RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-14 Thread Jeremy Phillips
Exchange 2010 is simply awesome. Huge jump from 2007. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 9:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Fi

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-14 Thread Jeremy Phillips
2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude cooler than 2007. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:23 PM To: MS-E

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Chipshead
Very cool. I'm still on 2003. Since we're talking about it, what's the anticipated release date? Thanks. - Original Message - From: "KevinM" To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:34:53 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Finally 2010 We can

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Bolser, Scott
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect (explains MS' lifecycle policy). -Scott From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventuall

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Clayton Doige
Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM > We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 > > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 > > > > ~Kevinm WLKMMAS >

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Clayton Doige
xchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Finally 2010 > > > > Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post > 2010 release? > > 2009/4/15 KevinM > > We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 > > > http://www.microsoft.com/download

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Sauvigne, Craig M
: chipsh...@comcast.net [mailto:chipsh...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Very cool. I'm still on 2003. Since we're talking about it, what's the anticipated release date? Thanks. - Original Message

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM wrote: > We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so people can give one item or several, and write a few words or many.) Thanks... -

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Peter Sam
and http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd298136(EXCHG.140).aspx > Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:19:38 -0400 > Subject: Re: Finally 2010 > From: mailvor...@gmail.com > To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM wrote: > &

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Campbell, Rob
2009 7:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM wrote: > We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchange 2010? :) (I figured I'd leave it open-ended so pe

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Bolser, Scott
tell. The idea is great, but we'll need to wait for MS' offering to mature. -Scott -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM,

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Dahl, Peter
: RE: Finally 2010 I heard way back that 2007 was the last Exchange version to support Public Folders. Is that still accurate? Are the PFs in 2010? Craig Craig M. Sauvigne System Administrator Winthrop University Rock Hill, SC 29733 sauvig...@winthrop.edu SC143 From: chipsh

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Campbell, Rob
Anybody know what the heck "cmdlet extension agents" are? From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread John Hornbuckle
icated and buggy GuidoElia HELPPC Da: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 8.24 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Finally 2010 2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude cooler

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread John Bowles
Well, aren't you going to talk about it? _ John Bowles 301.473.2260 From: KevinM [kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 12:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Finally 2010 We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 http

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Sobey, Richard A
I'm particularly intrigued by the size of the installer: 300MB! From: bounce-8490525-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8490525-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of John Bowles Sent: 15 April 2009 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread KevinM
[mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM wrote: > We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Excha

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Campbell, Rob wrote: > Anybody know what the heck “cmdlet extension agents” are? I would guess they're additional commands, or command options, for PowerShell. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Jeremy Phillips
Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org>> We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=189

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Campbell, Rob
Maybe. From what little documentation there is, it appears they may be agents that run powershell scripts. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 9:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 On Wed, Apr 15

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Jeremy Phillips
and buggy GuidoElia HELPPC Da: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 8.24 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Finally 2010 2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude cooler than 20

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Jeremy Phillips
: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The DAG, The secondary mailbox thing. Calendaring federation, the cloud move stuff.. the more pretty OWA. The comical dictation of my voicemails. NO MORE CLUSTERING. Much hugely improved Jet Design. ~Kevinm

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread John Cook
And the prospect of built in archiving is huge! John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud - Original Message - From: KevinM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wed Apr 15 10:22:48 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 The

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Jeremy Phillips
ks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 And the

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread John Cook
ssues Sent: Wed Apr 15 11:14:22 2009 Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Yeah, but honestly it's not going to be what people want at first. If I remember correctly you can't move the archive databases off to different storage so you really don't gain much storage wise. It will be nic

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Jeremy Phillips
D: 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I'm sure some lurking MVPs will express the importance of putting the archive

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Randal, Phil
hibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 April 2009 17:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 K

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
w the design. :) > > Thanks, > > Jeremy Phillips > Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | D: > 425-949-1337 | BB PIN: 318A6889 > > > > -Original Message- > From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:1

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Sean Martin
--- > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* 15 April 2009 17:21 > > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Finally 2010 > > Kewl. I will be checking it out whenever I finish my deployment of > E2K7. Just getting

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Bolser, Scott
Swing method for 2007-->2010. There is no option for an in-place upgrade. -Scott From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 Any word on migration strategies from Exchange 2003 and Excha

