Does anyone use tools like diskeeper to defrag their nondatabase
servers? Is it recommended?
Yes, I use Diskeeper - on all my servers.
Sean Rector, MCSE
-Original Message-
From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defragmenting servers
Does anyone use tools like diskeeper to defrag their
es
Subject: Defragmenting servers
Does anyone use tools like diskeeper to defrag their nondatabase servers? Is it
recommended?
d.ri...@hwinstitute.com
SERVICE. INNOVATION. RESULTS.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
It provides a marginal speed improvement (assuming you de
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:00 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> It provides a marginal speed improvement (assuming you defrag
> regularly).
ge Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Defragmenting servers
The really old school notion is to have a file system that doesn't need it,
like UFS...
Heh.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:45, David.Ricci wrote:
> I was always under the impression that it was bad to defrag a server.
> I guess tha
ssues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out, Microsoft told
us NTFS didn't need defraggingthus was born a new industry. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December
t; To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out, Microsoft
> told us NTFS didn't need defraggingthus was born a new industry. :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt B
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:02 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out,
>
ues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> IIRC, they also said the NT4 Directory was superior to Netware's directory,
> because a flat directory structure provided better performance.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent:
: 401.228.1399
www.hwinstitute.com
david.ri...@hwinstitute.com
SERVICE. INNOVATION. RESULTS.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
Do you remember
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:58 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Defragmenting servers
>
> The really old school notion is to have a file system that doesn't need it,
> like UFS...
>
> Heh.
>
&g
:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:02 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out, Microsoft told
> us NTFS didn't need defraggingthus was born
) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX
i...@sonomatilemakers.com
From: David.Ricci [mailto:david.ri...@hwinstitute.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
That is where I got it from.
So now it is ok so as long as
From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
OK, so does that mean the databases do not get fragmented, or there is another
way to defrag them?
I do not support our databases, only the
>> David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
>> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
>> (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:47 PM
know
> >> :-)
> >>
> >> David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
> >> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
> >> (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: mqcarp
2009 4:47 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Defragmenting servers
>
> Does anyone use tools like diskeeper to defrag their nondatabase servers? Is
> it recommended?
suming you defrag regularly).
> >
> > I like MyDefrag (used to be JKDefrag). It's free and it's fast.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:47 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange
marginal speed improvement (assuming you defrag
>> > regularly).
>> >
>> > I like MyDefrag (used to be JKDefrag). It's free and it's fast.
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
>>
), the difference is
measurable. For random access, probably not so much.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 6:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Defragmenting servers
Quick related question:
Do you defrag file
rt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 6:17 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Defragmenting servers
>
> Quick related question:
>
> Do you defrag file servers where the store is on a SAN? Does it make a
> measurable difference? I
0 National Highway
Cumberland, MD 21502
301-777-3914
cknier...@pccareonline.com
-Original Message-
From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: [MALWARE FREE]Defragmenting servers
Does anyone use tools like di
23 matches
Mail list logo