This time James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> As urpmi exists I wouldn't think it would work. I've seen the
> distro upgrade done on debian.. If you aren't too far out of date it
> works eventually. But if you are way out of date it has a real
> chance of
On Tue 2003-03-11 at 22:25:41 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> I gave up on Debian in disgust when I used apt-get to fix a security
> problem in gcc and it helpfully upgraded the kernel and glibc to a
> version that made my build environment useless. urpmi occassionally
> makes decisions I d
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 08:45 pm, David E. Fox wrote:
> > du -xsh /*Summary of the size of all dirs that are on "/"-partition
> > serach the biggest dir and then go to that dir and do the same.=20
>
> Hey - that's a very useful command. ;)
>
> It lists directories that could be located on thei
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 21:58, David E. Fox wrote:
> > Q: what's the difference between doing it with a cooker directory and a
> > release directory?
> > A: Someone at MandrakeSoft changed the label from cooker to release.
> > Hint: they didn't tell urpmi about that.
>
> Hmm. An interesting approac
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 21:58, David E. Fox wrote:
> > Q: what's the difference between doing it with a cooker directory and a
> > release directory?
> > A: Someone at MandrakeSoft changed the label from cooker to release.
> > Hint: they didn't tell urpmi about that.
>
> Hmm. An interesting approac
> Q: what's the difference between doing it with a cooker directory and a
> release directory?
> A: Someone at MandrakeSoft changed the label from cooker to release.
> Hint: they didn't tell urpmi about that.
Hmm. An interesting approach, but it's dependent on timing. If one
would updagte to cook
> du -xsh /*Summary of the size of all dirs that are on "/"-partition
> serach the biggest dir and then go to that dir and do the same.=20
Hey - that's a very useful command. ;)
It lists directories that could be located on their own file systems,
though. Adding -x according to the man page f
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 21:22, David E. Fox wrote:
> > Is it possible to use drakautoinst to automate an effectively upgrade a
> > machine from one release to another? Rather than try to use the upgrade
>
> Should be. I've wondered the same thing, although not in the
> context of drakautoinst.
>
> Is it possible to use drakautoinst to automate an effectively upgrade a
> machine from one release to another? Rather than try to use the upgrade
Should be. I've wondered the same thing, although not in the
context of drakautoinst.
Debian (for instance) allows you to do a dist-upgrade (aka ap
I installed Linux Mandrake 8.0 from a cd about a year ago. Recently, I
tried to get the Apache web server going. It woks, except that it won't
run cgi scripts. I set the exact same configuration that currently
works for linux Mandrake 7.0, running on the exact same machine, in a
different partit
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 05:05 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 13:50, JOHAM,DAVID (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:
> > Not having ever used xpp, can anyone compare/contrast it's features and
> > capabilities vs. the KDE print system? I'm a huge advocate of the KDE
> > system since it wraps a ve
Hi, Todd Thank you for your explanation for the modem.
I tried to do it, but I could not make it. MDK9.0 does not recognize the modem after
installing ltmodem-kv_2.4.19_16mdk-8.26a9-1.i586.rpm. When I tried to get on web using
kppp, kppp was trying to initialize the modem, but it won't proceed f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne Wilson wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:59:12PM + :
> >
> I tried adjusting them on one printer layout, but KEdit brings up the kde
> print interface, which appears to ignore what has been set via xpp. Is this
> your experience?
Yes. But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim C wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:55:37PM -0800 :
> Liquid 0.9.5 on KDE 3.0.x bombs on the configure. Can't find qt3
> despite the fact that it is installed.
At the time that Liquid was written, Mandrake was using the qt libs
which were named l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G'afternoon, g...
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 02:24 pm, g wrote:
> did you change fstab and lilo.conf?
Yup. I looked in dmesg, and everything matches. I think the problem is with
the MB BIOS, since the secondary drive is a 120 G EIDE on an 80 pin cable
Anne Wilson wrote:
Yes. I have made no change to the physical layout. The drives are where they
have always been. I was booting between windows and Mdk 8.2 before I
installed 9.0.
there is a diff with 8.2 and 9.0. what i do not know. something to do with
how booting is handled.
if you do tr
Dave Laird wrote:
decided in a rash moment of heat, to put one drive as primary/master and one
drive as secondary/master. The second drive disappeared.
did you change fstab and lilo.conf?
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
=+=
think green...
save a tree, save a life, save time, save bandwidth, save
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good afternoon, Anne...
