> Are you indicating that 9.0 doesn't support anything other than ext2 or
> ext3? If so, Where's the BEEF? Do you have any Documentation available?
Mandrake 9.0 supports reiserfs. Personally, I've been using reiserfs
on all my partitions save one since roughly version 8.0 or 8.1. I've
yet to e
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 04:08 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 12:03 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
I am curious as to Which OS Version you enco
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 04:31 pm, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 January 2003 04:08 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Are you indicating that 9.0 doesn't support anything other than ext2 or
> > ext3? If so, Where's the BEEF? Do you have any Documentation availabl
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 04:08 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
> Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> >On Tuesday 28 January 2003 12:03 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
> >>I am curious as to Which OS Version you encountered this?
> >[...]
> >
> >Really? Perhaps another problem to chalk up to th
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 12:03 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
I am curious as to Which OS Version you encountered this?
I have a Sever running for Several Months on LM 8.2, when I install LM
9.0 it will not rung for more than a few days without
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 12:03 pm, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
> I am curious as to Which OS Version you encountered this?
>
> I have a Sever running for Several Months on LM 8.2, when I install LM
> 9.0 it will not rung for more than a few days without encountering this
> message. Any ideas?
I am curious as to Which OS Version you encountered this?
I have a Sever running for Several Months on LM 8.2, when I install LM 9.0
it will not rung for more than a few days without encountering this message.
Any ideas?
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
Some of what I have found with regar
On Monday January 27 2003 11:08 am, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> Some of what I have found with regards to messages like:
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 01100112
>
> is that it is thought to be related to memory/cache problems. Does
> anyone know one way or anot
Some of what I have found with regards to messages like:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 01100112
is that it is thought to be related to memory/cache problems. Does anyone
know one way or another? I have been running memtest86 for over an hour on
the problem system a
Check your bios for setting memory > 64 mb used in OS/2 and NT
Jeanette
Denis Havlik wrote:
>
> :~>I installed Mdk 6.0 on a Compaq Consignia 300 with 82mo ram and Linux see
> :~>only 16mo should i pass the mem parameter with lilo( LILO: linux mem=82M).
> :~>Thanks
>
> Strange. Linux does not
:~>I installed Mdk 6.0 on a Compaq Consignia 300 with 82mo ram and Linux see
:~>only 16mo should i pass the mem parameter with lilo( LILO: linux mem=82M).
:~>Thanks
Strange. Linux does not need it anymore - and even in the old times when
it did, it would heve recognised 64 MB. I have a bunch of c
On Mon, 01 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed Mdk 6.0 on a Compaq Consignia 300 with 82mo ram and Linux see
> only 16mo should i pass the mem parameter with lilo( LILO: linux mem=82M).
>
Yep. That should do it. Also, you might try going into your system
bios and making sure the "memory ho
- Original Message -
From: Carl St-Jacques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 01, 1999 7:39 PM
Subject: [expert] memory problem
> Hi,
>
> I installed Mdk 6.0 on a Compaq Consignia 300 with 82mo ram and Linux see
> only 16
Hi,
I installed Mdk 6.0 on a Compaq Consignia 300 with 82mo ram and Linux see
only 16mo should i pass the mem parameter with lilo( LILO: linux mem=82M).
Thanks
Carl St-Jacques
14 matches
Mail list logo
