RE: Spam Control

2002-07-17 Thread Stu Sjouwerman
*** -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spam Control I like IM. In our office, we can talk about other people in the office without them knowing about it! Mind you, when everyone else is

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-12 Thread Neil Hobson
ed At: 10 July 2002 18:39 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Spam Control Subject: RE: Spam Control Hence, Exchange 2000 Instant Messaging Server. :o) "Keeps the Store clean!" -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 1

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-10 Thread William Lefkovics
Hence, Exchange 2000 Instant Messaging Server. :o) "Keeps the Store clean!" -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spam Control Mm... Pizza. Internal SPAM can

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-10 Thread Lynne Seamans
essage- >From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:46 >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >Subject: RE: Spam Control > > >Mm... >Spam. > >That's why DL's that include everyone are usually restricted >to senders

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-10 Thread Carl Houseman
Mm... Spam. That's why DL's that include everyone are usually restricted to senders with good judgement, right? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spam Contro

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-10 Thread Schwartz, Jim
09, 2002 5:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spam Control Then from the next cubicle comes... Net send jschwartz "Hey Jim! 2 for 1 at New York Pasta and Pizza!" -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:50

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-10 Thread PSmith
I'm also using eManager, and I've seen a lot of spam that contain no words, only pictures. At that point, you have to open the email and View, Options, and add the sender's domain to the Anti-Spam tab as a new rule, with their domain in the Routing Domain line. If you've already done this, then

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-09 Thread William Lefkovics
Then from the next cubicle comes... Net send jschwartz "Hey Jim! 2 for 1 at New York Pasta and Pizza!" -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spam Control Su

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-09 Thread Schwartz, Jim
much. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 5:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spam Control You can't stop (all) SPAM, try as you might. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sen

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-09 Thread William Lefkovics
You can't stop (all) SPAM, try as you might. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Spam Control I'm using Trends NeaTSuite with eManager to limit spam. I'm blocking about 250 - 400 me

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-09 Thread Roger Wright
It's never going to be 100%. You can make big inroads, however, if you monitor the content of what gets through and add that to the content filter. Roger Wright Southern Commerce Bank ___ Don't force it, get a larger hammer. --Anthony -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mail

RE: spam control

2002-02-14 Thread Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc.
-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control Well for us, the spam slammer is a very welcome side effect. We needed the app to do confirmations. We receive data attachments from clien

RE: spam control

2002-02-13 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Title: RE: spam control Well for us, the spam slammer is a very welcome side effect. We needed the app to do confirmations. We receive data attachments from clients to enter into our own database, and to verify that data, we have the app force an email to KNOWN regulatory email addresses to

RE: spam control

2002-02-13 Thread Allen Crawford
-9800 x > 120 > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:36 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: spam control > >

Re: spam control

2002-02-13 Thread Don Andrews
. > > -Original Message- > From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:47 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: spam control > > Why don't you recommend installing a spam

RE: spam control

2002-02-13 Thread Toni, Randy
- > From: David N. Precht [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: February 12, 2002 6:56 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: spam control > > I second that... > > -Original Message- > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >

RE: spam control

2002-02-13 Thread Matthew Carpenter
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control I suggest you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big. PS, Get to SP4. -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS

RE: spam control

2002-02-13 Thread Matthew Carpenter
ginal Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control No, I don't. Its just a matter of preference. I don't want to have to go trudging through all the false positives

RE: spam control

2002-02-12 Thread Martin Blackstone
et so much spam. -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control Why don't you recommend installing a spam control software on Exchange?  Do you u

RE: spam control

2002-02-12 Thread Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc.
ECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control I suggest you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big. PS, Get to SP4. -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [m

RE: spam control

2002-02-12 Thread David N. Precht
Title: Message I second that... -Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 18:35To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control www.marshalsoftware.com -Original Message-From: Nelson

RE: spam control

2002-02-12 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message I suggest you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big. PS, Get to SP4. -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: spam

RE: spam control

2002-02-12 Thread Simon Curtiss
Title: Message www.marshalsoftware.com -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 12:27 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: spam control Hello,     What software do you guys recommend to control