if you DON'T set /z or /b, the performance is pretty close, with eseutil
winning by a few points due to larger buffers.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com]
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Jim Holmgren wrote:
> Their DBA suggested using ESEUTIL for the copy.
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/granth/archive/2010/05/10/how-to-copy-very-large-files-across-a-slow-or-unreliable-network.aspx
Interesting.
Sounds like ROBOCOPY needs anoth
That's nifty! Thanks for the link!
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 3:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Using Eseutil to copy other files
Just got out of a meeting with a business partner of ours.
We need to copy a
Just got out of a meeting with a business partner of ours.
We need to copy a large SQL database from their location to ours over a
WAN link. Their DBA suggested using ESEUTIL for the copy.
I thought he was crazy until I did a little digging myself:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/granth/archive
Sorry yes I meant once these are all done I am going to put them all in
their own SG since its all down anyway.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
Not until everything in an SG
Not until everything in an SG can mount clean.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Lists - Level5 [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
Ok, but would now
Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
You cant ignore the fact that you are operating in
multiple-databases-per-SG mode.
In that case, the fact that an individual DB is clean shutdown is pretty
much irrelevant. You need to have all DBs in that SG in clean shutdown.
Once you are in one-DB-per
ust 31, 2010 7:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
Yes, I have been arguing with them that their DB's need to be smaller and to
implement archiving. I hate to be the I told you so and use these as 'lessons'
but hopefully the urgency will be understood now.
just hoping its fairly contained to the actual problem
which was maybe 50-100 emails when the db went offline.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: eseutil /p
At this point I think you need to
Issues
Subject: eseutil /p
So long story, as short as possible ...
I have exchange 2007 running on an EQL san for the datastores and logs. We have
2 Stores with 2 DBs in each and 1 PF. The EQL san didn't auto-resize and with
about 150GB left it went offline with an error dropping the conne
rolling back 2 weeks.
I have corrupted log files and 2 dbs in the second storage group are dirty
shutdown. When I mount them I get errors that logfiles are corrupt and tried
rolling those back and then ended up with invalid timestamps on the logs.
We decided to get it to clean by running eseutil
8:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
I’ll keep it in mind.
But I’ve made a career out of baptism by fire. Just need the occasional
pointer in the right direction. I’m not really having a
problem, just
hange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
I’ll keep it in mind.
But I’ve made a career out of baptism by fire. Just need the occasional
pointer in the right direction. I’m not really having a
problem, just not familiar enough wit
: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: June 4 Webcast:
Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util ity
in that case I normally
have the customer shadow my Ts connection, we then can either talk on IM or
over the
Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and
WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
Title: Message
Just one of those mile high mountain boys
here…..
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: June 4 Webcast:
Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
Title: Message
West
coaster here
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
Don't you p
Title: Message
Well
carry on then.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
As tempting as
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: June 4 Webcast:
Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util ity
Give me a TS-enabled
login and I'll do it from here.
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:41 PM
To: MS-Exc
Title: Message
Give
me a TS-enabled login and I'll do it from here.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Es
Title: Message
That sucks. Wanna come finish this upgrade
for me?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: June 4 Webcast:
Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
Title: Message
I am
unemployed. I've been home all day.
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
Title: Message
Don’t you people sleep? Don’t
you go home?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: June 4 Webcast:
Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util ity
Title: Message
They
tell you evyting!
-Original Message-From: Garland Mac
Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002
7:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
William
IssuesSubject: RE: June 4
Webcast: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Util
ity
William,
Would I be correct in
assuming that is for both E2K and 5.5?
