---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
After sending the post about time travel being impossible 'cos we ain't seen
time travellers . . . it occured to me that time travel could be theoretically
possible but maybe it is prohibitively expensive - using up half the energy in
the Unive
Re my own "scientists being able to refocus the rays to witness the scene":
So if any of you have ever had sex in the great outdoors your strenuous
athletic exploits could be a YouTube viral hit in the year 3115 ;-)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
After sending the po
After sending the post about time travel being impossible 'cos we ain't seen
time travellers . . . it occured to me that time travel could be theoretically
possible but maybe it is prohibitively expensive - using up half the energy in
the Universe, say - or maybe Our Great Leader Nathaniel Clint
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Re this story: on another site someone added a comment - "A time machine in my
lifetime would be awesome."
To which some wag responded: "If it happens at all it'll be in everyone's
lifetime".
Nice.
Yes. Reminds me of the old physicists
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Re this story: on another site someone added a comment - "A time machine in my
lifetime would be awesome."
To which some wag responded: "If it happens at all it'll be in everyone's
lifetime".
Nice.
It's a bit like those who argue that i
Re this story: on another site someone added a comment - "A time machine in my
lifetime would be awesome."
To which some wag responded: "If it happens at all it'll be in everyone's
lifetime".
Nice.
It's a bit like those who argue that if there are aliens how come we ain't
seen them.
S
Re "The inflation of the Universe /Empty space can travel faster than light":
Neither of those phenomena contradict Einstein - space is not "stuff".
Re "Electrons in quantum entanglement can simultaneously act together even
when they're trillions of miles away":
Scientists seem to agre
Salyavin and S3,
About a week ago, I posted a few phenomena that seemingly exceed the speed of
light. These are:
1. The inflation of the universe milliseconds after the Big Bang.
2. Empty space can travel faster than light because it has no mass.
3. Electrons in quantum entangl
Well: pariNaama-traya-saMyamaad atiitaanaagatajñaanam! (YS III 16)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Re "Faster than light they must be relativistically moving backwards in time.":
This stuff is beyond my pay grade but I understand that talk of backwards time
travel is based on the "light cone" - zones in our past are "now" outside the
abili
Re "Faster than light they must be relativistically moving backwards in time.":
This stuff is beyond my pay grade but I understand that talk of backwards time
travel is based on the "light cone" - zones in our past are "now" outside the
ability of a light signal to reach us (see below).
H
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Scientists said on Thursday they recorded particles travelling faster than
light.
Antonio Ereditato, spokesman for the international group of researchers, said
that measurements taken over three years showed neutrinos pumped from CERN near
Gen
Om, weren't Einstein the one who discovered that mass times the speed of light
squared equals $, ? Money. It explains a lot and seems unchanged with this.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Scientists said on Thursday they recorded particles travelling faster than
light.
Ant
13 matches
Mail list logo
