> > > Barry, you need either to spruce up your game
> > > considerably, or learn to lose gracefully.
> > >
> > So all of this is about "winning" and "losing"
> > in your opinion?
> >
authfriend:
> Well, for you it's about losing, yes.
>
Yeah, you loser, brother-puncher! LoL!
> When you don't
>
> > Why he didn't say, right from the start, "yes I have
> > struck my students, and here's the context"
> >
authfriend:
> Two reasons. One, he was accused of striking his students
> in a very specific context in which he believed he had not
> done so; and two--well, you'll need to read
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > Barry, you need either to spruce up your game
> > considerably, or learn to lose gracefully.
>
> So all of this is about "winning" and "losing"
> in your opinion?
Well,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> Barry, you need either to spruce up your game
> considerably, or learn to lose gracefully.
So all of this is about "winning" and "losing" in your opinion?
And *that* is why you're so upset and why you've used up
half of your allotted
Barry, you need either to spruce up your game
considerably, or learn to lose gracefully.
You are *always* going to lose if you don't
tell your story, whatever it may be,
straightforwardly, because lying and distortion
signal to everyone that you have no confidence
in the case you're trying to make
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
(snip)
> > You can read them in full context in the repost I just
> > made of Robin's Open Letter.
>
> In other words, "Go back and read what I wrote before,
> Dummy."
Er, no, B
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
> Why he didn't say, right from the start, "yes I have
> struck my students, and here's the context"
>
> Wouldn't that have made a lot more sense, than issuing
> a blanket denial?
Why didn't Judy say, right from the start, "
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > > He didn't lie. As he said:
> > >
> > > "I did not deny something I knew was true. I denied
> > >
Thanks. (-:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote:
>
>
> Good to hear, Steve.
> I like you, your posts. I was only trying to annoyingly put attention
on something that has way too much attention.
> If I was to post a bunch of crap that happened around my life on here,
it would be
Good to hear, Steve.
I like you, your posts. I was only trying to annoyingly put attention on
something that has way too much attention.
If I was to post a bunch of crap that happened around my life on here, it would
become the same. Controversial, entertaining, fun, stupid and eventually
anno
Good news. I've got a better understanding of the situation and am ready
to move on. I'm sorry if the process didn't move along at your
prescribed time table. Perhaps I can do better next time.
P.S. If you ever come to St. Louis, I recommend you try the toasted
raviolis. We seem to be the onl
Ahh, nothing like a little animation to the alleged story, here, boys and
girls. Let's go deeper into the rabbit hole
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDxgvMHCDXA
Stop, Steve! This whole thing is looking ridicules to us all and as you say, I
am not Shakespeare, (Don't have a dick, like you say t
He did have his reasons, and he explains them in his letter.
It's good of you to have read the letter and to respect his
reasons; I can't imagine he'd ask any more of you than that.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
wrote:
> >
> > Why he didn't say, right from the start, "yes I have struck
> > my students, and here's the context"
>
> Two reasons. One, he was accused of stri
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
> Why he didn't say, right from the start, "yes I have struck
> my students, and here's the context"
Two reasons. One, he was accused of striking his students
in a very specific context in which he believed he had not
done so;
Why he didn't say, right from the start, "yes I have struck my students,
and here's the context"
Wouldn't that have made a lot more sense, than issuing a blanket denial?
As I've said, and others as well, it's not about the hitting, it's about
the cover up, or the "appearance" of lying.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > He didn't lie. As he said:
> >
> > "I did not deny something I knew was true. I denied
> > what I was accused of."
>
> Hey Judy, can you flesh this out a little. Prov
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> He didn't lie. As he said:
>
> "I did not deny something I knew was true. I denied
> what I was accused of."
Hey Judy, can you flesh this out a little. Provide some examples where
this would be a meaningful distinction?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> One of my good friends in Santa Fe was a psychiatrist who had, over the
> course of his career, treated many individuals suffering from
> Naricissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). When I met him, he had already
> given up on psychiatric t
http://youtu.be/EI4mutjhwJI
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> One of my good friends in Santa Fe was a psychiatrist who had, over the
> course of his career, treated many individuals suffering from
> Naricissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). When I met him, he had alread
20 matches
Mail list logo
