This part is ape-like chest-beating:
Hanuman.
Not the gossip-monger dwarf being that you fall so easily into.
No other Guru can command such love from a devotee.
It is an expression of Unity Consciousness...over the long-term.
OffWorld
Yahoo! Groups
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This speaks loud and clear to George Harrison's love and utter
devotion to Maharishi. It needs little commnet. It speaks for
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:51 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Again the Paul rumor is just that, a rumor and most likely
desperate disinformation. But if
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:40 PM, off_world_beings wrote:This speaks loud and clear to George Harrison's love and utter devotion to Maharishi. It needs little commnet. It speaks for itself. The naysayers are ignorant little worms in the light of this comment by George: "Maharishi only ever did
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the transcript of the part about Maharishi:
CHARLIE ROSE: What do you look forward to now?
PAUL McCARTNEY: I look forward to enjoying
myself. It's one of the
great things for me. It seems a bit sort of corny
sometimes when
people say
On Dec 1, 2005, at 8:04 PM, anonymousff wrote:And these two substances, melatonin and DHEA, are available over the counter in in health food store. I have been taking them for years. So is the point that for a few dollars for a few pills anyone can achieve the greatness of the indo-tibetian
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:23 PM, authfriend wrote:No, Vaj, *you're* desperate, more so than the true- bluest True Believer.Not at all, really it doesn't matter much to me. George went on to other things eastern, I don't find it a big deal. It appears he was also able to forgive M. which speaks
On Dec 2, 2005, at 7:23 AM, Peter wrote: Interesting to see Paul could forgive. Good man that McCartney dude. His love for MMY shines through, doesn't it? Since he was taking his children on their request I picked up more on his love for his kids. But Paul seems to be a loving man in general.
Throwing Water at the CloudsThe Mysterious Powers of Pilot Babahttp://www.wie.org/j24/baba.aspsnip:On the other side was Sri Ramana Maharshi. Hailing from the Advaita Vedanta, or nondualist, school of Hinduism, he insisted that any interest in the attainment of siddhis [supernatural powers] was
Major story in today's Washington Post Style Section WashingtonPost.com
recapping the first leg of the college tour of the David Lynch Foundation for
Consciousness Based Education and World Peace. The final quote from
Lynch - When people catch on to this, this is a done deal.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Also, on a visit to the New York area in 2000, Janet Hoffman,
long-time TM teacher in Manhattan, told me that she had spent a
delightful week in Lancaster, MA getting pancha karma and George was
there the whole time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:51 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Again the Paul rumor is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:23 PM, authfriend wrote:
No, Vaj, *you're* desperate, more so than the true-
bluest True Believer.
Not at all, really it doesn't matter much to me. George went on to
other things eastern, I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:51 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Again the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:40 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
This speaks loud and clear to George Harrison's love and utter
devotion to Maharishi. It needs little commnet. It speaks for
itself.
The naysayers are ignorant
On Dec 2, 2005, at 10:31 AM, off_world_beings wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:40 PM, off_world_beings wrote: This speaks loud and clear to George Harrison's love and utter devotion to Maharishi. It needs little commnet. It speaks
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:40 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
This speaks loud and clear to George Harrison's love and utter
devotion to
On Dec 2, 2005, at 10:28 AM, off_world_beings wrote:Paul NEVER said anything against Maharishi. EVER. I don't think it's possible for you to know everything Paul has said. In fact most of what we know is the public Paul M, not the private one.Maybe you're right and he did not forgive the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jim_flanegin wrote:
I am learning more from the weather today- very, very active with
rain and wind- than I am from who we call Maharishi. Again, not
sure
there is a significant difference there...
Yes, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:40 PM, off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 10:28 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Paul NEVER said anything against Maharishi.
EVER.
I don't think it's possible for you to know everything Paul has
said.
In fact most of what we know is the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 10:31 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
In the same quotes was:
My life belongs the Lord Krishna now. I'm just the servant of
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a TMer can't be a servant of Krishna (or Jesus or Muhammad or...). TM sadhana is, you know, TM. That's the meditation practice. Anything else is up to the individual, especially one's choice of object
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 10:28 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
Paul NEVER said anything against Maharishi.
EVER.
I don't think it's possible for you to know everything Paul has
said. In fact most of what we know is the public
It could just be my cynical nature regarding the current
administration, but this latest move by the TSA seems mighty curious,
especially since there is no popular groundswell to 'LET US BRING OUR
SCISSORS!' on airplane flights.
Bush's poll numbers have seriously tanked with a majority of
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a
TMer can't be a servant of Krishna (or Jesus or
Muhammad or...).
TM sadhana is, you know, TM. That's the meditation
practice.
