[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-30 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- jyouells2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > snip > > > > > > Stupid ass wipe mother fuckers. > > > > > > -Peter (all is Self) > > > > > That states it more sussinctly (sp?)!! And better > > too

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-30 Thread Rick Archer
on 3/30/05 6:27 AM, Peter Sutphen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > That type of behavior blows my mind (and apparently my > vocabulary too!). When people get too close to the > inner workings of the TMO this is what they find: this > dysfunctional devious behavior, not all the time, but > often en

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-30 Thread Peter Sutphen
Naw, I think it was an onion I ate in a past life. Off_world held me down and Ron stuffed it in my mouth. -Peter --- lurkernomore20002000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Stupid ass wipe mother fuckers.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-30 Thread Peter Sutphen
--- jyouells2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > snip > > > > Stupid ass wipe mother fuckers. > > > > -Peter (all is Self) > > > That states it more sussinctly (sp?)!! And better > too! > I learned later that it was the word 'lawyer' that > did it. :) > Don't get me wrong - even though

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-29 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- jyouells2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, > > "lurkernomore20002000" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, > > "jyo

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked (or is that wacked?)

2005-03-29 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kenny H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This relates to a point waay down there. (the lost art of snipping) > snip am about to get on the plane, still hadn't heard > anything. I call the course office in FF for one last shot before the > plane

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-29 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stupid ass wipe mother fuckers. > > -Peter (all is Self) This is what happens when you stay up past your bedtime. And I KNOW it's past your bedtime. lurk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To subscribe

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked (or is that whacked?)

2005-03-29 Thread Rick Archer
on 3/29/05 9:30 PM, Kenny H at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This relates to a point waay down there. > > At the time of some big course or other back in FF, I was center > chairperson of the Manhattan (NYC) TM Center. We sent zillions of cp's > to the courses. I had been an initiator in go

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-29 Thread akasha_108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Peter (all is Self) Sorry to hear of your affliction and misfortune. But don't worry, the dawn will come soon and break this dark night, and you will come to realize All is Us. To subscribe, send a messa

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked (or is that wacked?)

2005-03-29 Thread Kenny H
This relates to a point waay down there. At the time of some big course or other back in FF, I was center chairperson of the Manhattan (NYC) TM Center. We sent zillions of cp's to the courses. I had been an initiator in good standing for 10+ years at the time, applied for the course, ev

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-29 Thread Peter Sutphen
--- jyouells2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, > "lurkernomore20002000" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, > "jyouells2000" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Fred is quite a character and a very good

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: snip > > Thats the story and I'm sticking to it ;) > JohnY Thanks for that story. I always like to hear people's experience with the TMO phantom bureuocracy. I think I had an alleged balance due. I sort of

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 3/28/05 12:13:18 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I think thats it. And no worries. Everyone will get to take ther > refresher course if the thing works and initiations actually go up. What makes anybody think that initiations are going to

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Fred is quite a character and a very good guy > > Who is Fred? > Fred is a retired Air Force Major fro

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread rudra_joe
ch 28, 2005 12:12 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ? on 3/28/05 12:10 PM, lupidus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> I suppose the initial shock and disappointment with the fact that> Maharishi seems to just wipe out of history 35 years of commitment is>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lupidus108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > snip > > I suppose the initial shock and disappointment with the fact that > Maharishi seems to just wipe out of history 35 years of commitment > is slowly being replaced with something which appears to be anger.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread rudra_joe
more and more dangerous things. Maharishi isn't mentioned in Revs exactly because well maybe he peters out. - Original Message - From: off_world_beings To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 10:55 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread Rick Archer
on 3/28/05 12:10 PM, lupidus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I suppose the initial shock and disappointment with the fact that > Maharishi seems to just wipe out of history 35 years of commitment is > slowly being replaced with something which appears to be anger. Don't > know yet what direction

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread lupidus108
> > I think thats it. And no worries. Everyone will get to take ther > refresher course if the thing works and initiations actually go up. One could only hope that you are correct. > > > I've had a few years to get used to the fact that I > > > no longer have ties to the TM organization. N

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread off_world_beings
I think thats it. And no worries. Everyone will get to take ther refresher course if the thing works and initiations actually go up. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps this whole re-certification program is just to > shake off the remainin

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread Peter Sutphen
Perhaps this whole re-certification program is just to shake off the remaining pups still holding onto MMY's teat. Everyone's got the whole thing upsidedown. -Peter --- Patrick Gillam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've had a few years to get used to the fact that I > no longer have ties to

