what's normally a service in a DOS box will show
additional errors as it loads. There might even be extra command line
switches exposed like dumping a log.
HTH,
Mike
On 10/11/2011 02:41 PM, Phil Hershey wrote:
My bad. I did try the command that Joseph sent, and I verified
We're not upgrading our iSCSI SAN. Not only is it much less expensive,
DAS is much faster for us.
Phil Hershey
Caprinteria, CA
From: Brian McGloin [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 Disk
Can't believe we haven't run into this before, but we've just run into
the issue with Outlook (2003 or 2010 on Exchange 2003) reverting the
From... field to a user's primary SMTP address, even though they enter a
valid alternate address of their own in the field. We are a 3rd party
insurance
Laurence,
If you're going to have all three roles, CAS/HT/MB, on each server, you
need a hardware load balancer. You can get a decent one for under $2k.
If you go with the CAS/HT role on one server and the MB role on the
other, you won't have any fault tolerance other than any level of RAID
with Office 365? - that is if you don't need customer stuff
you cannot get in the cloud?
Looks like a quick simple install. Well tested and designed by MS and HP
-
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: HP
looking at them? IE- what about them looks appealing?
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 12:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: HP E5500 Appliance
Is anyone using the HP E5500 Exchange 2010 appliances? We're looking at
a pair of them for our 2010
Question came up recently. Checked the MS KB's, and I haven't found one
that applies. I have some users who want their OoO settings to kick in
whenever a message is received outside of their normal work hours
(evenings, early mornings, weekends, obviously). They don't want to
have to turn on
servers are required, or can a single pair of
sufficiently sized mailbox serves host 2 DAGs? I realize I'll need a
witness and alternate witness server in each site. There will be 2
combination CAS/HT servers in each site as well as a local CAS array.
Thanks.
Phil Hershey
Carpinteria, CA
before the users data went live in the other state.
-jim
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 3:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DAGs per Mailbox Server
I need to design an active-active, site-tolerant configuration for our
migration from
Good day, all. Odd situation I cannot seem to figure out. Suddenly as
a domain admin I was unable yesterday to get into a users mailbox. I
needed to check the Sent Items (Outlook '03) for a possible DLP issue.
While I could add the mailbox to my profile, I was unable to open it.
In checking
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Inherited Security Settings, Exchange 2003
http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/focus-ms/2006-08/msg8.html
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Phil Hershey phers...@agia.com wrote:
Good day, all. Odd situation I cannot seem to figure
,
including the default deny permissions that are propagating down. (If I
understand the issue, which may not be the case...)
Please be very careful playing about in there. :)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/264733
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Phil Hershey phers...@agia.com wrote
Good morning, all.
My problem is with setting up a Cisco IronPort appliance to work with
our Exchange 2003 servers. We had one in here last summer, and had it
working correctly. Well, the $$ finally shook loose to purchase a unit
for each of our two offices. We're going to use them solely
Subject: RE: Smart Host Setup, Exchange 2003
No SMTP fixup.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Smart Host
and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Smart Host Setup, Exchange 2003
Good morning, all.
My problem is with setting up a Cisco IronPort appliance to work
Turns out it was an SMTP route table setting for All Other Domains
pointing back in to the Exchange server. We're good now.
Thanks for the help.
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 1:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Smart Host
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 IronPort
When you write FQDN, do you mean the internal FQDN if it's different from the
public one? (e.g. ironport.domain.local -vs- mail.domain.com)
Have you tried putting the ip address in the smart host settings?
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Phil
Anyone out there in the ether have experience with configuring Exchange
2003 with an IronPort from Cisco? We had a test box in here for a
month's trial about 6 months ago. Boxed it up, never sent it back to
Cisco or the vender, and now we've purchased it after all. The IronPort
still has the
I had NTBACKUP running a backup of one of our storage groups yesterday,
a VSS job, and it seems to have delayed deliveries from mailboxes in
that group for the few hours the job was running. Doesn't seem as if
this should be the case, or is this normal? Had to run the backup, as
my log drive was
for backing up Exchange? I don't think that it does by
default. How did you set it up to do so?
