Brian T. Schellenberger said:
Is the zip drive 0,0 or 0,1?
0,0
Have you tried
cdrecord -scanbus
I did, but all I remember was that it didn't lead to a solution at the time.
I'm not booted with ide-scsi right now, because it screws up other things
(fstab stuff) that I don't want to
Well, of course, the zip drive *should* be 0,1 and the CD-RW *should*
be 0,0, given that the zip drives on hdd and the CD-RW on hdc (unless,
perhaps, you specified both of them on the lilo.conf in reverse order,
but I'm sure you didn't do that).
However, I'm afraid we've reached the limits of
Trevor Farrell said:
Been there, done that.
You have, I'm guessing that both cd's are on the same cable, set the dip
switches to the correct master or slave settings??
That too! Both devices work perfectly under win95 and BeOS 5, only Linux has
problems.
Just to let you
Is the zip drive 0,0 or 0,1?
Have you tried
cdrecord -scanbus
?
On Sun, 09 Apr 2000, you wrote:
| Trevor Farrell said:
| Been there, done that.
|
||You have, I'm guessing that both cd's are on the same
cable, set the dip |switches to the correct master or slave
settings?? |
Trevor Farrell wrote:
The ongoing tradition of "weird wacky" Ver 7.0-2 problems continues:
Two new ones for you to dissect and enlighten me on (please)!
1) OK, by now you all know I've got a CDrom and a CRrw (right?) and that
the CDrw works OK as a CDrom, but has some problems burning -
Larry Sword wrote:
A look in /dev shows that the cd-Rom is correctly linked, @cdrom-hdc.
There is also a cdrom1, linked , @cdrom1-/dev/hdd. The @cdrom2-hdd is
also linked to hdd. Anyway to get the cd-rom2 icon the properly open and
read and display the second cd-rom, which is the CDRW we
Trevor Farrell wrote:
The ongoing tradition of "weird wacky" Ver 7.0-2 problems continues:
Two new ones for you to dissect and enlighten me on (please)!
1) OK, by now you all know I've got a CDrom and a CRrw (right?) and that
the CDrw works OK as a CDrom, but has some problems burning
