I am waiting - AD/LADP auth to BAS is extremely buggy imo. I managed to get it
working once by entering seemingly incorrect values for LDAP server and port.
However, I made the mistake of rebooting the server which caused it to break
again! I no longer have a BES5 trial license to play around
All,
This is more of a Powershell question, but it's relating to an Exchange
problem, so hopefully someone can help me.
I've got a resource mailbox configured just right, and I'm going to be creating
a few more in the next couple of weeks. Is there any way I can export the
configuration of
Move the database onto a dedicated partition. I wouldn't run a defrag utility
within 10U of my mailbox servers!
Richard
From: bounce-8665541-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8665541-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Brown
Sent: 23 September 2009 20:18
To:
Can you confirm if you are seeing events 102 or 107 or 1022 in the event logs?
It won't help me fix your problem, but might tell me if you have the same issue
as us :)
From: bounce-8662998-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8662998-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf
that
are either over the receive limit or are disabled.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exch 2007 Index Search issue
Can you confirm if you are seeing events 102 or 107 or 1022 in the event logs?
It won't
. Is this replicated or is it the job of the passive node to
build the index as transactions come and go. If this the case, so the passive
node also have the indexes rebuilt since there is no way to test them without
failing over.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday
I wonder if the user's free/busy info is corrupt? I don't know if that's
possible with Exchange 2007 but anyway, you can try starting Outlook with the
/cleanfreebusy switch to see if that improves anything. I've never seen that
NDR before.
From:
Been using SL with Entourage EWS, 2007 SP1 RU9 for over a week now, seen no
issues at all. We will not be stopping our users upgrading however (free reign
on whatever client/platform they prefer) so I imagine if this issue is real
it'll rear its ugly head sooner or later.
From:
There should be no old address as nothing has changed on the mailbox, although
you may be right technically re: meeting requests using X400. Moving mailboxes
doesn't strip proxy address though I thought?
Andrew, what is the NDR the user gets?
From:
Glen,
Sorry to have to say this, but you realise your users will always say
Initializing... until Enterprise Activation is complete?! I had to ask, it
was too obvious not to. It seems that you may be having activation issues
instead.
Richard
From:
that tells
him how to set up his HH.
Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this problem?
-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 2:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.
Glen,
Sorry to have to say
user during the time I re-added him, reloaded and re-sent service
books so it looks like the BPS server didn't/couldn't send the initial
email.
-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
That particular email will be generated by the server. It doesn't strictly
matter if the user never receives that, simply set an activation password
manually (abcdef for example!) and give the user that password to enter into
their handheld.
As an aside, if the email isn't sent, it could
I stand corrected on the CDMA issue. My point still stands though! :)
Richard
-Original Message-
From: bounce-8649107-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8649107-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: 04 September 2009 15:23
To:
All,
Does anyone know if it's possible to query AD for the last logon time of an
Exchange 2007 mailbox? I know it's exposed through MAPI and
Get-MailboxStatistics, but we're trying to automate something where there's
already an interface with AD, thus trying to reduce complexity.
Cheers
I suspect hardware issues. Does the server have any built-in diagnostics?
-Original Message-
From: bounce-8646740-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8646740-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Harry
Singh
Sent: 02 September 2009 01:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Chris
I had/have the same issue - as I understood it the cmdlet just doesn't work as
advertised, or you cannot have a certificate installed with no services
attached to it.
Regards
Richard
-Original Message-
From: bounce-8640089-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Is the website on your new BE configured properly to allow access from the
FE IP address? Is IIS started?
On 26/08/2009 15:25, Gary Babb gsb...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have added a second back-end Exchange 2003 server. The server is in the same
admin group. I moved a test mailbox enable user
25, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Sobey, Richard A
r.so...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Nothing official on this, I got the link from a different list I'm on:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=4c4bd2a3-5e50-42b0-8bbb-2cc9afe3216a
Enjoy
For (2) you can monitor Event id 9666 (iirc) for named properties being
created, but you cannot query for how many named properties are already taken
up until you deploy SP2 on your mailbox servers.