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-28 Thread Peter Sutphen
Sorry, I was having a private conversation in public. Fred's just someone I met when Punditji was here who also has friends that post in this newsgroup. -Peter --- lurkernomore20002000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fred is quite a character and a very good guy Who is Fred? some interesting run ins with the > 'movement' (over $$ and an agreements that they broke...). A local > small town here with 1%... and the rest

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread jyouells2000
Fred is quite a character and a very good guy I've been encouraging him to look you up and he ended up finding you with intuition ;). Ask him about the monistary in GA. I hear that you and I share a similar limp Saw the big M a few times in NY City (before TTC in 1975/76) and I lost him

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Patrick Gillam
akasha_108 wrote: > > "Patrick Gillam" wrote: > (They want 2400 U.S. teachers and they have > > 550? That means they're 77% short of quota. > > I must have missed the 550 post. Is that a real number? Where did it > come from? I thought someones said 3 day sago no one in the midwast > (ronism)

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread akasha_108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (They want 2400 U.S. teachers and they have > 550? That means they're 77% short of quota. I must have missed the 550 post. Is that a real number? Where did it come from? I thought someones said 3 day sago no one i

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Patrick Gillam
I've had a few years to get used to the fact that I no longer have ties to the TM organization. Not teaching in 13 years is a big part of it. Not being able to afford courses is a big part. When, a few years ago, Maharishi said his movement was only for the wealthy, I figured I was laid off

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Peter Sutphen
I am too! He's a bit of a character, isn't he! We were on the same SCI course in 1972 in Kingston, Ont.. Even had the same experience with the first contact with MMY's eyes. Saw him again at the satsang right before Punditji went to the airport. Other post: There's the inner relationship with the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Sal Sunshine
The Real Thing? Sal On Mar 27, 2005, at 5:51 PM, L B Shriver wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that anything like the New Math? I think it's more like the New Coke.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread jyouells2000
I wonder how many of those 550 will be ready to be full time when they learn of the course fee for "recertification"? Sounds like another way to try to squeeze water form a rock. It seems like they are burning up any remaining good will it will backfire worse than previous failed plans.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Vaj
On Mar 27, 2005, at 7:44 PM, Bob Brigante wrote: > Maharishi: What I have taught, because it has > it's eternal authenticity in > the vedic literature and you should know that, > how many? 30 - 40 thousand > teachers of TM I have trained and many of them > have gone on their own and > they may n

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Bob Brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 3/27/05 4:47:15 P.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > When MMY said at a press conference a couple years ago that he did not > mind if renegade TM teachers taught outside the TM bu

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Nelson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Brigante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > snip > > I'm not an initiator, having only completed phase I of TM teacher > > training, but on the basis of my 37 years of T

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 3/27/05 4:52:48 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You know once Bush finds out the Sat Yug has started he's just going to extend the retirement age. Sounds more like a democratic plan to me. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread MDixon6569
In a message dated 3/27/05 4:47:15 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When MMY said at a press conference a couple years ago that he did not mind if renegade TM teachers taught outside the TM bureaucracy as long as they did it in the prescribed way, Bob , MMY sa

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that anything like the New Math? I think it's more like the New Coke. L B S > > Sal > > > On Mar 27, 2005, at 5:14 PM, akasha_108 wrote: > > > Or it creates an opening and clear distiction for te

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Brigante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > snip > I'm not an initiator, having only completed phase I of TM teacher > training, but on the basis of my 37 years of TM practice, I see this > latest announcement as just another unworkable plan that will be >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Sal Sunshine
Is that anything like the New Math? Sal On Mar 27, 2005, at 5:14 PM, akasha_108 wrote: Or it creates an opening and clear distiction for teachers taching old school TM and those that are certified to teach the NEW TM.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread akasha_108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Brigante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lupidus108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Just a question to you fellows. > > > > Since many of you are Initiators, and since most of you are not > Rajas - > >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Vaj
On Mar 27, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Bob Brigante wrote: > I predict a life-span of about 3 months for this pronouncement -- maybe > it will disappear in July when the Sat Yuga starts!! You know once Bush finds out the Sat Yug has started he's just going to extend the retirement age. To subscribe,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread Bob Brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lupidus108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just a question to you fellows. > > Since many of you are Initiators, and since most of you are not Rajas - > how do you react to the probable fact that all the rest of us who are > not going to be fulltime a

[FairfieldLife] Re: Are we all sacked ?

2005-03-27 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lupidus108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just a question to you fellows. > > Since many of you are Initiators, and since most of you are not Rajas - > how do you react to the probable fact that all the rest of us who are > not going to be fulltime