You said it very well. It sounds pretty darn enlightened.
Bronte
lurkernomore20002000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Boy, I like that, Lurk. "Enlightenment means you operate on a
quantum level, not a N
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Boy, I like that, Lurk. "Enlightenment means you operate on a
quantum level, not a Newtonian level." That's beautiful.
Thanks.
I remember that up until about 25, I was a pretty serious fellow-
still working th
Boy, I like that, Lurk. "Enlightenment means you operate on a quantum level,
not a Newtonian level." That's beautiful.
Bronte
-
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Geez, does this ever end?
>
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night
> > and asked him
> > > abo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> --- Bronte Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is an interesting post. It reminds me of a
> > question I've had a long time that maybe some people
> > out there can answer. It's about kundulini. What are
> >
11:47 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> > Of Vaj
> > > > Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:43 PM
> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
--- Bronte Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an interesting post. It reminds me of a
> question I've had a long time that maybe some people
> out there can answer. It's about kundulini. What are
> you supposed to do with it?
>
> Sometimes in my life when I've done a lot of
> me
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Vaj
> > > Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:43 PM
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring
> Visit to Baba
> Muktananda
> > >
> > > On Sep 8, 2007
On Sep 9, 2007, at 1:56 AM, Bronte Baxter wrote:
Of course I know the standard "party line" Indian admonition, that
"the student needs the master" to guide him through the kundulini
experience safely. But I no longer buy that we have to give our
power away to gurus to unfold the divinity w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is an interesting post. snip
It's about kundulini. What are you supposed to do with it?
You're going to get a flood of responses. Let me say, I was one who
fervently prayed for "enlightenment" in the early
gt; > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba
Muktananda
> >
> > On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Peter wrote:
> >
> > Geez, does this ever end?
> >
> > For the Axis II TM/TMSP practitioner?
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Geez, does this ever end?
>
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night
> > and asked him
> > > abo
This is an interesting post. It reminds me of a question I've had a long time
that maybe some people out there can answer. It's about kundulini. What are you
supposed to do with it?
Sometimes in my life when I've done a lot of meditation, back in the days of
TM or later through other sy
On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:47 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
On Sep 8, 2007
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Vaj
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:43 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Peter wrote:
Geez, does this
On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Peter wrote:
Geez, does this ever end?
For the Axis II TM/TMSP practitioner?
Likely not. (at least in this incarnation)
Geez, does this ever end?
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night
> and asked him
> > about diagnoses of people you knew online for a
> couple of years
> > and if i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night and asked him
> about diagnoses of people you knew online for a couple of years
> and if it would be possible to diagnose someone, roughly, based
> on their interactions with o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > >
> > > TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > > But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
> > > > curiosity, *is* there a
Vaj wrote:
> I was talking to a psychiatrist friend last night and asked him about
> diagnoses of people you knew online for a couple of years and if it
> would be possible to diagnose someone, roughly, based on their
> interactions with others, their responses, etc. He said not only would
> yo
Vaj wrote:
> Watch Charlie Brown get lured in and then watch him
> get blasted again. And then get lured back in again:
> rinse and repeat.
>
According to my analysis, you have a bad case of ATT.
Get some professional help. Stop coming back here
time and again to get blasted. Get a life.
On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> TurquoiseB wrote:
> > But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
> > curiosity, *is* there a psychological term or
> > profile for someone who obsesses on making other
>
TurquoiseB wrote:
> Obsessive compulsive disorder certainly fits quite
> a few people who have posted here...
>
You've been posting to Usenet for what, thirteen years.
"I've been trying to stay off of this newsgroup to
help keep the flame factor down. My intention was
never to disrupt things.
Nobody here seriously suggested Peter should
apologize. Because Barry is "above" reading my
posts, he missed it when I corrected him on
this earlier today--and now *he's* obsessing
about this imaginary demand for an apology
from Peter.
Barry Wright, Master of Inadvertent Irony.
--- In FairfieldLi
---Yes, definitely bizarre! (I've seen it before).
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
> > > curiosity, *is* there a psycho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> TurquoiseB wrote:
> > But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
> > curiosity, *is* there a psychological term or
> > profile for someone who obsesses on making other
> > people apologize to them, or apologize, peri
TurquoiseB wrote:
> But now, Peter, asking a professional out of
> curiosity, *is* there a psychological term or
> profile for someone who obsesses on making other
> people apologize to them, or apologize, period?