-Original Message-
From: bounce-8640819-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Turn the BES server off :P
From: bounce-8638723-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8638723-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Shih,
Henry
Sent: 24 August 2009 20:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: stop BB server to sync the data for the individual user after
Nothing official on this, I got the link from a different list I'm on:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=4c4bd2a3-5e50-42b0-8bbb-2cc9afe3216a
Enjoy :)
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 August 2009 14:02
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 Service Pack 2 released
Nice, the link for What's New in Exchange 2007 SP2 returns a page not
found..
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Sobey, Richard A
r.so...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.so
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: stop BB server to sync the data for the individual user after hours
Won't work ..
Just for some of the BB users, not for all of them.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:48 AM
To: MS
Spammers using fake reply-to - those people will get very upset!
From: bounce-8636570-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8636570-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Russ
Patterson
Sent: 21 August 2009 17:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Auto-Responders with
[mailto:bounce-8638386-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Ben
Scott
Sent: 24 August 2009 11:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Auto-Responders with loop detection
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Sobey, Richard A
r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Spammers using fake reply
Perform an offline defrag if you need to reclaim disk space from whitespace in
the database. There's no other reason to do it. I can't recall ever seeing
documentation to say you should do it regularly or not to be honest.
-Original Message-
From:
That's just stupid. Who would recommend an offline defrag just for the sake of
a pre-migration task? It won't help anything!
-Original Message-
From: bounce-8633979-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8633979-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Miguel
a backup. Obviously it is less risky and quicker backing up 25
Gb than 60 Gb.
Miguel
--- El mar, 18/8/09, Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk escribió:
De: Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk
Asunto: RE: Offline defragmentation of Exchange information store
Para: MS-Exchange Admin
Monitor the values of:
MSExchangeIS\RPC Averaged Latency, RPC Operations/sec and RPC Requests.
That���ll tell you if the server is genuinely damned busy or you have a network
issue somewhere.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc540464.aspx
From:
Worse than that, we used to get Unable to Verify Certificate when setting up
the iPhone 3G. I would have thought our SAN certificate vendor to be big enough
that the iPhone knows about it by default!
-Original Message-
From: bounce-8628785-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
We lock ours down to authorised users and remove the permission when they're
done. If you're getting the list abused then tell management something needs to
be done about it. I've learned that management will do whatever they want
regardless of what you say anyway :)
From:
All,
This might be an obvious question but I can't think of an obvious answer. Apart
from Send and Receive connectors, we all know that Exchange will use a HT
server for internal message processing. My question is: After installing a HT
server, apart from keeping the thing turned off, how do
, and setting them all to disabled
until you're done configuring?
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Hub Transport installtion question
All,
This might be an obvious question
Issues
Subject: RE: Hub Transport installtion question
How about stopping the Exchange services, and setting them all to disabled
until you're done configuring?
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:13 AM
To: MS
I've tried BES 5.0 and for me, it appears to be a step back. I don't recall
ever thinking You know, a web based ActiveX control management system would be
far better than a nice MMC and after trying it, I know why. Progress for
progress sake imo. Even without the LDAP auth to BAS bugs I'm
If the message was originated using MAPI you will not be looking at a relaying
issue. Make sure anti-virus is up to date on the PCs where those accounts are
logged on (or have logged on since this issue started). If necessary, re-build
the PCs completely.
Have you looked in IIS logs, too?
Is your IS service not up and down like a yoyo? That error would mean to me
that your Information Store just went down...
From: bounce-8593331-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8593331-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Fergal
O'Connell
Sent: 10 July 2009 14:32
Issues
Subject: RE: faulting application store.exe
IS is up - just sorting the events by category and I have had 3 of these events
today -
Exchange is performing as expected
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 10 July 2009 14:40
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
I'd steer well clear of that personally. My home setup from yesteryear had me
running my EDB on a USB hard drive and I felt uncomfortable with that :)
From: bounce-8591474-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8591474-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Cesare'
A.
- of course, it only applies this check in
inbound connections - internal servers are presumed to not be the source of
poor behavior.
Do you have a way to exclude your HT server(s) from this check?
_
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009
be modified? or is it your ISP's server?
