Pherhaps a declaration of support for Redhat's endeavors or something?
Miark wrote:
Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
big'uns duke it out.
Miark
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 00:27:26 -0300, Sergio
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:14, Miark wrote:
> Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
> I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
> big'uns duke it out.
>
> Miark
>
What peeves me is that IBM bailed SUSE linux out of the hole with
millions
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> * Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-06]:
>> Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>>
>>> Wrong. See MandrakeSoft donation page dated April 19, 2001
>>>
>>> http://www.linux-mandrake.com/donations/
>>>
>>> wobo
>>>
>>
>> These are donations given to Free projects supporte
> BTW, can't we just use Redhats newly formed Linux Legal Fund to help
Mandrake
> become solvent?
French law does not allow donations to a company (except the French state
however)
Eric
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 02:47 am, Eric Fernandez wholly or partly mentioned :-
> These are donations given to Free projects supported by Mandrake:
> "Mandrake Linux Open Source developments", not to the Mandrakesoft
> company.These donations cannot help Mandrakesoft (the company) decrease
> its debt, wh
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 02:05 pm, Jonathan Shilling wrote:
>
> Normally I go to Best Buy, or Walmart and purchase the Power Pack edition,
> but I have been looking for Mandrake 9.1, and have _not_ been able to find
> it. I can find SuSE 8.2, and Red Hat 9.0, but no Mandrake, what gives?
> Hell
Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
big'uns duke it out.
Miark
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 00:27:26 -0300, Sergio Javier Belkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I would want to hear something simil
Any one know how Mandrakes stands against SCO. I have not heard a work about
this.
James S. Lawson
Network Administrator
(@ @)
oOO--(_)--OOo-
Notice: This message, and any attached file, is intended only for the
charlie wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 02:47 am, Eric Fernandez wholly or partly mentioned :-
These are donations given to Free projects supported by Mandrake:
"Mandrake Linux Open Source developments", not to the Mandrakesoft
company.These donations cannot help Mandrakesoft (the company) decrease
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 02:44 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:14, Miark wrote:
> > Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
> > I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
> > big'uns duke it out.
> >
> > Miark
>
> What
Aaron Matteson wrote:
Lyvim Xaphir became daring and sent these 1.2K bytes,
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:14, Miark wrote:
Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
big'uns duke it out.
Miark
Brant Fitzsimmons became daring and sent these 2.2K bytes,
> Aaron Matteson wrote:
>
> >Lyvim Xaphir became daring and sent these 1.2K bytes,
> >
> >Again, value of a product is in the eye of the beholder. SuSE's
> >enterprise lineup is superior to Linux Mandrake's.
> >
>
> Not according to:
> h
Lyvim Xaphir became daring and sent these 1.2K bytes,
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:14, Miark wrote:
> > Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
> > I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
> > big'uns duke it out.
> >
> > Miark
> >
> What
* Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-06]:
> > BTW, can't we just use Redhats newly formed Linux Legal Fund to help
> > Mandrake become solvent?
>
> French law does not allow donations to a company (except the French
> state however)
Wrong. See MandrakeSoft donation page dated April 19,
* Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-06]:
> Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> >Wrong. See MandrakeSoft donation page dated April 19, 2001
> >
> >http://www.linux-mandrake.com/donations/
> >
> >wobo
> >
>
> These are donations given to Free projects supported by Mandrake:
> "Mandrake Linux Op
Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 August 2003 02:05 pm, Jonathan Shilling wrote:
>>
>> Normally I go to Best Buy, or Walmart and purchase the Power Pack
>> edition, but I have been looking for Mandrake 9.1, and have _not_
>> been able to find it. I can find SuSE 8.2, and Red Hat 9.0, but n
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
* Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-06]:
BTW, can't we just use Redhats newly formed Linux Legal Fund to help
Mandrake become solvent?
French law does not allow donations to a company (except the French
state however)
Wrong. See MandrakeSoft donati
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> What peeves me is that IBM bailed SUSE linux out of the hole with
> millions of dollars, and here Mandrake sat needing only a measly million
> or so, and got passed over. Crazy. Such a waste.
> I think Mandrake is superior to SUSE linux, and IBM could have saved
> alot o
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 02:44 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 00:14, Miark wrote:
> > Red Hat has a million bucks or more to dump into this--Mandrake doesn't.
> > I'm content to have Mandrake focus on it's own problems and let the
> > big'uns duke it out.
> >
> > Miark
>
> What
Yes, I would want to hear something similar to RedHat...
El Mar 05 Ago 2003 14:18, Lawson, Jim escribió:
> Any one know how Mandrakes stands against SCO. I have not heard a work
> about this.
>
> James S. Lawson
> Network Administrator
> (@ @)
> ---
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] SCO UNIX file system!
"Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, J. C. Woods wrote:
>
> >Why "MSDOS"? You can setup a NFS mount, and copy directly to Lin
"Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, J. C. Woods wrote:
>
> >Why "MSDOS"? You can setup a NFS mount, and copy directly to Linux. Try
> >a "man nfs". It should point you in the right direction.
>
> Thanks for helping! But according to the msdos fs well, that's
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, J. C. Woods wrote:
>Why "MSDOS"? You can setup a NFS mount, and copy directly to Linux. Try
>a "man nfs". It should point you in the right direction.
Thanks for helping! But according to the msdos fs well, that's not my
choice! ;-)
But it's a good question!
I'll ask
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, J. C. Woods wrote:
>"Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas" wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> A friend has asked to 'transfer' some files saved on SCO UNIX file system
>> to msdos on Linux!
>>
>> Is this possible? Can mount a SCO unix file system and copy the files?
>>
>> []s Ricardo Castanho
"Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> A friend has asked to 'transfer' some files saved on SCO UNIX file system
> to msdos on Linux!
>
> Is this possible? Can mount a SCO unix file system and copy the files?
>
> []s Ricardo Castanho
>
> --
> =
Hi!
A friend has asked to 'transfer' some files saved on SCO UNIX file system
to msdos on Linux!
Is this possible? Can mount a SCO unix file system and copy the files?
[]s Ricardo Castanho
--
==
Linux user # 102240 => Machine # 96125 =>
Look for IBCS (sp?) modules - this is Intel Binary Compatibility System (or
something similar).
My understanding is that you need the program, whatever components are needed
for IBCS, and the shared libraries from SCO system for SCO binaries to work.
This is how guys 3-4 years ago first got I
Hi All,
Anybody really clever here that can tell me whether I can run SCO 3.2
binaries on Linux Mandrake. I have seen vague references to this on a
web search but I cannot find any definate information. From what I have
found there seem to be some kernel modules that support it but I don't
28 matches
Mail list logo
