New Morning et al snipped :
But my view doesn't include a SHOULD, its more of a visionary
could.
TomT:
Absolutely agree. But in order to spring fully into the could I find I
need to see the perfection of what IS and not as a static IS but an
everchanging, ever perfect IS. As one friend recently
Tom, thanks for you reply. Thoughts (not arguments) below.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New Morning et al: writes snipped
___Thus, for example, I understand, directly, that thoughts, and
the subset of thoughts called desires,
New Morning et al: writes snipped
___Thus, for example, I understand, directly, that thoughts, and
the subset of thoughts called desires, is not from any
individualities' effort. Thus, the nuance, that might be sympathetic
and understanding of Jim's and Rory's apparent position of: they don't
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
45. When a Shiva-yogi is completely established in God
Consciousness,
he experiences this state spontaneously within and without or both.
I take verse 45 to mean that some will see all
Some additional things that came up whilst the eyes were closed. In
chapter 2 of Patanjali verses 34 and 35 (close quess as my copy is
still in a box somewhere). #34 goes like this. When the person is
established in truthfulness all actions achieve the desired results.
#35 When the person is
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some additional things that came up whilst the eyes were closed. In
chapter 2 of Patanjali verses 34 and 35 (close quess as my copy is
still in a box somewhere). #34 goes like this. When the