_
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 6:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MaxMessagesPerConnection - Exchange 2007
Hi all
Since I have updated our send connectors on Exchange 2007 to use our
June 2009 19:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MaxMessagesPerConnection - Exchange 2007
Take a look at set-transportserver
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 9:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MaxMessagesPerConnection - Exchange
Makes me so proud of my ~60MPG @ 70MPH in my new Mini Cooper Diesel (and ~40MPG
@ 105MPH, but I never did that, honestly).
/loves fuel bill.
-Original Message-
From: bounce-8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf
Hi all
Since I have updated our send connectors on Exchange 2007 to use our HT servers
to route mail to our smart host, it seems to be sending through too many
messages per connection. The smart host is thus delaying delivery of those
message by up to 15 minutes as it thinks it's bulk mail
The operation can take some time to complete. I've seen it hang for almost a
minute sometimes. My advice would be to reconnect it, then go for a crafty pint
down the pub. If it's still hung when you get back, you have a problem :)
Richard
From: bounce-8573384-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
You can force quota changes to take effect immediately with an IS bounce,
otherwise you need to wait ~2hours. Removing someone���s quota (i.e. giving
them unlimited storage) is instant.
From my personal experience that is.
From: bounce-8574815-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
I find Message Tracking GUI to be very frustrating; you can only specify one HT
server at a time. Using Powershell may be different. And yes, since any HT
server in a site can be chosen, you need to track messages through all of them
to get the results you desire.
From:
Or a server crash leaves you with missing transaction logs and the only way to
get databsaes mounted again, with the knowledge you've lost at least some data,
is to use eseutil.
(Yes, it happened to me).
From: bounce-8548547-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
PF replication will always take a lesser precedent to normal mail traffic, and
you can configure it to happen out of hours, if any such things exists in your
company.
You might also have the luxury - depending on costs and how much time you have
- of setting up an Exchange PF store on a new
Hi all
I've run into a stumbling block on this one. I've got performance counters set
up which tell me the rate of messages/sec on various Send/Receive connectors on
my HT servers. I'm trying to find an equivalent counter which can tell me how
many messages are being processed by the
Of Sobey,
Richard A
Sent: 27 May 2009 15:34
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Hub Transport - message flow monitoring
Hi all
I've run into a stumbling block on this one. I've got performance counters set
up which tell me the rate of messages/sec on various Send/Receive connectors on
my HT
I'm not really sure what could cause this issue, but won't hurt reading
KB913643 and KB923537 (taken from the BES installation guide which is fresh in
my memory).
From: bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
-software.com] On Behalf Of Clayton
Doige
Sent: 14 May 2009 16:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Blackberry :-( Issue
cool, will do, thanks :-)
2009/5/14 Sobey, Richard A
r.so...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk
I'm not really sure what could cause this issue, but won't hurt
tab
besadmin has allow and deny ticked for full mailbox access.
Does anyone know where this is inheritedfrom? I can't see it on the information
store level. And I can't remove it as there is no tick box to sotp inheriting.
Thanks:-)
2009/5/14 Sobey, Richard A
r.so...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.so
Ditto, it works fine with Windows 7 RC too.
Kevin - when I was at TechEd EMEA in 2008, our Exchange 2007 deployment had
just started and IE7 was the latest flavour available. Me and a colleague both
used OWA 2007 from one of their stock computers that were littering the halls.
I was able to
You're lucky. We had to get MS involved after EAS decided to stop working for
any Exchange 2003 user, but carried on for 2007 users. It turned out to simply
be an authentication issue on the MSAS virtual directory.
In this particular case, though, since it's working for iPhone users, I'd
Which is it :)
From: bounce-8525240-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8525240-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Fergal
O'Connell
Sent: 11 May 2009 16:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 552 size limit exceeded
Yes.