I don't know if Peter would agree but you named the term when you said
"obsesses
Sorry, but I had some additional thoughts:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Your original argument
(Again, it wasn't my "original argument.")
was ridiculous when you claimed that I had
> violated some sort of confidentiality with Richard and
> could onl
Peter wrote:
> Judy, I haven't replied to your post yet because I
> read it once and when I returned to it the next day
> it was gone because for some reason I only can keep
> a certain number of post in my mail box.
>
Get a Mac you fuckin' idiot!
And stop mixing up your client email with the
Peter wrote:
> > You're crazy.
> >
Judy wrote:
> Wouldn't you just *love* to have him as your
> therapist? Such integrity...makes you feel all
> warm and fuzzy, don't it?
>
Pete reminds me of that doctor guy I met at the
State Hospital. Years ago I applied for a job there
and I was taken on a tou
> > > Richard should consider going back on his
> > > antipsychotic medication.
> > >
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> > Quack!
> >
Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
> You're crazy.
>
So, you think you're a psychoanalyst and a doctor
who can advise people to medicate themselves. But,
it looks like you're no
I knew it wouldn't be long...
Barry, you're so *predictable*.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote:
> >
> > Someone mentioned apologize. For what?
>
> You and your comments were merely the excuse
> tha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I personally just find it appalling that you don't
> instinctively know what the problem is, that you
> have to have it explained to you.
How can one expect that from a fellow who labels people according to
his mood ?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Someone mentioned apologize. For what?
You and your comments were merely the excuse
that an unhappy person was waiting for to dump
their unhappiness on someone else, and hope-
fully drag that someone else down to their lev
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Judy, I haven't replied to your post yet because I
> read it once and when I returned to it the next day it
> was gone because for some reason I only can keep a
> certain number of post in my mail box.
There's always the FF
---Somebody mentioned that an insult naming an anatomical part would
be inappropriate. Saythe part that follows from "go suck
your.". Of course, this would be the elbow since that would not
only be inappropriate, but impossible for most people.
Instead of medications, I would recomme
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
> > > > Richard should consider going back on his
> > > > antipsychotic med
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> --- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
> > > Richard should consider going back on his
> > > antipsychotic medication.
> > >
> > Quack!
>
> Thank you for your healthy respo
--- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
> > Richard should consider going back on his
> > antipsychotic medication.
> >
> Quack!
Thank you for your healthy response, Richard! It
appears to be given in the same spirit that I told you
to return to your anti
Shemp Mcgurk wrote:
> Judy's right, you're wrong, Peter.
>
> The best course of action for you is to apologise and
> tell her and this forum
>
Apologize to Judy and the forum?
> that you were wrong and that you stand
> corrected.
>
Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
> > Richard should consider going bac
Dr Peter Sutphen wrote:
> Richard should consider going back on his
> antipsychotic medication.
>
Quack!
"I have no intention of meeting Curtis at
"Union station", now or at any time in the future for
sexual activities)"
Thanks for crushing my dream man, crushing my dream.
BTW anytime you need a non-professional to call somebody here "nutz",
just tap 3 times on the side of the stall. (Twice if you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jesus Judy, relax, will you! I was making a crack
> regarding Richard. I was not doing so in any
> professional capacity. How is this unethical?
Peter, I'll go through it again for you. PLEASE
make an effort to follow what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> If it's any consolation to you, once you've done that you can feel
> all superior to Judy because apologising and admitting she was wrong
> on a point is something she's never done.
>
I'm not sure but I seem
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Jesus Judy, relax, will you! I was making a crack
> regarding Richard. I was not doing so in any
> professional capacity. How is this unethical? Nasty?
> Yes. He g
--- curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You can take the peter out of the doctor, but you
> can't take the
> doctor out of Peter?
>
> I've been watching this thread with some interest.
> My first reaction
> was to defend Peter, so I took a little more time to
> see if I could
> get ar
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Jeez, leave this board for a day and you miss a
> lot. I
> > didn't make any sort of diagnosis formal or
> informal
> > regarding Richard. I just mentioned that Richard
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Jeez, leave this board for a day and you miss a lot. I
> didn't make any sort of diagnosis formal or informal
> regarding Richard. I just mentioned that Richard
> should consider going back on his antipsychotic
> medication
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeez, leave this board for a day and you miss a lot. I
> didn't make any sort of diagnosis formal or informal
> regarding Richard. I just mentioned that Richard
> should consider going back on his antipsychotic
> medication.