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Steve Ens
e-mail in error please contact the >> sender immediately and destroy all copies of it. >> >> >> -- >> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* 15 April 2009 17:21 >> >> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin I

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread KevinM
true... ~Kevinm WLKMMAS From: Steve Ens [stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I would think a swing migration would not be needed between 03 and 10, but perhaps just install

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread Steve Szabo
nt: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:20 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Finally 2010 > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:34 AM, KevinM wrote: > > We can finally talk to ya'll about Exchange 2010 > > Okay. So what do people find most compelling about Exchang

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-15 Thread KevinM
.. ETC.. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -Original Message- From: Steve Szabo [mailto:steve...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Here are some shots of 2010 OWA: http://www.networkworld.com/slideshows

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Sobey, Richard A
ent: 15 April 2009 18:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Finally 2010 I would think a swing migration would not be needed between 03 and 10, but perhaps just install alongside (since it will be 64 bit only) and move mailboxes and public folders. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, S

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Maglinger, Paul
HELPPC Da: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com] Inviato: mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 8.24 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Finally 2010 2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude cooler than 2007. Thanks

Re: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
esivelogic.com] > *Inviato:* mercoledì 15 aprile 2009 8.24 > *A:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Oggetto:* RE: Finally 2010 > > 2007 was a great improvement over 2003. 2010 is an order of magnitude > cooler than 2007. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jeremy Philli

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Campbell, Rob
I'm guessing those changes to Jet disallowed that as an option. From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 I was hoping that database portability could

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Okay... disregard my first reply. Didn't get this far into the emails... From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:peter.d...@yum.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Public Folders are still alive and ki

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread John Hornbuckle
So, will Microsoft be moving some of the things back into the GUI that they had pulled out in 2007? That decrease in functionality never made sense to me. I'm all for a strong CLI, but from a usability standpoint it seems to make more sense to let the user choose whether they want to use a GUI o

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Sobey, Richard A
Yup. Never mind ;( From: bounce-8491481-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8491481-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Campbell, Rob Sent: 16 April 2009 16:07 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 I'm guessing those changes to Jet disallowed th

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Campbell, Rob
hn.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 So, will Microsoft be moving some of the things back into the GUI that they had pulled out in 2007? That decrease in functionality never made sense to me. I'm all for a

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Barsodi.John
PowerShell can get your mailboxes migrated in less than a week if scripted and implemented properly. ;) - John Barsodi From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 12:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 I was hoping that

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Michael B. Smith
were split. From: Campbell, Rob [rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 You're still using the CLI when you use the GUI. All the GUI is doing is helping you const

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread John Hornbuckle
com] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Close, but not strictly true. Both the CLI and the GUI create a RunSpace which parses and executes the commands. The CLI does more than just the RunSpace - it handles the ConsoleHost and handles

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Maglinger, Paul
Da: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Inviato: giovedì 16 aprile 2009 14.36 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Finally 2010 So, will Microsoft be moving some of the things back into the GUI that they had pulled out in 2007? That decrease in functionality never made sense

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Miller Bonnie L .
AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Anyhoo... It's still a step backwards to give users LESS functionality with a GUI than they had with prior versions. I've seen a lot of complaints about that out on the intertubes, and I tend to agree. -Original Message

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Campbell, Rob
lace for some of the common Unix commands like ls, and it's agnostic about which way the slashes go. -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 GUI, definitely. The

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Maglinger, Paul
16, 2009 11:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 I think PS will go a long way toward replacing the chaotic collection of command line programs that have their own special syntax with a common management platform. If you're managing Unix boxes too, I'd think y

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread John Hornbuckle
plit this task between ADUC and EMC. -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 12:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 GUI, definitely. There's already too much CLI out there with their own special sy

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Randal, Phil
ictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it. -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: 16 April 2009 18:28 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Maglinger, Paul
ed to return to CLI. Where'd I put those 6.22 disks...? -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 12:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 Would PowerGUI and some of the powerpacks

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-16 Thread Don Andrews
...and the drive ;-) -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 It may be, but why get a 3rd party GUI for things that could have, did have and ought to have a GUI

RE: Finally 2010

2009-04-17 Thread Sobey, Richard A
2009 16:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Finally 2010 PowerShell can get your mailboxes migrated in less than a week if scripted and implemented properly. ;) - John Barsodi From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 12:29 AM To: MS-Exchange