-Original
Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:31
PMTo: MS
with the Eseutil Utility
Don't forget to add to
your calendar:
June 4 Webcast: Offline
Defragmentation with the Eseutil Utility
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=%2Fservicedesks%2Fwebcasts%2Fwc060402%2Fwcblurb060402%2Easp
William Lefkovics, MC
Title: Message
Don't forget to add to your calendar:
June 4 Webcast: Offline
Defragmentation with the Eseutil Utility
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=%2Fservicedesks%2Fwebcasts%2Fwc060402%2Fwcblurb060402%2Easp
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, WLKMMAS,
ExchangeMVP
List Ch
Cool. Priv has 1.2 GB of free space. Pub
has 56 MB. I never looked closely at those defrag Ids. Thanks again
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:03
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ESEUTIL
New
Title: Message
Thanks all. I am glad I didn't run
it then
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:52
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Yes, seriously!
Leave it up for another 4
New around here, huh?
Never.
- Original Message -
From:
Matthew
Carpenter
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:41
PM
Subject: ESEUTIL
What is the recommended calendar
for using this defrag tool?
Once a month?
Twice
Title: Message
DB
Maintenance and a defrag run automatically every night (check your logs for
Event 1221). Any whitespace recovered from either the auto defrag or
running ESEUTIL will be used again very shortly through normal server use.
The
space recovered (which again will get used
mass amounts of mailboxes off of the
server?
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29,
2002 12:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
ESEUTIL
Seriously?
This server has been
up for 4 years, and I am p
Title: RE: ESEUTIL
I had a feeling this had come up before. I appreciate the note.
I was misinformed, then, that the ONLINE defrag was not enough. That the online defrag was OK, but an offline ESEUTIL was necessary routinely.
-Original Message-
From: Ruan Kotze - CPX NAM [mailto
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
ESEUTIL
Seriously?
This server has been
up for 4 years, and I am pretty sure it has never been run. Does it fragment
like a normal hard drive on a workstation or server would, which needs regular
maintenance?
Exch 5.5
SP4
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:38
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Only when
necessary?
Only during DR
procedures?
Only under direction of
PSS?
Only if you're
encountering the 16GB DB limit in the Standard version?
-Ori
these days, so he took time to answer very
difinitively why regular offline defrags with eseutil is totally unnecessary
with Exchange.
It is fairly thorough, a good read, and what we have seen posted here
before:
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
First in
: Monday, April 29,
2002 9:41 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
ESEUTIL
What is the recommended calendar
for using this defrag tool?
Once a month?
Twice a year?
Once a decade?
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
12:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
ESEUTIL
What is the recommended calendar
for using this defrag tool?
Once a month?
Twice a year?
Once a decade?
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
What is the recommended calendar for using this defrag tool?
Once a month?
Twice a year?
Once a decade?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
What service packs ?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 09:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Question
> I am running Exchange 5.5 on NT server.
What OS ?
> What version of Ex
*looks up at the sky filling with fire and brimstone*
Heheheh... ok who wants to take this one
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Question
My first question is why
My first question is why do you think that an offline defrag is
necessary?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:54 AM
Posted To: Exchange Sunbelt
Conversation: ESEUTIL Question
Subject: ESEUTIL Question
Hi Everyone
> I am running Exchange 5.5 on NT server.
What OS ?
> What version of Exchange ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 08:54
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: ESEUTIL Question
>
&g
What OS ?
What version of Exchange ?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 08:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL Question
Hi Everyone,
Well I am currently in the process of running an Off-Line Defrag,
and
Title: RE: ESEUTIL Question
Youre copying almost 3 GB over a LAN.. It may take a while, depending on your LAN speeds.
The server then has to put it in place, and remove the old priv.edb and patch the temp db.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: RE: ESEUTIL Question
It all depends on yuor network speed
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL Question
My Store was 3.4 GB, I looked at the size of the
My Store was 3.4 GB, I looked at the size of the Temp File, and it said
2.75 GB. I had to place the temp file an a network drive, because I didn't
have the space on my Exchange Server. i was going to move the IS over to
the other Server and run the defrag there, and then move it back, but
someone
Title: RE: ESEUTIL Question
Nick,
You will return to a normal command prompt. How big is your store? If at all possible don't defrag to a net drive.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:54 AM
To: MS-Exc
Thank you Mike, I appreciate the info.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: RE: ESEUTIL Question
Yikes@ Defragging to a network drive..