From: Campbell, Rob
The Export-Mailbox cmdlet will let you export Dumpster items but only from the
Deleted Items folder. This is of limited use but perhaps worth Robert pursuing:
If you export data to another mailbox by using the TargetMailbox parameter,
the Export-Mailbox cmdlet also exports
messages from the
Do you have more than one PF database that this folder was replicated to? You
could be seeing the effects of replication, if that is true, you'll see a high
rate of message throughput on your HT server, or depending on the speed of your
servers, the queue might be backing up a little too.
ideas? Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 8:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Pub Folder very high log generation rate
Do you have more than one PF database that this folder was replicated to? You
Pulte Homes Information Services
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k7, Recover Deleted Items
The Export-Mailbox cmdlet will let you export Dumpster items
I'm currently rewriting some scripts that failed when our lone 5.5 server went
tits up, and the only guy that knows anything about 5.5 isn't around. It isn't
a production server thankfully :)
From: bounce-8519794-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Hi Glen
When you run exmerge - either in import or expert mode - you will be given the
option to merge, copy, replace or archive the items. Explanations of each
option are given within the program. We use exmerge a fair bit to perform the
actions you describe below. Personally, I use merge the
Assuming DB portability in 2010 works the same as 2007, these are the high
level steps I used to move all databases from one server to another. It works
lovely. I've taken some of my own notes out that relate specifically to my
organization.
1) Shut down Exchange on old server. Run
, there was no
move-mailbox possible?
Oh well... I'll just assume broken in Beta :)
jlc
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange DB Portability
Assuming DB portability in 2010 works the same
I'm glad to hear that :)
From: bounce-8506879-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8506879-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Miller
Bonnie L.
Sent: 28 April 2009 13:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Can't update addresses...
Without being 100% certain, my
Someone will have had to rewrite the IMAP protocol to achieve that!
John - check out the SMTP logs on the UNIX box first to make sure it's actually
trying to send mail to your Exchange server.
Ignore IMAP.
-Original Message-
From: bounce-8506970-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
There's certainly no mechanism in the protocol to allow one to send messages,
but if messages are being dropped into a mailbox folder using IMAP, then
something else server side is processing them, that could explain the need for
IMAP.
Richard
-Original Message-
From:
how to track a message like that, I wouldn't have e-mailed the list...
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 8:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Diagnosing Claim Delayed Mail Receipt
Track the message
I've never built a lab which replicates my live environment so I'm really not
sure of the steps you'd need to go through. However assuming you're running
Exchange setup in /DisasterRecovery mode, you'll also need to run the SP2
installer in /DisasterRecovery mode too. Could this be the problem?
Restarting the SA on Exchange 2007 should be fine; I did that on all my boxes
couple of days/weeks ago to cure some problem reading AD information. So long
as your AD is working properly otherwise, with no other underlying issues, I'd
say go for it.
From:
services and it’s not going to kick my Outlook
users? I just haven’t had to restart anything except the Transport service
while “live” in so long, I want to be sure…
Thanks,
Bonnie
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Get-Mailbox xxx | fl WhenCreated
WhenCreated : 17/04/2000 09:11:13
From: bounce-8498793-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8498793-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Cookman
Sent: 22 April 2009 12:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
. I think that's actually the creation date of
the user, which may or may not be the same as the creation date of the mailbox.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
Dear all,
I'm not too sure how to proceed with this, but I am pretty sure it can be done.
I have a requirement to create a new mailbox where any item in that mailbox can
never be more then xx months old, i.e. delete all items if they get to xx
months old.
What's the best way to go about it?
2009 16:35
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Finally 2010
PowerShell can get your mailboxes migrated in less than a week if scripted and
implemented properly. ;)
- John Barsodi
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 12:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange
I was hoping that database portability could be an option for 2007 2010. How
sexy that would be - could get my entire user base migrated in a week :)
From: bounce-8490809-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8490809-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Ens
Sent:
that as an option.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Finally 2010
I was hoping that database portability could be an option for 2007 2010. How
sexy that would
It's Working As Intended I'm afraid to say. The OAB is only updated server side
every 24 hours or so and then the client has to fetch the changes and update
its cached copy, which could be another 12-24 hours. That explanation is
extremely simple, but the upshot is that you could be waiting up
I'm particularly intrigued by the size of the installer: 300MB!