Jeez, leave this board for a day and you miss a lot. I
didn't make any sort of diagnosis formal or informal
regarding Richard. I just mentioned that Richard
should consider going back on his antipsychotic
medication. Was this a bit of a nasty comment? Yes, it
was. Should I have said it? I don't kno
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think that posting on this board is a venue for him to
> act as a doctor, posting here makes you a poster on a fairly
> outrageous board. I don't even know exactly what his
> credentials are.
He's a P
, 2007 11:36 AM
>> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
>>
>>
>>
>> But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
>> unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
>> publically, and ESPECI
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Curtis,
> Your answer clearly upset Maria.
>http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/09/01/sports/02sharapova.1.60
0.jpg
>
That, or inflamed hemmoroidal tissue.
lurk
> > >
> >
>
Curtis,
Your answer clearly upset Maria.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/09/01/sports/02sharapova.1.600.jpg
She just lost at US Open. Reining champion losing in second round. And
its all your fault.
(And no, she is not interested in a consolation date. I just talked to
her, sobbing, s
You can take the peter out of the doctor, but you can't take the
doctor out of Peter?
I've been watching this thread with some interest. My first reaction
was to defend Peter, so I took a little more time to see if I could
get around my personal bias of friendship. (We are not exactly tapping
our
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 1, 2007, at 2:11 AM, new.morning wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > I am not sure i agree. To assert in one breath that one has the right
> > and sanction to declare one "crazy" in Fl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't also ignore the fact that TM and TMSP-based kundalini
> disorders can help give rise to and/or exacerbate personality
> disorders and a wide range of psychological pathology. In this
case,
> the more you meditat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:06 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > Vaj means to say, of course, "It's pretty strange for
> > an editor to claim they're different." He's the one
> > claiming there's no distinction between them.
>
> No, that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think most non-professionals would be surprised at the degree of
> accuracy of some psychological and psychiatric professionals in
> assessing general state of mind and disorders such as personality
> disorders just bas
On Sep 1, 2007, at 2:11 AM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> > > But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
> > > unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
> > > publically,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:06 PM, authfriend wrote:
> >
> > > Vaj means to say, of course, "It's pretty strange for
> > > an editor to claim they're different.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:06 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > Vaj means to say, of course, "It's pretty strange for
> > an editor to claim they're different." He's the one
> > claiming there's no distinction between them.
Shitfes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> > > But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
> > > unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
> > > publically, and ESPECIALLY for the purpose of venting
> > > h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of authfriend
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 11:36 AM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Fai
On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:06 PM, authfriend wrote:
Vaj means to say, of course, "It's pretty strange for
an editor to claim they're different." He's the one
claiming there's no distinction between them.
No, that's not what I'm claiming.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of nablus108
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:04 AM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Fai
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tertonzeno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---But it's also strange for an editor to banter back and forth
> endlessly as in: [J = Judy, M = John Manning]:
>
> J: Yes you are!
> M: No I'm not!
> J: Yes you are!
> M: No I'm not!
> J: Yes you are!
> M: No I'm
---But it's also strange for an editor to banter back and forth
endlessly as in: [J = Judy, M = John Manning]:
J: Yes you are!
M: No I'm not!
J: Yes you are!
M: No I'm not!
J: Yes you are!
M: No I'm not!
etc.
endlessly, though it is rather amusing; I like it to a certain
extent, it's different
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> > > But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
> > > unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
> > > publically, and ESPECIALLY for the purpose of venting
> > > h
Please take a breather Judy. You’re up to 37 posts by my count.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.13.0/980 - Release Date: 8/30/2007
6:05 PM
On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
> unethical for Peter to deliver that diagnosis
> publically, and ESPECIALLY for the purpose of venting
> his frustration--because he's a credentialed
> professional, and his word therefore carries
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> authfriend wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >> authfriend wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > wrote:
> >>>
> Dude, with all respec
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 11:36 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
But even if he WERE psychotic, it would STILL be
unethical for Peter
authfriend wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> authfriend wrote:
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
>>>
> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
Seroquel. I kid
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> authfriend wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
wrote:
> >
> >> Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
> >> Seroquel. I kid you not. You have symptoms of a mild
> >> psychosis.
> >>
authfriend wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
>> Seroquel. I kid you not. You have symptoms of a mild
>> psychosis.
