Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-10 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 28 November 2002 10:54, James Sparenberg wrote: OK, I've got SNF running on my firewall now comes the problem... How do I update it? The update directories on the mirrors don't have hdlist.cz so urpmi is out. The web pages insist that I'm not connected (note if I wasn't

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-06 Thread Lorne
On Thursday 05 December 2002 10:47 pm, Jack Coates wrote: On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 18:46, Lorne wrote: On Thursday 05 December 2002 08:49 am, Mark Weaver wrote: KevinO wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Weaver wrote: You mean you learned nothing about

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-06 Thread James Sparenberg
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 07:27, Lorne wrote: Heavily snipped The linux non gui version is NOT commercial. It is a shell script that leads you question by question and when it is done asking you questions, it then compiles the packages and settings and places them on a floppy for you. You can

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-05 Thread Jack Coates
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 07:49, Mark Weaver wrote: KevinO wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Weaver wrote: You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during that time using SNF? It was a learning experience. I stand corrected...

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-05 Thread James Sparenberg
For a floppy firewall I'd use LRP myself but I really did want more... And after a fair amount of time at the command line I've finally got it working reasonably. For the moment. James On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:20, Jack Coates wrote: On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 07:49, Mark Weaver wrote:

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-05 Thread Jack Coates
LEAF is based on LRP -- it forked because LRP wasn't being actively developed and there was some bad blood with the people who were actively developing. If you use LRP, LEAF is really worth a look. Jack On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 09:34, James Sparenberg wrote: For a floppy firewall I'd use LRP

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-05 Thread Mark Weaver
James Sparenberg wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:41, Mark Weaver wrote: KevinO wrote: rant I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar) My suggestion: Use smoothwall or something similar. Don't bother with SNF. Sorry Mandrake. I

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-05 Thread Lorne
On Thursday 05 December 2002 08:49 am, Mark Weaver wrote: KevinO wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Weaver wrote: You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during that time using SNF? It was a learning experience. I stand corrected...

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-05 Thread Mark Weaver
KevinO wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Weaver wrote: You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during that time using SNF? It was a learning experience. I stand corrected... - -- KevinO you know...I've heard peanut linux is quite

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-05 Thread Jack Coates
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 18:46, Lorne wrote: On Thursday 05 December 2002 08:49 am, Mark Weaver wrote: KevinO wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Weaver wrote: You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during that time using SNF? It

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-05 Thread Mark Weaver
Jack Coates scribbled nervously after reading Mark's message: On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 07:49, Mark Weaver wrote: KevinO wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Weaver wrote: You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during that time using SNF?

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-04 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:41, Mark Weaver wrote: KevinO wrote: rant I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar) My suggestion: Use smoothwall or something similar. Don't bother with SNF. Sorry Mandrake. I like your

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-04 Thread Mark Weaver
KevinO wrote: rant I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar) My suggestion: Use smoothwall or something similar. Don't bother with SNF. Sorry Mandrake. I like your distributions and I support you financially. But, SNF was a

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-04 Thread Lorne
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 06:04 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:41, Mark Weaver wrote: KevinO wrote: rant I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar) Well I must say I did the same about a year

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-12-04 Thread KevinO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Weaver wrote: You mean you learned nothing about iptables and how to use them during that time using SNF? It was a learning experience. I stand corrected... - -- KevinO Matz's Law: A conclusion is the place where you got tired of

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-11-28 Thread KevinO
rant I ran (fought with, suffered with) SNF for several months. Now we use Smoothwall. (IPCop should be similar) My suggestion: Use smoothwall or something similar. Don't bother with SNF. Sorry Mandrake. I like your distributions and I support you financially. But, SNF was a terrible product.

Re: [expert] Updating SNF

2002-11-28 Thread James Sparenberg
I have to laugh... I came from smoothwall because of the problems of the inability to modify it to suite my needs. ... *sigh* Yes you are right about Mandrake/RH/SuSe having monster solutions. James On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 11:01, KevinO wrote: rant I ran (fought with, suffered with)