On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 09:00, Oliver Thieke wrote:
Hi List, hi Steve B. ;-) !
Linux is very, very, very expensive for customers to take care of,
Talking about a home environ he might be right. But in a corporate
environ ? win2k and XP-Pro are there as complicated and difficult to
Somehow I think he is referring to more 'apparant' innovations than back
room stuff - such as applications and interfaces - more on the consumer
level or what the business customer would see - and I have to say that while
MS is not known for honest practices or using it's own ideas - it certainly
How expensive is USD 10 for standard version which is what most computer users will
need ? Even the commercial version of Linux is cheaper than Windows, and this also
depend on which MS we are talking about .Linux no innovation ?Well, maybe because
there is too much innovation already build in
h, microsoft apparently thinks its innovative to buy software companies
with software they couldn't write themselves...
strange...
Also, considering neither DOS or a GUI were microsoft ideas.. and that
win2000 and XP contain alot of commands that relate back to unix versions..
and in fact
021024 Jim C wrote:
Hmmm... correct me if I am wrong because I am not sure about this
but didn't X-Window exist before the GUI Windows?
yes, long before: it came out of Bell Labs, like most IT innovations.
Apple put it into the consumer market with the Mac,
which M$ then belatedly imitated
Hi List, hi Steve B. ;-) !
Linux is very, very, very expensive for customers to take care of,
Talking about a home environ he might be right. But in a corporate
environ ? win2k and XP-Pro are there as complicated and difficult to
administrate as LX/UX... The decisive difference is not the
Sorry guys, i have to keep this mail intact , so here's my rant.
The notion of free market MONOPOLY is not evil , just as we drink Coke occasionally
althought its not a health drink .But its about softdrinks, not something as important
as a computer operating system where we are in this age of
So we have to support AMD more, afterall AMD is as American as ,Microsuck.Intel is
the Devils advocate.We know who we are .,and dont forget that browsers technology of
M$ is a clone of Mosaic and do M$ pay back to the world ?NO.
Choong
Oliver Thieke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List, hi Steve
I am starting to question the idea of us all supporting AMD, if transmeta
made a good desktop processor comparable with Athlons or P4's I'd back them
first...
AMD are sucking up to M$ something bigtime, they have jumped on the
Palladium bandwagon just like intel, they renamed their processor
On Friday 25 October 2002 12:55 pm, Franki wrote:
I am starting to question the idea of us all supporting AMD, if transmeta
made a good desktop processor comparable with Athlons or P4's I'd back them
first...
AMD are sucking up to M$ something bigtime, they have jumped on the
Palladium
On Friday 25 October 2002 02:26 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry guys, i have to keep this mail intact , so here's my rant.
The notion of free market MONOPOLY is not evil , just as we drink Coke
occasionally althought its not a health drink .But its about softdrinks,
not something as
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:00:39 +0200, Oliver Thieke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And what about M$ ? Which innovations do they provide ? Declaring
the web browser as a vital OS' component ? They just get it half-way
right on the third attempt... And what about their innovations ?
+ C#:
Yes, you are right but i has been raise up in a third world condition untill now that
we are in good shape nationally speaking but in a nation , your meaning of
infrastructure will encompass telcos and here is why a free choice of OS mean a lot.
So is solar power technology.In my childhood
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,5331307%5e15317%5e%5enbv%5e1
5306,00.html
I REALLY like this bit
Linux is very, very, very expensive for customers to take care of, he
said. Linux is a cloned operating system - it cloned Unix and now it wants
to clone Windows. It would be nice to
14 matches
Mail list logo