I've been avidly following this discussion regarding ATA100 drives because I
saw something quite akin to that just last week. I formatted and installed
two ATA100 drives, both on the primary cable as Master/Slave, and did a
bun
Try James Connor -- I just pointed out an article, he's the one
compiling :-)
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 02:01, mycal62 wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> tried it on my system as you outlined and it compiled and installed
> fine except for the transparent menus :-(
>
> athlon xp 1700+ epox 8kta3pro MB kde 3.1
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 13:50, JOHAM,DAVID (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:
> Not having ever used xpp, can anyone compare/contrast it's features and
> capabilities vs. the KDE print system? I'm a huge advocate of the KDE system
> since it wraps a very easy to use and polished interface around a lot of
> neat f
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 9:50 pm, JOHAM,DAVID (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:
> Not having ever used xpp, can anyone compare/contrast it's features and
> capabilities vs. the KDE print system? I'm a huge advocate of the KDE
> system since it wraps a very easy to use and polished interface around a
> lot of nea
Hi Todd. Thanks for the reply.
As an FYI, you can do the same thing with the KDE print system as well with
the kprinter wrapper application.
try
cat file.txt | kprinter --stdin (optionally with --nodialog)
or
kprinter file.txt
I use kprinter in this manner with all of my non-KDE apps (Cros
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 7:29 pm, Joe Braddock wrote:
> Are the ATA66 controllers connected to anything? If not, is the controller
> disabled in CMOS (the hde and hdf correspond to the 3rd and 4th primary
> controller). Of course, disabling the controller in CMOS might cause
> nothing to boot as yo
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 9:51 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Anne Wilson wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:46:19PM + :
> > > Change your print command to either 'lpr' or 'xpp' in Mozilla (go into
> >
> > This is a big help. The remaining print problem
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 8:44 pm, g wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> are you saying that you had both drives on ata100 controller and it was
> working. now it has diff layout?
Yes. I have made no change to the physical layout. The drives are where they
have always been. I was booting between windo
Liquid 0.9.5 on KDE 3.0.x bombs on the configure. Can't find qt3
despite the fact that it is installed.
Now I had to get Mofset's Liquid. I looked for an updated rpm and it
...
on its success or failure?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JOHAM,DAVID (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:50:26PM -0800 :
>
> Looking at the screenshots on the xpp homepage, my first impression of the
> interface was that it wasn't as polished or user-friendly as KDE's printing
> system. However,
Hi Jack,
tried it on my system as you outlined and it compiled and installed
fine except for the transparent menus :-(
athlon xp 1700+ epox 8kta3pro MB kde 3.1 on a Mdk 9.0 system
did the transparent menus work for you ?
Jack Coates wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 02:47, James Conner wrote:
..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne Wilson wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:46:19PM + :
> >
> > Change your print command to either 'lpr' or 'xpp' in Mozilla (go into
> This is a big help. The remaining print problem for me is in printing text
> files from KEdit or KWrite. Ma
Not having ever used xpp, can anyone compare/contrast it's features and
capabilities vs. the KDE print system? I'm a huge advocate of the KDE system
since it wraps a very easy to use and polished interface around a lot of
neat features (print to ps, pdf, email, fax etc) as well as providing all o
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 7:56 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Daniel Anderson wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:49:16PM -0500 :
> > Hi,
> > MDK9.0, I can't print from mozilla or mozilla based brousers. The only
> > printer that shows is a postscript prin
Are the ATA66 controllers connected to anything? If not, is the controller disabled
in CMOS (the hde and hdf correspond to the 3rd and 4th primary controller). Of
course, disabling the controller in CMOS might cause nothing to boot as your drives
might change from hde/hdf to hdc/hdd, so you mi
Oooo! I'll byte! I've tried installing it before and couldn't get it to
work.
Jack Coates wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 02:47, James Conner wrote:
...
Now I had to get Mofset's Liquid. I looked for an updated rpm and it didn't
exist, so I went to his web site to get the tarball. He claims on h
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 03:51 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 11:56, Todd Lyons wrote:
> ...
>
> > Change your print command to either 'lpr' or 'xpp' in Mozilla (go into
> > Properties in the print dialog). You probably don't have xpp installed
> > by default, so you'll need to man
Anne Wilson wrote:
Trouble is, it doesn't work, and hasn't done since these appeared in lilo
that was a part i was not sure about. if lilo.conf had been working. this puts
a whole different light on subject.
