Life@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 2:55:24 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
>
> Â
> Doesn't surprise me. Just another sign of Idiocracy.
>
> I'm always amused at how many of the folks who scream the loudest about an
God... I wish he would run for president( after having a gastric bypass)!:)
From: authfriend
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 7:59:16 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
--- In FairfieldLife
invested that same
money at a higher interest rate and been better off like Galveston civil
servants.
From: seventhray1
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 4:22:48 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
Dix, I unde
Joe, you sound like you confuse easily.
From: Joe
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 2:55:24 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
Doesn't surprise me. Just another sign of Idiocracy.
I'm always
eople who never had a
real
job and paid into SS.
From: Tom Pall
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 2:46:09 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Mike Dixon
> > So, you're saying that after 32 years of public
> > service, a postal clerk should lose his pension
> > and health insurance? This is outrageous!!!
> >
Tom:
> A postal clerk who offered 32 years of public
> service?
>
Yes, I know it's probably hard to imagine,
but some people make a career
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:48 AM, WillyTex wrote:
> So, you're saying that after 32 years of public
> service, a postal clerk should lose his pension and
> health insurance? This is outrageous!!!
>
>
A postal clerk who offered 32 years of public service? Didn't he get paid
for those 32 years?
> > So, can you cite a single U.S. elected leader that
> > is advocating cutting public pensions to limit
> > federal spending and reduce the deficit?
> >
Bhairitu:
> So let me guess, you want me to say Jerry Brown,
> right?
>
Is Jerry Brown a part of the federal government?
> Yes I believe h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71"
wrote:
> I did not make clear that I dislike much of Gov Christie's
> plans. He is targeting teachers as the cause of many of
> the state problems (and not targeting firefighters or
> police who since they tend to vote Repub). He sounds good
>
> > Right on Mikey:-)
> >
Mike:
> ^5
>
= __o
\`,
= (*) % (*)
> > Hey, it's time to stop subsidizing poverty.
> > Tax people who earn less than 20K at a
> > higher rate than those who earn more than
> > 20K. Poverty should be taxed like any othe
Joe:
> Doesn't surprise me. Just another sign of Idiocracy.
>
Well, I'm opposed to all income taxation - it's
my money. Why should I have to pay the federal
government to redistribute my wealth? Where is it
written in the U.S. Constitution that there
should be taxation without representation? Y
> From: WillyTex willytex@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011 9:52:28 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
>
> Â
>
>
> > > With my plan, which is to create good paying
> > > jobs for everyone, peop
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 02/18/2011 11:42 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
> > Nobody wants to be poor but not everybody wants to earn their keep. This
> is the
> > problem.
> >
>
>
> That's what you *assume*. There are more people than there are jobs.
> We don't need "make w
51.html
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon wrote:
> >
> > Nobody wants to be poor but not everybody wants to earn their keep. This is
> > the
> > problem.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____
> >
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Mike Dixon wrote:
>
>
> Nobody wants to be poor but not everybody wants to earn their keep. This is
> the problem.
>
>
And we pretty much have a race of men in the US who don't want to support
the kids they spawn. We need to bring back the stocks and the lash in
ybody wants to earn their keep. This is
> the
> problem.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Bhairitu
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 11:26:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poo
On 02/18/2011 11:42 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
> Nobody wants to be poor but not everybody wants to earn their keep. This is
> the
> problem.
>
That's what you *assume*. There are more people than there are jobs.
We don't need "make work" jobs which do nothing either. You are still
laboring und
Nobody wants to be poor but not everybody wants to earn their keep. This is the
problem.
From: Bhairitu
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 11:26:53 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
Count Von
^5
From: wgm4u
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, February 18, 2011 11:06:45 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon wrote:
>
> Hey, it's time to stop subsidiz
ll.
>
>
>
>
> From: WillyTex
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011 9:52:28 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
>
>
>
>
>>> With my plan, which is to create good paying
&g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon wrote:
>
> Hey, it's time to stop subsidizing poverty. Tax people who earn less than 20K
> at
> a higher rate than those who earn more than 20K. Poverty should be taxed like
> any other bad behavior. No social programs for those that don't pay
s benefits received are repaid
in
full.
From: WillyTex
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011 9:52:28 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ObamaBudget: War on the Poor
> > With my plan, which is to create good paying
> > job
On 02/16/2011 06:35 AM, WillyTex wrote:
>> I wonder why you continue to make an absolute fool
>> of yourself on FFL.
>>
> So, can you cite a single U.S. elected leader that is
> advocating cutting public pensions to limit federal
> spending and reduce the deficit?
So let me guess, you want me to s
> I wonder why you continue to make an absolute fool
> of yourself on FFL.
>
So, can you cite a single U.S. elected leader that is
advocating cutting public pensions to limit federal
spending and reduce the deficit?
> > So, can you cite a single U.S. elected leader that is
> > advocating cutting p
On 02/15/2011 04:15 PM, WillyTex wrote:
I hope all you whiners that think people are lazy
find yourselves laid off or YOUR pensions cut.
>>> Have you thought this through, because none of what
>>> you said is even being considered by your elected
>>> leaders to contain federal spendi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
> >
> > > >> I hope all you whiners that think people are lazy
> > > >> find yourselves laid off or YOUR pensions cut.
> > > > >
> > > > Have you thought this through, because
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
> > >> I hope all you whiners that think people are lazy
> > >> find yourselves laid off or YOUR pensions cut.
> > > >
> > > Have you thought this through, because none of what
> > > you said is even being considered by your elected
> > >
> >> I hope all you whiners that think people are lazy
> >> find yourselves laid off or YOUR pensions cut.
> > >
> > Have you thought this through, because none of what
> > you said is even being considered by your elected
> > leaders to contain federal spending. Go figure.
> >
Bhairitu:
> I wonder
On 02/15/2011 12:01 PM, WillyTex wrote:
>
> With my plan, which is to create good paying
> jobs for everyone, people would pay next to
> zero income tax, and what they pay would be a
> flat tax that is equal and fair for everyone.
>
So you advocate a social jobs program lik
> > > > With my plan, which is to create good paying
> > > > jobs for everyone, people would pay next to
> > > > zero income tax, and what they pay would be a
> > > > flat tax that is equal and fair for everyone.
> > > >
> > > So you advocate a social jobs program like FDR had?
> > >
> > No, free
On 02/15/2011 09:52 AM, WillyTex wrote:
>
>>> With my plan, which is to create good paying
>>> jobs for everyone, people would pay next to
>>> zero income tax, and what they pay would be a
>>> flat tax that is equal and fair for everyone.
>>>
> Bhairitu:
>> So you advocate a social jobs program lik
> > With my plan, which is to create good paying
> > jobs for everyone, people would pay next to
> > zero income tax, and what they pay would be a
> > flat tax that is equal and fair for everyone.
> >
Bhairitu:
> So you advocate a social jobs program like FDR had?
>
No, free enterprise system.
On 02/14/2011 02:26 PM, WillyTex wrote:
>
> Bhairitu:
>> Too much cutting of social programs...
>>
> With my plan, which is to create good paying
> jobs for everyone, people would pay next to
> zero income tax, and what they pay would be a
> flat tax that is equal and fair for everyone.
So you adv
Bhairitu:
> Too much cutting of social programs...
>
With my plan, which is to create good paying
jobs for everyone, people would pay next to
zero income tax, and what they pay would be a
flat tax that is equal and fair for everyone.
With my plan, there would be no need for social
programs fun
34 matches
Mail list logo
