Yes, I use Diskeeper - on all my servers.
Sean Rector, MCSE
-Original Message-
From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defragmenting servers
Does anyone use tools like diskeeper to defrag their nondatabas
It provides a marginal speed improvement (assuming you defrag regularly).
I like MyDefrag (used to be JKDefrag). It's free and it's fast.
-Original Message-
From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Defragme
d.ri...@hwinstitute.com
SERVICE. INNOVATION. RESULTS.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
It provides a marginal speed improvement (assuming you de
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:00 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> It provides a marginal speed improvement (assuming you defrag
> regularly).
ge Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Defragmenting servers
The really old school notion is to have a file system that doesn't need it,
like UFS...
Heh.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:45, David.Ricci wrote:
> I was always under the impression that it was bad to defrag a server.
> I guess tha
ssues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out, Microsoft told
us NTFS didn't need defraggingthus was born a new industry. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December
t; To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out, Microsoft
> told us NTFS didn't need defraggingthus was born a new industry. :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt B
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:02 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out,
>
Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:02 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out,
> Microsoft told us NTFS didn't need defraggingthus was born a new
> industry. :-)
>
: 401.228.1399
www.hwinstitute.com
david.ri...@hwinstitute.com
SERVICE. INNOVATION. RESULTS.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
Do you remember
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:58 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Defragmenting servers
>
> The really old school notion is to have a file system that doesn't need it,
> like UFS...
>
> Heh.
>
&g
:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:02 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
>
> Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out, Microsoft told
> us NTFS didn't need defraggingthus was born
) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX
i...@sonomatilemakers.com
From: David.Ricci [mailto:david.ri...@hwinstitute.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
That is where I got it from.
So now it is ok so as long as
From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers
OK, so does that mean the databases do not get fragmented, or there is another
way to defrag them?
I do not support our databases, only the
I have wondered this too Harry but I think the question is better put
to your shared storage provider. That said, we are testing out
Vizioncore's vOptimizer as well
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Harry Singh wrote:
> Is it recommended to kick off defrag's for VM's who are using shared storage
>
After doing some digging, I did find the answer to my initial question. When
it comes to defrag'n your VM guests, it's recommended.
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/77661
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:23 PM, mqcarp wrote:
> I have wondered this too Harry but I think the question is better put
Quick related question:
Do you defrag file servers where the store is on a SAN? Does it make a
measurable difference? I've got a bit over 2tb in three LUNs on a LH
SAN, and have never really bothered, but am interested, and could be
convinced...
Kurt
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 13:59, Michael B. Smi
the whole argument about defrags is nullno app is better than the
other...the question is when is defragging too much?
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Quick related question:
>
> Do you defrag file servers where the store is on a SAN? Does it make a
> measurable differenc
I'm not worried about which app to use - I'd probably use either the
native app or MyDefrag. It's just a matter of whether it makes sense
to do it on a file store that's on a SAN.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 15:19, Raul Torres wrote:
> the whole argument about defrags is nullno app is better than
), the difference is
measurable. For random access, probably not so much.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 6:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Defragmenting servers
Quick related question:
Do you defrag file
rt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 6:17 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Defragmenting servers
>
> Quick related question:
>
> Do you defrag file servers where the store is on a SAN? Does it make a
> measurable difference? I&#
21 matches
Mail list logo