Since it was not there from the start, I am beginning to wonder if something I
did when
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 11:56, Todd Lyons wrote:
...
> Change your print command to either 'lpr' or 'xpp' in Mozilla (go into
> Properties in the print dialog). You probably don't have xpp installed
> by default, so you'll need to manually install it. I recommend it as
> it's super and works GREAT.
Thanks Todd. That fixed it. And thanks to all who responded.
Dan
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 02:56 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Daniel Anderson wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:49:16PM -0500 :
> > Hi,
> > MDK9.0, I can't print from mozilla or mozilla
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 7:51 pm, JOHAM,DAVID (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:
> Can you print from KDE 3.x? If so, try making your print command "kprinter
> --stdin" and that should get you going...
>
That's the one I was trying to remember. Thanks David.
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Want to bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Anderson wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:49:16PM -0500 :
> Hi,
> MDK9.0, I can't print from mozilla or mozilla based brousers. The only
> printer that shows is a postscript printer. I have a Deskjet 841c (cups) on
> the network that wor
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 7:49 pm, Daniel Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> MDK9.0, I can't print from mozilla or mozilla based brousers. The only
> printer that shows is a postscript printer. I have a Deskjet 841c (cups) on
> the network that works for everything else. I searched the archives but
> didn'
Can you print from KDE 3.x? If so, try making your print command "kprinter
--stdin" and that should get you going...
David
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 12:49 PM
To: Expert
Subject: [expert] mozilla and printing
Hi,
Hi,
MDK9.0, I can't print from mozilla or mozilla based brousers. The only
printer that shows is a postscript printer. I have a Deskjet 841c (cups) on
the network that works for everything else. I searched the archives but
didn't find an answer that works. Looks like others have had this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> No. You're allowing people to ssh directly to your firewall. That's
> not safe. At the very least use tcpwrappers to limit what IP's can
> connect to the sshd daemon. Even better, limit it to key based ssh'ing
> (ie no interactive login).
Make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Conner wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:25:27PM + :
>
> Well, some distros put KDE in /opt/kde and some, like Mandrake, put it in
> /usr. Granted, there are pros and cons on both sides. I'm not starting this
> thread to discuss that, I j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:02:41PM -0500 :
> Dear all,
>
> I am using a notebook computer and I installed Mandrake 9.0. The
> problems I am having is that my notebook cannnot get on internet. My
> notebook has a LT Win Modem a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim C wrote on Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 02:28:10PM -0800 :
>
> So basically the local network and the firewall box can talk to anyone
> but, as defined below, not anyone can talk back.
Not quite. If you send a packet out, a reply coming back in (aka ta
On Tuesday March 11, 2003 04:52 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
> In this month's Linux Journal, there's an article about KDE's Desktop
> Sharing which makes it very clear what one needs to do to compile
> software for KDE on Mandrake. It agrees with your process. Perhaps
> Mosfet should consider a subscri
On Tuesday March 11, 2003 04:18 pm, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> It is simply wrong that Mandrake breaks kde, its a lie . full stop.
> The only thing that mandrake changes is the location of the menus, since it
> uses debian-style menu-entries as far as I know. But so debian would break
> kde too.
We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne Wilson wrote on Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:11:52PM + :
> > Konqueror->Settings->ConfigureKonqueror->KonquerorBrowser. Uncheck the
> > "Enable completion of forms" setting or lower the number to 1, login,
> > and then log back out. That should c
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 5:00 pm, g wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 Mar 2003 1:18 pm, g wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to get to grips with both this one and the one that follows
> > it. Bear with me, it's brain-spinning
>
> not having been into hardware, i can understand how it is confu
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Sunday 09 Mar 2003 1:18 pm, g wrote:
> I'm trying to get to grips with both this one and the one that follows it.
> Bear with me, it's brain-spinning
not having been into hardware, i can understand how it is confusing to you.
i am looking forward to your comments on 'one
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 02:47, James Conner wrote:
...
> Now I had to get Mofset's Liquid. I looked for an updated rpm and it didn't
> exist, so I went to his web site to get the tarball. He claims on his web
> site( http://www.mosfet.org/liquid.html ) that "Mandrake uses a non-standard
> direct
Actually I didn't--it's our box, not theirs.
