: How does one decide if a person's testimony
is valid?
Anartaxius -- gunna devil-advocate on yer buns. Gunna be snarky N "the worm
turns" funzies. Just to see what I can getcha to pony up about why your
authority in these matters, well, matters.
Who says I have a
Duveyoung, comments in your text, below.
From: Duveyoung
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: How does one decide if a person's testimony
is valid?
Anartaxius -- gunna devil-advocate on yer buns. Gun
a bit more, a
few days I think. A devil's advocate is always the best adversary, unless of
course we are on the same side there.
From: Duveyoung
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: How does one decide
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Hi Edg, kudos to you for saying all this. And a real good and funny read. What
you say resembles much of my thinking on this topic, so you save me the time to
formulate it myself ;-) Thanks. Gets me in the feels.
So according to some, we sh
Hi Edg, kudos to you for saying all this. And a real good and funny read. What
you say resembles much of my thinking on this topic, so you save me the time to
formulate it myself ;-)
So according to some, we should not think? Or should not think about
metaphysical abstract topics? Or not about
I don't think Anartax wears a mortar board hat - I think he might be sporting a
pork pie hat instead.
From: Duveyoung
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: How does one decide if a person's testimony
Try to get to this tomorrow or the next day. My bedtime. I also require a
certain amount of time during the day to work, and most importantly, to goof
off and play. What appears certain to me is not necessarily certain to others,
and what is certain to me is not necessarily true either. The most
Anartaxius -- gunna devil-advocate on yer buns. Gunna be snarky N "the worm
turns" funzies. Just to see what I can getcha to pony up about why your
authority in these matters, well, matters.
You speak as I do when I'm really doing my mad-poet high-stepping -- dead
certain of everything -- o
From: "anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
Yes, no longer mutually exclusive. I think it is basically a teaching
technique.
Thanks for finally putting it so succinctly. Pondering such things as the
supposed "difference" between awareness and consciousness is BY DEFINITION
something tha
On 12/17/2014 01:04 PM, anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Yes, no longer mutually exclusive. I think it is basically a teaching
technique. As Nisargadatta said, it forces a person to look within if
all they know is thinking and doing. The 'within' really is not a
separate place in t
Yes, no longer mutually exclusive. I think it is basically a teaching
technique. As Nisargadatta said, it forces a person to look within if all they
know is thinking and doing. The 'within' really is not a separate place in the
universe, it is made to seem that way at first to break the habit of
Problem is for some people awareness and consciousness are no longer
mutually exclusive. That they are seems to be splitting hairs. Like
Krishnamurti I just don't care about these issues anymore. And
furthermore I am bewildered that people who have been practicing
meditation for decades have
I was evaluating these statements a few months ago. All I can say is I seem to
get them in terms of my own experience, but that does not help anyone else.
Basically just meditating for half a century seems to be the trick.
Also certain specific experiences that have occurred also helped illum
13 matches
Mail list logo
