rpass 20MB with MIME overhead.
We have 2GB mailbox quota limits.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 11:35 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Best Practices for Attachment Size
Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
We have a 20MB attachment limit and an Accellion FTA to securely transfer files
larger than that. Biggest problem: MIME overhead. People say "you said it's
20MB but it won't go through". So, we have to explain that depending
September 08, 2011 12:40 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
>
> We have a 20MB attachment limit and an Accellion FTA to securely transfer
> files larger than that. Biggest problem: MIME overhead. People say "you said
> it&#
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
How are you implementing the AD policy that automatically sends through it?
> -Original Message-
> From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September
Admin Issues
Subject: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
We have the standard 10-meg attachment size limit in place, and I was wondering
if we should reconsider. It actually doesn't seem to cause much of a problem,
but periodically we have a situation where someone is trying to send/recei
Original Message-
> > From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 12:40 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
> >
> > We have a 20MB attachment limit
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
We have the standard 10-meg attachment size limit in place, and I was
wondering if we should reconsider. It actually doesn't seem to cause
much of a problem, but periodically we have a situation where someone is
trying to
10 meg message size limit (as opposed to attachment size) and a secure transfer
system.
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 10:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
>
> We have the standard 10-meg attachment size limit in place, and I was
> wondering if we should reconsider. It actually doesn't seem to cause
> much of a problem, but periodically w
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 11:35 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
> >
> > We have the standard 10-meg attachment size limit in place, and I was
> > wonderi
1 11:38:12 -0400
From: Jonathan Link
Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Coming to this late, I'd bump the send limit to probably 20 MB.
> I'd remove the receive limit entirely.
r end can fix the recipients limit.
>
> Mike
>
> - Message from jonathan.l...@gmail.com -
> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:38:12 -0400
> From: Jonathan Link
> Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues <
> exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
> Subject: Re
1:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
Yes. Generally we're the recipient, though. In the case of sending, I've been
told that the limit on sending (on our end is too onerous) so I just opened
that up, too. 9 times out of ten they
lously in size anyway.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 09, 2011 11:04 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
>
> ** **
>
> Yes. Genera
14 matches
Mail list logo
