There are numerous books in the stores about Red Hat and almost none about
Mandrake. Even though Mandrake is derived from RH, I understand there are
significant differences including where files are kept. As a newbie, this
strikes terror in that if I try to use a RH rpm, etc., I moght
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Jeff Malka wrote:
:~Therefore my question is: what are the differences between RH and Mandrake
:~that a user needs to be aware of to avoid causing problems. To include:
:~
:~file locations, config, etc.(I obviously do not know what else or I would
:~not be asking the
As far as "file locations" go, there is very little difference between LM
and RH. However, both RH and LM are going to change file positions a lot
in the future, in order to be Linux-Filesystem-Hierarchy compliant.
Therefore, most of the the info about file-locations in these books will
be
On Sat, 09 Sep 2000, you wrote:
As far as "file locations" go, there is very little difference between LM
and RH. However, both RH and LM are going to change file positions a lot
^
in the future, in order to
you.
Jeff Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux user 183185
- Original Message -
From: Denis Havlik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: liste.expert
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7.1
On Fri, 8
Having used RedHat for a couple of years, and having recently (about half a
year ago) switched to Mandrake, I don't think you can expect much
problems running RH RPM's on your machine, or finding RH-specific text
books invalid in the Mandrake environment. I haven't experienced any
problems.
The
Dont know man i find both with there ups down
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Johnson, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7.1
As far as "fil
AM
Subject: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7.1
There are numerous books in the stores about Red Hat and almost none about
Mandrake. Even though Mandrake is derived from RH, I understand there are
significant differences including where files are kept. As a newbie,
that make Linux easier to use.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Malka" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7.1
: That is scary, particularly for a newbie who would upgrade t
If Redhat is cake, Mandrake is cake and ice cream. Mandrake ROCKS!
You need to take a look at the RedHat 6.9.5 Pinstripe Beta. :-)
--Greg
__
Vous avez un site perso ?
2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france) !
Thank you.
Jeff Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux user 183185
- Original Message -
From: Jesper Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7.1
Having used RedHat
I downloaded Pinstripe beta one night. It was two disks. The first one was
numbered Redhat 6.8 and would not install at all. The second disk was a copy
of Mandrake 7.02 ?!?!?!?
I don't have a lot of respect for redhat.
Abe
= Original Message From "Greg Stewart" [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
pablito wrote:
[snip]
problems. Mandrake also does a much better job sticking on the various
programs that make Linux easier to use.
[snip]
Plz clarify this.
Thanks,
Ron
--
+--+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Tell us more about it.
Jeff Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux user 183185
- Original Message -
From: Greg Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7.1
If Redhat
The current RHBeta is 6.9.5, and yes it is 2 CDs... but I don't think the
2nd is a "copy" of MDK7.02. There are still many apps that RedHat just
doesn't bother with, that Mandrake chooses to install whether you need them,
want them, or would rather never see. Pinstripe is still a smaller full
15 matches
Mail list logo