When it is done, the cursor should return to a normal status, showing x seconds it took to do the defrag.
Then you can start the IS
-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
window. I am
assuming because I had to send the Temp file to a network drive, that the
file is possibly being copied back to the Exchange Server. If someone can
recall the sequence of events during the eseutil process, and what
displays on the screen to let me know when it is complete so I can fire
That pss guy was on crack with that number. That time looks to be very
consistent with everything I have seen. Glad it all went well.
Eseutil on a defrag writes a temp database, beats it up, then writes it
all back to the original priv. Which means in your environment you had
to move at least 40
-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
When I said "quoted", that's what I meant! I read those figures somewhere
(they were from Microsoft) but I do admit in reality they'
Great links, thanks !
-Original Message-
From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 20:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: AW: RE : Eseutil Questions
eseutil /?
or http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q182903
or http
eseutil /?
or
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q182903
or
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q192185
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q244525)
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q183888)
(http
I have also to clean my databases and run eseutil can you point me on a
whitepaper how exactly to do it
thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : vendredi 22 février 2002 16:55
À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Objet : RE: Eseutil Questions
Thank
The last eseutil I was forced into running did a 1.5 Gb edb in less than
30 minutes.
PE2400, RAID, PIII-500 with 512Mb.
I left for coffee and junk food and it was done when I got back.
YMMV
John Weber
Consultant
Centerlogic
503-262-0490 x203
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller
Thanks for the info. I haven't done one of these either in about 3 years
and wouldn't be doing it if PSS had not requested it.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: R
Very smart man...
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
Thanks for the info. I
22, 2002 7:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
When I said "quoted", that's what I meant! I read those figures
somewhere (they were from Microsoft) but I do admit in reality they'd
probably be a bit lower. To be honest, I've not done an offli
do them
often at all...
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 22 February 2002 15:19
Posted To: Sunbelt Excha
ssues
Subject: RE: Eseutil Questions
I've seen quoted speeds of 4-6Gb per hour, but it really depends on how
much data within the database is used, not necessarily the actual
physical size of the edb file, as well as the spec of the machine
running it.
Neil Hobson
Silver
ified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 22 February 2002 15:04
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Eseutil Questions
Subject: Eseutil Questions
In diagnosing an issue on my Exc
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Eseutil Questions
In diagnosing an issue on my Exchange server PSS has suggested I run
"eseutil /d" on my stores. Does anyone have any idea of how long this
whole process might take, assuming all
In diagnosing an issue on my Exchange server PSS has suggested I run
"eseutil /d" on my stores. Does anyone have any idea of how long this whole
process might take, assuming all goes well, given the following info (just
trying to plan my weekend):
2 mailbox stores total
6 storage gr
Let alone break all of the single instance store!
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely - Verizon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, January 25, 2002 8:05 AM
Posted To: Exchange Sunbelt
Conversation: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
That
That's a rather ignorant solution...
D
-Original Message-
From: Ben Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
What I did before was, I'll transfer their mail to their "
es
> Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
>
> Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline
defragmentation.
>
> "Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is
an
> expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it cre
What I did before was, I'll transfer their mail to their "personal folder",
than use eseutil.exe to defrag.
-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 January 2002 03:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
How long management will allow the server to be unavailable before they
freak out.
-Original Message-
From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Please explain, "
What you are attempting to do is to compress the
database by creating a copy with no whitespace in it.
Ed Woodrick
-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
Posted To: Exchange Sunbelt
Conversation: ESEUTIL DE
Please explain, "time window"?
-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exce
anuary 24, 2002 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
We have another drive we have added for the defrag and we need to defrag the
database because there is only 300mb of free space on the database drive and
to expand the disk, we need to move the database
Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation.
"Generally, however, avoid offline defragment
at it will never grow
larger? Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is reclaiming the white
space. That is it. White space simply explained is just space in the
database that is not currently being used, but will be used as the database
grows. Since the space has already been reserved, your serve
Judging by your 60GB DB, you need at least twice that in disk space to run
ESEUTIL. That means, to run ESEUTIL at all, you need at least 120GB and I
would say a little more to be safe for it to run.