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Phil Hershey phers...@agia.com wrote:
I had NTBACKUP running a backup of one of our storage groups yesterday, a VSS
job, and it seems to have delayed deliveries from
Under what conditions, if any, will MS support Exchange 2010 on VMware
vSphere? Our current Exchange 2003 is running on an IBM blade/NetApp
iSCSI SAN on ESX 3.0.2, and performance sucks. Unfortunately the 'let's
virtualize it' flu is running rampant here, although my vote is to take
the Exchange
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Phil Hershey
phers...@agia.com wrote:
Under what conditions, if any, will MS support Exchange
2010 on VMware vSphere? Our current Exchange 2003 is running on an IBM
blade/NetApp iSCSI SAN on ESX 3.0.2
?
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=897615
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Phil Hershey
phers...@agia.com wrote:
Under what conditions, if any, will MS support
Exchange 2010 on VMware vSphere
.
Typically speaking, I would recommend you keep your databases beneath
200 GB unless you have at least three DAG copies of your data.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Tuesday
I’ve seen this when the domain on the other end has a different internal domain
name than their external name. Sounds like the cert is assigned to the internal
domain.
Phil
From: phil levine [mailto:plevin...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 12:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Quick question, folks.
I've heard from a couple of sources that when upgrading from Exchange
2003 to 2010 that the mailboxes will double in size. Is this correct?
I'm trying to provision new servers with storage to last us 3-5 years.
J
Thanks.
Philip
---
To manage subscriptions
as the months roll by after a
migration..
Richard
From: bounce-9158637-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9158637-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Phil Hershey
Sent: 03 November 2010 13:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox Expansion During Upgrade
certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/
Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: 03 November 2010 13:40
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox Expansion During Upgrade?
Thanks, Richard.
I'll bet the reference
We tried out an IronPort unit, and now we’re going to purchase 2 of them. We
needed to start implementing encryption for HIPAA purposes between us and
insurance carriers, as we’re a 3rd party insurance administration company. We
like the idea of offloading the TLS overhead from the Exchange
Sorry, but I've got another basic question. Can't wait to actually get
my training.
In our environment only the MS Forefront Online Protection Server are
allowed to 'touch' our email servers to deliver messages. We don't have
a formal DMZ per se, but all the servers sit behind Cisco firewall
, 2010 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Another Noob Question
You don't need Edge servers if you are running FOPE.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com]
Sent: Wednesday
I've just taken our Exchange 2003 servers off Symantec SMSMSE and moved
us to Antigen 9, as that's included in our MS Enterprise agreement.
Which are the best 3 or 4 of the engines to use, both in terms of
effectiveness and performance?
Thanks!
-phil hershey, MCSE:Security
!
Joe Heaton
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: External Mtg Invites Off By 1 Hour
Unfortunately for us, that's not it. We had an invitation sent in from
a system we
://support.microsoft.com/kb/941018
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931667
-Bonnie
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: External Mtg Invites Off By 1 Hour
With all of our systems patched for the DST change
With all of our systems patched for the DST change last year, I'm
surprised to be seeing this. Calendar invitations and accepted
appointments sent into some of our users from outside Exchange users
this week all come in 1 hour late. For example an invitation for a
conference call with a supplier
on that one, as this
machine had just recently been rebuilt.
Joe Heaton
From: Phil Hershey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: External Mtg Invites Off By 1 Hour
With all of our systems patched
While these queues display correctly n the Exchange 2003 System Manager
on the Exchange server itself, on my client (actually a VMware virtual
XP system, as my main box is Vista Pro x86) these queues do not display.
There's just a line Default SMTP Virtual Server is a red ! on the
icon and the
51 matches
Mail list logo
