Re: PF replication

2010-11-01 Thread Rob Sargent
Or maybe there really is only 2gb of PF data? Maybe your source PF store, which indicates 12gb, has lots of white space? Does it look like there are replicas on the target server of all folders? Rob On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Level Five - List li...@levelfive.uswrote: Okay, what am I

RE: PF replication

2010-11-01 Thread Level Five - List
, 2010 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: PF replication Or maybe there really is only 2gb of PF data? Maybe your source PF store, which indicates 12gb, has lots of white space? Does it look like there are replicas on the target server of all folders? Rob On Sat, Oct 30, 2010

PF replication

2010-10-30 Thread Level Five - List
Okay, what am I missing, I have 2 ex2k7sp2 servers that im trying to replicate PF data. The data is about 12GB which isn't a lot but its dozens of folders and hundreds of permissions. I started replication a month ago, replication got to about 2gb on the 2nd server and it hasn't moved since.

ex07 pf replication

2010-08-30 Thread Lists - Level5
We are migrating away from an SCR 2007 cluster to a single vm box for our mailbox database. We have 4 DB's and have been moving mailboxes over the past several weeks. Our PF DB is about 40GB. When I looked at all the PF's they had a replication of the new server, and all the stores were set to

RE: ex07 pf replication

2010-08-30 Thread Michael B. Smith
. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Lists - Level5 [mailto:li...@levelfive.us] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ex07 pf replication We are migrating away from an SCR 2007 cluster to a single vm box

RE: ex07 pf replication

2010-08-30 Thread Webster
MoveAllReplicas has never worked for me. Webster From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Subject: RE: ex07 pf replication MoveAllReplicas has rarely worked for me (I say it that way, because some people swear it's great; my experience has been otherwise). I

RE: ex07 pf replication

2010-08-30 Thread Level 5 - Lists
screwed the pooch for me this time, I did use it a few times before without incident FWIW From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ex07 pf replication MoveAllReplicas has never worked for me. Webster

E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication

2010-03-26 Thread John Bowles
All- I'm trying to replicate my public folders from E2K3 to E2K10. I've set all the limits for replication up to 2GB (seemingly that's as high as you can go on either RGC and PF DB). Problem is that my replicas are getting queue's up on the RGC between the two servers. Am I missing

RE: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication

2010-03-26 Thread John Bowles
Yea, PF replication traffic queue is slowly dwindling down. Will I not see the replica's on E2K10 until all the traffic has been replicated? Or should I be able to view what's been replicated over in ESM2k10? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4

RE: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication

2010-03-26 Thread Michael B. Smith
MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication Yea, PF replication traffic queue is slowly dwindling down. Will I not see the replica's on E2K10 until

PF replication, latency and archiving

2009-05-28 Thread Kurt Buff
All, We're implementing SEA here, and have three offices - one here in the US, one in the UK and one in AU. The latency between offices for data transfer is pretty huge, as you might expect, with the further handicap that the UK office has a consumer grade DSL connection of 768/128. To

RE: PF replication, latency and archiving

2009-05-28 Thread Eric Hanna
: http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com Physical Address: 33 N Garden Ave Suite 120 Clearwater, FL 33755 United States -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PF replication, latency and archiving

Re: PF replication, latency and archiving

2009-05-28 Thread Kurt Buff
, 2009 2:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PF replication, latency and archiving All, We're implementing SEA here, and have three offices - one here in the US, one in the UK and one in AU. The latency between offices for data transfer is pretty huge, as you might expect

Re: PF replication, latency and archiving

2009-05-28 Thread Kurt Buff
: 33 N Garden Ave Suite 120 Clearwater, FL 33755 United States -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PF replication, latency and archiving All, We're implementing SEA here

RE: PF replication, latency and archiving

2009-05-28 Thread Sobey, Richard A
PF replication will always take a lesser precedent to normal mail traffic, and you can configure it to happen out of hours, if any such things exists in your company. You might also have the luxury - depending on costs and how much time you have - of setting up an Exchange PF store on a new

Re: PF replication, latency and archiving

2009-05-28 Thread Kurt Buff
That will probably prove useful. I'll make note of that during the conversations we have. On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 13:29, Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: PF replication will always take a lesser precedent to normal mail traffic, and you can configure it to happen out of hours