Anything else is up to the individual, especially
This is lunar month of Margashirsa. It is the month that Lord Krishna
declared as Him. December 15th is the Purnima and Datta Jayanthi celebrating the
appearance of Lord Dattatreya.
It is my intention to post an excerpt from the Life History of Sri Ganapathi
Sachchidananda Swamiji each day through
on 12/2/05 12:28 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, on a visit to the New York area in 2000, Janet Hoffman,
long-time TM teacher in Manhattan, told me that she had spent a
delightful week in Lancaster, MA getting pancha karma and George was
there the whole time she was and he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
[Vaj wrote:]
Is sadhana of Krishna taught in TM/TMO? I trust you get my
point.
Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a
TMer can't be a servant of Krishna (or
In Datta Seva
Sri Guru Datta
Hanuman
Religious Harmony Month
Divine words that came out of Sri SwamijiÕs heart during the installation
ceremony of
Kalagni Shamana Dattatreya Temple in Datta Peetham in Mysore in the year 1978
are still
ringing in our ears. This is the Datta Temple. That is, a
In a message dated 12/2/05 9:33:57 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In
the same "quotes" was: "My life belongs the Lord Krishna now.
I'm just the servant of Krishna. I've never been so humble in
all my life, and I feel great!" - George
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a
TMer can't be a servant of Krishna (or Jesus or
Muhammad or...).
TM sadhana is, you know, TM.
Maybe. But what is even more OTP is the fact that he didn't leave the TMO any of his life-savings, but chose instead to give it to his (gasp!) family.
Sal
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x-tad-biggerI wonder if having Hari Krishnas around you chanting the Maha Mantra
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a
TMer can't be a servant of Krishna (or Jesus or
Muhammad or...).
TM sadhana is, you know, TM. That's the meditation
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:27 AM, authfriend wrote:Or maybe he didn't think there had been any, given that he has been willing to state in public, on national television, that MMY wasn't into "chicks." He didn't have to say that; he wasn't *asked* about it by Charlie Rose. He volunteered it, in the
That's probably just because they haven't thought of it yet.
Sal
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:49 AM, authfriend wrote:
Non sequitur, as I'm sure you realize.
*Any* practice that is considered to interfere with
TM practice would be a no-go.
But as you know, there is no area on the forms for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's refresh our memories of the context, since
Vaj keeps snipping it.
Here was the quote Vaj offered as proof that George
was no longer a devotee of MMY:
My life belongs the Lord Krishna now. I'm just the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:27 AM, authfriend wrote:
[Vaj wrote, then snipped:]
Maybe you're right and he did not forgive the spiritual
incest which took place.
Or maybe he didn't think there had been any, given that
he has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's probably just because they haven't thought of it yet.
See, if a TB came out with a silly rationalization
like this, you'd hear the horselaughs from here to
Rishikesh.
But somehow it's just fine when TMO critics
I guess, Maharishi has to be given the benefit of doubt. I've seen too many women lie through their teeth, with a straight face. I've nothing against women, just telling what I've seen. By the way, Vajranatha is the only guy who has accused Ramana, some thing nobody
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Let's refresh our memories of the context, since
Vaj keeps snipping it.
Here was the quote Vaj offered as proof that George
Title: Swami G responds to FFL post which anon poster sent
anon poster to Swami G:
I hope I am not making a mistake by posting this but
I sort of had a laugh from it- our new standard of understanding-
the sensible thing is we all have holes in our mind and it is
nonsense to think
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hurdy Gurdy Man revealed
on 12/2/05 1:29 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess, Maharishi has to be given the benefit of doubt. I've seen too many women lie through their teeth, with a straight face. I've nothing against women, just telling what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a
TMer can't be a servant of Krishna (or Jesus or
Muhammad or...).
TM sadhana is, you know, TM.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
[Vaj wrote:]
Is sadhana of Krishna taught in TM/TMO? I trust you get my
point.
Nothing
On Dec 2, 2005, at 2:21 PM, authfriend wrote:That doesn't mean he's right, of course, but it does strongly suggest it's what he believes. Hey, maybe Paul is a True Believer! At this point, your initial attempt to claim Paul had "seen the light" and was no longer an admirer of MMY having
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 9:33:57 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the same quotes was:
My life belongs the Lord Krishna now. I'm just the servant of
Krishna. I've never been so humble in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a
TMer can't be a servant of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:27 AM, authfriend wrote:
[Vaj wrote, then snipped:]
Maybe you're right and he did not forgive the spiritual
incest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/2/05 1:29 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess, Maharishi has to be given the benefit of doubt. I've
seen too many
women lie through their teeth, with a straight face. I've nothing
against
This brings to mind a previous post about internet trolls.