D
-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange
5.5?
Has anyone ever done this before?
Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our
database?
What would you recommend?
Chris
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
No.
William
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Same publisher? :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
Hey!
William
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Same errors? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 December
Same errors? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 December 2001 08:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Same publisher? :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20
Same publisher? :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20 December 2001 18:49
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: ESEUTIL
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
>>There's enough info in these (and other) archives to fill a book
com> cc:
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
12/20/2001 10:00
irborne.net
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Same logic applies to eseutil on Exchange 5.5: don't bother
You mispelled 'persecution'.
William
-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
I've been here about 3 months, and when I sort by topic, ESEUTIL has 100
en
Title: RE: ESEUTIL
You
could run it nightly if you wanted to and you'd probably be
fine.
But
when you shrink the database like that, you lose performance as Exchange has to
hesitate and reacquire disk space each time it needs to grow. Personally,
I can't afford the performance
I've been here about 3 months, and when I sort by topic, ESEUTIL has 100
entries (101 with this. A few classic quotes:
- eseutil is a tool that if you are not familiar with, you shouldn't be
using. Now tell us why you want to do it.
- Have a look at eseutil /? (which in my opinion i
Same logic applies to eseutil on Exchange 5.5: don't bother unless you
have a problem (and are under the guidance of PSS or other suitable
consultancy) or you've moved a ton of mailboxes off of the server and
really need the space.
There's enough info in these (and other) arc
ssage-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL
Oh lord... I can see the hellfire and brimstone in the dark clouds forming
above already... hehehehe
I'll save my finger muscles and let some of
xchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL
Hi,
This is probably a really dumb question but what are your recommendations
for running the ESEUTIL utility on Exchange 2000 systems. With Christmas
coming up it seems like the perfect time to run it, and do a Defrag on the
DB's
Any thoughts would be a
NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER run Eseutil unless PSS tells you to.
If it ain't broke don't try to fix it.
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com
We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior P
Is this a setup?
Why are you considering running eseutil? What benefit doth thou seek this
blessed holiday season? Overtime pay?
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net
Title: RE: ESEUTIL
He he he, this is one of those topics that should come with a warning label in this list. Bring it up at your own risk.
Jez, expect to be resoundly flamed for even thinking of running eseutil by most on this list. Personally, I run it on a monthly basis during a
with Friends and Family [7]
[1] something that can be caused by running Eseutil
[2] The opinion of the upper level exchange admins [3]
[3] There is about 2 good reasons to run a defrag of the Priv [4][5]
[4] Hi Guiseppe Pinarello!
[5] Non of those reasons involve maintance
[7] That is what the
01 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL
Hi,
This is probably a really dumb question but what are your recommendations for running
the ESEUTIL utility on Exchange 2000 systems. With Christmas coming up it seems like
the perfect time to run it, and do a Defrag on the DB&#
Hi,
This is probably a really dumb question but what are your recommendations for running
the ESEUTIL utility on Exchange 2000 systems. With Christmas coming up it seems like
the perfect time to run it, and do a Defrag on the DB's
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Jez.
List Charte
Sorry David.
My bladder is right full. Figured I could beat anyone today.
Don't be so shy, dude. David's a great name.
William
-Original Message-
From: dp
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/4/01 6:28 PM
Subject: RE: Eseutil
David precht hailing from just west o
That was my Guess : >
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: dp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 6:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
David precht hailing from just west of beantown
-Original Message-
F
David precht hailing from just west of beantown
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 21:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
He is getting at who are you? DP can mean many things. We like to have
names.
We
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
8000 users domain migration
What ya trying to get at?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 21:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
If your words are not worthy of your own
8000 users domain migration
What ya trying to get at?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 21:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil
If your words are not worthy of your own name, how can you expect them
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
