Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-21 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 20 February 2003 08:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote: On Thu Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote: [...] Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are you simply using the binary version.

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-21 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 20 February 2003 02:45 pm, Todd Lyons wrote: Praedor Atrebates wrote on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500 : Anything kernel-wise from 2.4.19 or higher has been a complete, total loser for me. It is either kernel panics (can't

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-21 Thread Alfredo C. López
Praedor: Wich compiler are you using?? I use to have problems with it a long time ago. Try to see wich are the options that the 2.4.19-24mdk.src.rpm package use to generate the binary package. El Vie 21 Feb 2003 11:58, Praedor Atrebates escribió: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash:

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-21 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 06:58, Praedor Atrebates wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 20 February 2003 08:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote: On Thu Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote: [...] Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-21 Thread Damian Gatabria
In any case, the harddrive is new, the system memory is sound, the CPU is sound, the video card is sound (NVidia Ti4200). And what about the sound card? Any sound in there? Sorry, i know, stupid joke, you will probably want to beat me up for this, but i could not resist. Want to

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-21 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Praedor Atrebates wrote on Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:19:52PM -0500 : Try a RedHat kernel. I suspect you're having acpi issues. You appear to be correct but in a way I hadn't suspected. I installed the current cooker kernel (binary) and then

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-21 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 21 February 2003 03:03 pm, Todd Lyons wrote: Praedor Atrebates wrote on Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:19:52PM -0500 : Try a RedHat kernel. I suspect you're having acpi issues. You appear to be correct but in a way I hadn't suspected. I

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-21 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 21 February 2003 02:25 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 06:58, Praedor Atrebates wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 20 February 2003 08:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote: On Thu Feb 20,

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-21 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 11:25, James Sparenberg wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 06:58, Praedor Atrebates wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 20 February 2003 08:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote: On Thu Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote:

[expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread Praedor Atrebates
Well, at the suggestion of someone on the list, I downloaded, built, and installed the 9.0 update kernel 2.4.19-24mdk. Doesn't work. Not at all. I also built 2.4.18 from MDK 8.2 (and have been using my own build of the default MDK 9.0 kernel) and can use each without problems. 2.4.19-24mdk,

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread Greg Meyer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 20 February 2003 10:58 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote: Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are you simply using the binary version. What did MandrakeSoft do to get it to build and actually work, if this is

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 20 February 2003 11:54 am, Greg Meyer wrote: On Thursday 20 February 2003 10:58 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote: Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are you simply using the binary version. What did

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread Praedor Atrebates
On Thursday 20 February 2003 11:54 am, Greg Meyer wrote: On Thursday 20 February 2003 10:58 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote: Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are you simply using the binary version. What did MandrakeSoft do to get it to build and actually

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Praedor Atrebates wrote on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500 : Anything kernel-wise from 2.4.19 or higher has been a complete, total loser for me. It is either kernel panics (can't find init even though there IS an init), no bootups, loss

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Praedor Atrebates wrote on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:48:15PM -0500 : whatsoever, no beeps, no messages. Logs are totally devoid of any information on the 2.4.19-24 kernel. It is absolutely, totally, without doubt a dead, lifeless, useless, limp,

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread Robert Crawford
Praedor's problems must be system related. Admittedly, I'm not running any peripherals that could cause problems. With a stock 9.0 install, kernels 2.4.19-16mdk, 2.4.-19-24mdk, kernel.org vanilla 2.4.20 (with or without a preemptive patch), and the cooker 2.4.21.-0.pre4.5mdk (normal i586, or

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread J. Grant
Hi, Todd Lyons wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Praedor Atrebates wrote on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:48:15PM -0500 : whatsoever, no beeps, no messages. Logs are totally devoid of any information on the 2.4.19-24 kernel. It is absolutely, totally, without doubt a dead,

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 20 February 2003 04:14 pm, Robert Crawford wrote: Praedor's problems must be system related. Admittedly, I'm not running any peripherals that could cause problems. With a stock 9.0 install, kernels 2.4.19-16mdk, 2.4.-19-24mdk,

Re: [expert] 2.2.19-24mdk is DOA

2003-02-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote: [...] Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are you simply using the binary version. What did MandrakeSoft do to get it to build and actually work, if this is the case? To what god(s) did they