;
Subject: QUARANTINED: Re: [expert] *running* StarOffice??
> The message "Re: [expert] *running* StarOffice??" that you sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/16/2001 22:24 was quarantined because it
contained unacceptable language. Please consult your mail administrator in order
t
ECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fw: QUARANTINED: Re: [expert] *running* StarOffice??
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 07:25:38 +0100
"Richard Bown (QMW)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to
ponder:
> Hi alll, it would
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 07:25:38 +0100
"Richard Bown (QMW)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to
ponder:
> Hi alll, it would'nt be so bad , but that bloody stupid filter also catches
> the sig block , and as there 's a "รถ" ,o with two dots over it, ...yup you guessed
> "your messag
fun
4 days to freedom until I get kicked out of sweden
-Original Message-
From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fw: QUARANTINED: Re: [expert] *running* StarOffice??
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:03:01 -0800
&qu
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:32:51 -0500
Ed Tharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> really Mark, keep it down to 2 syllables and they won't treat you so harshly
>
well, darn-it...
*/ begin brown_word block
brown_word(butt.slobber.snot.brain){
w
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:03:01 -0800
"David Guntner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> Mark Weaver grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> >
> > this is getting RIDICULOUS! lets get it taken care of.
> >
> > wait...lightning has just struck my brain.
> >
> > F-I-L-T-E-R-I
really Mark, keep it down to 2 syllables and they won't treat you so harshly
On Monday 17 December 2001 20:03, you wrote:
> Mark Weaver grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> > this is getting RIDICULOUS! lets get it taken care of.
> >
> > wait...lightning has just struck my brain.
> >
> > F-I-L-T-E
Mark Weaver grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> this is getting RIDICULOUS! lets get it taken care of.
>
> wait...lightning has just struck my brain.
>
> F-I-L-T-E-R-I-N-G!!!
Mark, you *really* need to stop using that bad language that's being acted
on by some boneheaded (and brain-damaged
Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: QUARANTINED: Re: [expert] *running* StarOffice??
> The message "Re: [expert] *running* StarOffice??" that you sent to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/16/2001 22:24 was quarantined because it contained
>unacceptable language. Please consul
On Sunday 16 December 2001 10:26 pm, you wrote:
> Mark Weaver grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> > well David,
> >
> > that sucks in plain words. I've got Star Office 6.0 that I can place
> > on my FTP server if you don't mind allowing it to take a day or so to
> > download. It's up to you. If you wa
I'm actually running the StarOffice 6.0 beta and have not noticed any speed
or memory problems. Works like a charm.
Joe
On Sunday 16 December 2001 10:54 pm, you wrote:
> I installed OpenOffice-641 on MDK 8.1 and I think that the second step
> is to run /usr/local/Office52/program/setup as norm
Mark Weaver grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> well David,
>
> that sucks in plain words. I've got Star Office 6.0 that I can place
> on my FTP server if you don't mind allowing it to take a day or so to
> download. It's up to you. If you want to write me back and I'll stick
> it on the server f
I installed OpenOffice-641 on MDK 8.1 and I think that the second step
is to run /usr/local/Office52/program/setup as normal user and not the
soffice program.
BWT, OpenOffice is running very slowly and eating up all my memory. I do
have a 126 megabyte RAM Pentium III and the performance of OO is
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 18:19:42 -0800
"David Guntner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> Mark Weaver grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> >
> > David,
> >
> > try this. I've been where you are right now with Star Office and it
> > can be a real BIG pain in the arse to get ar
Mark Weaver grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> David,
>
> try this. I've been where you are right now with Star Office and it
> can be a real BIG pain in the arse to get around. destroy the entire
> SO dir in your home directory including the .sversionrc file.
>
> next, run this command in a te
On Sunday 16 December 2001 02:25 pm, you wrote:
> Lee Roberts grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> > Goes to show that the SO installation script lacks a lot to be desired.
> > It's "good" to know that I'm not the only one having this trouble.
> >
> > It seemed like a straightforward install but...
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:25:59 -0800
"David Guntner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> Lee Roberts grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> >
> > Goes to show that the SO installation script lacks a lot to be desired.
> > It's "good" to know that I'm not the only one having thi
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:45:07 -0700
Lee Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:00 PM 12/16/2001 -0800, David Guntner wrote:
>
> >directory. When it was done with that, it told me that there was No Java
> >Runtime Environment was found which can be used by StarOffice (even though
> >I have
Lee Roberts grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> Goes to show that the SO installation script lacks a lot to be desired.
> It's "good" to know that I'm not the only one having this trouble.
>
> It seemed like a straightforward install but
>
> Also, I'm not sure if installing SO caused me
At 12:00 PM 12/16/2001 -0800, David Guntner wrote:
>directory. When it was done with that, it told me that there was No Java
>Runtime Environment was found which can be used by StarOffice (even though
>I have it installed in /usr/local/java/jre1.3.1_01). (BTW, if I try
>clicking on the "Brow
David Guntner wrote:
>
> I logged out and then back in to "restart" my KDE session. I don't see any
> StarOffice stuff on any of my K menu items. I opened a shell window and
> typed:
>
> office52/soffice
>
I think this is your problem. I run StarOffivr all the time on Solaris.
We never st
Mark Weaver grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>
> These are typical symptoms of a Star Office install that didn't happen
> correctly. the best thing you can do at this point is uninstall it,
> clean things up in your home directory and try the install again.
>
> in case you didn't do this the last
On Sunday 16 December 2001 00:54, you wrote:
> And from a shell window, if I type "office52/soffice" from my home
> directory, I get a box that comes up called StarOffice 5.2 Repair, saying
I've had that problem as well - nothing I've tried will get me around it, so I
ended up running SO as root
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 00:54:42 -0800
"David Guntner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
> Hi all,
>
> Ok, I've got StarOffice installed. I then ran the setup program as a
> normal user to create my local stuff. It told me that it had integrated
> itself with KDE and t
Hi all,
Ok, I've got StarOffice installed. I then ran the setup program as a
normal user to create my local stuff. It told me that it had integrated
itself with KDE and to restart my KDE so that the changes would become
available to me. I logged out and back in, but none of the StarOffice
25 matches
Mail list logo
