On Thursday 28 November 2002 10:54, James Sparenberg wrote:
OK,
I've got SNF running on my firewall now comes the problem... How
do I update it? The update directories on the mirrors don't have
hdlist.cz so urpmi is out. The web pages insist that I'm not connected
(note if I wasn't
On Thursday 05 December 2002 10:47 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 18:46, Lorne wrote:
On Thursday 05 December 2002 08:49 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
KevinO wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Weaver wrote:
You mean you learned nothing about
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 07:27, Lorne wrote:
Heavily snipped
The linux non gui version is NOT commercial. It is a shell script that leads
you question by question and when it is done asking you questions, it then
compiles the packages and settings and places them on a floppy for you. You
can
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 07:49, Mark Weaver wrote:
KevinO wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Weaver wrote:
You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during
that time using SNF?
It was a learning experience.
I stand corrected...
For a floppy firewall I'd use LRP myself but I really did want
more... And after a fair amount of time at the command line I've
finally got it working reasonably. For the moment.
James
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:20, Jack Coates wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 07:49, Mark Weaver wrote:
LEAF is based on LRP -- it forked because LRP wasn't being actively
developed and there was some bad blood with the people who were actively
developing.
If you use LRP, LEAF is really worth a look.
Jack
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 09:34, James Sparenberg wrote:
For a floppy firewall I'd use LRP
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:41, Mark Weaver wrote:
KevinO wrote:
rant
I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use
Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar)
My suggestion: Use smoothwall or something similar. Don't bother with SNF.
Sorry Mandrake. I
On Thursday 05 December 2002 08:49 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
KevinO wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Weaver wrote:
You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during
that time using SNF?
It was a learning experience.
I stand corrected...
KevinO wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Weaver wrote:
You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during
that time using SNF?
It was a learning experience.
I stand corrected...
- --
KevinO
you know...I've heard peanut linux is quite
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 18:46, Lorne wrote:
On Thursday 05 December 2002 08:49 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
KevinO wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Weaver wrote:
You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during
that time using SNF?
It
Jack Coates scribbled nervously after reading Mark's message:
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 07:49, Mark Weaver wrote:
KevinO wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Weaver wrote:
You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use
them during that time using SNF?
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:41, Mark Weaver wrote:
KevinO wrote:
rant
I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use
Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar)
My suggestion: Use smoothwall or something similar. Don't bother with SNF.
Sorry Mandrake. I like your
KevinO wrote:
rant
I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use
Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar)
My suggestion: Use smoothwall or something similar. Don't bother with SNF.
Sorry Mandrake. I like your distributions and I support you financially.
But, SNF was a
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 06:04 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:41, Mark Weaver wrote:
KevinO wrote:
rant
I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use
Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar)
Well I must say I did the same about a year
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Weaver wrote:
You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during
that time using SNF?
It was a learning experience.
I stand corrected...
- --
KevinO
Matz's Law:
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of
rant
I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use
Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar)
My suggestion: Use smoothwall or something similar. Don't bother with SNF.
Sorry Mandrake. I like your distributions and I support you financially.
But, SNF was a terrible product.
I have to laugh... I came from smoothwall because of the problems
of the inability to modify it to suite my needs. ... *sigh* Yes you
are right about Mandrake/RH/SuSe having monster solutions.
James
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 11:01, KevinO wrote:
rant
I ran (fought with, suffered with)
17 matches
Mail list logo