>>
>
> Unethical *in the extreme* for a mental health
> professional to p
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablus108
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:04 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
Please remember that petersutphen is a "professional phcycolo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
wrote:
> >
> > Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
> > Seroquel. I kid you not. You have symptoms of a mild
> > psychosis.
>
> Unethical *in the extreme*
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
>
>
> > she seems to assume her view of Peter
> > is "true" and that she has some sort of mantle of authority to
> > make such an assement, but she does no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're here only to attempt to piss EVERYONE off. You're a bucket of
> shit that has somehow become conscious enough to use a keyboard.
>
Interesting point in a thread about projection.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> What leaders of the tmo say about "sweet truth" in public and what
> they do in their daily life are two completely different things.
> TMO leaders specialize in public superficial sweetness
Exactly. This nauseates
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The below is merely and only my opinion.
>
> I don't believe it, but it's been said that Judy is a True Believer
in TM.
>
> So why does she not practice the most basic "outside of meditation"
> "commandment" that Maha
What leaders of the tmo say about "sweet truth" in public and what
they do in their daily life are two completely different things. TMO
leaders specialize in public superficial sweetness while privately
obsessing like secret police on who should or shouldn't be on their
black lists for being "off
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It may be of greater value for you to look in the mirror with regard
> to the same essentisl message you have just used to aim at Judy. [This
> is my view and I do consider it to have significant value.]
>
John Manning,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The below is merely and only my opinion.
>
> I don't believe it, but it's been said that Judy is a True Believer
in TM.
>
> So why does she not practice the most basic "outside of meditation"
> "commandment" that Mahar
The below is merely and only my opinion.
I don't believe it, but it's been said that Judy is a True Believer in TM.
So why does she not practice the most basic "outside of meditation"
"commandment" that Maharishi STRONGLY underlined and espoused, and, in
fact, in most of his public appearances wa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --Not necessarily.
It's unquestionably professionally unethical.
If another person's behavior is perceived to be
> adharmic, a first course of action would be to assist the
individual
> in "crashing" the behavior
--Not necessarily. If another person's behavior is perceived to be
adharmic, a first course of action would be to assist the individual
in "crashing" the behavior as a form of tough love. (enter for
example, the destructive energy of Kali); followed by a softer form
of love.
- In FairfieldLif
---I agree, the facts - though limited in scope and circumstantial -
point to obvious conclusions the tex. is in complete denial of. He's
hopeless.
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
> Seroquel. I kid you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
> Seroquel. I kid you not. You have symptoms of a mild
> psychosis.
Unethical *in the extreme* for a mental health
professional to publically attempt a diagnosis
of psycho
Dude, with all respect, you need to be back on your
Seroquel. I kid you not. You have symptoms of a mild
psychosis.
--- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Has the Marshy anyone ever offered to help in
> the
> > > rehabilitation of the women who suffered from
> the
> > > sex
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 12:31 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
Rick Archer wrote:
> I don't think he feels res
> > Has the Marshy anyone ever offered to help in the
> > rehabilitation of the women who suffered from the
> > sexual predations of the Marshy or the Mukta?
> >
Rick Archer wrote:
> I don't think he feels responsible for Muk's behavior.
>
But Marshy gave the Mukta a public hug - that sort of
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 12:11 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
> And what recompense has been given to the vict
Michael Dean Goodman wrote:
> > I call Maharishi by the name he uses to speak of himself.
> > This is common courtesy. To change someone's name (to
> > shorten it, make it 'cutesy', or whatever - as in 'The
> > Marshy') is usually the mark of strongly-gripped
> > individual ego - either to show
> And what recompense has been given to the victims
> since the alleged events occurred?
>
Rick Archer wrote:
> Not sure what you're talking about here.
>
Has the Marshy anyone ever offered to help in the
rehabilitation of the women who suffered from the
sexual predations of the Marshy or the
Michael Dean Goodman wrote:
> I resent being used!
>
So, Dr. Goodman, you think that a visit by the Mukta, a
known profligate, with the Marshy, a known sexual pervert,
was an inspirational experience, yet, if what Rick and
the others allege is true, would be a travesty of the
spiritual life -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Troll:
> And the moderator of a "spiritual" forum won't answer my
> simple question of "What happened to all the money"
>
> Me:(acting a bit trollish)
> If Rick would just accept his omniscient status conferred
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 11:11 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An Inspiring Visit to Baba Muktananda
> And the moderator of a "spiritual" forum
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