Miark
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 07:23:34 -0500
et <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And even more important to _me_, where did you find a hosting/co-location
> service using Mandrake?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.man
James,
For FTP, I edited /etc/proftpd.conf to include the following line:
IdentLookups off
and then restarted ProFTP with /etc/rc.d/init.d/proftpd restart
For POP/POPS I edited ipop3 and pops in /etc/xinetd.d/ to include
log_on_success = yes
instead of what it was(=+ USERID
Thanks to everyone who has answered this. You've cleared up things a
great deal for me.
Jim C.
Vox wrote:
This time Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
The -l just lists ports that are in the act of listening, whereas active
connections are listed separately. For instance,
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 11:47, James Conner wrote:
> I'd been using Mofset's Liquid style on KDE 3.0.5a on MDK 9.0 for quite a
> while. I wanted to upgrade to KDE 3.1, but didn't want to lose Liquid. I
> installed KDE 3.1 from here:
> ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-addon/KDE 3.1 MDK 9.0/rpms
I'd been using Mofset's Liquid style on KDE 3.0.5a on MDK 9.0 for quite a
while. I wanted to upgrade to KDE 3.1, but didn't want to lose Liquid. I
installed KDE 3.1 from here:
ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-addon/KDE 3.1 MDK 9.0/rpms
First I had to download all files into a subdirectory and
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 1:02 pm, Joe Braddock wrote:
Hi, Joe
> I'm not sure if this is the case or not, but might this problem be due to
> how your drives are partitioned as in primary vs extended partitions?
> Could it be that if your OS, doesn't matter which is actually in an
> extended partiti
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:58, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> Get over it... your statement is factually incorrect what you are
> probably referring to is the old-style [sub]net broadcast address
>
> Classfull:
> 192.0.0.0: old-style broadcast -- last 0 only (Class C)
> 162.198.0.0: old-style broadca
I'm not sure if this is the case or not, but might this problem be due to how your
drives are partitioned as in primary vs extended partitions? Could it be that if your
OS, doesn't matter which is actually in an extended partition, that LILO need to mount
the primary partition containing it to
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 01:50:52 -0600 Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On TCP/IP networking, 0 as any octet of an IP is, for all purposes,
> a universal globing. That's why I hate people who set their LANs to
> use 192.168.0.x as their IPs...it drives me crazy, even if it's
> valid :)
Get o
On Sunday 09 Mar 2003 1:18 pm, g wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
I'm trying to get to grips with both this one and the one that follows it.
Bear with me, it's brain-spinning
>
> you may not have an hda and hdb, but, when 'what ever' wrote your
> 'lilo.conf', it thought you need to have them.
>
> s
This time Adolfo Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 03:50, Vox wrote:
>
>> 0.0.0.0 = any
>>
>> On TCP/IP networking, 0 as any octet of an IP is, for all purposes,
>> a universal globing. That's why I hate people who set their LANs to
>> use 192.
And even more important to _me_, where did you find a hosting/co-location
service using Mandrake?
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 12:49 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 13:58, Miark wrote:
> > It's me, O, Lord :-)
> >
> > I Googled the situation and found the answer: ident lookups. I
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 07:58, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> Hi Vox:
>
> I don't know if I understood what you meant by universal globing and why
> you hate 0 in IPs.
>
> As long as 0 is not the ending octet, it has no special meaning in IP
> addresses. The same applies to 255, or to any power of 2 number.
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 06:58 am, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 03:50, Vox wrote:
> > 0.0.0.0 = any
> >
> > On TCP/IP networking, 0 as any octet of an IP is, for all purposes,
> > a universal globing. That's why I hate people who set their LANs to
> > use 192.168.0.x as their
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 03:50, Vox wrote:
> 0.0.0.0 = any
>
> On TCP/IP networking, 0 as any octet of an IP is, for all purposes,
> a universal globing. That's why I hate people who set their LANs to
> use 192.168.0.x as their IPs...it drives me crazy, even if it's
> valid :)
>
> Vox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> 0.0.0.0 = any
Further to this, if you see a service listening on 0.0.0.0, it actually means the
service is listening on all available (and future) interfaces.
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 1:17 am, engage wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2003 03:32 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 Mar 2003 11:21 pm, engage wrote:
> > > Is anyone using this (Settings->Configure POP filters)? I'm trying to
> > > get it to delete HTML e-mail from the mail server instead of
> > >
I suddenly have a heavy printing problem:
while beeing connected to the internet (via rp-pppoe-gui and DSL) I cannot
print.
kprinter does not show any printer. After closing the DSL all printers appear
agian.
This came up recently.
I have installed:
--
cups-common-1.1.18-1.1mdk
cups-drivers-
70 matches
Mail list logo