From: bounce-8490525-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8490525-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of John
Bowles
Sent: 15 April 2009 14:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Finally 2010
Well,
Create a DL and restrict the recipient to receiving mail only from members of
that DL (Exchange General Delivery Options IIRC). Add your VPs etc to the DL.
Job's a good'un.
Richard
From: bounce-8479939-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Hi all
One of our mailbox servers (Exchange 2007 SP1 Rollup 6) has a suspected
hardware fault and we were planning to use database portability to mount the
databases on a standby server. The live server is running RU6, but the
standby is at RU7. I figured since we're going to RU7 soon anyway,
Exchange 2007 SP1 I don't see why this is much different. As far as I
can tell there are no updates to the database.
-alex
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Sobey, Richard A
r.so...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Hi all
One of our mailbox servers (Exchange 2007 SP1 Rollup 6
Very nice - always learning something new to do with Powershell :)
From: bounce-8475384-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[bounce-8475384-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Kleciak, Clint
D A7IT [clint.klec...@cigna.com]
Sent: 01
Are you using IE6.0 or higher?
From: bounce-8473641-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8473641-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Smith
Sent: 31 March 2009 12:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Unable to recover Deleted Items in Exch2k7
Thanks for
Deleted
Items is working fine in Outlook
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sobey, Richard A
r.so...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Are you using IE6.0 or higher?
From:
bounce-8473641-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:bounce-8473641-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Also - Options General Settings Accessibility depending on Light or Premium
experience.
Richard
From: bounce-8473695-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8473695-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Sobey,
Richard A
Sent: 31 March 2009 13:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin
It also only works for OWA Premium (IE6.0+).
From: bounce-8469272-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8469272-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Neil
Hobson
Sent: 27 March 2009 11:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to recover Deleted Items in Exch2k7
I was viewing an Inbox with around 15,000 items in it the other day (Exchange
2007 mailbox). It wasn't uncomfortable by any means (compared to the equivalent
experience on Exchange 2003) but I'd still hesitate to recommend anything above
10,000. But you're right, it all depends on the server.
Yes, if your Deleted Items Retention policy is set appropriately, you will be
able to use Tools Recover Deleted Items to get them back.
Richard
From: bounce-8465782-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8465782-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Oliver
Marshall
I'm still trying to decide how it will actually affect us. We're at the default
limit of ~8000 after only 4-5 months in production on some databases, and
moving users to a new DB just to reach the limit againcompletely pointless
imo. Anyone else agree?
Cheers
Richard
-Original
Hi all
I think this is to do with WSUS, but I'm not entirely sure. I've installed a
dev CAS server into the organization and got it fully patched (Windows Server
2008 and Exchange Server 2007 SP1 RU6). However, Windows Update - WSUS - is
telling me that RU3 should also be applied.
Has anyone
the Ex Server itself? That would tell if it’s WSUS or something else.
Also, RU7 was released yesterday.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960384
- John Barsodi
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Update
Savvy users can delete their own dumpster items though.
From: bounce-8460131-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[bounce-8460131-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Sam Cayze
[sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: 17 March 2009 16:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin
I think you'll need to get PSS involved, or perhaps the Quest Exchange tools
which some members of this list speak so highly of. Even to exmerge a mailbox
from an RSG the mailbox must reside in the mailbox store from where that backup
was created.
Just out of interest, how did you create the
You could write a script to do it :)
From: bounce-8459158-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8459158-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Joe
Heaton
Sent: 16 March 2009 15:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Setting another user's OOO
I need to set the Out Of
You could run eseutil /mh on the database immediately after a full backup to
find out which logs would be needed in the event of having to perform a
restore. In fact you wouldn't even need to wait to do a full backup. The
database will need to be taken offline though.
Richard
-Original
The clue is that they probably spent a whole wedge of cash on the ESX host to
support the number of mailbox servers they had running. Money that could have
been equally well spent on *gasp *physical servers! My colleague has just been
to VMworld and told me that they'd virtualised all their MBX
I couldn't see the information in those articles, but I wonder if they're going
to kill the SRP keys at some point too. For those that already have BPS and
with no real need to upgrade to BES, that would be a real shame.
From: bounce-8451114-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
401 - 500 of 578 matches
Mail list logo