L B S
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anon poster to Swami G:
I hope I am not making a mistake by posting this but
I sort of had a laugh from it- our new standard of understanding-
the
Note from anon Poater- I think 1,2 and 3 are seperate posts. If Swami
G
has a comment, I will post it to this group. Clairification can be
interesting, some of this looks common to me:
*1 So he is assisting the greatest Master of all times -- of whom
never before has anyone like him been on
NHNE News List
Current Members: 1386
Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.
SCIENTOLOGISTS TRY TO STOP KRQE REPORT ABOUT COMPOUND
KRQE News 13
November 21, 2005
http://www.krqe.com/expanded.asp?ID=12982
ALBUQUERQUE - KRQE News 13 has been working for
Title: Swami G in conversation
G: what is not understood is Shaktipat and fully engaged
Kundalini versus One that rests in Realization . One is still
in the midst of Phenomena and seeking while the other has
passed through and rests within Balance .
* Both Baba and Gurumayi claimed
***
Global Country of World Peace -- NEWSFLASH for Great Britain
***
SUBJECT: November issue of TM News
For subscriptions or enquiries about TM News, please send a message
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
In a message dated 12/2/05 12:14:54 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe.
But what is even more OTP is the fact that he didn't leave the TMO any of
his life-savings, but chose instead to give it to his (gasp!)
family.Sal
The most unforgivable sinn!
To
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 10:31 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:40 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
[...]
So??
Ksrisna is the MAIN
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 10:40 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a
TMer can't be a servant of Krishna (or Jesus or
Muhammad or...).
TM sadhana is, you know, TM. That's the meditation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a
TMer can't be a servant of Krishna (or Jesus or
Muhammad or...).
TM sadhana is, you know, TM.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It could just be my cynical nature regarding the current
administration, but this latest move by the TSA seems mighty
curious,
especially since there is no popular groundswell to 'LET US BRING
OUR
SCISSORS!' on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/2/05 1:29 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess, Maharishi has to be given the benefit of doubt. I've
seen too many
women lie through their teeth, with a straight face. I've nothing
against
Hi Tom B.:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:03 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
There are few statements so respectful and admiring in this day and
age about gurus.
Well, I think you are exaggerating. I originally merely proposed that
this over adulation on the Beatles could be typical movement
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 2:21 PM, authfriend wrote:
That doesn't mean he's right, of course, but it does
strongly suggest it's what he believes.
Hey, maybe Paul is a True Believer!
At this point, your initial attempt to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I've taken it up with you because you so obviously
wholeheartedly approve of it, having used it to
justify labeling MMY a
On Dec 2, 2005, at 5:56 PM, authfriend wrote:
Of course it *is* a nitwit notion, for the reasons I
went into at length on alt.m.t, and which, as I've
already pointed out, you are obviously completely
unable to deal with. Having met victims of sexual
exploitation by spiritual teachers would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tom B.:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:03 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
Paul McCartney SAID: And he gave us his book, the great wise man,
gave us his book, because he was one of the ones that wasn't a fake.
There were a lot of them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Major story in today's Washington Post Style Section
WashingtonPost.com
recapping the first leg of the college tour of the David Lynch
Foundation for
Consciousness Based Education and World Peace. The
***
Global Country of World Peace -- NEWSFLASH for Great Britain
***
SUBJECT: November issue of TM News http://tmnews.net
TEN NEW GOVERNORS OF THE AGE OF ENLIGHTENMENT FOR GREAT BRITAIN
I don't think the term incest is overkill. The relationship between a guru
and his disciples is, or can and should be, very profound and emotionally
intimate. From my perspective, it is a sacred relationship and should be
pure. It is ultimately the guru's responsibility to keep it that way, since
Paul: We were in India almost as tourists. We asked him, 'Can people
fly? Can people levitate? We've seen it in all the books and stuff.'
And he said, Oh yes, people can, yes.' We said, 'Can you?' He said,
'No, I personally have not practiced this art.' We said, 'Well, who
could?' He said,
Lol, David Lynchmy kinda guy:
He confesses a fondness for caffeine and sweets (he famously went
to a nearby Bob's Big Boy restaurant almost every day for seven
years for a chocolate milkshake).
http://snipurl.com/k9v6
LOS ANGELES David Lynch is wiggling his fingers. As the filmmaker
On Dec 2, 2005, at 6:58 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
Now go and find another statement of respect and reverence about a
guru from someone who followed the guru in the 1960's and is still
visiting their guru in the 21st century.
