Are you indicating that 9.0 doesn't support anything other than ext2 or
ext3? If so, Where's the BEEF? Do you have any Documentation available?
Mandrake 9.0 supports reiserfs. Personally, I've been using reiserfs
on all my partitions save one since roughly version 8.0 or 8.1. I've
yet to
I am curious as to Which OS Version you encountered this?
I have a Sever running for Several Months on LM 8.2, when I install LM 9.0
it will not rung for more than a few days without encountering this message.
Any ideas?
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
Some of what I have found with
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 12:03 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
I am curious as to Which OS Version you encountered this?
I have a Sever running for Several Months on LM 8.2, when I install LM
9.0 it will not rung for more than a few days without encountering this
message. Any ideas?
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 12:03 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
I am curious as to Which OS Version you encountered this?
I have a Sever running for Several Months on LM 8.2, when I install LM
9.0 it will not rung for more than a few days
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 04:08 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 12:03 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
I am curious as to Which OS Version you encountered this?
[...]
Really? Perhaps another problem to chalk up to the many with
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 04:31 pm, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 04:08 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
[...]
Are you indicating that 9.0 doesn't support anything other than ext2 or
ext3? If so, Where's the BEEF? Do you have any Documentation available?
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 04:08 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 12:03 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
I am curious as to Which OS Version you
Some of what I have found with regards to messages like:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 01100112
is that it is thought to be related to memory/cache problems. Does anyone
know one way or another? I have been running memtest86 for over an hour on
the problem system
On Monday January 27 2003 11:08 am, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
Some of what I have found with regards to messages like:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 01100112
is that it is thought to be related to memory/cache problems. Does
anyone know one way or another?