Wouldn't the truer response be: who only visited his meditation
On Dec 2, 2005, at 7:10 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
I don't think the term incest is overkill. The relationship
between a guru
and his disciples is, or can and should be, very profound and
emotionally
intimate. From my perspective, it is a sacred relationship and
should be
pure. It is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 6:58 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
Now go and find another statement of respect and reverence about
a
guru from someone who followed the guru in the 1960's and is
still
visiting their guru in the 21st
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the term incest is overkill. The relationship
between a guru
and his disciples is, or can and should be, very profound and
emotionally
intimate. From my perspective, it is a sacred relationship and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, authfriend wrote:
Nothing I've ever heard of MMY's teaching says a
TMer can't be a servant of Krishna (or Jesus or
Muhammad or...).
TM sadhana is, you know, TM. That's the meditation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Let's refresh our memories of the context, since
Vaj keeps snipping it.
Here was the quote Vaj offered as proof that George
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 5:56 PM, authfriend wrote:
Of course it *is* a nitwit notion, for the reasons I
went into at length on alt.m.t, and which, as I've
already pointed out, you are obviously completely
unable to deal
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:18 PM, authfriend wrote:
I believe you misread my last sentence. Try again,
please.
When you have, please get back to us.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home
on 12/2/05 7:14 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think george rejected MMY, but clearly his main spiritual
allegiance was with iskon if it was with anything. George wasn't a
rejecting type, remember he had a number 1 hit with a chorus
featuring
of halleluias and hare
on 12/2/05 6:55 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe, but don't forget that Krisna in mythology had 16,000 wives.
http://www.pantheon.org/articles/k/krishna.html
Oh, and regarding todays gurus, lets not forget, something that has
no basis in any factual account, and is a
on 12/2/05 6:42 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 7:10 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
I don't think the term incest is overkill. The relationship
between a guru
and his disciples is, or can and should be, very profound and
emotionally
intimate. From my perspective, it is a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Wouldn't the truer response be: who only visited his meditation
teacher after his kids wanted to see this person, many years later?
No, on the basis of what he said on Charlie Rose,
that would be a false response.
Here's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:18 PM, authfriend wrote:
I believe you misread my last sentence. Try again,
please.
When you have, please get back to us.
When you've reread and understood my last sentence
(which you've again
It's getting into my third month since I did all of my planetary
yagnas to get to the Turning Point all at once. Also, I sponsored a
Mahalakshmi Yagna in October and November. Those should start bearing
fruit.
Well, life's been getting better and it seems like each day things
change faster. A
In a message dated 12/2/05 8:46:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are
certainly moving toward fascism. The Patriot Act, the attempt to
repeal Habeas Corpus, the new bankruptcy law, censorship in the
media, etc. So you would rather live under a rule of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the term incest is overkill. The relationship
between a guru and his disciples is, or can and should be, very
profound and emotionally intimate. From my perspective, it is a
sacred relationship and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the term incest is overkill. The relationship
between a guru
and his disciples is, or can and should be, very profound and
emotionally
intimate. From my perspective, it is a sacred relationship and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 8:46:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are certainly moving toward fascism. The Patriot Act, the
attempt to repeal Habeas Corpus, the new bankruptcy law,
This is from McCartney's book Many Years
from Now. What he failed to mention is
that his brother Michael was an
enthusiastic, if not exceptionally
accomplished, Yogic Flyer.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul: We were in India almost as tourists. We asked
What if they had been less mature or intelligent, with say, only a BA? You might have disbelieved them then?
Sal
On Dec 2, 2005, at 8:51 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
I agree, which is why I only accept what I consider to be factual accounts,
which I have received directly from people who had
In a message dated 12/2/05 9:23:57 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(I think
you both mean *prosecution*, not "persecution."Hopefully we all agree
persecution is not a good thing.)The problem is that denying habaeus
corpus to *suspected*terrorists means that
If they only had a BA, of course we would disbelieve them. College
girls are sluts. Its an established fact. :)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What if they had been less mature or intelligent, with say, only a BA?
You might have disbelieved them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lol, David Lynchmy kinda guy:
He confesses a fondness for caffeine and sweets (he famously went
to a nearby Bob's Big Boy restaurant almost every day for seven
years for a chocolate milkshake).
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 8:46:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are certainly moving toward fascism. The
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hurdy Gurdy Man revealed
on 12/2/05 9:30 PM, Sal Sunshine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if they had been less mature or intelligent, with say, only a BA? You might have disbelieved them then?
Sal
Generally, people more highly educated and established in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/05 9:23:57 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(I think you both mean *prosecution*, not persecution.
Hopefully we all agree persecution is not a good thing.)
The problem is that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/2/05 9:30 PM, Sal Sunshine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if they had been less mature or intelligent, with say, only
a BA? You
might have disbelieved them then?
Sal
Generally, people more
on 12/2/05 9:13 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S.: And it's *particularly* odious to refer to a
spiritual teacher who engages in sex with his (adult)
followers as a pervert on the basis of the phrase
spiritual incest, especially without explaining
that basis up front, which is
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
